Softly softly catch the monkey!
ET did you see how Glenn-UK wants an uniformed public to ensure everyone has the jab, rather than provide any information about the pros and cons (called scare story’s) of doing so.
You mention the lack of informed consent, but worse, the consent form is to indemnify those giving the jab, the forms waive the patients rights, now why do this, wouldn’t that be alarming in itself, and how many know what their doing, and it applies to the planned ‘vaccination’ of entire populations. That’s why news about side-effects is being suppressed, but you get virus terrorism 24/7, which shows the whole thing is unethical and sinister.
Informed consent is I believe a legal starting point, for all legal transactions, the fact its downplayed, could constitute criminal negligence, but some want to scare people, not to exercise their rights, but would a court be prepare to hear the case?