Cadbury’s Demise a Disaster for Ghana

by craig on January 19, 2010 2:53 pm in Ghana

Cadbury’s were using Fair Trade Cocoa for generations before the phrase was invented.

Cocoa in Ghana is a smallholding crop, with individual farmers having a hectare or two of mixed crops, including cocoa. It is not a plantation crop as it is in Brazil or Ivory Coast. That is why Ghanaian cocoa is of higher quality, and commands a premium on commodity markets. Cadbury’s chocolate in the UK uses 95% Ghanaian cocoa.

The Catholic Orangemen of Togo, p184

A major reason that Ghana is the most stable and successful of Sub-Saharan African countries, is that traditional landholding patterns were not broken up by colonial usurpation. (White men ?” and their cattle ?” died like flies in the climate here. Wheat wilted).

Cocoa farming has for well over a century provided the backbone of a thriving agrarian society in Ghana. That widespread economic base has in turn enabled the continuation of traditional chieftaincy institutions and other indigenous forms of government.

Colonial population displacement is the root cause of many of Africa’s conflicts. In Kenya and Zimbabwe, conflicts we dismiss as tribal or as the result of African bad governance, in fact come down to the long term consequences of tribes displaced from their land by the British, and being forced to settle in other tribes’ territory.

If you don’t understand that, you don’t know Africa. The idea that the land was desolate before whites came, or that African forms of agriculture are unproductive, is nonsense which I tackle in The Catholic Orangemen of Togo.

Displacement to form vast cocoa estates has been part of the cause of conflict in Ivory Coast. The estates are attended with other evils ?” erosion and devastation of soil nutrients caused by monoculture, widespread use of child labour, and the conversion of independent small farmers to landless day labourers. These are but some of the ill effects.

The estates also produce low quality cocoa. It seems a truth in agriculture that over-intensive monoculture produces tasteless food. Most British people realize that Cadbury’s chocolate tastes better, but don’t know why. The answer is in the cocoa.

What Cadbury’s use in the UK is from independent Ghanaian smallholders, and is the equivalent of wines from an ancient small chateau or boutique Californian estate. They pay extra for it, and their willingness to pay extra has been a key part of keeping the Ghanaian small farmer going.

Kraft on the other hand use the mass produced estate cocoa; the equivalent of soulless and tasteless wine from multiple fields and huge stainless steel tanks. They source mostly in Brazil ?” the World’s most tasteless cocoa ?” and Ivory Coast. The bad taste in the mouth from the cocoa is both real and metaphorical. The estates in both countries make massive use of child labour.

It is a fact that Cadbury’s practices in dealing fairly with small African farmers dated back directly to the ethical precepts of their Quaker founders. I had occasion to prepare a report for the British government on the Ghanaian cocoa industry, in response to concerns about the use of child labour on Ivory Coast estates. I visited numerous Ghanaian farmers and Cadbury’s headquarters in the process, and have met Cadbury’s buyers in the field in West Africa over twenty years.

I have no doubt that in order to rack up the return on their vast investment, Kraft will switch to the cheap and nasty cocoa they normally use. This could be the worst thing to hit the Ghanaian rural economy since blackpod disease.

I sympathise entirely with those concerned about the effects in the UK of this takeover ?” just the latest manifestation of the fact that our society knows the price of everything and the value of nothing.

But try to spare a thought for the ill effects in Africa too.

73 Comments

  1. MJ

    19 Jan, 2010 - 3:52 pm

    Craig, thanks for this informative post. I knew nothing about how Cadbury’s sourced its cocoa. A couple of questions however: firstly, are you sure Kraft will change things in the way you suggest? “If it ain’t broke don’t fix it” might be a sensible policy with such an iconic brand. Secondly and perhaps more frivolously, if Ghanaian cocoa is such high quality, why is Cadbury’s chocolate so mediocre? To put it another way, where do Belgian chocolateers source their cocoa?

  2. Craig

    19 Jan, 2010 - 3:56 pm

    MJ

    Takeovers’ changed Terry’s and Rowntree’s sourcing to estate cocoa. I expect you will see the Cadbury’s recipe varied that way by quite large degrees over three years or so.

    The best Belgian chocolatiers do use smallholder cocoa. Belgian chocolate is not all good!

  3. tony_opmoc

    19 Jan, 2010 - 4:13 pm

    Kraft would be daft, to change a successful business in the way that you suggest, but by paying so much they may have already demonstrated how daft they are.

    Whilst brand recognition is important, people can taste the difference.

    There would be nothing much to stop the now presumably rich management and shareholders of Charlie and the Chocolate Factory resigning en-masse and moving down the road to a new Chocolate Factory in Bourneville or elsewhere, and continuing where they left off under another brand. They could even bring the Charlie’s Flake advert back.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7aUTdYsZda8

    Tony

  4. Larry from St. Louis

    19 Jan, 2010 - 4:43 pm

    Craig Murray,

    I suspect you regard the 911 conspiracy nuts who inhabit your site as idiots. I just find it funny that they continue to post here.

    In fact, they’re pulling out every thoroughly debunked conspiracy non-factoid from many years ago.

    If you think that 911 was not caused by 19 Arab Muslims, you really are an idiot.

  5. Richard Robinson

    19 Jan, 2010 - 5:21 pm

    And, one more time, I know more than I did before I came here. Thanks, Craig, interesting.

    But, “Most British people realize that Cadbury’s chocolate tastes better”, I’m sorry … when I see “Cadbury’s Chocolate” I think Dairy Milk; which I never really liked too much. For me, those dark 70% things taste better. But then again, I’m not most Brits, it’s entirely possible the sales figures would bear you out. (I guess Cadbury’s probably own some of that market too, by now ?)

    And again, the Quakers. I knew they had a comparatively honourable history, but not that bit of the detail. But incidentally, I had a local history book out of the library a while back, containing a glorious quote from George Fox (diary ? can’t remember), who felt Impelled to Preach to the Townspeople on their Wickedness, and subsequently found himself obliged to retire in haste to the house of a handy fellow-Quaker sugar merchant when they threw things at him.

  6. technicolour

    19 Jan, 2010 - 5:22 pm

    Thanks for interesting post. Also means Kraft now own Green & Blacks, which had already been taken over by Cadbury. Alas for Mayan Gold.

  7. dreoilin

    19 Jan, 2010 - 5:33 pm

    Very interesting post, Craig.

    I grew up almost-next-door to a Cadbury factory. The brothers used to climb the rear wall and snaffle the “seconds” and broken bits that had been dumped at the back of the building. The factory must have been there since before 1950, because that’s when my parents moved into the area … Sad to see the company go. I felt equally sad (or worse) when Waterford Glass was lost.

    I had no idea about the difference in quality, but Eamonn Holmes was reading out ‘tweets’ people sent him this morning, and some were complaining that American chocolate has an after-taste of old socks. I can’t comment on that as I’ve only eaten European chocolate. But it makes your post even more interesting. I imagine the tweeters didn’t have your background information.

  8. Horace Taylor

    19 Jan, 2010 - 5:35 pm

    The USA is awash with milk from hormone treated cows. Many countries refuse to import it. Recently, I noticed that Cadbury chocolate had a powdery taste, which I presume comes from the use of powdered milk instead of the usual pint and a half of fresh milk. I shall not be buying Cadbury products again.

  9. Daniel Hoffmann-Gill

    19 Jan, 2010 - 5:47 pm

    Fascinating post, learnt a lot, I will try and re-blog this as deserves to be seen by many people.

  10. Andrew

    19 Jan, 2010 - 6:01 pm

    Cadburys is low quality mass market garbage, with very low real chocolate content.

  11. Vronsky

    19 Jan, 2010 - 6:04 pm

    But is Cadbury’s really chocolate?

    http://www.chocolate-history.co.uk/chocolate-war.htm

  12. Richard Robinson

    19 Jan, 2010 - 6:05 pm

    “Green & Blacks, which had already been taken over by Cadbury”. Thanks, technicolour, I’d been wondering. Hmm, get a bar & read the wrapper, call it research … I agree, that does taste better. Than Dairy Milk. (runs away and hides).

  13. technicolour

    19 Jan, 2010 - 6:42 pm

    Are you a chocoholic, Richard?

    Cadbury’s had promised to keep running Green & Black’s as a separate business. Will that apply to Kraft, I wonder.

    ‘Ersatz’ is a word which occurs to me when faced with a lot of UK chocolate (but not Mayan Gold:))

  14. MJ

    19 Jan, 2010 - 6:46 pm

    “Mayan Gold”

    I thought that was a type of marijuana.

  15. Guano

    19 Jan, 2010 - 6:50 pm

    Although cocoa farms are called “plantations” in the Ivory Coast they are not very different from cocoa farms in Ghana. They are small family-run farms: the word “plantations” in French doesn’t mean that they are big or owned by companies or foreigners.

    There are some big differences though between Ghana and the Ivory Coast. The Ivory Coast has been in a spiral of decline since the structural adjustment programmes of the 1980s. There is very little effective government in the country: this means that there is no Government support to farmers for replanting trees or improving quality, there is no guaranteed price paid to farmers.

  16. MJ

    19 Jan, 2010 - 7:23 pm

    “Oops, it is Maya Gold. Still, now the name MJ becomes clear :)

    “Or so I’ve been told” I should have added.

  17. technicolour

    19 Jan, 2010 - 7:31 pm

    MJ, fancy coming out for a spliff?

  18. technicolour

    19 Jan, 2010 - 7:33 pm

    Seriously, Craig, will do some more research on Kraft.

  19. MJ

    19 Jan, 2010 - 7:35 pm

    OK. No, I mean.

  20. Craig

    19 Jan, 2010 - 7:49 pm

    Guano

    There are a lot of really big commercial cocoa farms in Ivory Coast – I’ve been there and looked. The majority of Ivory Coast production is not smallholder. That is not to say there are no smallholders.

    The major difference between Cadbury and continental chocolate is the proportion of cocoa solids as against cocoa butter used.

    It is fashionable with the middle classes to promote cocoa solids and decry cocoa butter. I see no basis for that other than fashion and the desire to be more “sophisticated” by adopting continental style.

    Can we not discuss 9/11, and who is or is not mad, on this post please.

  21. Clark

    19 Jan, 2010 - 7:51 pm

    Hi Craig, it’s good to have you back. I’ll stop as you’ve asked. I just want a bit of peace from Larry, who is SO aggressive.

  22. Clark

    19 Jan, 2010 - 7:52 pm

    Just this post, Craig, or the other three I’m monitoring, too?

  23. Craig

    19 Jan, 2010 - 7:53 pm

    sorry folks I just deleted the whole “truthers v conspiraloons” comment spat because I want to keep this one somewhere near its important topic.

  24. Clark

    19 Jan, 2010 - 7:55 pm

    That’s the best news I’ve had in weeks. I have a copy for reference.

  25. Craig

    19 Jan, 2010 - 7:55 pm

    you are most welcome to carry it on on the other threads

  26. Clark

    19 Jan, 2010 - 7:56 pm

    Oh, I’m fed up with the subject, but not as fed up as I am with Larry. He misrepresents everyone.

  27. Clark

    19 Jan, 2010 - 7:59 pm

    I certainly wish I had some decent chocolate right now. I have some Cadbury’s cocoa powder; I’ll have to go and make a cuppa.

  28. Clark

    19 Jan, 2010 - 8:02 pm

    This is very sad news about Cadbury’s in Ghana. I didn’t even know that they were a good employer there. I used to get Green and Blacks, though I stopped when they started adding dairy products.

  29. technicolour

    19 Jan, 2010 - 8:05 pm

    yeah but Maya Gold :) is vegan

  30. Richard Robinson

    19 Jan, 2010 - 8:12 pm

    That “white chocolate”, isn’t that mostly cocoa butter & very little of the solids ? Or have I remembered that wrong ? I just prefer chocolate a bit less sickly.

    But, spare a thought for the Ghanaians (?), yes. Are there other buyers, or is Kraft/Cadbury the 900lb gorilla ? What other possibilities are there, if cocoa goes wrong for them ?

  31. Clark

    19 Jan, 2010 - 8:13 pm

    Yes, I still eat that one. And ‘Divine’. Come to think of it, I think dairy products only appeared as a warning on Green and Blacks, and not as an actual ingredient. In the dark chocolate, I mean.

    Craig,do you know the cocoa source for any of these other brands? Is there a brand we can buy to support the smallholders in Ghana?

  32. Larry from St. Louis

    19 Jan, 2010 - 8:22 pm

    I certainly appreciate the term “conspiraloon”!!!!

  33. Craig

    19 Jan, 2010 - 8:55 pm

    Richard,

    Well, I expect that the premium on Ghanaian cocoa will disappear and their prices will be driven down to match those of the international big estates. Most of them will limp on, but poorer, and production will drop while farming becomes unattractive to young people.

    Other small “Fair trade” chocolate brands do use Ghanaian cocoa. It’s not organic though because of the need to spray against blackpod fungus. Body Shop cocoa and shea butter products also source a great deal from Ghanaian smallholders.

  34. writerman

    19 Jan, 2010 - 9:30 pm

    Craig,

    Thanks for another interesting post about agriculture in Ghana. Your empathy and concern about the farmers does you credit.

  35. Chris Dooley

    19 Jan, 2010 - 9:55 pm

    A nice bar of Bournville is better than most ‘quality chocolate’ I have tasted. Some 70% cocoa bars taste like soap to my British pallet.

    If Bournville is the taste of Ghana I hope Kraft keep their skilled farmers in business.

  36. techicolour

    19 Jan, 2010 - 11:03 pm

    did my post asking whether Kraft had given assurances that Cadbury would continue being run as a separate company get deleted in the purge? Or have I missed it?

  37. Mark Golding - Children of Iraq

    19 Jan, 2010 - 11:25 pm

    Phew – a sense of peace on this thread – yes interesting post Craig – my wife Tina believes Kraft will change the source for their cocoa as well – OMG if I had the money I would save a great British institution – Oh boy I love Fry’s Cream bar and you can really taste the difference in Cadburys. As one Cadbury board member commented, “I’m horrified. I just think there’s a cultural imbalance. For a quintessentially, philanthropic iconic brand to sell out to a plastic cheese company – there’s no mix there,” and I agree. Looks like more jobs lost here in Britain and at the cocoa source in Ghana.

  38. tony_opmoc

    19 Jan, 2010 - 11:41 pm

    An even better one – how did they get away with it?

    “My Mum (Dona Evans – nee McDonough) in 1960s Flake Ad.. Slightly provocative but hey it paid for my education!”

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mYr90nCFZE

    Tony

  39. subrosa

    20 Jan, 2010 - 12:14 am

    Thanks for this information Craig. It’s been a day of misinformation from the UK government as usual.

    I liked the Flake advert Tony, many of us young women ate them just in the hope they looked like your Mum.

  40. Craig

    20 Jan, 2010 - 12:20 am

    technicolour

    Possibly, but only by accident.

  41. glenn

    20 Jan, 2010 - 12:30 am

    I don’t suppose Cadbury’s has a binding agreement for its sources? It should be impressed upon their new owners that if they shake the whole Cadbury’s product to pieces, they’ll have a loss on their hands with sales and profits down. They could keep it as a high-end part of their portfolio, and some encouragement in that direction might be helpful. After all, Ford bought Jaguar, but that didn’t mean new Jaguars then had to be built with Escort engines.

  42. Mark Golding - Children of Iraq

    20 Jan, 2010 - 1:02 am

    Tony,

    Completely off topic but I wanted to make sure you received my thanks for these important and crucial facts which I hope are on a question sheet when Lord Goldsmith QC attends the Iraq inquiry:

    “The critical paragraph of her letter, published yesterday under the Freedom of Information Act, was blanked out by the Government on the grounds that it was in the public interest to protect the privacy of the advice given by the Attorney General. But last night the contents of the paragraph were leaked, and Tony Blair was facing fresh allegations of a cover-up. There has long been speculation that Lord Goldsmith was leant on to switch his view, and to sanction the war – and confirmation of that would be devastating for the Prime Minister. The Wilmhurst letter stops short of explaining what caused Lord Goldsmith to change his mind.”

    Will Blair be muted – or – will Goldsmith lie – We will witness a British Queens Councillor’s integrity ‘in the dock’ – Will it be:

    litterae clausae?

    or

    litterae patentes?

    ROTULI LITTERARUM PATENTIUM

  43. angrysoba

    20 Jan, 2010 - 5:36 am

    Craig,

    There is a bar of chocolate called “Ghana” which is sold here in Japan. It’s produced by a South Korean company called Lotte. Do you know anything about Lotte’s dealings there?

  44. Guano

    20 Jan, 2010 - 9:07 am

    Dear Craig

    Is there any way we can discuss further the meaning of “plantations” in Ivory Coast. I am researching this area and your information deviates from information from other sources. Your overall conclusion is correct, though; there could be serious implications for growers and for improved conditions throughout the supply chain.

  45. Barbara

    20 Jan, 2010 - 9:08 am

    Interesting and informative, thanks.

    You may recall the smell of chocolate that wafted over Norwich for many years from Caleys factory, since taken over and then closed down.

    A pity that Cadbury’s seems headed for the same fate, and that fair business practices build up over some time will be cast aside for profit.

  46. ingo

    20 Jan, 2010 - 9:21 am

    good, uptodate blog about the facts that underline the riches of some of the most powerfull international companies who’s colonial past in the cocoa cartel has left us with large conglomerates producing cocoa.

    Manufacturing chocolate was, up to the 1990 fully in the hands of those who exported it to Europe and America, only during the last ten fifteen years have we seen the fair trade movement make a real impact by producing their own chocolate.

    Divine is an African brand and its good, off course you can’t fail green and Blacks, but there are also some very good South American producers that can make good cocoa and chocolate.

    Swiss chocolate ought to be boycotted for all the right, at least ten reasons reasons, banking being one of them.

    I have to agree with Craigs comments on belgian choci’s, not all of them carry their usual excellence.

    I am not becrying the loss of Cadbury’s range of chocolates, but the fact that Kraft will now own Green nad Blacks, that the regime will be tightened and that another global brand has swallowed a comapny that had social responsibility written into the history books. I also fear for small producers and setting up a chocolate manufacturing operation/coop in Ghana could be the way forward out of this malaise, Kraft will try and change the arrangements I feel.

    good blog, makes a change from the predictable lying of the ‘chilcouterie’and its predictable clients.

  47. nik

    20 Jan, 2010 - 10:15 am

    Barbara

    Ah, yes, i used to love that smell! Coming into the city, parking on the old cattlemarket and smelling the chocolate factory, mmmmm. Thanks for the reminder. And thanks to Craig for yet more info i would otherwise never have known.

    nik

  48. glenn

    20 Jan, 2010 - 12:48 pm

    Saw a quite amazing 3D Cadbury’s advert yesterday in the cinema before watching Avatar. Ghana was mentioned in it, which made my ears pick up having read this blog before going out, but apparently some people (on behalf of the people of Ghana, naturally) took offence:

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/advertising/cadbury-accused-of-racial-stereotyping-in-chocolate-advert-1801020.html

    Would the people of Ghana really have a problem with this sort of advert? Critics have apparently claimed it portrays Africans as “buffooning simpletons”, but I wonder if they’ve ever seen how British people are portrayed in our own adverts?

  49. dreoilin

    20 Jan, 2010 - 1:52 pm

    Is this it, Glenn:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ktLtvinZBs

    They look like they’re having fun. But then, I’ve seen portrayals of “Irish” people, in films, that seriously irritated me. Buffooning simpletons aplenty. (It’s improved in recent times.)

  50. technicolour

    20 Jan, 2010 - 2:09 pm

    dreoilin, don;t watch Shrooms :)

  51. dreoilin

    20 Jan, 2010 - 2:26 pm

    Shrooms? A film?

    I’m laughing at MJ.

    Got to lie down for half an hour. Just had the swineflu vaccine. Nearly didn’t.

  52. MJ

    20 Jan, 2010 - 2:39 pm

    “Just had the swineflu vaccine”.

    Oh dear. Why dreoilin, why?

  53. Larry from St. Louis

    20 Jan, 2010 - 3:40 pm

    MJ, apparently because that’s one conspiracy of yours that she won’t buy into.

  54. Anonymous

    20 Jan, 2010 - 3:47 pm

    Everyone I know who’s had the vaccine (from old to young) is fine, dreoilin! But still:

    EU to probe pharma over “false pandemic”

    04 January 2010

    The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) is to hold an emergency debate and inquiry this month into the “influence” exerted by drugmakers on the World Health Organisation’s (WHO) global H1N1 flu campaign.

    The text of the resolution approved by the Assembly calling for the debate and inquiry states that: “in order to promote their patented drugs and vaccines against flu, pharmaceutical companies influenced scientists and official agencies responsible for public health standards to alarm governments worldwide and make them squander tight health resources for inefficient vaccine strategies”

    http://www.pharmatimes.com/worldnews/article.aspx?id=17147

  55. technicolour

    20 Jan, 2010 - 3:49 pm

    That was me.

  56. MJ

    20 Jan, 2010 - 3:50 pm

    No conspiracy of mine Larry. It’s just that taking a largely untested vaccine to protect against a largely innocuous virus never seemed a particularly sensible proposition. Perhaps that’s why the uptake has been so derisory. But I’m sure dreoilin can answer for herself, thanks all the same Larry.

  57. Craig

    20 Jan, 2010 - 5:41 pm

    I had swine flu. Just like normal flu. No idea what the fuss is about.

  58. glenn

    20 Jan, 2010 - 6:14 pm

    The side effects of Tamiflu seem to be worse than the actual swine flu might be – particularly as swine flu is pretty tame compared with other strains (such as the one that bit Poland in particular, which I also got). Still, taking Tamiflu will put a smile on the kindly features of Gruppenfuhrer D. Rumsfeld, who has a financial interest in its uptake.

  59. Roderick Russell

    20 Jan, 2010 - 6:23 pm

    Craig, I am not myself a natural political opponent of the former Empire. One can hardly live in Canada without having some appreciation for it. And yet, I found your comments about population displacement to be very illuminating. It seems to me that Africa got the rough end of the stick of Colonialism, without seeing any benefits. Not just land displacement, but 350 years of massive displacement caused by the very efficient operation of the cross-Atlantic slave trade. And then the Congo, 100 years ago, I read somewhere recently that 10 million died to feed the greed of a Belgium King: More deaths than in the holocaust. With trauma like this, relatively recently, it is hardly surprising that some countries have been in turmoil. And yet, during the business trips I used to make to Africa one always noted the remarkable cheerfulness of the people in adversity, their hard work, and their innate ability. One also noted the huge differences between the various African people, something most Europeans don’t understand.

  60. Richard Robinson

    20 Jan, 2010 - 6:51 pm

    “taking Tamiflu will put a smile on the kindly features of Gruppenfuhrer D. Rumsfeld, who has a financial interest in its uptake.”

    It might be fair to point out that they didn’t know it would turn out so mild, when they started these balls rolling ? When you know that there seems to be a new mutant flu on the way, and you know that previous variants really have killed vast numbers of people, perhaps it’s better to err on the side of being able to help more people than turn out to need it ?

    I mean, if we had an unexpectedly cold snap and ran out of salt for the roads, maybe some people would feel there should have been bigger stocks ? Like that.

  61. MJ

    20 Jan, 2010 - 7:06 pm

    “perhaps it’s better to err on the side of being able to help more people than turn out to need it ?”

    The vaccine was patented and licensed months before the first case of the disease presented itself. I wonder how they managed that. The only people helped by this blatant scam were the pharmaceutical companies and their profits.

  62. glenn

    20 Jan, 2010 - 7:15 pm

    Maybe there shouldn’t have been quite the media frenzy about swine-flu, with doom-mongers like the Daily (hate-) Mail screaming “10,000 deaths from flu this winter!!” without troubling us with the information that that’s the typical death rate anyway. There was never anything to indicate this swine flu was either particularly virulent or acute. We never know what the latest strains of flu are likely to bring, so should we have this headless-chicken approach every year?

    One can’t blame the public, they – after all – only have the lurid headlines and breathless media to get their information. So who kept prompting the media? And how come just a few individuals were so well placed to profit handsomely out of the scare?

  63. technicolour

    20 Jan, 2010 - 7:24 pm

    Weren’t doctors being threatened if they refused to give it?

  64. technicolour

    20 Jan, 2010 - 7:26 pm

    Gosh, sorry, way way off topic.

  65. glenn

    20 Jan, 2010 - 7:29 pm

    Yikes, it is too. Sorry.

  66. George Dutton

    20 Jan, 2010 - 10:10 pm

    RBS and the takeover…

    http://tinyurl.com/ydgyh59

  67. anno

    20 Jan, 2010 - 11:47 pm

    Thank you very much Craig for this important information. I have just finished working on a flat next to Cadbury’s in Birmingham and I have done a few days’ electrical work inside the factory in 2000.

    It also worries me that the factory is sited in one of the best residential areas of the city, partly because Cadburys invested in and created the local amenities. The Quaker ethics are preserving a factory which is asking to be relocated to Eastern Europe, putting more pressure on the dairy industry of many local counties, which have already been served very badly by Hilary Benn and New Labour. A vast milk processing plant has been built in Kent, ready to import dairy produce, as part of the strategy to squeeze dairy farmers dry.

    Just as we try to crawl out of a property based recession, New Labour is planning a property based recovery, with zero-energy New Builds running on heat pumps, replacing fossil fuels. The bankers who control the money supply are not interested in chocolate. They buy and sell cocoa to make cash, they buy and sell property to make cash and they are not interested in the changes that they wreak on Africa, or Birmingham, or farmers, or you or me. They are only interested in themselves.

  68. Abe Rene

    21 Jan, 2010 - 1:35 am

    There may be an entrepreneurial opportunity here for someone who can fill the traditional British sweet tooth more competently than Kraft, if they abandon Ghananian sources.

    Would you, Craig, be interested in becoming the next John Cadbury?

  69. dreoilin

    21 Jan, 2010 - 8:52 am

    Sorry – broadband still mostly off – BT Ireland has decided to send me a new router – waiting for that. I have a connection, sometimes, for about 10 mins. Grrr.

  70. MJ

    21 Jan, 2010 - 1:50 pm

    OK dreoilin. Hope you’re feeling well.

  71. Strategist

    21 Jan, 2010 - 3:42 pm

    “There may be an entrepreneurial opportunity here for someone who can fill the traditional British sweet tooth more competently than Kraft, if they abandon Ghananian sources.”

    As has already been said on this thread, Divine are already in there

    http://www.divinechocolate.com/default.aspx

    For the best bar of chocolate since Green & Blacks sold out, my vote goes to Seeds of Change – cocoa sourced from the Dominican Republic, it appears (other half of Hispaniola from Haiti)

    http://www.seedsofchange.co.uk/chocolate.html

  72. chris

    22 Jan, 2010 - 1:58 pm

    spot on craig

    every so often there are real jaffas on this site:

    Colonial population displacement is the root cause of many of Africa’s conflicts. In Kenya and Zimbabwe, conflicts we dismiss as tribal or as the result of African bad governance, in fact come down to the long term consequences of tribes displaced from their land by the British, and being forced to settle in other tribes’ territory.

    (PS Steyn’s not a chucker)

  73. George Dutton

    24 Jan, 2010 - 3:44 pm

Powered By Wordpress | Designed By Ridgey | Produced by Tim Ireland | Hosted by Expathos