wouldn’t “any naked part of the Claimant’s body” include the face? if so everyone at the BBC is going to jail. Hurrah for unintended consequences!

Simon: I had the same thought.

Perhaps the only photos of Tiger Woods one may now legally publish are ones where he is wearing a burqa or ninja suit.

And yes, anyone who signs up with Schillings is automatically placed into The Book of Cunts. No exceptions.

“Schillings are the law firn who terrified my publisher out of publishing “The Catholic Orangemen of Togo” on behalf of hired killer and liar Tim Spicer, and who got this website shut down for a few days on behalf of convicted racketeer and blackmailer Alisher Usmanov.”

I like the website. Mind, I think Craig should probably say what he really thinks a bit more. His tendency to mince his words is appalling.

Keep up the good work. People do care, you know.

“His tendency to mince his words is appalling.”

Harrr! I love a belly-laugh before bed.

Craig

Apart from the apparent claim (?) by this English judge that his writ runs in all of the known universe – does this legal ruling have any currency under the law of Scotland?

Funny post Craig – but is it really worth the legal risk for you? I know you like thumbing your nose at ridiculous injunctions, but perhaps that might be better served for more serious political stuff. At least there the risk is serving a worthwhile purpose, and you’re partially shielded by the ability to raise embarrassing stuff in court.

I Didn’t Actually Get The Queens Award For Industry – But The Team I Enabled Did – And I Was Really Proud Of Them

And So As It Is Approaching Christmas I Want To Say Something About Lady Jane

Or She Can Say it Far Better Herself

http://theflucase.com/

Skip the Bollocks and The Infiltration of Her Website – and Just Go Straight To Her Video…##

You See if She is Talking Bollocks (And She Isn’t)

She Has Mounted An ENORMOUS Defence Against Government and Corporate Bio-Warfare

Jane Burgermeister Has Got So MUCH COURAGE

So Jane Gets My Vote as Woman Of The Year 2009

I Reckon She Has Single Handedly Saved Millions of Lives

Tony

I noticed something in the Guardian article, near the end:

“The whole question of whether they and judges are using their power in private hearings is very important, and they are now much warier of making super injunctions.”

How would we know when nobody is allowed to report the things and we have to rely on leaks to know they exist?

I have no sympathy for Woods, as someone who works in advertising I have sympathy for the agency guys and production house guys who have just seen a lot of hard work go up in smoke. The damage to their reputations will take a long time to repair, agencies will lose clients and some will lose their jobs, and nobody is hiring right now. So you can keep your trite “any man living with two trophy blondes”, the man was paid a lot of money and was expected to keep up his side of the deal. He didn’t. He also ensured that all celebrity sportsmen will be subject to intrusive background checks and some fairly nasty clauses in their contracts before they clean up on their abilities with little balls.

I really thought this was a wind up. I can’t believe it! The law is indeed an ass.

PS I want to know if there any piccies of Justice Eady in compromising positions.

Craig -

Another good article, keep it up!

Your second link, http://tmz.vo.llnwd.net/o28/newsdesk/1210_schillings_doc_wm.pdf, doesn’t load, returning a ‘stopped’ message – something I’ve never seen before….

Craig, another good post, keep it up!

Your second link, http://tmz.vo.llnwd.net/o28/newsdesk/1210_schillings_doc_wm.pdf, doesn’t load, returning a ‘stopped’ message – something I’ve not seen before…

why didn’t you mention simon singh?

I think you should have considering he is the one who faced them down.

I’d just like to put it on record that I have not read your contemptuous post, nor have I read anything else of a contemptuous nature. Nor will I do so until Mr Justice Eady in his infinaite wisdom makes it lawful to do so.

I only read Ian Dale.

And, I have only read Iain Dale since homosexuality was made compulsory.

As a person of blackness, I’d like to apologise to my brothers for still choosing white trash even though I’m a billionaire.

I promise in future to only shag top white posh totty who won’t spill to the tabloids.

Oh yeah, and I love my wife and kids and Nike.

Ooh err.

That Teery Enree can handball me anytime.

Glenda

People need to look at what’s really going on here in terms of the British libel industry.

Read up on liar and manipulator Peter Carter Ruck who created that industry and you’ll see that Eady was himself involved as a beneficiary of that industry as a barrister.

He’s now a judge in that industry and ensuring that it prospers.

This country is rotten to its very core.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2003/dec/23/pressandpublishing.comment

I shagged Tiger in Dagenham and I feel very very sorry for his wife and kids.

Craig Murray Enterprises has not paid me for this post.

Girls. Girls!

Woodn’t you like to put a tiger in your tank?

Geddit, geddit?

Philomena Space

Free speech

Is out of reach

I heard a screech

In the beach

So I ate a peach

But I didn’t drink bleach

I just made that up.

I hope that the aforementioned solicitors, barristers and judges read this and see the derision in which they are held.

PS Is the Simon Malcolm Smith referred to in Schedule 1 on the link anything to do with Simon Smith and His Amazing Dancing Bear?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N8zI5xjwKYw

I may go out tomorrow if I can borrow a coat to wear

Oh, I’d step out in style with my sincere smile and my dancing bear

Outrageous, alarming, courageous, charming

Oh, who would think a boy and a bear

Could be well accepted everywhere

It’s just amazing how fair people can be

Seen at the nicest places where well-fed faces all stop to stare

Making the grandest entrance is Simon Smith and his dancing bear

They’ll love us, won’t they?

They feed us, don’t they?

Oh, who would think a boy and a bear

Could be well accepted everywhere

It’s just amazing how fair people can be

Who needs money when you’re funny?

The big attraction everywhere

Will be Simon Smith and his dancing bear

It’s Simon Smith and his amazing dancing bear

This idiot Eady seems to be a bit of a wanker, whose curious decision in this case favoured the pornographer, Dick Desmond:

“Eady was repeatedly rebuked by the Court of Appeal for his conduct during the 2009 libel case Desmond v. Bower. Eady disallowed several pieces of evidence against Desmond which the Appeal Court ruled were clearly relevant to the case. The Court of Appeal judges ruled that Eady’s decision was “plainly wrong” and “might lead to a miscarriage of justice”. After hearing the evidence, the jury found in favour of Mr Bower.”

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/jul/24/richard-desmond-tom-bower-mr-justice-eady

Isn’t it about time he fucked off to spend more time with his penis?

Funny the way this peculiarly British libel industry works.

A few years ago all the scumbags who wished to hide their reputations headed off to Carter Ruck. That firm still exists, but its chief liar is now rotting in the ground.

Now all the scumbags go to Schillings. Why didn’t they stay with Carter Ruck?

Surely Schillings don’t have someone like Peter working for them?

Obviously Woods is totally clueless about who’s what in the British libel charts.

It’s just lucky for us he didn’t go for reputation managers like shit hot Clarke Wilmott.

Now, that would be scary….

Sue, Grabbit and Run Solrs.

Catering for all those times you need to hide wot u dun

Looks like Lord Lester may be able to put a stop to some of this nonsense.

“Lord Lester, the leading human rights barrister, is drawing up a defamation reform bill, which would prevent lawyers pocketing excessive fees and would also stop foreigners with tenuous links to this country from using British libel laws to silence critics”

“London is becoming the world centre for libel,” he said. “That is clearly wrong and must be brought to a halt.”

http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/law/article6936336.ece

One little point;

Fortunately I have been lucky enough to be afforded the chance of sitting on judgement, and pompously proceed to adjudicate (albeit on a total bollocks matter) however, during this experience I found myself applying my foibles/prejudices/preconceived notion/values without any hesitation, which really did not amount to any degrees of fairness, or discharge of duty with care and judicious independence, and wisdom.

Therefore, whereupon any third party is charged with the duty’s of adjudication, those agreeing to such an arrangement have by default rendered themselves to the decisions/whims of the person sitting in judgement, which yields both plaintiffs “independence” no longer obtains.

Therefore deferral to adjudication ought to remain to be the last recourse. However given that our laws are set in place to protect the rights of property over the rights of man, and those setting the said laws have been careful not to incriminate themselves, and or prejudice any future and probable disputes yet to be arising (which upon any shortcomings can yield, changes; additions, or redactions, and or total elimination of the said crestfallen laws), therefore it is safe to reiterate that Justice Eady is in fact an epitome of the Judicial standards of our lands, which does give rise to the question; what gave you the idea that fucking natural justice has to do with any of our judicial arrangements/constructs?

Hence Tiger can be happy that he has gagged the press here, and elsewhere where he can protect his “privacy” and in this case suppression of the tales of his wandering little pecker, with a view to keep the gazillions of dollars, he get for just shoving a ball around the lawn!

And my father made me swat, and beat me up to learn mathematics, and sciences, resulting in a life of misery and abject poverty, despite the further education and mastery of the subjects.

Well named. Tiger’s plaything.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/medic1663/1175256181/

Phew. Panic over folks.

Elin is standing by her man.

child of divorce blah blah importance of parents staying together blah blah, the kids, the kids, blah blah.

“They are also said to have already renegotiated their marriage pre-nup with the amount of money Mrs Nordegren would receive in any future divorce being substantially increased.”

All together now…Ahhhhhh

Craig,

I have a photo of Tiger Woods naked (top half) and in a few short moments will cut part of his naked chest and hand out of it. I believe he’s holding someone’s razor! I’ll email it to you (along with the full shot for verification).

Publish at your per- pleasure.

The judiciary. Showbiz for a-holes.

What is it with Eady? Is he so hungry for fame that he has to distort the law in this way?

We bloggers should all post a pic of Tiger Woods and see what happens.

“I am Craig Murray” “No, I am Craig Murray.” “No, I am Craig Murray and so is my lawyer.”

The judiciary. Showbiz for a-holes.

What is it with Eady? Is he so hungry for fame that he has to distort the law in this way?

We bloggers should all post a pic of Tiger Woods and see what happens.

“I am Craig Murray” “No, I am Craig Murray.” “No, I am Craig Murray and so is my lawyer.”

Please Craig don’t put Naked pics of tiger woods here or any other Gay Porn.

I am not that way inclined.

And according to Jane from the other thread I am a Homophobe.

Or am I a Homophone or a Homograph?

I’m not sure but I am some sort of Homonym. Anyway, whatever I am I’m not a poof so I don’t want to see naked men the next time I click on your site.

Tiger Woods entered the “Book of C*nts” long before he encountered Schillings:

http://www.thenation.com/doc/20091214/zirin

He’s not an honest man, nor is he as squeaky-clean as his image would have you believe. He is a greedy, careless and selfish business man willing to profit from the suffering of the poor.

OBAMA IS RIGHT ?” THE UK’S SYSTEM IS OPRESSIVE: IT’S DEMOCRACY A SHAM

On Writermans comment to Craig ?” “I was wondering what your reaction was to Obama defining the revolt in the American colonies … as a union formed as a reaction to oppression.” Is this definition of the causes of the American Revolution not at least partially true? Did not Benjamin Franklin spend a decade in London trying and failing to persuade its crooked establishment to accept some measure of representation and fair play?

Anybody who doubts the (disguised) oppressive nature of the UK system should just read my story of zerzetsen torture by MI6 / MI6 ?” threats, intimidation, harassment, defamation, and a government cover-up. Or just look at the comments behind Craig’s Dec 9 2009 posting that relate to the horrible and fatal persecution of foreign office whistleblower Mark Higson.

Fair play, Rule of Law, Independence of the Judiciary, Magna Carta, a properly functioning parliament, Free Press, Institutions that honestly stand for civil liberties and human rights, etc ?” What’s all this rubbish that we fool ourselves with and pontificate about? I used to be fooled too, until I learnt the truth the hard way – In the Land of Shakespeare it is just all playacting!

The measure of freedom and democracy is not whether the authorities respect rule of law most of the time, but whether they still continue to respect rule of law when the establishment is pulling the other way.

Craig, People like Higson & I had no choice. But, one should be aware that once you are in a battle with these thugs, you are in it for life. One will get no help from human rights organizations or the press that should be helping because they are all scared of the establishment.

Obama is right ?” It is oppressive; the establishment operates above the law with impunity, turning MI5 / MI6 thugs on its enemies.

Benjamin Franklin was a rebel, a terrorist and a traitor.

America’s declaration of independence has to be revoked, or better still, all the Americans should go back to where they came from and the land should be returned to the natives who took much better care of it.

We can do genetic testing to differentiate the true Americans from the descendants of immigrants.

And while we are at it, we should genetically test all the members of the British National party of this list:

http://wikileaks.org/leak/bnp-membership-list.txt

And deport slightest none British ancestry to where ever they came from.

Failing that we can always phone them up, I think they are usually at home between the hours of 1-6 AM to tell them to go back to where ever they came from.

Presumably this also means Woods’ face cannot be shown. He has just destroyed his own public image.

That’s ok.

What I sent Craig is just a bit of skin.

Check Out “THE BALLAD OF TIGER (Cheetah) WOODS” @ youtube.com/thisisjohnnyblack

Arsalan

As we all originally “came from” Africa, presumably we should all go and live in the rift valley!

I’m often tempted to wind up US citizens by reminding them that the “original” Americans have been murdered or put on reservations…

John

I think it might be a good idea to dump Nick Griffin in the middle of the rift valley. He is always talking about sending people back to where they came from.

I’m not tempted to say that to them, I do that at every opertunity.

That’s why I keep getting banned from American webpages.

Viva My ever changing IP addresses!

this quite spectacular order, in which everybody in the world is covered by the word “defendant”

Phenomenal!

Another lawyers’ paradise. Another cover up.

It has just been said on the BBC 1pm News that Milipede is using the most expensive lawyers in the land to prevent Binyam Mohammed’s torture evidence being made public.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8411143.stm

Binyam Mohamed torture collusion case returns to court

Mr Mohamed: Secret summary critical to his case

Three of England’s most senior judges are to hear an appeal by the government against letting the public know about allegations of torture.

Former Guantanamo Bay detainee Binyam Mohamed says a secret summary of his treatment must be released in the UK.

He says the British colluded in his mistreatment by providing questions in 2002 for his secret interrogations.

But the Foreign Secretary says the summary is so sensitive it would “seriously damage national security”.

Arsalan

Reminds me of the (probably apocryphal) story of the young black guy talking to Enoch Powell on “Nationwide”.

YBG “Do you think people like me should be encouraged to move back where I came from?

EP “Yes, I’m afraid I do”

YBG “But I don’t like Wolverhampton!”

ps Anyone know if this is true?

if a picture of Tiger’s todger and scrotal sack area were to be published but his face and or other identifying regions not, then surely if the case came to trail, the prosecution would have quite a job on their hands to prove that the parts so exposed were indeed Tiger’s. Would he want his privates discussed in open court in that manner? I’m sure the proceedings would soon plumet to those of a Brian Rix farce.

John the Monkey

I think it was one of Lenny Henry’s jokes.

EP: When we take power we’ll send you to Jamaca.

LH: Thank you very much, I’ll take my first two weeks in July.

@John D Monkey

It’s true whether it’s true or not.

Lovely line.