The Really Nasty Party

by craig on April 22, 2010 8:34 am in The Election

nastytories.bmp

As unemployment hits 2.5 million, the Tories are blaming the unemployed on benefit for our economic woes, rather than the bankers at Goldman Sachs who have an average salary of £520,000 per year. The Tories are going back to their nastiest base instincts to try to pull off an election win.

The sad thing, of course, is that you could replace Cameron in that photo with James Purnell, Hazell Blears or Tessa Jowell without having to change the slogan.

The benefit system already is onerous and humiliating to those who want to work and feel, wrongly, ashamed to be unemployed. Many entitled and unemployed, normally hard working, people drop out of benefits, and into terrible trouble, because of the routine degradation heaped on them by the New Labour “New Deal” system, which Cameron seeks to reinforce.

Strangely the brass-necked benefit cheats, who do exist, are the ones who are not discouraged by the endless appointments, interrogations and form filling and continue to thrive on the counter-productive system.

But if anyone doubts the real nastiness of the Tories, or that the Lib Dems are seen as a real threat to the established order by the corporate media and their paymasters, should look at the absolutely vicious anti-Clegg headlines on the front pages of every single Tory newspaper today. I have not seen anything like this concerted a Tory media campaign since the Falklands War. The only parallel at election time was the vilification of Kinnock, but even that did not have every other front page vying with the Sun in extremity.

http://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2010/04/22/tabloids-cover-lib-dems-sensation/

The Mail’s Clegg Nazi front page headline wins first prize for tenedentiousness, The Telegraph “expenses scandal” is not about taxpayers’ money but private and declared donations (and has been saved up for nine months for this moment), the Financial Times warns the City won’t accept anything but a clear Tory win, the Sun is apoplectic at the idea that for once Murdoch may not be able to nominate his Prime Minister, and the Daily Express warns that Clegg will flood the country with black people.

The Tories are truly vicious when rattled. This has become a campaign about who democracy is for – the people or the press barons. Anybody who opposes corporate and City power and its ownership of democracy through the mass media, needs now to fall in line behind the Liberal Democrats to resist this.

UPDATE

I take my hat off to Iain Dale for his excellent article on the subject.

http://iaindale.blogspot.com/2010/04/these-shameful-attacks-on-clegg-will.html

I attack Iain from time to time because it is part of the blogosphere game; but I have always had a high opinion of him. He seems to have wandered into the wrong political party by mistake – if you look at the typical Tory commenter on the political betting first link above, Iain has nothing in common with these vicious people.

53 Comments

  1. brian

    22 Apr, 2010 - 9:40 am

    I’ll gladly fall in line if you can get a few members of the corporate elite to pay £250 per month into my bank account for “staffing” costs.

  2. Craig

    22 Apr, 2010 - 10:09 am

    Brian,

    But unlike you, Clegg did actually have some staff to pay. Private donations to fund political activity are perfectly normal. In fact how else would political activity happen? I received some for my campaigns. Is that wrong?

  3. brian

    22 Apr, 2010 - 10:18 am

    Given what we know now about the goings on in the recently dissolved parliament I think it is wrong and I’d be amazed if any politician would enter into a similar arrangement in the future.

    My gut feeling about NC is that he is an honest “kinda guy”, but I think this episode does show that perhaps he’s not quite the new broom he’s trying to portray himself as.

    The bottom line with Clegg though is that the Conservative party could put in a transfer request for him tomorrow and come saturday afternoon it is all too easy to see him scoring goals for the tories and kissing the badge on his blue shirt.

  4. Anonymous

    22 Apr, 2010 - 10:28 am

    Done over by Labour and maybe soon done over by the Conservatives…the poor do not appear represented. Why should people pay and feel the pain when lack of regulation and oversight on their behalf cause the effects. I don’t want to pay more, why can’t the govenment be sued to prevent them raising taxes to pay for the badly done bailout. Look at the Chinese effort. One would hope you are right about the LD, but what if they obtain power and carry on as other parties have done.

    No one has mentioned David Mundell, a tory and a dirty little horrific man. Giving this tit milk to squirt at the under represented will hurt those least able to defend themselves very badly.

  5. Craig

    22 Apr, 2010 - 10:31 am

    Brian

    Clegg is certainly not on the radical side of the Lib Dems. But I think he is far from being a Tory – if what you said is true, then the Tory media wouldn’t be getting so hysterical against him.

    At least he’s not a war criminal, unlike the New Labour leadership.

  6. Anonymous

    22 Apr, 2010 - 10:50 am

    “This has become a campaign about who democracy is for” That’s utter crap Craig.

  7. lwtc247

    22 Apr, 2010 - 10:53 am

    Sorry,

    “This has become a campaign about who democracy is for” That’s utter crap Craig.

  8. brian

    22 Apr, 2010 - 10:57 am

    Hmm…2 possible slogans spring to mind:

    VOTE CLEGG: AT LEAST HE’S NOT A WAR CRIMINAL

    or

    VOTE CLEGG: THE BEST CHANCE THE WAR CRIMINALS HAVE OF RETAINING POWER

    both true but sort of contradictory, funny old world.

  9. Control

    22 Apr, 2010 - 11:00 am

    Craig,

    I don’t know if you caught Radio4 this morning (I know your a fan) but there was an interesting piece on the today programme with someone whose name escapes me from the Indie and Trevor Kavanagh from the Sun. The hack at the Indie said that yesterday James Murdoch and Rebecca Brooks from News International turned up at the Indie unannounced and marched up to Simon Kelners desk.

    Apparently upset by the new Indie Poster ‘ “Rupert Murdoch won’t decide this election. You will,”

    Says it all really.

    Trevor Kavanagh was outraged at having being invited on to talk about Clegg and been asked for comment on something he didn’t know had taken place. Whoops.

    -Control

  10. Craig

    22 Apr, 2010 - 11:13 am

    lwtc247,

    What is crap is to claim that a chance to break the two party system after a hundred years is meaningless.

  11. brian

    22 Apr, 2010 - 11:18 am

    or

    VOTE CLEGG: TO BECOME FURTHER ENMESHED IN EU CORRUPTION

    or

    VOTE CLEGG: LABOUR FIDDLED THEIR EXPENSES MORE THAN WE DID, HONEST

    or

    VOTE CLEGG: WE PROMISE NOT TO USE MONEY STOLEN FROM FRAUD VICTIMS FROM NOW ON

  12. Stevie

    22 Apr, 2010 - 11:27 am

    or

    Don’t vote Labour:

    - they took us into the Iraq war

    - they let the gap between the rich and poor expand

    - they care more about business than the majority of hard working people

    - they fiddled their expenses

    - the are not to be trusted

    - they failed to reform the House of Lords (I mean Alan Sugar as a Lord, wtf is that!?)

    - Gordon Brown

  13. brian

    22 Apr, 2010 - 11:30 am

    or

    VOTE CLEGG: THE WEALTHY BANKER FAMILY ELITE KNOW WHAT’S GOOD FOR YOU PLEBS

  14. Craig

    22 Apr, 2010 - 11:33 am

    brian,

    we get the you don’t like Nick Clegg bit. So who will you vote for?

  15. lwtc247

    22 Apr, 2010 - 11:34 am

    “What is crap is to claim that a chance to break the two party system after a hundred years is meaningless.”

    You REALLY believe the LibDems will step outside the bicentennial crap that’s been fragging at will?

    You REALLY think the much needed political revolution will stem from the LibDems.

    That’s just laughable Craig.

    I supported you last time because I think you and many more independents could offer that, but it certainly isn’t going to come from the LibDems.

    Look forward to you writing about the LibDem Friends of Israel.

    The reality is, not matter how less nasty then the (always smarmy)Tories or the NeoLabour NeoTraitors will be, the LibDems will not make any meaningful change.

    The ncessary change goes much deeper than that. As for the ‘leader debates’, what the hell is all that about? President bLiar’s legacy solidifying it seems.

    These are dark times. The day after no matter who wins, they will still be dark days.

  16. John D. Monkey

    22 Apr, 2010 - 11:35 am

    I’m a LD voter and we’re running the Tories close second in my constituency so it’s easy for me to say this – but my slogan would be:

    “Vote for whoever has the best chance of kicking out Gordon Brown and his party of greedy liars.”

  17. Anonymous

    22 Apr, 2010 - 11:35 am

    To many voters considering voting for liberals, Nick Clegg is a relatively unknown player in this election. There is concern that Nick Clegg may turn out to be a deceitful dud like Blair and Obama, a slick performer who will renege on his promises.

    He needs to categorically state his position on key issues which are of major concern to the public such as their Policies on getting people back to work, Trident, Restoring Habeas Corpus and having an ethical foreign policy. Charles Kennedy took the moral high ground by opposing the invasion of Iraq. We know where Nu Labour and conservatives stand on these and Nick Clegg should bury them in their own slime in tonights debate .

  18. lwtc247

    22 Apr, 2010 - 11:37 am

    p.s. Who was it that made this claim?…

    “What is crap is to claim that a chance to break the two party system after a hundred years is meaningless.”

  19. Ed

    22 Apr, 2010 - 11:42 am

    Agree, had never seen anything like the anti-Libdem headline frenzy this morning. Obviously not coincidental that the second debate is tonight, but this was so OTT you’d have to expect it to backfire.

    Not just because beating up on the little guy is not generally good politics, but because only a week ago it was all “we agree with, Nick” and the about turn isn’t going to fool many people.

  20. brian

    22 Apr, 2010 - 12:15 pm

    Assuming he’d give us the promised(?) vote on EU membership I think Clegg just takes it for me from the three main parties.

  21. George Dutton

    22 Apr, 2010 - 12:26 pm

    “As unemployment hits 2.5 million, the Tories are blaming the unemployed on benefit for our economic woes, rather than the bankers at Goldman Sachs who have an average salary of £520,000 per year. The Tories are going back to their nastiest base instincts to try to pull off an election win.”…

    “In politics, absurdity is not a handicap.”

    Napoleon Bonaparte (1769 – 1821)

  22. HotterThanAPileOfCurry

    22 Apr, 2010 - 12:57 pm

    All this at a time when a study shows that the rich-poor gap is the widest it’s ever been since the days of slavery.

    Tory’s will give tax breaks to the rich and the poor suffer.

    social mobility….my arse.

    http://hotterthanapileofcurry.wordpress.com/2010/04/22/londons-rich-poor-gap-widest-divide-since-the-days-of-slavery/

  23. Larry from St. Louis

    22 Apr, 2010 - 1:00 pm

    lwtc247′s blogroll contains numerous links to reptilians, anti-Christ mysticism and the like. I wouldn’t take that crazy person seriously.

  24. Craig

    22 Apr, 2010 - 1:19 pm

    lwtc247

    Well I tink we would get a better voting system for one. And I do think the civil liberties situation would greatly improve.

  25. Clark

    22 Apr, 2010 - 1:43 pm

    lwtc247,

    you seem to be thinking only in terms of the LibDems gaining power. To me, this is more about breaking the stranglehold of Labour and Conservative, and under the current voting system, voting LibDem (in most constituencies) gives the best chance of that.

  26. lwtc247

    22 Apr, 2010 - 1:44 pm

    Craig.

    I hope you are right, but I know you’re not.

    And Larry, if people don’t take me seriously then there will be too.

  27. Mark Golding - Children of Iraq

    22 Apr, 2010 - 1:56 pm

    OK Brian – slag Nick but remember this:

    Lib Dems did not vote for an illegal ‘war’

    that dismembered and burned to death Iraqi children sitting at breakfast tables as dawn broke in March 2003, when their country was smashed and their parents massacred on lies.

    An illegal ‘war’ that ‘Murdering Murdoch’ said would “give us cheap oil.”

    Every morally decent thinking Brit across ALL walks of life in this country that I and others have spoken to, regret this dreadful period in their lives, when we witnessed death and destruction on an enormous scale. A ‘holocaust’ that Labour and the Conservative Party voted for, on misinformation lies, media support and ignorance.

    We have the opportunity to cleanse our minds and souls by voting for an decent man and a party of good people (I have witnessed many informed Lib Dems physically distressed and weep when told the true scale of devastation and despair in Iraq) who agree the Iraq war was indeed ILLEGAL.

    Let it be said, if the Conservatives seize power, then goodbye Iraq inquiry, goodbye redemption and goodbye atonement.

    Goodbye to pressure for the relief of suffering in Gaza and the Middle East, goodbye to civil liberties, goodbye to a caring government and goodbye to a strong, consolidated and meaningful health service for all.

    We are sick of ‘war and terror’ sick of corruption, sick of powerful corporations calling the shots; sick of corporate media influencing, prodding, cajoling, over-riding and disrupting our lives, our children’s lives and inevitably their children’s future world.

  28. lwtc247

    22 Apr, 2010 - 2:01 pm

    Strangely enough, Larry forgot to point out that the two main articles on my blogs front-page cover the fact of a US execution squad, sorry, special forces as Larry would likely call them, that assassinated 8 schoolboys in Ghazi Kang, Afghanistan 2009. I also have a clip of the “Collateral Damage” 2007 wonderful examples of human beings, that spat death from an Apache helicopter, err, I mean reptilians, anti-Christ mysticism

  29. George Dutton

    22 Apr, 2010 - 2:09 pm

    “US execution squad”

    http://tinyurl.com/29s4lma

    “Dundee University”…

    tinyurl.com/23f5xgn

  30. Jon

    22 Apr, 2010 - 2:09 pm

    @lwtc247 – I agree with your position that a win for the LDs is not exactly a radical ‘for the people’ vote. But in a three-horse race, I would still agree with Craig that it is better than the other two. And it is true that the newspaper owners generally are trying to influence the outcome of the election, and much more so towards the Tories than towards any other party.

    Personally, my instincts lie with the Greens, but in my Birmingham Labour constituency, only the LDs have a cat-in-hells chance of knocking Labour off the top spot. The Tories don’t stand a chance in a working class area like mine, and most of the voter’s have hardly heard of the Greens, or incorrectly believe that the Greens are only interested in environmentalism.

  31. lwtc247

    22 Apr, 2010 - 2:40 pm

    But Jon, it’s only a 3 horse race because /we accept it as such/. IT’s madness, and it must be stopped. It ain’t gonna stop by a flutter on either one of these ol nags.

  32. Anonymous

    22 Apr, 2010 - 2:54 pm

    In The Daily Mail Today

    A young woman who left school with three A-levels and ten GCSEs killed herself because she felt ‘humiliated’ about not getting a job.

    Vicky Harrison, 21, failed to find work after applying for more than 200 jobs over two years.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1267953/Job-seeker-Vicky-Harrison-commits-suicide-rejected-200-jobs.html?ITO=1708&referrer=yahoo

  33. lwtc247

    22 Apr, 2010 - 3:04 pm

    @ George Dutton

    Thanks for the links. Chilling. Kucinich(sp?) warned the other day it was extra-judicial. Heads should roll but Obamessiah is above the law, like jack-ass BuSh was. As for a UCL’s dreadful antics, disgraceful behaviour. To save costs why not just sew a green crescent on them instead? Beware Muslims!

    Wonder what Clegg will do about the ‘special relationship’.{Ans: Nothing} Will he sevver it?{And: No} Will he do anything to holding Obama, bLiar, Olmert Livni Barak, Azanr, little jonnie coward, da da da to account?{No, absolutely not}. Will he do anything about a proper investigation into 7/7?{No}. Will he allow prosecution of BAE?{No}.

    Sorry. Dead Leg Clegg’s may treat some of the symptoms, but can’t cure the disease. And Larry ‘forgot’ to point out that the two main articles on my blog front page cover the US led execution squads that murdered a number of Afghan school kids at Ghazi Kang 2009. I also blog about the “Collateral Damage” 2007 strafing and murder by US pilots on civilians, or as Larry said reptilians, anti-Christ mysticism

  34. Craig

    22 Apr, 2010 - 3:07 pm

    George

    Dan Ellsberg warned me in Washington six months ago that the US was going to start using assassination squads in Afghanistan.

  35. George Dutton

    22 Apr, 2010 - 3:31 pm

    It had to come, torturing their own…

    http://tinyurl.com/244878v

  36. lwtc247

    22 Apr, 2010 - 3:37 pm

    Ellsberg is worth listening to. He gave a great interview on DN recently.

    But I think what this really means is they have it as OPEN policy.

    http://www.democracynow.org/2010/3/30/our_president_is_deceiving_the_american

  37. George Dutton

    22 Apr, 2010 - 3:51 pm

    lwtc247

    You have to understand that Craig is all over the place politically. I remember he was for Obama on his blog. I told him what Obama was (look back in the threads). I turned out to be right and Craig turned out to be wrong. Craig and the Lib Dems is just another wrong turn for him. How long I wonder before he is coming on here and saying he is going to leave the Lib Dems?…Only a matter of time.

  38. lwtc247

    22 Apr, 2010 - 4:17 pm

    It is painful to see someone I (let me say ‘we’) regard so highly to wonder off down this path. I can understand perfectly his frustration with Norwich, but it really is a remarkable testament as to how entrenched this diseased political system has become, when guys who just might be able to do something about it end up merging with ‘the system’

    Part of me wants to say “Thank God he joined the LibDems and not NeoLabour or the Tories, but that would be falling into the abyss too. There is only one remedy for this vile beast and that’s to destroy it. Then, forge a new system from new. I recall the mighty Zinn quote I.F. Stone: “Governments Lie”

  39. ScouseBilly

    22 Apr, 2010 - 4:20 pm

    Peter “YouGov” Kellner was saying that, when people are asked, “If you thought your party had a chance of winning who would you vote for?”, the reults are as follows:

    LibDem 49%

    Con 22%

    Lab 19%

    Also once the LibDem share exceeds 38% they start to gain a healthy working majority of seats.

    Interesting isn’t it?

  40. ScouseBilly

    22 Apr, 2010 - 4:26 pm

    P.S. You know tonight’s debate is up against Atletico Madrid v Liverpool on Channel 5 – bloody hell.

    Think I might just record the debate seeing as it’s on Foreign Affairs.

  41. writerman

    22 Apr, 2010 - 4:30 pm

    Craig is… is hopefully absolutely correct about the prospects for Britain if the Liberal Democrats manage, against the odds, to break the two-party stranglehold over UK politics.

    However, one should be aware that the system is designed to be a two party system, or nothing. So, the Liberal Democrats will have to replace either the Conservatives, or New Labour in order to break the mold. Now, how likely is this outcome? It’s a possibility of course, but given the structure of politics in the UK, I wouldn’t bet on it.

    The best hope for the Liberal Democrats, and for reform, is some form of two party government where the LD block is actually represented in the cabinet with full ministerial responsibility; but this will require the LD’s to choose whether to support New Labour or the Conservatives.

    This is the crucial question for the Liberal Democrats, if they continue their surge, who will they lever into power, Brown or Cameron, and which of those two paragons is most likely to raise Clegg, and Liberal policies, up with him?

    Personally, I won’t be voting, as I don’t reside in the UK anymore, at least not during the Winter!

    Election campaigns contain an awful lot of rhetoric, as do the parties manifesto promisses. Afterwards harsh reality returns and hopes are usually dashed, as real struggle over power takes place after the ritual of the election, when people like Murdoch, and the “Market” really show how much influence they have in society.

  42. ScouseBilly

    22 Apr, 2010 - 4:34 pm

    writerman, I agree with a lot of what you say. It is just possible, see post above, that a LibDem momentum could continue to grow. This is certainly possible if there is a 49% latent LibDem vote as suggested by YouGov’s private polling.

  43. MJ

    22 Apr, 2010 - 4:36 pm

    ScouseBilly: as an Everton supporter I’ll be cheering on Liverpool tonight. Very much hope they win the cup. After today’s Portsmouth verdict it”ll mean Everton will qualify for Europe from eighth.

    Up the redshite!

  44. kingfelix

    22 Apr, 2010 - 4:44 pm

    The Conservatives will unveil their next poster tomorrow -

    “Let’s give more money to rich people.”

    Not sure what happened to ‘we’re all in it together’.

  45. ScouseBilly

    22 Apr, 2010 - 4:48 pm

    Cheers, MJ.

    “I’ve seen supporters on Merseyside going to the ground together, one wearing red and white and the other blue and white, which is unusual elsewhere. You get families in Liverpool in which half support Liverpool and the other half Everton. They support rival teams but they have the same temperament and they know each other. They are unique in the sense that their rivalry is so great but there is no real aggro between them. This is quite amazing.

    I am not saying they love each other. Oh, no. Football is not a matter of life and death… it’s much more important than that. And it’s more important to them than that. But I’ve never seen a fight at a derby game. Shouting and bawling… yes. But they don’t fight each other. And that says a lot for them.” – Bill Shankly

  46. Jon

    22 Apr, 2010 - 4:58 pm

    @lwtc247 – of course the three-horse race is wrong. I don’t support the LDs on a number of things, but then on a wide range of things they are not liberal at all (foreign policy and attitude to Israel just for a start).

    But a three-horse race is better than a two-horse race. In fact if the LDs get some toehold on power, perhaps in a hung parliament, we may stand a better chance of electoral reform. I dare say you would be in favour of that, as it would provide a slightly better chance for radical or indie candidates to gain seats.

  47. ScouseBilly

    22 Apr, 2010 - 5:10 pm

    Btw “Happy Earth Day” everybody:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dyxuVFzKypU

  48. Alfred

    22 Apr, 2010 - 6:35 pm

    “Let’s cut benefits for those who refuse work”

    The Tories are evidently betting (or have poll results indicating) that taxpayers want benefits recipients compelled to lose a few pounds.

    But I have a better idea. Eliminate benefits altogether and bring back the workhouse.

    Not your, great-grandpa’s workhouse, of course, but an institution reflecting present-day realities. The indigent would be offered work with wages and work conditions fully competitive with those of their Asian counterparts.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1266643/Microsofts-Chinese-workforce-tired-stay-awake.html

    This would mean a workplace exempt from health and safety regulations, a wage of around 34 pence an hour, work shifts of up to 15 hours and dormitories, with twelve bunks to a room, to eliminate the cost and waste of time involved in commuting.

    Participation, obviously, would be voluntary, and there would be no cost to the state, since both work and workplace would be provided by the private sector.

    If they like cutting benefits, taxpayers will surely love this idea.

  49. Alfred

    22 Apr, 2010 - 6:49 pm

    Naturally, if one wanted a sane policy for dealing with the problem of eight million unemployed, marginally-employed or discouraged workers one would establish a new social contract that guaranteed a job to everyone.

    Government would fulfill this contract by providing a wage subsidy to employers of those at the margin of the workforce.

    A wage subsidy can be provided with minimal administrative overhead by means of an online auction of government wage subsidies in specified numbers, tied to specific places, for specific durations, according to need.

    The direct cost of subsidizing (50%) the wages of up to eight million people would be in the region of 30 billion pounds annually. In addition, there would be costs generated as employers sought to replace full-wage employees with subsidized employees. Such replacement would be limited, however, not only because it would involve additional training costs, but because, with the approach of full employment, the availability of low-wage replacement workers would be severely limited.

    Altogether, the cost of subsidizing employment to the extent nececessary to drive unemployment to less two or three percent, should not exceed 30 ?” 40 billion pounds annually, or 5% of total government revenue, a cost that would be offset, in part or in whole, by reductions in unemployment benefits, and the indirect costs of unemployment.

  50. Anonymous

    22 Apr, 2010 - 7:33 pm

    ock’ what irony!

  51. Owen Lee Hugh-Mann

    22 Apr, 2010 - 10:44 pm

    Unemployment has not reached the level expected given the massive slump in the economy, (even allowing for the massaging of the figures). This is entirely because, when faced with the stark prospect of unemployment, 80% of the workforce accepted a pay freeze or cuts last year, and 66% again this year, despite inflation increasing due to quantitative easing etc. Effectively, the overwhelming majority have taken a big cut in wages over the last 18 months. This makes the contrasting massive bonuses paid to the bankers, whose greed and fraud caused this disaster, even more sickening. Brown’s stubborn refusal to take action against them STILL is an insult to the electorate. Cameron has made it clear that he will continue to favour those same fat cats while castigating the unemployed victims of their actions. One-off easily avoidable bonus taxes aren’t enough. The bankers should be taxed until their bloody pips squeek, and then some more. The worst effects of their actions have not even been seen yet, but the misery they have caused will continue to affect us for at least a generation. People will die as a direct result of hospital cutbacks, yet these smug bastards are still allowed to reward themselves for their continuing delinquent behaviour.

  52. George Dutton

    23 Apr, 2010 - 9:10 am

    “People will die as a direct result of hospital cutbacks, yet these smug bastards are still allowed to reward themselves for their continuing delinquent behaviour.”

    http://tinyurl.com/3yt5zjl

  53. George Dutton

    23 Apr, 2010 - 10:03 am

    “Bank of America is considering a special program for unemployed borrowers that would offer as many as nine months of no mortgage payments while they hunt for a new job.”…

    http://tinyurl.com/3xgpju3

Powered By Wordpress | Designed By Ridgey | Produced by Tim Ireland | Hosted by Expathos