Bilderberg – It’s About Screwing Black People

by craig on June 9, 2010 2:18 pm in Sleaze

Africans have yet to see much economic benefit from the policies espoused by the apostles of globalisation. Not exactly many black faces among the delegates either. Scroll through all the Guardian’s pictures here.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/gallery/2010/jun/09/bilderberg-spain

69 Comments

  1. Denis

    9 Jun, 2010 - 2:30 pm

    I see Georgie boy Osborne is to be a guest.

    Haven’t noticed any Labourites on the list.

    A sign of things not to come, perhaps.

  2. Count Von Bilder Berg

    9 Jun, 2010 - 3:08 pm

    Vot do you mean “black” people? Ve belief in screwing EVERYBODY! Vot is more, ve vouldn’t dream of doing it ourselfs. Ve leave it to our gut freunden die skull und crossbones to do it for us! Dat vas a gut jarn we spinnt to get dem to think dat dey have noble German ancestors! Noble blut, drinking bier like Budweiser? Pull die other vun!

  3. kingfelix

    9 Jun, 2010 - 3:12 pm

    There are no polar bears there, either. Therefore, it’s about screwing polar bears…

    (No poor people, either).

  4. craig

    9 Jun, 2010 - 3:24 pm

    kingfelix,

    it’s a grim joke which Harriet Harman would undoubtedly call misogynistic. Scroll through the photos and you might get it.

  5. MJ

    9 Jun, 2010 - 3:27 pm

    “Distinct lack of black delegates at Bilderberg…Not exactly many black faces among the delegates either”.

    Did you mean to say something else?

  6. Craig

    9 Jun, 2010 - 3:46 pm

    MJ

    No, just tired. Have edited thanks.

  7. Duncan

    9 Jun, 2010 - 4:10 pm

    Er, to be fair Kingfelix it is about screwing poor people; that’s the one thing they’re reasonably open about.

  8. Clark

    9 Jun, 2010 - 4:11 pm

    So, in decreasing order by representation, I make that roughly:

    Big Oil,

    Big Money,

    Political Power,

    Software and Communication,

    Fizzy Drinks.

    All my favourites. Where are Arms and Big Pharma?

  9. MJ

    9 Jun, 2010 - 4:14 pm

    Clark: good question. Monsanto et al seem to be absent too.

  10. Apostate

    9 Jun, 2010 - 4:15 pm

    Yea,The Guardian photographers are hiding in bushes looking for black faces at Bilderberger!

    Just how many gay people turn up there,do you reckon?

    How PC to just ask after not giving a shit for decades who turns up-cos it’s all conspiracy theory anyway-how many blacks turned up!

    Maybe you’re still fantasising about Diane Abott?

    Oh and while you’re on your minority hobby-horse how about finding about how many muslims turned up for Bilderberger?

    Let’s squish everybody into tiny little compartments shall we,label them and keep records on their intellectual trajectory shall we? I mean just so we can place them on some thoroughly irrelevant left/right paradigm.

    Has it ever crossed your mind that who/who doesn’t participate at Bilderberger is a barometer of the level of democratic deficit that exists?

    Since you’re pretty complacent about democratic deficit anyway who turns up at Bilderberger should be neither here nor there should it?

    Oh,forgive me I was forgetting how much intellectual posturing went on among you PC Establishment Lefties!

    Anyway the Guardian is on the case!

    Allelujah!

  11. MJ

    9 Jun, 2010 - 4:17 pm

    “Just how many gay people turn up there,do you reckon?”

    Isn’t Mandelson there this year?

  12. Clark

    9 Jun, 2010 - 4:18 pm

    Apostate,

    for all that you deride the likes of myself, you are as powerless as I. Let us agree upon some action we can take.

  13. Steelback

    9 Jun, 2010 - 4:20 pm

    Polar bears at Bilderberger?

    Just check with Bilderberger anorak, Tony Gosling. He has lists of all atendees since they started.

    Blacks,Gays,reptiles….everybody!

    Be sure to check with Craig and The Guardian that they are ACTUALLY minorities/endangered species won’t you?

    LOL!

  14. juniper

    9 Jun, 2010 - 4:29 pm

    Hey boy don’t you go forgetin’ bout all dem Beefburger attendees wot suffrin’ from death,disentry and direa,will yer?

    Hell,din yoo no Larry anna Massa Silverstein’s rite dare now?

    And I jussa wanna yer awl to no, Masa Craig dey suffrin mitey bad an’all!

    In fac day sayin’ tell Massa Craig and da W.H.O. we awl suffrin wid more crabs

    now dan we ever did wid dat swine flu stuff!

    Day sayin’ day all biga minority dan any kinna black peeple!

  15. kingfelix

    9 Jun, 2010 - 4:30 pm

    Craig, you devil!

  16. juniper

    9 Jun, 2010 - 4:33 pm

    Scuze I jussa likka add one mo’ting to ya,Massa Craig,venereal ambassder.

    Da only time dat Bilderberger is all ’bout screwing black people is wen izza held in Africa!

  17. kingfelix

    9 Jun, 2010 - 4:39 pm

    Polar bears? You mocked me, well, what about this piece of incontrovertible evidence?

    http://www.bookarmor.com/photos/polar.jpg

  18. Suspicious

    9 Jun, 2010 - 4:46 pm

    @ Steelback

    Tony has lists of every cabal going. Not exactly a lean outfit this NWO are they?

  19. Apostate

    9 Jun, 2010 - 5:18 pm

    Coming from someone called Clark-as in Kent? the idea that we’re all powerless is indeed a bitter pill to swallow.

    You’re living proof that the elite plan to demoralize us is working perfectly.

    The solutions to our problems are in fact relatively simple.

    GET THE ELITE BILDERBERGERS,CFR,RIIA,TRILATERALS et al OFF OUR BACKS!

    How?

    Get rid of central banking.

    The system of central banking has been responsible for all the economic sabotage and wars that took place in the last century and the “War on Terror” in this.

    Quite simply national governments must print the money not hand that responsibility to central bankers who will keep us in perpetual debt slavery.

    The controllers of the money supply control the whole system from the bought and sold political class and media to the geopolitical strategy that prevails.

    Such arcane and antiquated money systems allow some decidedly retrograde elite monopoly interests to prevail via subversive networking arrangements most people can’t be arsed to audit or monitor.

    Save us all the trouble-write off the worthless paper debt and return to the fixed exchange rate mechanisms Nixon ditched in 1972.

    Surely you guys will one day be able to come up with some solutions of your own?

    Keep track how many central bankers are black,gay,anti-semitic or gay in secret!

  20. MJ

    9 Jun, 2010 - 5:38 pm

    Apostate: I agree. The US could practically eliminate its massive debt overnight by simply nationalizing the Fed. Over 90% of the debt is owed to the Fed. Nationalize it and the US would owe the money to itself. Sorted!

  21. Suhayl Saadi

    9 Jun, 2010 - 5:44 pm

    This – a book called ‘Unperson’, by Irish journalist, Denis Lehane, looks like an interesting book on one man’s horrifying experience of the secret US/ UK state(s). It reminded me a little of some of the experiences related by people like Roderick Russell and others:

    http://www.quartetbooks.co.uk/bookpages/unperson.html

  22. Arsalan

    9 Jun, 2010 - 5:50 pm

    globalisation is imperialism with the nice bits removed.

    It is draining all the resources from poor countries as well as enslaving their population with the obligation of taking care of the peoples removed.

  23. Clark

    9 Jun, 2010 - 5:57 pm

    Apostate,

    I believe that my mother named me after Clark Gable; embarrassing, but not my fault. I identify myself publicly and provide a means of contact via the link on my name below.

    Yes, it seems wrong to me that money creation has been given into private hands. The problem is power. Now that private concerns have that power, they have the power to hold on to it.

    Suggestions?

  24. Larry from St. Louis

    9 Jun, 2010 - 7:11 pm

    MJ: “Over 90% of the debt is owed to the Fed. Nationalize it and the US would owe the money to itself. Sorted!”

    Spoken like a true truther.

  25. Larry from St. Louis

    9 Jun, 2010 - 7:13 pm

    “It reminded me a little of some of the experiences related by people like Roderick Russell and others:”

    Suhayl, I’m sure you’ve heard of Occam’s razor. Please use it.

  26. mr. m

    9 Jun, 2010 - 7:30 pm

    i think the “mystery delegate” in the last photo is dambisa moyo. black and african, though judging by her work i wouldn’t guess that her presence means anything particularly positive being arranged for africa.

  27. mike cobley

    9 Jun, 2010 - 7:32 pm

    @Clark

    But ultimately the power lies with democratically elected governments since the state holds the power of life and death over companies and corporations. It is the state which provides the structure and the legislation by which corporations exist. I heartily recommend you read ‘The Corporation’ by Joel Bakan – excellent summary of the nature of corporations.

  28. JimmyGiro

    9 Jun, 2010 - 7:37 pm

    Speaking of Occam’s razor, there are really only two types of people that are socially dangerous: those with nothing to lose, and those with everything.

    Those with nothing, have no vested interest in society; and those with everything, plot to keep society at bay.

  29. Mark Golding - Children of Iraq

    9 Jun, 2010 - 8:02 pm

    Originally in Craig’s previous Bilderberg post – I am re-posting this piece(corrected spelling) here because I think it is important and I know Robin would have agreed:

    The al-Qaeda Myth – An important piece of knowledge to empower you – friends.

    It was Zbigniew Brzezinski former national security advisor to President Carter and now advisor to Obama who was tasked to form and equip the Afghan mujahideen at a cost of $20 billion including training. On a visit to Afghanistan Brzezinski urged the ‘soldiers of God’ to double their efforts, he said, “your cause is right, God is on your side.”

    He created the Soviet Vietnam.

    At the time President Carter said, “We must recognize the strategic importance of Afghanistan to stability and peace. A Soviet occupied Afghanistan threatens both Iran and Pakistan and is the stepping stone to possible control over much of the worlds oil supplies!!”

    The scheme known as Operation Cyclone was an amazing success. The Red Army retreated from Afghanistan in 1989. Brzezinski said the CIA were involved in Afghanistan from 1980 after the Soviet army invaded on 24th December 1979. President Carter signed a secret order on July 3rd 1979 for secret aid to the opponents of the pro-soviet regime in Kabul. Western intelligence actively recruited Islamic extremists for the express purpose of provocateuring the Soviets into invading!!

    Brzezinski and the American government fostered Islamic extremists and helped form a fighting force. From Arab Afghans in this group another element was formed from these so called ‘foreign fighters.

    Wthin this group was a small group, about a dozen,led by a man called Osama Bin-Laden, a Saudi born heir to the Bin-Laden construction family fortune.

    It was Robin Cook after the 7/7 bombings in London in 2005 who wrote an article in the Guardian in which he claimed al-Qaeda (the base) literally referred to the database of mujahideen who were being handled by the CIA in Afghanistan.

    It was Robin Cook who divulged to me in a 15 minute meeting in Milton Keynes that he was very afraid and that I should investigate thoroughly the events of 7/7.

    Michael Springman an official at the Jeddah consulate testified that Bin Laden was a CIA asset and he was rubber stamping visas for his operatives to go to the United States for training.

  30. Clark

    9 Jun, 2010 - 8:29 pm

    Mike Cobley,

    I agree that is how it should work, but since globalisation, corporations have effectively risen above national law. They hold national legislatures to ransom; “if you introduce such-and-such restrictions, we’ll move our operation to a more compliant country. They will reap the rewards, and you will lose tax revenue and your economy will be damaged”.

    So there is a New World Order, but World Government would be a part of the solution.

    As things stand, however, it looks like our ‘elected representatives’ are so thoroughly bought by corporatism that only a corrupt world government could be constituted.

    I’ll get that book, though, thanks.

  31. ScouseBilly

    9 Jun, 2010 - 8:33 pm

    Mark Golding – Children of Iraq at June 9, 2010 8:02

    Could you expand on what you said about your 15 minute meeting with Robin Cook?

  32. Anonymous

    9 Jun, 2010 - 8:35 pm

    7/7 – “Covenant of Security”

  33. Apostate

    9 Jun, 2010 - 9:22 pm

    Being in Milton Keynes would make me afraid too!

    More seriously though it was the British who led the way in Afghanistan,with operatives like Lords Avebury and Bethell using Radio Free Kabul to enlist mujahadeen.

    The “arc of crisis” Central Asian strategy is often credited to Brzezinski but really came out of London via Bernard Lewis of the Mackinder school of international geo-politics (RIIA).

    Far too many people see Britain as the junior partner or poodle.In fact in the special relationship the shots are called from London.

    People are not generally aware of this because the London-based system of usury-sorry international finance,which was the real reason behind most of the revolutions and wars of the last century uses a supine media and a set of what Ezra Pound called “court historians” to obscure the facts.

    One writer who was aware of this was the aforementioned Pound.

    Check out web.archive.org for Michael Collins Piper assessment of Pound’s work if you can overcome the Frankfurt syndrome that screens out all reference to the fact that WW2 was primarily all about preservin http://www.coia.org.uk

    Thanks Apostate for expanding the history and Bernard Lewis.

    Scousebilly – what would you like me to expand on?

  34. Mr M

    9 Jun, 2010 - 9:40 pm

    That Blair is reported to have said he is 100% behind Israel’s decisions. Is he paid by Tel Aviv or by our taxes?

  35. Courtenay Barnett

    9 Jun, 2010 - 9:53 pm

    @Steelback,

    Speaking of “reptiles”, here is my piece on Henry Kissinger. Ugly reptile too.

    http://civillibertarian.blogspot.com/2006/03/alfred-nobel-and-real-prize-peace.html

  36. ScouseBilly

    9 Jun, 2010 - 9:54 pm

    Mark, I’m curious.

    Did he say why he was afraid?

    Did he say anything else regarding why 7/7 should be thoroughly investigated?

    I too am concerned that he was murdered.

  37. Mark Golding - Children of Iraq

    9 Jun, 2010 - 10:42 pm

    Scousebilly,

    The meeting, frantic as it was after ‘Any Questions’ when the stage was ‘invaded,’ was a defining moment and hangs heavily in my mind. I managed to get him to one side, I held his hand with both my hands which made him nervously look down. We talked about Iraq. He said he was ‘concerned’ because Gaynor had told him he *must* get out of politics – get away.

    I saw fear in his eyes – it haunts me – even today. Robin told me to ‘keep looking’ and that is what I’m doing.

    Robin Cook (PBUH)

  38. Suhayl Saadi

    9 Jun, 2010 - 10:45 pm

    ScouseBilly, and/ or Mark, what makes you think that? Just asking. I remember Mark wrote something about his eyes revealing fear.

  39. Anonymous

    9 Jun, 2010 - 10:46 pm

    Africans have yet to see much economic benefit from the policies espoused by the apostles of globalisation.

    http://www.grain.org/seedling/?id=679

  40. Larry from St. Louis

    9 Jun, 2010 - 10:54 pm

    Robin Cook (PDDDDDDDDDDDUHHHHHHHH) presented no evidence for his silly statements. Mark Golding, you likewise present no evidence for your silly statements.

  41. arsalan

    9 Jun, 2010 - 10:59 pm

    In this Zionist controlled world, lives mean very little.

    But black and Muslim lives are worthless than than other lives.

    People in the most fertile, resource rich continent are starved more than any other region.

    This happens because the Zionists can get away with it.

    Something needs to be done, for African nations to obtain real independence and for slavery to really end.

    But that something will not come from the imperialist nations. It has tome come from themselves.

    Freedom is not free, they need to do what they need to do to obtain it.

  42. MJ

    9 Jun, 2010 - 11:01 pm

    Larry: it hasn’t escaped our notice that you never present evidence for your silly statements either.

  43. Larry from St. Louis

    9 Jun, 2010 - 11:08 pm

    Btw, Suhayl Saadi, you’re obviously quite a sick person for egging on Roderick Russell. Don’t you have medical training? Don’t you have some minimal qualification for understanding when someone is delusional?

    Is that the state of doctors’ education in the UK? You don’t know how to recognize potential life-threatening mental illness? Suhayl, you seem even worse than one of the many silly goose homeopathic doctors that you have over there. At least a homeopath would probably recognize Roderick’s mental state. (But of course, the homeopath would probably prescribe heavily diluted nothing, and then charge a credulous NHS for it).

    Suhayl, you seem to be lacking in either logic or ethics ?” most likely both, actually.

  44. Suhayl Saadi

    9 Jun, 2010 - 11:09 pm

    Interesting, how these types of interjections occur whenever questions are raised wrt matters potentially concerning the hard state. It’s almost as though it were on asp auto-pilot: SISISISISISISISISISISISISISIS

    What occurs to me is that don’t you think, Mark and/ or Scousebilly, that Margaret Cook would’ve shouted about it if she’d had the slightest suspicion of foul play, esp. if she’d though the second wife were involved in some way? She doesn’t seem the sort of person who would keep quiet about something like that.

    I agree though that it did seem awfully convenient that both Kelly and Cook died in the woods/ on a mountainside. Nonetheless, while I guess Clare Short ‘knew’ less than they (possibly), one has to ask why the same thing didn’t happen to her or to Lawrence Wilkerson, the US Chief of Staff to the mendacious and pathetic Colin Powell, who still speaks loudly of deliberate policies and actions in relation to ‘War on Terror’. And the ex-FBI woman, Sybil Edmonds, and all the other whistleblowers, all of whom must have known a hell of lot more about lots of other things and yet who didn’t end up dead in the woods.

  45. Larry from St. Louis

    9 Jun, 2010 - 11:10 pm

    MJ, congratulations on stealing bullshit rhetoric from end-the-Fed idiot right-wing Americans.

    And what did I not provide evidence for?

  46. Suhayl Saadi

    9 Jun, 2010 - 11:13 pm

    Well, Mr Lawrence of America, you know the saying: ‘become a doctor and keep a lawyer’. Is that what you do in St Louis, Lawrence? Do you chase ambulances? I won’t go away, Lawrence. Like an elemental or a vampire, I’m here to stay. The more you say, the more I gain life. Words. They are like blood to me.

  47. Mark Golding - Children of Iraq

    9 Jun, 2010 - 11:34 pm

    Larry (not from St Louis)

    Some comments you ignore, most you ridicule, some you will fight – then I win. Best stick with the official conspiracy theory Larry – it keeps the wolves away!

  48. Anonymous

    9 Jun, 2010 - 11:36 pm

    Somebody does’nt want you to talk about Robin Cook. Distraction is the order of the day. It happens so often on this forum.

  49. Anonymous

    9 Jun, 2010 - 11:38 pm

    He knows who to bait.

  50. Abe Rene

    9 Jun, 2010 - 11:45 pm

    According to a wiki article (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bilderberg_Group) the original purpose of Bilderberg was to deal with anti-Americanism and promote atlanticism. A similar process, I would suggest, led to the EEC and EU. Denis Healey is quoted: “To say we were striving for a one-world government is exaggerated, but not wholly unfair. Those of us in Bilderberg felt we couldn’t go on forever fighting one another for nothing .. we felt that a single community throughout the world would be a good thing.” That doesn’t sound like something intended to perpetuate colonialism, even though it is true that whites as a group remain the wealthiest and most powerful race on the planet.

  51. Suhayl Saadi

    9 Jun, 2010 - 11:52 pm

    So, ScouseBilly/ Mark, tell us more about your thoughts on the death of Robin Cook. It’s a really interesting and important subject. Thanks.

  52. Mark Golding - Children of Iraq

    10 Jun, 2010 - 12:08 am

    Margaret Cook is a diamond – enthusiastically marching in the anti-war demonstrations in Glasgow on March 15, 2003 – one of several of the largest, multiple mass protests ever seen in Britain and against the Iraq war.

    “It is not difficult to perceive, as we all did then, that there were hidden agendas at play behind the scenes.”

    “And no one could say I was not warned about the single-mindedness of the man I was involved with, for I had evidence from the start that here was someone for whom career was everything.”

    Margaret Cook 6th Feb. 2010

  53. Larry from St. Louis

    10 Jun, 2010 - 12:34 am

    Yes, Suhayl, Lawrence Wilkerson says some fairly damning things. He was certainly an insider. Yet he doesn’t go near any of the things that you and the other commenters believe at this blog. Why is that?

  54. Larry from St. Louis

    10 Jun, 2010 - 12:42 am

    And Suhayl, I can just imagine you working at an intake for mental health patients. Poor souls, wide-eyed, crazy girations, frothing at the mouth – and you believing every single word.

    For egging on Roderick Russell, if someone horribly happens to him or someone around him, you’ll own part of it. And you won’t care.

  55. ScouseBilly

    10 Jun, 2010 - 12:53 am

    Mark Golding – Children of Iraq at June 9, 2010 10:42 PM

    Thank you. Yes I can imagine that will always haunt you.

    For my part I met him once. I was “between jobs” mini-cabbing (yes, I know….). Anyway, I had to rush up to pick him up in Hampstead in the morning rush hour and had only 20 minutes to get him to Broadcasting House. Well, somehow we made it. I got a call on the radio to say that Mr Cook would like me to wait outside for him and take him to Heathrow after the radio show but could I please “take it easy” as he had plenty of time.

    This was around 1993. I found him to be the most courteous and least pretentious of the few celebs I drove.

    Now Angus Deaton is another matter altogether….

  56. ScouseBilly

    10 Jun, 2010 - 12:56 am

    Suhayl, I have no information that will help you, sorry. I have my suspicions that’s all.

  57. Roderick Russell

    10 Jun, 2010 - 12:57 am

    MORE SMEARS FROM MI6′s LARRY THE LIAR TEAM

    Responding to Larry from St. Louis at June 9, 2010 11:08 PM where he says ?” “you’re obviously quite a sick person for egging on Roderick Russell …. At least a homeopath would probably recognize Roderick’s mental state” As regular bloggers know I can barely comment without being smeared by The Larry Team. The Larry Team is a rather sinister team of professional smear artists probably subcontracted to MI6.

    What may have upset MI6 this time is a comment I posted yesterday on this blog. Here it is:

    #####

    “Take the case of the British traitor, MI6 agent Kim Philby. MI6′s key US-based liaison with the CIA and FBI, Philby new most of their secrets and passed them on to his KGB masters. Some have even estimated that as many as a 1,000 people in Eastern Europe were killed as a result of Philby’s treachery. After Philby came under suspicion, MI6 tried to cover it up and, since he needed the income, MI6 even helped him find a paid occupation as a correspondent of the Economist and the Observer. So how did Philby and MI6 get away with this cover up when so many people knew about it? The answer is that people were scared of Britain’s draconian libel laws, particularly where MI6 were known to be trying to keep their agent’s treachery quiet !!! ”

    #####

    I should mention that the Larry Smear Team has no knowledge of me whatsoever. They don’t know me from Adam, so they have no basis for making any of the defamatory smears they have made, except that they are paid to make their filthy accusations. I have been asking for some months now for Larry’s contact details, and I note that the Larry Team are too cowardly to supply them.

    Larry’s comments are not just one crank spouting off. They are part of a very nasty professionally run campaign against my family, using tactics developed by the former East German Secret Police “The STASI”. To read my story, just click on my signature

  58. Clark

    10 Jun, 2010 - 1:07 am

    Larry:

    “…if someone horribly happens to him…”

    Sorry, who is foaming at the mouth?

  59. Mark Golding - Children of Iraq

    10 Jun, 2010 - 1:09 am

    Suhayl,

    Robin had detailed knowledge of Ahmed Chalabi’s connections – a good starting point.

    Robin Cook comments on Deulfer’s report:

    “It establishes that Iraq had no stockpile, no biological agents, no chemical feedstocks, no plants to manufacture them and no delivery systems to fire them. Saddam was no threat to us and had no weapons of mass destruction to pass to terrorists. Brushing the UN inspectors aside in order to go to war on false intelligence was a colossal blunder.”

  60. Ruth

    10 Jun, 2010 - 1:28 am

    Also, I’ve read that both Robin Cook and Dr Helly were writing books.

  61. avatar singh

    10 Jun, 2010 - 1:34 am

    Juniper said “In fac day sayin’ tell Massa Craig and da W.H.O. we awl suffrin wid more crabs

    now dan we ever did wid dat swine flu stuff!

    Day sayin’ day all biga minority dan any kinna black peeple!” and there were a similar commnets in similar vein-trying to portray particular accent by literal phonetic pronucciation.

    my humble question is simply this-why do the english people do that when their own langauge -that is english -is not phnetically spelt and what if others start imitating thier accent in phonetic way as a fun making of their lack of real spelling or phonetic ability? and they do to make fun of their own deprived class aswell making fun of their pronucnciation.

    Pronunciations of OUGH

    Anyone foreigner who learns English has accomplished a major achievement.

    Ough is pronounced off in trough, cough

    Ough is pronounced ow in bough.

    ” ” ” uff in rough, tough,

    ” ” ” oo in through

    ” ” ” oh in dough

    ” ” ” aw in Thought, fought, ought

  62. avatar singh

    10 Jun, 2010 - 1:41 am

    Craig what good the black face will do? what matters is the type of people -not the colour or nationality. take for example such punjabis like uneelcted prime minster of india manmoan singh and his crony punjabis like unelelcted ahulawalia(who not holding ficnace misntry is still running that minsitry for all purpose) and his other greedy punjabis bastards for whom money gotten by any means is the gOd.

    what good are they for the people of india -they attand Davos meeting to sell india to anglosaxon masters of theirs who run thse punjabi traitors.

    How India is being treacherously enslaved by angloamerican agents likes of (unelectable and defeated in democratic election ) this Pm

    manmohan singh and the english media inside india.

    a great misconception is that so caled liberalization and globalization was brought to india by this manmohan singh. In fact soon after

    victory in iraq war in febraury 1991 the bush no. first declared a new world order in which he explicitly said that he will open up the

    world for american business. In fact his trade seccratary immeditealy annomnuced that she will make sure that america open up the thighs

    of thrid world countries (Like as with a vice ) as a slwoly and surely to american business(true analogy to a rape)-that was given the name

    Liberalization and globalization for which the british and americans had been working since 1986. What was left for america to do was

    install maleable stooges inside the thrirld world countries. escpeally those types who are unelctable and have no mass base of their own–

    in other words who are not elelctable democratically but installed from above through media and other manipulations.

    this manmohan singh in india fulffiled that criteria of being unliked and unelctable insignificant person who was willing to act on arder

    of his american masters -if they had asked him to turn communist he would have done that.It is this traitor manmohan singh who informed

    america of impending Indian nuclear test in 1993 and also who openly said that iran pakistan inida pipe line would be difficlt to finance

    -just because his americans masters did not want that!

    It isa sad refletion on india that since 1986 we

    have has only weaklings as our prime minsiters and fincnace minsiters not to speak of non mentionable defence misnters who made sure that

    Indians nuclear and missle programme got stuck at 1986.

    Modus operandi of british and american scumbags –Groom an opposition candidate to run against the guy you hate, pay him well and line up your media to back him.

    During the campaign, sell him as the savior of the bourgeois opposition who lost their money in the revolution. Use your own pollsters and media propaganda to convince his followers that they are going to win by a wide margin.

    When your guy loses, scream “FRAUD!” It’s akin to yelling “FIRE!” in a crowded theatre, inflaming all those disappointed bourgeois counter-revolutionaries. Get them out on the street, setting fires, playing the victim, waving flags, ready-to-go placards, banners, women crying in front of CNN and BBC cameras and men yelling angrily ”

    Rubin, Summers and Geithner are credited with managing the global economy through the turbulent nineties, including the

    Mexican, East Asian, Russian and Latin American financial crises. This narrative glosses over the role they played in forcing countries, particularly in Asia, to liberalize financial flows.

    A New York Times account from February 1999 noted: “It was American officials who pushed for the financial liberalization that nurtured the speculation (even if developing nations themselves welcomed it). And it was American bankers and money managers who poured billions of dollars into those emerging markets. Then, when the crisis hit, American officials insisted on tough measures like budget cuts and high interest rates, which many economists argue made things worse.”

    Summers and Rubin were the point men for liberalization, which led to the rise of oligarchic billionaires and financial panics that saw huge outflows of funds, currency devaluations, mass impoverishment and Western capital sweeping in to cherry-pick industries at fire-sale prices.

  63. kingfelix

    10 Jun, 2010 - 3:13 am

    “Modus operandi of british and american scumbags –Groom an opposition candidate to run against the guy you hate, pay him well and line up your media to back him.

    During the campaign, sell him as the savior of the bourgeois opposition who lost their money in the revolution. Use your own pollsters and media propaganda to convince his followers that they are going to win by a wide margin.

    When your guy loses, scream “FRAUD!” It’s akin to yelling “FIRE!” in a crowded theatre, inflaming all those disappointed bourgeois counter-revolutionaries. Get them out on the street, setting fires, playing the victim, waving flags, ready-to-go placards, banners, women crying in front of CNN and BBC cameras and men yelling angrily ”

    Bears repeating. A sweet description of how it goes down time and again.

  64. Suhayl Saadi

    10 Jun, 2010 - 7:20 am

    “For egging on Roderick Russell, if someone horribly happens to him or someone around him, you’ll own part of it. And you won’t care.”

    Lawrence of America, ‘Tales of The Seven Dwarves’, 2010

    Is that a threat…? If it is not, then surely that is “egging-on” of the most immoral sort. If it is…

    Thanks, Mark Golding, that was a very moving quotation, yes, I’ve heard from others, including relatives of her patients, that Margaret Cook is a wonderful person. Thanks. ScouseBilly, you could write a book based on your ‘mini-cab’ encounters. They sound intriguing and I’m sure some will be hilarious – that vignette about Robin Cook is illuminating. Thank you also.

    Yes, as you know, I too have suspicions about these things. I just try to remain sceptical and logical – as do you – and to resist the temptation to attribute everything to the hand of the security state, though there is enough already to damn them, as it were. So, as far as murder goes, Kelly I have grave concerns about. Cook I’m not so sure of. But I don’t know any more than the next person, of course.

    Craig, would you tell us, please, does the SIS outsource executive action nowadays? Or, shall we say, ‘is it a valid position to argue that the SIS outsources executive action?’

    They certainly engage in character assassination. But do they engage in physical assassination as well?

  65. Suhayl Saadi

    10 Jun, 2010 - 12:22 pm

    Here’s an interesting article on the ongoing militarisation of US society:

    http://www.zcommunications.org/occupied-washington-dc-by-stephanie-westbrook

    I fear that in some important ways, the militarisation of important elements of our society – economy, culture, academia – is perhaps less obvious yet because of that is almost as profound. I think the constant in-flow of US TV dramas celebrating in a very heavily glamourised way the work of law enforcement agencies of various kinds, is concerning.

    Many of them are very well-made, excellent scripts, etc., and I enjoy watching them. But I am conscious of a low-level, infiltrative propaganda which they seem to impart, which says that US security organs, together, form a force for unadulterated benificence in the world and in US society itself.

  66. Roderick Russell

    10 Jun, 2010 - 5:14 pm

    Suhayl Saadi – Re Larry the Liars Threat that you refer to – “For egging on Roderick Russell, if someone horribly happens to him or someone around him, you’ll own part of it. And you won’t care.”

    Of course the Larry Team intends it as a threat, and a very sinister threat too.

    On this blog you are all now seeing the sort of things that my family and I have had to put up with for years. Larry the liar has an agenda and he is certainly a professional co-conspirator with the people that have been threatening me for years.

  67. Suhayl Saadi

    11 Jun, 2010 - 9:42 am

    Yes, in view of what Craig now reports on another – today’s – thread, this type of dynamic ought to be taken very seriously.

  68. Suhayl Saadi

    11 Jun, 2010 - 10:22 pm

    Or, to put it another way, this is not Woodstock. What it is, is a stack of rotting wood out of which the woodlice creep and crawl evincing their squeaks and scratches. Let it all be revealed. Let it all be exposed.

  69. Steelback

    13 Jun, 2010 - 8:47 am

    Apostate

    Gay Bilderbergers?

    Yes siree!

    http://aangirfan.blogspot.com./2010/06/gay-bilderberger-.html

Powered By Wordpress | Designed By Ridgey | Produced by Tim Ireland | Hosted by Expathos