Anna Ardin’s Police Statement

by craig on September 4, 2012 2:00 pm in Uncategorized

If Assange is ever extradited to Sweden, the danger is that the evidence against him will be held entirely in secret. ALthough published in Sweden, the evidence so far has not been published in the UK except for some extremely selective quotes designed to damage Assange as much as possible.

This is (in translation) the full Swedish police statement arising from Ardin’s interrogation and approved by Anna Ardin. I gave it here without comment. Some further analysis of Ardin will follow in a later post, along with Sofia Wilen’s full statement.

I will however note here the fact that, following this statement, Ardin did produce a condom split across the top to police as evidence. However forensic examination showed not only that there was none of Assange’s DNA on the condom, but that it had never been worn by anybody.

It is impossible to put on a condom and leave no microscopic traces of the fact.

That does not of itself make Ardin’s story untrue. This is her statement:

The chief interrogator rings claimant Anna Ardin (hereafter ‘Anna’) for the purpose of conducting an interrogation because of the event described above (‘rape or sexual molestation at Tjurbergsgatan 36 up to 2010-08-14 12:00′).

Anna says she’s worked as a press secretary and political secretary for Sweden’s christian social democrats – the brotherhood movement. Anna says she was involved in organising a seminar that was to take place on 14 August where Julian Assange had been invited in as a lecturer.

Because Anna would be out of town 11 – 14 August she lent her flat to Assange. But Anna returned to Stockholm already Friday 13 August because she had a lot of work to do for the seminar. Anna and Assange have never before met personally but only had contact via mail and the telephone.

The Friday in question Assange and Anna went out and ate dinner together. They’d agreed that Assange would go on living in Anna’s flat despite her coming home a day early. After their dinner on the town they went back to Anna’s flat and drank tea.

In answer to a question Anna says that neither she nor Assange drank alcohol that evening. When they sat and drank tea Assange began caressing her leg. In answer to a question Anna says Assange earlier in the evening had not made any physical approaches save now which Anna initially welcomed. But it felt ‘uncomfortable from the get-go’ as Assange was rough and impatient. According to Anna, ‘everything happened so fast’. He ripped off her clothes and in conjunction with this pulled at and broke her necklace. Anna tried to put some clothes back on again because things were going too fast and it felt uncomfortable but Assange immediately took her clothes off again. Anna says that she thought she actually didn’t want to go any further but it was too late to say ‘stop’ to Assange when she’d ‘gone along with it this far’. She thought she ‘could blame herself’. So she let Assange fully undress her.

Then they lay in the bed. Anna was on her back and Assange was on top of her. Anna thought Assange wanted to immediately put his penis in her vagina which she didn’t want as he didn’t have a condom on. So she tried to twist her hips to the side and squeeze her legs together to prevent a penetration. Anna tried several times to reach for a condom which Assange stopped her from doing by holding her arms and prying open her legs and trying nevertheless to penetrate her with his penis without a condom. Anna says that in the end she was ready to cry because she was pinned and couldn’t reach a condom and thought ‘this might not end well’. In answer to a question Anna says Assange must have known she was trying to reach for a condom and he was holding her arms to stop her.

Assange asked after a while what Anna was doing and why she was squeezing her legs together. Anna then told him she wanted him to put on a condom before he entered her. Assange released her arms and put on the condom Anna got for him. Anna felt a huge unexpressed reluctance from Assange to using a condom which led to her getting the feeling he didn’t put on the condom she’d given him. She therefore reached down with her hand to Assange’s penis to check if he’d really put the condom on. She could feel that the edge of the condom was where it should be at the root of Assange’s penis. Anna and Assange resumed having sex and Anna says she thought ‘hope it’s over soon’.

Anna notices after a while that Assange withdraws from her to fix the condom. Judging from the sound, it sounded to Anna like Assange took the condom off. He entered her again and continued the act. Anna again checked his penis with her hand and again felt the edge of the condom where it should be and so let the sex continue.

After a while Assange ejaculates inside her and thereafter withdraws. Anna saw that the condom didn’t have semen in it when Assange took it off. When Anna began moving her body she noticed how things were running out of her vagina. Anna understood rather quickly that it must be Assange’s semen. She pointed this out for Assange but he denied this and told her it was she who was wet with her own juices. Anna is convinced that Assange, when he withdrew from her the first time, deliberately broken the condom at the tip and thereafter continued the sex with the resulting ejaculation. In answer to a question Anna says she didn’t look closer at the condom, if it was broken as she thought, but she says she thinks she still has the condom at home and will look at it. She says that even the bed sheets used on that occasion are most likely still in her hamper.

After the above mentioned incident Anna says she and Assange didn’t have any more sex. Yet Assange went on living with her up to and including Friday 20 August. According to Anna Assange made sexual overtures every day after that evening when they’d had sex. For example by touching her breasts. Anna rebuffed Assange on all these occasions and Assange accepted it. On one occasion, Wednesday 18 August, he’d suddenly removed all his clothing on his lower body and thereafter rubbed his lower body and his erect penis against Anna. Anna says she thought this was strange behaviour and uncomfortable and had therefore moved down to a mattress on the floor and slept there instead of up in the bed with Assange. The next night Anna stayed with a friend because she didn’t want to be around Assange because of his strange behaviour. She even pointed out after Wednesday 18 August that she didn’t want Assange staying any longer in her flat which he didn’t respond to until Friday when he took his things and returned her flat key.

In answer to a question Anna says Assange lived with her but they hardly slept together because Assange was up at night working with his computer. She mostly got up in the morning about 07:00 when he went to sleep.

In answer to a question Anna says she knew of Sofia when she’d been in contact with Anna before the above mentioned seminar and been part of the audience. According to Anna Sofia had purchased electrical cables for Assange and been with Anna and Assange at the lunch after the seminar. Anna noticed Assange flirted with Sofia during the lunch and understood that they’d afterwards begun some sort of relationship when Assange rang Sofia later in the evening when he was at Anna’s at the crayfish party.

She received an email message from Sofia Friday 20 August where she wonders if she can reach Assange as she had something important to tell him. Anna understood immediately what it was about and contacted Sofia who then told her what had happened to her, that she and Assange had had sex and that he didn’t want to use a condom etc. Sofia wanted to follow this up with the police and Anna decided to follow along, foremost as support.

Anna says she already heard from several sources that Assange ‘chases all women who cross his path’. Considering Assange’s reputation Anna felt it very important that they used a condom the time they had sex, that is the day before the seminar.

Anna says she’s felt terrible after the occasion when she and Assange had sex. Foremost because of the worry she’d been infected by HIV or some other STD. Anna says she freely consented to have sex with Assange but she couldn’t have let it happen if she’d known he didn’t have a condom. Anna has been in contact with the health centre and been given a time for tests next week. Anna approves of the police having the results of these tests.

Anna does not want any help from the crime victims unit but will get back to us if she feels it’s necessary.

Interrogation read back and approved.

Tweet this post

153 Comments

  1. freindly phil

    4 Sep, 2012 - 2:21 pm

    …and they tell us Swedish girls are easy…

  2. So, as I read it, she thinks a condom broke but when she presented it to forensics the condom had never been worn at all. At no point was the sex lacking consent but she “thought” JA didn’t want to wear a condom – although he did.

    Most tenuous indeed.

  3. I applaud Craig Murray for putting this up on the net. It is available elsewhere but the more places the better. There is not much need for comments as it speaks for itself.

    David Allen Green is still pushing his agenda with ever increasing petulance. I’m trying to encourage people who might take what he is saying as the be all and end all to fully acquaint themselves with all aspects of the case and make up their own mind.

  4. Lot of background here – needs sifting.
    Re. the Virginia Grand Jury which may issue/have issued a sealed indictment for Assange.
    http://www.alexaobrien.com/secondsight/wikileaks/grand_jury/witness_profile/

  5. “In 1948, so the legend goes, Lyndon Baines Johnson, facing a formidable well financed primary opponent in his Senate race, turned to his campaign manager and suggested they spread the rumor that his pig farmer opponent had engaged in acts of barnyard intimacy that provided him “routine carnal knowledge” of his sow

    Taken aback, Johnson’s campaign manager protested, “But Lyndon, we can’t say that! It’s not true!” To which Johnson replied, “Of course not, but let’s make the bastard deny it.”

    LBJ was nothing if not the consummate politician, and that includes his hardball tactics. The fact is, dirty tricks have always been part of the political landscape in this country–and more than most of us realize, thanks to the furtive ways candidates and their surrogates go about sticking it to others.”

  6. Full lab report on broken condom:
    http://www.samtycke.nu/doc/ass/police_condom.pdf

    I don’t speak any Swedish, but am I right in thinking it was cut by a knife??

  7. Well fitted up Julian !!

  8. I wonder what the punishment in Sweden is for falsely claiming rape,tampering with evidence,conspiracy to pervert the course of justice,providing false witness and wasting police time?

  9. @Jives, you get a job with the CIA in Ghaza, a tranquil place placed within gun range or reach of Israeli predator drones, non stop surveillance, nobody else could probably look after a loose canon better than the IDF.

  10. Yes, I had read this. But it is not widely known. Not yet. Also Sophia Wilen’s statement is available, and is somewhat more interesting in that Irmeli Krans, the gay rights’ police interrogator who took the statement because she knew Anna Ardin and could not therefore take Ardin’s, altered the original statement which as you have rightly mentioned was not signed.

    I covered this here, with the link to Sophia Wilen’s statement, though I was not the first to post it on this blog.

    http://johngossip.blogspot.co.uk/2012/08/the-rape-of-julian-assange.html

  11. If Ardin’s account is true, Assange is clearly no angel – in fact he’s an ass. But not a criminal. The main complaint seems to be that he made her feel uncomfortable in a sexual situation. That’s poor sexual etiquette, indeed. He slightly wounded her feelings for a while, the cad.

    However, if this can sustain a legal prosecution, I’d like to put several former partners in the dock for similar crimes: for instance, of initiating congress with false reassurances of oral contraception, or of locking me in a leghold when I tried to withdraw before emission. Other misdemeanours could be brought into consideration: e.g. coercing performance under threat of an almighty strop, and seeking oral attention in a state of dubious menstrual hygiene. Ugh! OK, I wasn’t emotionally devastated but I was a bit annoyed and made my reluctance clear. But they pressed ahead regardless. Consequently, those evil harlots should be extradited to Sweden (one indeed was a Swedish citizen) to face criminal charges in a closed court.

    People can argue that the woman bears extra pressure in these situations due to her potential to become pregnant. But there is a straightforward remedy: (morning-after pill + pregnancy test) = peace of mind. By contrast, a man who has been duped doesn’t have the power to enforce such a course of action, and could go on fretting for months about being an unwilling father.

    Assange(l) has committed an arguable ethical transgression, but if we were to construe it as an actionable crime, most of the population could be sent to the dock. The fact that Sweden is prepared to fund a huge police operation and provoke a serious international diplomatic crisis for such a mundane episode of wounded feelings only goes to prove there is a hidden hand at play.

  12. AAMVM, well said. I endorse it 100%. The more coverage the better.

  13. Craig,

    I cannot get the link ‘Swedish police statement’ : http://http//rixstep.com/1/20110204,02.shtml to work. It appears broken?

  14. The link to the Swedish police statement is broken because of a slight typo, omitting the : after the http. This is the correct version:
    http://rixstep.com/1/20110204,02.shtml

  15. Quick checklist of commonly unknown facts (counter to the vapid NS list) here:

    http://notesonwikileaks.tumblr.com/post/15251907983/assange-extradition-fact-sheet

    Pity about the near-illegible font…note to notesonwikileaks, html needs to be legible to the reader as well as giving the writer a buzz.

  16. Outbreak of “Assange not only strangles panda cubs but leaves bail guarantors destitute” coming to a ‘journalist’s’ terminal near you….
    Based on this less partisan account:
    http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2012/09/04/julian-assange-in-ecuador-bail-battle-embassy_n_1853778.html

  17. Komodo, thanks for posting the possible Virginia Grand Jury indictment. I’ve been trying to locate that for weeks.

  18. Thanks Richard – I missed that.

  19. Komodo, thanks for that link. From there I found an interesting infographic, entitled 8 Things We Would Not Know Without Wikileaks.

  20. Jon, Komodo, interesting leaks indeed, especially the last one regarding the UN and the US illegal information-gathering (with naturally Hilary Clinton and Barack Obama spearheading).

  21. Here is a link to the the Sofia Wilen statement – one is relying, of course, on the accuracy of the translator(s). I know nothing about this website, just came across it:

    http://rixstep.com/1/20110131,00.shtml

  22. Another interesting site – alleging police shenanigans, also quotes from Craig Murray’s site:

    http://darkernet.wordpress.com/tag/assange/

  23. If Anna Ardin’s police statement is an accurate recollection of their encounter it would appear that Julian Assange got none of the benefits of condom use (their prophylatic effects) and all of the disadvantages (their de-sensitizing effects).

    Very strange.

  24. Don’t know about you OldMark but I’ve reached that age where I couldn’t even contemplate a condom.

  25. Too much information there John ;)

  26. In the chapter entitled Outcomes (written in 2007) in The New Old World, Perry Anderson describes Carl Bildt, Sweden’s Foreign Minister as:

    “..a founder member of the Committee for the Liberation of Iraq, along with Richard Perle, William Kristol, Newt Gingrich and others.”

    Not that that has anything to do with it, of course. Anyone has a perfect right to be a warmonger and and be responsible for the deaths of thousands. But tearing a condom is a hanging matter. Sweden hath need of thee, Burns.

  27. Hi Komodo, I speak Swedish.

    They have test cut the condom with a knife and scissors ripping the back of it off.

    The original damage in the front part most resembles that of the ripped off damage.

    Med Grad +2 It is just the probability scale (100  V < 6 000)

    I have translated quite a chunk. Will post what I have as long as no one marks it.

  28. Nextus (at 3:41pm), I take all your points. However, I guess the other point might be that a woman might feel an implicit sense of threat more than a man might in that kind of situation, assuming that in a specific case, the man had greater physical strength. The alleged unprotected ‘sleep event’ is troubling. Nonetheless, right now, these are simply allegations and no doubt the other party (Assange) will deny some of them. I guess the point is, as Craig and many others rightly have suggested, he needs to face these allegations in a court of law but requires an assurance that, regardless of the outcome, he won’t be spirited off to the USA.

    One of the problems with this whole, ploraised, subtextual discourse, it seems to me, is illustrated by the fact that simply by suggesting what I’ve suggested above, I have been attacked by some on a social media network as, “a rape apologist”. Well, it makes a change from being called, “a femi-nazi”, I suppose! Clearly, some people seem already to have decided Assange’s guilt without the need of recourse to a court of law.

  29. You are reading a story published by a government intelligence agency. You should stop reading and start writing what you think they are trying to achieve.

    Tony

  30. Tony,

    “You are reading a story published by a government intelligence agency. You should stop reading and start writing what you think they are trying to achieve.”

    It’s best to read before you write a reply Tony, that way to better understand and direct what you’re writing about, I’d suggest.

  31. I am 100% convinced that many of the stories published as news occasionally bear some resemblance to the truth, and that some are complete fabrications. This matters because over 90% of us tell the truth over 90% of the time, and we expect better standards from our media and those in authority over us,than what we achieve.

    When we realise that they are lying most of the time, we know that we us ordinary people are better than them, and that we will have to change their minds. They are our paid servants and they are spitting propaganda in our food which they present with a smile.

    They are not nice people. They are liars.

    Tony

  32. Jives,

    Most people who think I am stupid, have failed to understand what I am trying to communicate. I accept that sometimes this is a failure on my part. Sorry. But compared to some people I have worked with, I am stupid, so I asked them to explain again in more detail, and they were very patient with me and taught me until I UNDERSTOOD.

    Tony

  33. Here’s a “google translate” version of the first part of the report (English translation first, Swedish text follows).

    – English ———————————-

    The condom AB/7525-10/G001 had a through injury front. Injury edges were examined under a microscope. These were not observed any traces appeared to be deposited with the tool. However, slight scratches were observed in the area near the damage, in the direction perpendicular to the longitudinal direction of the damage.

    In the rear part of the condom provides grain sample damage with a knife with a scissors, and that the rear portion of the condom is torn off. Area of ​​lesions resembled nearest the severed damage, whereas with the tool resulting surface showed some very thin report. The appearance of the front, damaged part of the condom shown in Figure 1.

    The results speak for the damage in the front part of the condom AB/7525-10/G001 have been created by the condom has torn (Grade +2).

    Condoms ‘Condom’ was the front of a condom, see figure 2. The district’s edge were examined under a microscope. The edges were not observed any traces appeared to be deposited with the tool. Small scratches observed in some areas close to the separation edge, with a direction perpendicular to the dividing edge. The appearance of the split edge reminiscent of sharing edge of those worn by the laboratory.

    The results speak for the pitch surface of the condom part ‘Condom’ has arisen through the part has been torn (Grade +2).

    – Swedish ———————————-

    Kondomen AB/7525-10/G001 hade en genomgående skada främre delen. Skadans kanter granskades i mikroskop. I dessa iakttogs inte några spår som syntes vara avsatta med verktyg. Däremot iakttogs små repor i området nära skadan, i riktning vinkelrät mot skadans längdriktning.

    I den bakre delen av kondomen åstadkorns provskador med en kniv och med en sax samt att den bakre delen av kondomen slets av. Skadeytan liknade nårmast den avslitna skadan, medan de med verktyg erhållna ytorna uppvisade en del mycket tunna report. Utseendet på den främre, skadade delen av kondomen framgår av bild 1.

    Resultaten talar for att skadan i den främre delen av kondomen AB/7525-10/G001 har uppkommit genom att kondomen har slitits sönder (Grad +2).

    Kondomen ‘Kondom’ utgjorde främre delen av en kondom, se bild 2. Delens kant granskades i mikroskop. I kanterna iakttogs intenågra spår som syntes vara avsatta med verktyg. Små repor iakttogs i vissa områden nära delningskanten, med en riktning vinkelrätt mot delningskanten. Utseendet på delningskanten påminde om delningskanten hos de som slitits av vid laboratoriet.

    Resultaten talar for att delningsytan hos kondomdelen ‘Kondom’ har uppkommit genom att delen har slitits sönder (Grad +2).

  34. In the 1930s in the south of the United States of America there was a “stitch up” case of two white women alleging that some black boys had raped them on a train. The boys were tried in a day and sentenced to death (one – being 12 and not of age for the death penalty). One of the women withdrew her allegation. The case reached the US Supreme Court as Powell v. State of Alabama. The details of the case, known otherwise as the ‘Scottsboro boys case’ can be found at this link:-
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scottsboro_Boys
    Now, it is one thing to say that the foregoing case was back in the racist bad old days in the US south, and quite another in 2012 to seek advance of a case where the condom produced as evidence does not have any DNA of the person accused of sexual misconduct in relation to said condom. Likewise, one is going to permit someone who allegedly sexually misconducted himself with you to continue staying in your apartment after that misconduct? And you are going to have a crayfish party for the same man and be happily smiling there with the accused man present?
    I recall Derek Bentley’s case, from the 1950s, heard by the perverted Lord Goddard – a gross miscarriage of justice in the British justice system, if one ever exsited.
    What strikes me is that in 2012 we are going through a farce and travesty of justice when one considers the nature of the allegations, the evidence and the legal hip-hops between Sweden and Britain. Surely, an interview by the Swedish police of Assange at the Ecuadorian Embassy, which he is prepared to give, would be a logical step. But, maybe the Swedish justice system at the highest levels is minded that if they did, and Assange’s version in his police interview fully exposes the inconsistencies and weak and unsustainable nature of the evidence, then the case would be thrown out so as not to make the Swedish justice system appear not just partially but totally ridiculous. In the interview with Petra Ornstein, it is reported in the interview that Ardin saw the condom rolled back to the base of Assange’s penis. Now the evidence produced, as that condom, has a slit to the top of the condom, no DNA, and surely does not look like a condom busted in the act of sexual intercourse. Petra did not get the impression that Anna was afraid of Julian ( see Petra’s statement) – and this is the person who sexually molested you her and is worthy of being convicted for his “criminal wrongdoing”?

    Sophia Wilen’s interview can be found here:-

    http://www.nnn.se/nordic/assange/docs/protocol.pdf

    (Did she sign and approve the interview? Compare and contrast her interview with the other interviews – see bottom of the page of the interview.)

    What is the substance of her complaint; where is the criminal wrongdoing?

    The Scottsboro boys case did involve a racist judicial system in one country, the US. There is no element of “race” in the Assange matter, but these members of the “international community” are doing a pretty good job, in a manner similar to the Scottsboro boys case, of compromising and debasing the process of justice, where the weak, unreliable and strained nature of the “evidence” would not permit a charge to be laid in any fair and decent justice system.
    One of the points in extradition matters is the duality of the offence, being recognised as a criminal offence in both jurisdictions – the country seeking the extradition and the one requesting extradition.
    While the Scottsboro boys case was a national tragedy, the Julian Assange matter is an international conspiratorial scandal which debases both the British and Swedish justice systems. Assange is being framed to shut him up.

  35. David,

    You as most, are concentrating on the detail of the story, whilst subliminally accepting it as true, which it maybe, whilst missing the agenda which you think you already understand. This results in you and other highly intelligent people not questioning the real agenda, and beyond that demanding control from these horrible people.

    We are all drowning in bullshit instead of cleaning up our own mess and leaving a planet fit for our children.

    Tony

  36. Who was the philosopher whom maintained;

    “Women have no brains. They have no bell-end to carry it in!”

    This case ought to be Ardin v Condom manufacturer. and the fact that she kept reaching to feel the condom was in place; left, right, and centre, is a good enough case for any jury to reach a verdict of her finger nails wot done it and let the manufacturer off the hook.

    However Assange can be guilty of many things including bad taste in choice of women, and an easy to bed sort of a chap, who will jump into bed with anything that has a pulse, and further he can be charged with excessive patience and willingness to comply. As well as an idiot who could see a set up and still carried on , but rape he cannot be charged with.

    I have gone on record, I don’t particularity like the chap for his naivety to believe he could drink soup with 5msm because he had a long enough spoon, and stay immune from their poison.

  37. Ben Franklin

    5 Sep, 2012 - 12:13 am

    The message for the wiser whistleblowers is; Don’t fuck around. Sexual misconduct is the most popular method for discrediting the messenger. Even if it’s all above board; learn how to avoid compromising situations….especially crayfish parties.

  38. > but rape he cannot be charged with.
    Since you (nor I) was in the room at the time of this sexual encounter, that’s not something that you can say with any certainty. I’m sure there are hundreds of men that are not considered possible rapists, which is why so many men get away with it ! It’s for the courts to decide whether Assange is guilty or not, not you or I.

    As for that blog entry; it read like very badly written porn !

  39. Courtenay Barnett

    4 Sep, 2012 – 10:57 pm

    Hideously inappropriate and false comparison.

    So that’s Gandhi, Nelson Mandela and The Scottsboro Boys we’ve had JA compared to today. Who’ll it be tomorrow, Mother Teresa, Che Guvera and Rosa Parks?

    I can understand people having concerns with the Swedish investigation but some of the hero worship is way OTT and slightly worrying.

  40. @ Jane,

    Simply read the Swedish police interviews, approved and signed by Anna Ardin, but not by Sophia Wilen.

    http://www.nnn.se/nordic/assange/docs/protocol.pdf

    Piece the evidence together in your mind – then from the “complainants’” own complaints – let’s see if we can piece together a case of rape.

  41. @ CE,
    You say:-
    “Hideously inappropriate and false comparison. ”
    I chose the cases carefully:-
    - Scottsboro boys case; and
    - Derek Bentley’s case
    My point being one of fabrication and miscarriages of justice. There is perfect consistency when one simply reads the police interviews, considers the evidence and comes to rational conclusions.
    The questions I posed relate to the details that the so-called “victims” placed in a recorded formal manner, save and except that one of the two did not sign and approve.
    Then you proceed:-
    “So that’s Gandhi, Nelson Mandela and The Scottsboro Boys we’ve had JA compared to today. Who’ll it be tomorrow, Mother Teresa, Che Guvera and Rosa Parks?”
    Not my point, so direct that comment at others, and be fair and don’t juxtapose in this way. And you accuse me of “false comparison”?
    My reasons are stated and related to the actual interviews.
    Deal with the facts stated and then try to discredit the logic of what I had posted, and be specific.
    Kind regards – keep the debate going.

  42. @ Courtenay Barnett:

    you should know better, CE is NEVER “specific” and only very rarely does he/she “deal with the facts”. Don’t waste your time answering him.

  43. @ Fritz,

    Advice taken.

  44. Hi Courtenay,

    Apologies for grouping your argument with some other (what I felt were false) comparisons with JA’s Case. You’re correct you didn’t make all of them, and I shouldn’t have used them against yours.

    But there just seems to be a slight, rose tinted, hero worship theme running with some posters, which I feel you have continued when comparing JA to The Scottsboro Boys. I find it deeply inappropriate to compare the gross miscarriages of justice and institutional racism that the Scottsboro Boys had to endure to the somewhat concerning treatment JA has received from the Swedish Judicial System.

  45. Don’t feed ‘em.

    It’s beyond parody,it’s genuine idiocy now.

  46. Captain Cook

    5 Sep, 2012 - 2:14 am

    Brief comment on CE’s post of 1.18am, above :

    1st para : pseudo-Olympian, pompous, condescending

    2nd Para : cheap and inaccurate sneer, lower-4th form standard

    3rd para : good of you to understand, but do try not to worry too much,, dear.

  47. @ Courtenay Barnett

    now he’s trying to butter you up (it wasn’t you I meant, guv, it was them others…).

    keep ignoring him!

  48. ” I’m sure there are hundreds of men that are not considered possible rapists, which is why so many men get away with it! ”

    Oh well as long as you’re sure Jane eh? Given that there’s 3 billion or so men in the world; I’m so glad you surmise that only hundreds are NOT deemed possible rapists in your deeply disturbing worldview.

    It must be truly depressing to live inside your warped mind, Jane.

  49. VivaEcuador

    5 Sep, 2012 - 2:34 am

    Sorry, off-topic but here is a website that is begging for some uncomfortable questions:

    http://www.tonyblairoffice.org/page/s/contact

  50. VivaEcuador

    5 Sep, 2012 - 2:43 am

    Hey, check out how good ole Tone is bringing peace to the Middle East! Did you know that he has been to Jerusalem no less than 87 times? Gee, wow!!!

    (Warning: This could cause you to vomit uncontrollably)

    http://www.tonyblairoffice.org/quartet/

  51. “seeking oral attention in a state of dubious menstrual hygiene. Ugh!”
    .
    Believe me, you’ve gotten off lightly. Count your blessings.

  52. I understand that the world’s pharmacies are full of condoms that have never been used by Julian Assange. Truly, his days are numbered.

  53. Here is the forensic report direct from the Sweden – (it is in Swedish)

    http://www.samtycke.nu/doc/ass/police_condom.pdf

  54. @CE
    5 Sep, 2012. 1.18am

    “Hideously inappropriate” – exaggerated moral indignation, as if your sensibilities were the issue here.

    “Who’ll it be tomorrow, Mother Teresa, Che Guvera and Rosa Parks?”  - Sarcastic, rhetorical question based on fictious scenario.

    “.. but some of the hero worship is way OTT and slightly worrying.” – more exaggeration (“worship”) spliced with deliberate understatment (“slightly”) to convey faux measure in tone.

    If it looks like a troll, walks like a troll and quacks like a troll, guess what? It is a troll.

    Let’s try to stick to the facts, apply sound reason and put the ad hominem back in the bag, please.

  55. So if this is an accurate record of Anna Ardin’s statement to police, how are we to consider her internal monologue? Apparently, she struggled with Assange in the belief that he was to have sex with her without using a condom despite the fact he “must have known” that she wanted him to use one. It seems she can read his mind and, in turn, he is expected to read hers.

    I don’t think this is really a case of he says, she says. More like a case of he thinks, she thinks.

  56. Thx, DonnyDarko and David Landy. To trouble you further, can you see if the DNA test is reported? If the condom was torn by someone not wearing gloves, DNA would have been left on it. Anecdotally, no DNA was found. But the tearer’s should have been detectable (or the tearer wore gloves, which is not something I normally do in bed, at any rate…)

    I do think Tony Opmoc has a point here, incidentally. Since 2010, an astonishing amount of information on this case has leaked from the Swedish police, and others. I am cautious about taking it at face value.

  57. David Landy

    5 Sep, 2012 - 8:57 am

    @Fickel: Couldn’t agree more! :-)

  58. Fragment from Viva Ecuador’s Blair link above:

    Quartet Representative Tony Blair said: “The goal of this development agenda, again, is to catalyse significant economic change on the ground to give greater oxygen to the political negotiation process. So the ‘ground-up’ economic agenda will continue to provide critical support to the ‘top-down’ political process.”…

    So that will be hydrogen peroxide + metallic silver*, Tone? Careful you don’t turn the whole area into a “blown-up” clusterfuck, or at best a mixed metaphor, then.

    *Arts grads: refers to catalytic decomposition of H2O2 to water and oxygen.

  59. Also note the by the by mentioning of the crayfish party, it sounds as if the significance of it is underplayed, barely mentioned, why? when it is the pinnacle of Swedish outdoor entertaining.

    Have we not looked at it close enough? were those at the party assembled deliberately and was Julian the bait for her networking and information gathering?

    Lets mention it again, so Jane does not have to come back to this ‘badly written porn’, one wonders what spurns her attraction to come back here.

    Only 6% of rape in this country ever gets prosecuted, there is an systemic failure by the judiciary to see rape for what it is. Jane’s bluster is misdirected, she should try barking at the Bar association, judges and politicians. But its always easier to look at someone’s else and divert from one’s own inadequacies.

  60. David Landy

    5 Sep, 2012 - 9:07 am

    Sorry if that was a bit opaque… I was replying to a post by Fickel saying what a great site this is, but after I hit “submit comment”, his post disappeared!?! Weird… anyhow…

    @Komodo, I’ll have a look at the rest of it when I’ve got time, not sure when that will be at the moment.

  61. LOL…Fickel was a spambot – Jon probably shot it.

  62. Yep, spambot skewered! In general if a post has a website link, and is written in a very non-specific way, then it’s likely to be automated spam.

  63. Nevermind: This from Guy Rundle at Crikey.com.au…

    Meanwhile, Ardin sends a tweet: “Julian really wants to attend a crayfish party, anyone got two spare places”?*(*crayfish parties are a traditional summer activity in Sweden, less formal than usual, but more formal than, say, a barbecue. You can’t just turn up with extra guests. There being none going, it appears that Ardin arranges an impromptu one at her apartment.)

    There is also this:

    7) On Wednesday August 18 or the 19th, Ardin and Wilen exchanged texts and arrange to meet. (Unconfirmed: tweets from Wilen are made at this time regarding the events of the previous days. Wilen’s internet presence later disappears so completely that Swedish hacker sites conclude that a professional clean-up job has been performed).

    http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/12/13/rundle-timeline-of-assanges-visit-to-sweden-and-events-that-followed/

  64. Although not certain that these are all accurate, somebody posted a list of facts about Ardin;

    “It is a fact that Anna Ardin organized the press conference, and that she is not a “wikileaks volunteer” or an “intern” or a “girl.

    It is a fact that Ardin was planning to bring Assange to Sweden months in advance.

    It is a fact that Ardin sent Assange and another journalist plane tickets.

    It is a fact that she arranged that he would stay in her flat, “while she was away” and that she arranged this in advance.

    It is a fact that Ardin showed up at her flat and invited Assange to share her bed.

    It is a fact that Ardin recruited Sofia Wilen, who is not a journalist, to attend the press conference in advance.

    It is a fact that Ardin and Wilen communicated by email prior to the press conference.

    It is a fact that Wilen was admitted to the press conference, by Ardin,, on the day of, without a reservation.

    It is a fact that Ardin introduced Wilen to Assange, described her as a volunteer, and arranged for her to interact with Assange.

    It is a fact that Ardin invited Wilen to a luncheon after the press conference, and seated her next to Assange.

    It is a fact that Wilen hung around after everyone else had departed, including Ardin, and subsequently invited him to her apartment, where they had sex.

    It is a fact that Ardin was arranging a party for Assange, after leaving him inn the company of Wilen.

    It is a fact that Ardin boasted about sleeping with Assange to two witnesses, at that party, in addition to tweeting about her happiness at the party.

    It is a fact that she later tried to delete this tweet, and all other information she had posted on the internet about this time period.

    It is a fact that Ardin was aware Assange was sleeping with Wilen, and she acknowledged her comfort with it to a mutual friend, saying Assange could continue…”

  65. I still think that the best analysis of Ardin’s statement is by Goran Rudling, apparently also a defence witness at an extradition hearing.

    http://samtycke.nu/eng/2011/07/sex-lies-no-videotape-and-more-lies-false-accusations-in-the-assange-case/

    He also highlights in another blog that Assange’s legal team stipulated that he was open to questioning in London provided all information re the charges made by the accusers was relayed to them in advance. If that is true, i believe that to have been a strategic blunder, given how weak the case against him appears to be.

    Still, who knows he may yet negotiate himself a fair hearing session with the Swedish police without being held in jail. Someone suggested, as a middle-path, the questioning could occur at the Ecuadorian embassy in Stockholm. Interesting solution?

  66. Problem there is he can’t get to the Embassy in Stockholm without being arrested en route – unless some kind of guarantee is negotiated.

    Swedish plod have no interest in questioning Assange further – they just want him in jail awaiting charges.

  67. Daily Dogwhistle: You’ll see your money again if you get him out of the embassy:
    http://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime/make-assange-leave-embassy-court-tells-his-bail-backers-8104324.html

    (all papers)

  68. It is not often I overstep the mark, mods.

  69. Interesting legal point: you’re Australian, you’re going home, and you’re STILL on a watchlist?

    http://www.lawyersweekly.com.au/news/assange-lawyer-wants-answers-on-watch-list

    Oh, just a minute. You’re Australian and you’re representing Assange…

  70. The same crooked legal system that imposed a ridiculous bail amount (and conditions) will now extort all the money it can from Assange’s backers – regardless of the fact that they can’t prevent his seeking asylum and shouldn’t anyway as it can’t by any reasonable measure be considered ‘jumping bail’. It has to be considered part of the appeal process. But they’ll take the money – you can bet on it.

  71. Komodo, the Evening Standard article shows just how desperate Hague and company are to fulfil their obligations to their US masters. I think a fund should be set up to cover the losses of those who stood surety for Julian Assange. If all his supporters slip in a fiver it will probably solve the problem. I know I’d contribute.

  72. Appealing will just increase the sum. Are we seeing a new tactic here, more psy ops? will this bail bondage be a new lever on JA? And if anyone can’t pay, an arrest, court case and subsequent jailing might now be considered the only way of forcing him out of his refuge.

    Is that the plan?

  73. VivaEcuador

    5 Sep, 2012 - 1:17 pm

    @Macky:

    Those facts you presented re-inforce the view that Assange was set up, an idea beyond the pale for the AAA (Anti-Assange Alliance) – BBC, neo-cons, extreme feminists. Being a conventional Brit, I always found it strange that Ardin seemed happy to share Assange with the other girl. But then I suppose the AAA would argue that there is nothing wrong with that and in fact that is the beauty of Sweden – an egalitarian society where people share everything. And naturally, Swedes are so honest that if one of them shouts rape, that alone is proof.

    The AAA has cleverly taken advantage of Sweden’s long-standing image as a judicial and moral paradise – sexually liberated but honest to a fault. On the facts alone, the case against Assange looks like a farce. The real battle is being fought at a public relations and image level. This is exactly how the AAA wants it.

    @Komodo:

    I salute your bravery for daring to enter the unindicated war criminal’s website. Hope the feeling of nausea has subsided.

  74. If you are unable to speak up and say “I want you to wear a condom” and instead expect your partner to read your mind then you are not mature enough to engage in sexual activity. It’s not your partner’s problem, it’s your problem.

    If this was a man his behaviour would be rightly ridiculed. Instead, because we have this infantilised conception of female responsibility, Ardin has gone to the police to complain about “feeling uncomfortable” during sex as a result of her own immaturity. Do we honestly still think that a woman needs a man to take responsibility for her?

  75. Assange: bail conditions, £240 K surety with deposit of £200K, tagged, “house arrest”, not yet (after ten months) charged with any offence.

    Rebekah Brooks: Police bail (can’t find surety, anyway): to live at home, give police 7 days warning of intention to travel abroad. Not tagged. Charged*.

    *http://blog.cps.gov.uk/2012/05/charging-announcement-in-relation-to-rebekah-brooks-and-others.html

  76. LOL @ Viva…we dragons have strong stomachs. We need them.

  77. John Goss:

    I think a fund should be set up to cover the losses of those who stood surety for Julian Assange. If all his supporters slip in a fiver it will probably solve the problem. I know I’d contribute.

    I would contribute too, but I think Goldsmith, Pilger et al should be consulted first. I think the sum could easily be raised, but it could be bad PR for Assange – could it look like the legal process of posting bail was being circumvented? Maybe that would be a small tolerable issue – at the end of the day, asking for small individual contributions is very democratic!

    If you’re on Twitter, how about tweeting to Pilger to see what he thinks? Or, email him if you think it is best done outside social media.

  78. Good idea Jon.

  79. Let’s clarify something here. Either Ardin was the witting honeytrap here or not. If she was, then it is exceedingly unlikely that she would be leaving a trail of text messages indicating that she was happy with entertaining Assange. A much more cautious attitude would have been assumed.

    My opinion is that neither girl was a knowing participant in a so-called honeytrap. Although they may have been used by others when Assange went to Sweden in expectation that he would certainly slip up.

  80. @Jemand, I have tended towards the view that AA wasn’t a honeytrap to start off with, and the encounter happened naturally. However when she was spurned for another woman, her frustration – plus her interesting political history – made her ideal for a tap on the shoulder. Hence the deleted trail of evidence – the story was being changed to suit the new circumstances*.

    (* happy to put small print against each of my honey-trap theory posts: I still think Assange should face the allegations, if a safe way can be found for him to do so).

  81. Assange thinks Assange should face the allegations, if a safe way can be found for him to do so.

  82. One thing strangely absent from this debate is ‘what else was Assange doing in Stockholm?’

    Assange was finalising a deal with the Pirate Party, offered two weeks previously, in which the PP would host Wikileaks’ servers (along with Pirate Bay’s, which Wikileaks had previously been using, and which, following Wikileaks Afghan releases, had come under scrutiny and attack).)

    Assange’s naivete re. the Swedes is horribly apparent here:

    Assange also hopes that the new Swedish Parliament will assist the site in other ways. Passing legislation that guarantees press freedom so Wikileaks and similar operations can do their work freely, is high on his wish list.

    But the timing (13-17th Aug 2010)does suggest a causal connection between the reinstatement of the rape allegation by Ny and her Social Democrat friends (20th Aug 2010) and attempts to shut down Pirate Bay and/or Wikileaks. (The Pirate Party is the largest party outside Parliament in Sweden, and had at one point 2 MEP’s.)

  83. @Steve Cook, indeed. Just insulating myself against potential “above justice” rejoinders that I’ve addressed many times elsewhere :)

  84. Komodo @ 1.23,yes, that is what I thunked perplexing isn`t it (or maybe not at all).

    Does anyone have a link to Ardin`s stunning electoral performance where she received SIX votes.

  85. @Jon – I agree. Opportunities arise and people are approached. The FBI often operate in this way, especially when they’ve got the goods on someone.

    One person however, who I think was possibly prearranged was Daniel Domscheit-Berg. Assange doesn’t talk about him anymore despite accusing him of irrevocably deleting important files on the Bank of America. Is there more to know regarding him? I think there is.

    DDB got the payoff with a book deal and a phony alternative to Wikileaks calling it OpenLeaks. Perhaps fortunately, Openleaks will never open for business. It wouldn’t surprise me if he got a cheque from BOA. Anyone fool enough to associate with this creep deserves to get burnt.

  86. Vague Hague

    5 Sep, 2012 - 3:55 pm

    Nice to see that the Ecuadorians aren’t as stupid as Bully boy thinks. But additionally, why should anyone be extradited to a country that has torn up its own constitution and due process, the potus taking to himself the power to order the assassination of even US citizens without trial. The US is simply no longer a republic. It is no longer a society of laws, and no one ought to be extradited to face arbitrary detention in that lawless place. America is broke, in every way.
    .
    “A spokesman for the Ecuadorian government in London said Hague’s statement didn’t answer all of Ecuador’s concerns.

    “While we accept that there are provisions in the European Human Rights Convention that stops the extradition of a suspect if they face the death penalty, what the UK government have failed to address over the last three months, including today, is the inhumane treatment that Mr. Assange would face were he to be extradited to the USA, including solitary confinement for 23 hours a day, limited access to legal representatives and punitive sentencing should he be found guilty in a military of special court,” he said.

    “If the UK provided these basic human rights guarantees then we believe that there would be a quick, fair and honourable solution to the present impasse.”

    The fascinating standoff between Ecuador and Britain has pitted a former colonizing superpower against a small South American nation that refuses to give in to threats and intimidation. In a letter sent to Ecuador, the Brits tried to cite a little known law that alleges Britain has the authority to suspend the embassy’s diplomatic protection and allow authorities to go in and get Assange.”
    .
    http://atlantablackstar.com/2012/09/04/uk-tries-to-dismiss-assange-claim-hed-face-death-in-u-s/

  87. Domscheit-Berg, according to Wikileaks:
    http://wlcentral.org/node/2171

    Think I’ll look elsewhere for my next used car, then.

  88. Britain’s Socialist Workers Party and Socialist Party back extradition of Assange.

    “What unites all of these media commentators, the ex-left included, is an insistence that the allegations (no charges have been laid) against Assange are grave and must be taken seriously. By “seriously” they mean entirely uncritically and, above all, without reference to the context in which they were made. To do otherwise, they insist, is to somehow question not only his two accusers, but to endorse the exploitation of womankind by predatory males everywhere.

    This endlessly repeated injunction must be rejected. It is only in the deeply disoriented circles to which the Guardian, Independent, et al. cater, of which the SWP and SP are an essential component, that the presumption of innocence can be replaced by an insistence that all women tell the truth and all men are liars and sexual predators.”

    http://www.wsws.org/articles/2012/aug2012/assa-a27.shtml

  89. Thanks Komodo. From the homepage of that link, it seems that Visa and Mastercard can now again be used to support Wikileaks. It is thought that Washington will try to pressure payment processors to close down this loophole, but as far as I can tell, if you donate whilst it is open, the money will definitely get to WL:

    http://shop.wikileaks.org/donate

  90. Mark, thanks. If true – and I note the piece is sadly missing hyperlinks/refs – then that’s a shocking indictment of the state of the Left in the UK.

  91. Well, here’s the piece from the SP, which might be the basis for the above article. Here’s an extract:

    Assange, however, should have the right to defend himself without the fear of political persecution or extradition to the US. There is little doubt that Assange stands no chance of receiving a fair trial if he is taken to the US.

    Such cases [sexual allegations] must be investigated – so many will ask why the Swedish investigation cannot be carried out in the Ecuadorian embassy – showing both a serious approach to rape allegations and that there is no other motive on the part of the Swedish state.

    That seems sensible to me, so long as any decision to prosecute is done in the open (as of course it is otherwise hugely open to corruption).

  92. Villager, the Sex, Lies and No Videotapes link is thorough, as you say. However it fails to mention the relationship between the police interrogator, Irmeli Krans, and Anna Ardin, and why the two women visited a police station at which Krans worked rather than one nearer their homes. Krans could not take Ardin’s statement because she knew Ardin. And the fact that Ardin was present at the time of Wilen’s interview is most improper. Just as improper is the alteration to Wilen’s statement a week after it was taken.

  93. Vague Hague

    5 Sep, 2012 - 5:49 pm

    I’m afraid that many “leftists” haven’t the foggiest clue what the critical approach is all about. Nor do they understand economics.
    .
    Much of what passes for leftism is no more than simplistic binaries – goodies and baddies.
    .
    It was the same during the post war height of leftism. Few read Marx or anything else. The rich were bad. The poor were good.
    .
    You see the same manichean drivel in popular feminism.
    .
    It also explains why you often have to look to conservatives for the protection of civil liberties.
    .
    The debate between Burke and Paine lives on.

  94. Here’s a reference to the SWP position, which is rather depressing:

    Assange and some of his supporters have refused to take the rape allegations seriously. His own lawyers have endorsed conspiracy theories calling the women a “honeytrap”. Ecuadorian foreign minister Ricardo Patino even disgustingly called the accusations “hilarious”.

    I agree that Patino’s comments are inappropriate – rape allegations cannot be hilarious even if they are obviously false (of course this could be a mistranslation). To be fair, I’m sure that there are some “Assange supporters” somewhere in the world whose position on rape is appalling.

    But “Assange … [has] refused to take the rape allegations seriously” is entirely at odds with repeated statements from his legal team, and is worthy of a MSM smear piece. Also, the use of the phrase “conspiracy theories” can only be construed in the popular sense, which is ‘here is a theory we wish to discredit’.

  95. John, i’m aware of the Krans connection after having read so much information on the ‘case’ around the net where i’m at the point of exhaustion. The whole situation is just rife with inconsistencies and improprieties. Goran Rudlings witness statement at the February hearing can be found at http://justice4assange.com/Investigation.html#EDOJ
    Very interesting detail on Ardin’s tweets. He was the one who discovered her attempts to destroy evidence.

    He may have omitted the Krans connection because he came to the conclusion that Wilen’s statement reflected no crime. He does however make the point somewhere that the police failed to investigate the the full extent of the relationship between A and W and the circumstances that brought them together. Further that both statements should have been video recorded or taped at the very least.

    Sweden, for a little country, that couldn’t solve in all these years the open public assassination of its Prime Minister in downtown Stockholm, leaves me with the impression that they are utterly incompetent in the investigation dept.

  96. Thank you Villager. I have now read the statement of Göran Rudling. It is amazing. It is probably the strongest proof of a police and political cover-up imaginable. Göran Rudling describes himself as a law reform activist. He is particularly interested in rape cases because his mother was raped by her step-father. As might be expected he is concerned that rapists are prosecuted. But he also believes in justice and realising there was something wrong in the prosecution case.

    As you say, he discovered Anna Ardin’s tweet deletions, and her 7 step revenge on men who dump their women, which Ardin also tried to delete. From his statement it appears that he persistently sent information to the Swedish police that they have been unable to locate. He is a very credible and reliable witness which shows this case to have been flawed from the start, with clear political objectives. The UK media is disgusting in not presenting this to the public.

    I’ve tweeted John Pilger twice to see whether a fund could be started among supporters for Julian Assange to ensure those who put up bail do not go out of pocket suggesting small donations of say £5. The trouble is Pilger probably gets too much traffic to respond. Anybody have a direct line?

  97. @Vague Hague – I’m of the view that (well-read) Marxists know capitalism better than the capitalists, but agree that Leftists aren’t always familiar with such material. But the binary nature of politics tends to infect the further edges of the Right as well as the Left – see UKIP and the BNP in the UK as examples.

    In the UK at least, I’d have no idea who would be the natural home of civil liberties – the Conservatives are looking for real-time access to Internet logs, which is a step further than the authoritarianism of New Labour. Maybe you’re asserting, then, that the Conservatives are not at all conservative, in the sense you mean that word?

    (By the way, you no longer need dots in comments to obtain paragraphing – we fixed that).

  98. @John Goss, well done. If JP doesn’t respond, try other members of the surety group. Jemima Goldsmith was amongst them, she’s on Twitter; there are probably others with a public profile also.

  99. Jon, I’ve tweeted a Jemima Goldsmith before discovering that she tweets at Jemima_khan. So I’ve retweeted.

  100. I was completely mystified by the idea that servers in a nuclear bunker would be more secure. Certainly not from hacking. Was someone expecting a nuclear attack on the servers?

    That would be from USA, UK or Israel perhaps?

    ;)

  101. Vague Hague

    5 Sep, 2012 - 9:14 pm

    Our civil liberties were mostly bourgeois in origin. The left didn’t really have much to do with that, other than the left as a middle class movement. In any event, the vehicle for leftism is gone, as is the capitalist class. It’s all oligarchs and their servant managers these days.

    We’d all probably be better off acquainting ourselves with feudalism these days with a view to the future through the past.

    Marx can be helpful here too.

    R.I.P. dots

  102. Obama campaign brags about its whistleblower persecutions

    ‘Excuse me if I don’t join in Democrats’ sycophantic cheerleading for an Obama presidency that has shredded laws and liberties’
    Glenn Greenwald

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/sep/05/obama-campaign-brags-about-whistleblower-persecutions

  103. ‘Media professor Christian Christensen wrote about four fundamental mistakes made by journalists in their attacks on Julian Assange, including an ill-founded belief in U.S. justice, and how Mr Assange’s fears of U.S. prosecution are justified.’

    http://www.bjr.org.uk/blog/2012/09/05/covering-assange/

    Christian Christensen is Professor in the Department of Informatics and Media at Uppsala University, Sweden.

  104. @John Goss – Any fund you want to set up should be in consultation with Assange’s lawyers and the Wikileaks defence fund. I also don’t think it will be allowed. Bail or surety, I believe, is not just about money but also an expression of confidence from a reputable person that someone will front court. The money they put up is supposed to reflect their confidence and if others insure this amount, then the person’s confidence would be appear less credible. The American system is quite different, turning the whole bail system into a pawn shop.

    Still, it is worth looking into. I’d chip in a couple of dollars. And I wouldn’t expect to get it back – Hah!

  105. Regarding the British Left’s failure to support Assange, it’s worth noting that left wingers generally are not libertarian in nature. Indeed, they have historically been authoritarian. Assange is on the southern end of the political compass, opposite those who would like a heavy handed, centrally controlled bureacracy. Add to this, the infiltration and embedding of New Left principles of Feminism and their typically aggressive response to the subject of r-pe. This subject is emblematic of their identity as victims of men.

    Also, the British Left think they owe nothing to Assange. He’s not one of them. He doesn’t work within their political frameworks. He’s a Johnny-come-lately outsider, an interloper, the new kid on the block. The space taken up on the front covers of newspapers with Assange and Wikileaks is space stolen from traditional left wing issues and the current line-up of personalities.

    Hence, the Left are jealous and mistrusting of Assange. They want him gone.

  106. David Landy

    6 Sep, 2012 - 5:53 am

    @komodo:

    Part 1 of 3

    The first doc says:

    Swe: Undersökning beträffande DNA redovisas separat.

    Eng: Study on DNA reported separately.

  107. David Landy

    6 Sep, 2012 - 5:57 am

    @komodo:

    Part 2 of 3

    The second doc says:

    — English —————————

    Mats Gehlin 28/10/10 15:24

    Calls with SKL

    Conversed with forensiker Anders Nilsson at SKL to get a clarification on DNA samples.

    In previous PM, I have written to the condom used at Anna Ardin, they had not found the DNA.

    It is not true according to Anders Nilsson. He said that they see “something” but that it goes into deciphering. It has been chosen to analyze the sample in a more refined method. This method takes about. two weeks. At the previous PM et was into Anders Nilsson I spoke with.

    Anders Nilsson explained that into the amount of DNA that always determines whether they can see the DNA. There are many reasons that they fade get a clear picture.

    - Somewhat disturbing analysis such as dirt, etc..
    - Small amounts of DNA
    - People will emit different amounts of DNA
    - The study material has been affected by the use, for example, washed, dried off.

    This was some of the things that can affect the analysis of DNA, but there are more factors that influence.

    Mats Gehlin

    — Swedish —————————

    Mats Gehlin 28.10.10 15:24

    Samtal med SKL

    Samtalade med forensiker Anders Nilsson vid SKL för att få ett förtydligande kring DNA proverna.

    I tidigare PM har jag skrivit att på kondomen som använts hos Anna Ardin hade de inte hittat DNA.

    Dette stämmer inte enligt Anders Nilsson. Han sade att de ser “något” men att det into går att tyda. Det har valt att analysera provet i en mer förfinad metod. Denna metod tar ca. två veckor. Vid det förra PM et var det into Anders Nilsson jag talade med.

    Anders Nilsson förklarade att det into är mängden DNA som alltid avgör huruvida de kan se DNA. Det finns många anledningar till att de into får en tydlig bild.

    - Något stör analysen såsom smuts mm.
    - Små mängder DNA
    - Människor ger ifrån sig olika mängder DNA
    - Att undersökningsmaterialet har påverkats efter användandet, t.ex. tvättats, torkats av.

    Detta var några exempel på vad som kan påverka analysen av DNA men det finns fler faktorer som påverkar.

    Mats Gehlin

  108. David Landy

    6 Sep, 2012 - 5:59 am

    @komodo:

    Part 3 of 3

    The third doc says:

    — English —————————–

    Mats Gehlin 20/10/10 15:08

    In conversations with SKL up came the following.

    On the condom from MA2 home has not found any DNA.

    On vaginal swabs from MA1 found DNA from MA1 and DNA from a man.

    The condom bit that was found in the MA1′s apartment found DNA from MA1 and from the same man who was on the vaginal swab.

    MA1 have not noticed that some condoms have been broken when it was dark in the room and she heard that the suspect put on the condom it was part sounds like he pulled a balloon. Condom piece found under the bed, under the part of the bed that suspect was then put on the condom.

    — Swedish —————————–

    Mats Gehlin 20.10.10 15:08

    Vid samtal med SKL fram kom följande.

    På kondom från MÄ2 bostad har det inte hittats något DNA.

    På vaginaltops från MÄ1 hittades DNA från MÄ1 och DNA från en man.

    På kondom bit som hittades i MÄ1 s lägenhet hittades DNA från MÄ1 och från samme man som fanns på vaginaltops.

    MÄ1 har inte märkt att någon kondom har gjorts sönder då det var mörkt i rummet och hon hörde att då misstänkt tog på sig kondomen var det en del ljud som om han drog i en ballong. Kondombiten hittades under sängen, under den del av sängen som misstänkt låg då tog på sig kondomen.

  109. So, ‘The Left’ (as though it were a monolith) is being slammed for supporting Assange (“rape apologists!!”) and slammed for not supporting Assange (“femi-nazis!!”).

    Jon quoted correctly from the article in a socialist ‘paper, and it presented a pretty balanced picture, more or less similar to that which Craig presented.

    People have differing opinions – but perhaps the convenient whipping-post of ‘The Left’ now will be slammed for not being monolithic enough (yet somehow also anti-Libertarian). Here is a Lib Dem blogger merrily joining in the multi-pronged attack on ‘The Left’ (of course, to some extent, it depends what one means by ‘The Left’, eg. the Labour Party now is a Centre Right organisation, etc.). Progressive people have been successfully divided on this issue, just as Craig wrote suggested:

    http://danielfurr.wordpress.com/2012/08/22/the-british-left-moral-equivalence-and-the-cult-of-julian-assange/

    And again:

    http://300wordtheses.blogspot.co.uk/2012/08/julian-assange-and-silence-of-left.html

    And again:

    http://soupyone.wordpress.com/tag/british-left/

    This kind of thing is all over the web and across social media too. And largely, it’s the Right using this as an opportunity; they suddenly can pose as ‘defenders of women’! What a joke.

    Meanwhile, over in the Techiesphere, an interesting one:

    http://www.itpro.co.uk/642676/pro-assange-protesters-hit-mi5-and-mi6-websites

  110. Julian Assange’s name cropped up again in an introduction to a radio programme, this time on Cardinal Jozsef Mindszenty.

    Witness
    Cardinal Jozsef Mindszenty: 15 years in a foreign Embassy
    Media : Listen now (10 minutes)
    Last broadcast today, 03:50 on BBC World Service (see all broadcasts).
    Next on : Saturday, 22:50 on BBC World Service

    Synopsis
    In 1956 a Hungarian Cardinal sought refuge in the US Embassy in Budapest.

    Cardinal Jozsef Mindszenty had been imprisoned by the communists in 1948.

    Released during the uprising against Soviet rule he faced re-arrest when Moscow ordered tanks into Budapest.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p00xfqff

    The saddest part was at the very end when we were told that he was taken back to Rome where he published his memoirs written during his time at the US Embassy. Then the Vatican stripped him of his title after he refused to retire as Primate of Hungary. He died in exile in Vienna. Bastards.

  111. A new Pink Panther series based in Sweden would be timely. i wonder how Inspector Clouseau would come off sounding in a Swedish accent. I can imagine him having a lot of fun popping condoms like balloons, investigating Phantom’s DNA and arresting his culprit after kissing him goodbye at the Stockholm airport on a sunny September afternoon.

    I can’t fathom that this circus is taking place in a European country. It all sounds more than unprofessional–cosy, clubby, bordering on the parochial. Or are we seeing the paranoia borne out of decades of conditioning of ultra-feminism? I don’t know, but i’m asking. It’d be interesting to hear from some Swedes on that.

  112. Why we need whistleblowers, reason No.432:

    ‘Human Rights Watch accuses US of covering up extent of waterboarding’

    The organisation alleges that opponents of Muammar Gaddafi were subjected to the torture at secret CIA prisons

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/sep/06/human-rights-watch-us-waterboarding

  113. Mary, his exile etc was apparently not quite like that. Read up in Wiki.

    “The Hungarian government allowed Mindszenty to leave the country on 28 September 1971. Beginning on October 23, 1971, he lived in Vienna, Austria, as he took offence at Rome’s advice that he should resign from the primacy of the Catholic Church in Hungary in exchange for a Vatican-backed uncensored publication of his memoirs. Although most bishops retire at or near age 75, Mindszenty continuously denied rumors of his resignation and he was not canonically required to step down at the time.
    In December 1973, at the age of 81, Mindszenty was stripped of his titles by the Pope, who declared the Hungarian cardinal’s seat officially vacated, but refused to fill the seat while Mindszenty was still alive. Mindszenty died on May 6, 1975, at the age of 83, in exile in Vienna. In early 1976, the Pope made Bishop László Lékai the primate of Hungary, ending a long struggle with the communist government. Lékai turned out to be quite cordial towards the Kádár government.”

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/József_Mindszenty

    BBC’s soundbites?

  114. John Pilger writes

    The Liberal Way To Run The World — “Improve” Or We’ll Kill You
    http://www.zcommunications.org/the-liberal-way-to-run-the-world-improve-or-well-kill-you-by-john-pilger

    It’s also in the New Statesman. Can’t believe he is still connected to the NS.

    ‘Liberalism’s old world order
    What is the impeccable logic of the liberal way to run the world? “Improve” your form, the west tells the peoples of the world, or we’ll kill you.
    {http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/politics/2012/09/liberalism%E2%80%99s-old-world-order}

    An exchange on Medialens with their deputy editor.

    Further Exchange with Helen Lewis – New Statesman deputy editor
    Posted by emersberger on September 6, 2012, 12:52 pm, in reply to “Exchange with Helen Lewis – New Statesman deputy editor”

    Thanks for your additional note, Helen.

    I am aware that the NewStatesman publishes some fine work. You regularly publish John Pilger for example which is very much to your credit.

    I think we can safely assume that your readers are generally aware that the USA has employed kidnapping and torture on a vast scale (i.e. “renditions”). Your readers are probably aware that Sweden has in the past colloborated in some way with the USA on “renditions”.

    But are your readers aware that two Egyptian men were raped and tortured in Stockholm by US and Egyptian agents? Are your readers aware that rape and torture took place in the presence of Swedish officials who were already accomplices by virtue of the fact that they handed the victims over to those foreign agents? Are your readers aware that none of the perpertators (or their accomplices) of rape and torture that took place in Stockholm have been convicted or even prosecuted by Sweden?

    David Allen Green downplayed the relevance of this case to Assange’s case. I should not have to spell out whay that was outrageous.

    Who will be saying that to your readers? Who will be balancing David Allen Green’s calls for “due process” for Assange wilh equally persistent calls for the criminal prosecution of the perpetrators of rape and torture in Stockholm?

    Joe

    —- Original Message —-
    From: Helen Lewis
    To: David Allen Green ; jemersberger
    Sent: Thu, Sep 6, 2012 4:55 am
    Subject: RE: Is David Allen Green a Rape Apologist?

    Dear Joe,

    You may be interested in the series of articles that the New Statesman
    ran in 2006/7, by Stephen Grey, which are widely credited with helping
    expose the entire issue of extraordinary rendition:

    newstatesman.com/writers/stephen_grey

    Best wishes,

    Helen

  115. Also with a hat-tip to MediaLens, this interesting comment;

    “The condom in question was handed in to police by Anne Ardin on 25 August 2010 (12 days after the event to which it relates) as evidence of her claims that Assange “did something” to deliberately tear it halfway through sex. The condom was sent by police to the SKL (Sweden’s National Forensic lab) the same day. The first set of results could find no chromosonal DNA – male or female – on it at all, although it did have a tear in it and look ‘used’ (there are pictures, if you really must…). The lab did find a tiny speck of ‘something’ on it so the police requested a second test. Apparently this tiny speck did contain mitochondrial DNA but bear in mind two things: 1) Mitochondrial DNA, if there is no chromosonal DNA present, can ONLY come from hair or nails, 2) any condom used for sex should be awash with chromosonal DNA from both parties. I will forego saying what I personally think this lab result does to the credibility of Anne Ardin’s allegations and instead restrict myself to what it does to the credibility of the Swedish prosecutor’s action. The 2nd set of results arrived back from the lab on 25 October 2010, at least three weeks before the Swedish prosecutor described the ‘deliberate tearing’ of this condom on the EAW extradition warrant (18 November) as the offence of “sexual molestation”.

    As regards one of Anne Ardin’s other allegations – the ‘forced pinning down’ to stop her from reaching a condom as she twisted her legs sideways to prevent penetration – described on the EAW extradition warrant as sexual assault and coersion, what seems to have been overlooked is that the very next sentence of her witness statement describes Assange asking what on Earth she was doing. She explained for the first time that she wanted him to use a condom. He let go. She fetched one. He put it on and they resumed.

    The second woman’s witness statement describes being “half asleep”, which the prosecutor has bumped up to “fully asleep” on the extradition warrant.

    Stop trying to make the stories of two individual women stand in for ALL women’s experiences of sexual violence. Stop believing that because women routinely experience sexual violence all over the world and are generally poorly served by the courts in getting justice that individual women can NEVER be being untruthful if they make such claims. I am a woman. I was raped. I went to the police although the case never reached the courts. But I never lied about my experience and I didn’t hand in any false evidence.

    Turn your anger onto the Swedish prosecutor who has abused due legal process in this case and has lied to and misled the UK courts. She should be investigated because she has done a great disservice to ALL true victims of rape.”

  116. Vijay Sahni

    6 Sep, 2012 - 3:04 pm

    Too fucked for love

    Two wrongs don’t make a right
    No matter the reason for a fight

    Two wars won’t make a Peace
    No matter how short or long their lease

    Two Red C’s won’t have enough food
    No matter how much good they would

    Two B’s won’t produce a harmless fly
    No matter their trip of delusions and lies

    Two elections won’t make a Democracy
    No matter how many roam power hungry

    Two or twenty hoods won’t snap a man’s Dignity
    No matter if he’s the devil or just plain guilty

    Two leaders won’t inject into a country its Freedom
    No matter if their tongues are adorned with condoms

    Two armies and allies won’t conjure a Love
    So what in the fuck are we dreaming of?

    ( Copyright Vijay Sahni 2006–all rights reserved, except to kill another human being.)

  117. David Landy

    7 Sep, 2012 - 8:01 am

    One thing that jumped out at me from the translations is that it seems that the two condoms are from different people, referred to only as “MA1″ and “MA2″.

    I can only think that the DNA-less condom was supplied by SW, who was less willing to cooperate with a prosecution?

    And the condom tip (with DNA) is from AA.

  118. Is this the lady that’s the known CIA asset? If so, they are highly trained professional liars.

  119. Jane Glover

    9 Sep, 2012 - 9:02 pm

    @Jives – I don’t know why you think it such a deeply disturbed world view that I’m pointing out that men are committing rape and not being charged with it, due to the attitude of; “well he’s a nice bloke; he wouldn’t do anything like that’. Are you deliberately being obtuse ? Or are you paranoid enough to think that all claims of rape against men are just some feminist conspiracy ?

    What is depressing is the misogyny surrounding this case and the subject of rape in general. Not only in the way the two alleged victims are being discussed here, but also the dismissive way women are spoken to in the comments section.

    But hey, let’s not let such a minor subject of respect for half the planet’s population get in the way of the Julian Assange Roadshow, eh ?

  120. @Craig

    Ardin did produce a condom split across the top to police as evidence. However forensic examination showed not only that there was none of Assange’s DNA on the condom, but that it had never been worn by anybody.

    Craig, I think you need to publish a correction to your blog post.

    The original police report states that there were in fact TWO condoms analysed from the homes of two different people (see above for link to pdf in swedish, and my posts above for google translation).

    a) There was a complete condom from the home of someone referred to as “MA2″ which had (as you say) no DNA, and

    b) There was a condom tip from the home of SOMEONE ELSE who is referred to as “MA1″. This condom tip DID have male DNA on it, and it matched the male DNA from a vaginal swab taken from the same MA1. This condom tip was stated to have been found under the part of the bed where Assange had been adjusting the condom, and had been cut off with a knife or scissors.

    (So, presumably, MA1 is Anna Ardin, and MA2 is Sofia Wilen.)

    This raises a contradiction between Anna Ardin’s statement that she had heard him (Assange) tearing the condom, and the lab analysis which states that it’d been cut with something sharp (knife or scissors) – which would presumably have sounded quite different to tearing.

    Not to mention, how do you exactly “tear” a condom? They are phenomenally strong. Not to mention the snap-back if you succeeded… ouch!!!

    And is she (Ardin) saying Assange carried with him a set of condom-snipping scissors to his love-making activities, “just in case”? Or did there just happen to be one handy in the bedroom???

    The length of time between the complaint being made and this condom tip being “found” (12 days I believe) would have given plenty of time to fabricate and plant evidence, if this were the case.

    Plus, Anna Ardin is known to be a liar, as she lied to eg Donald Bostrom about not having slept with Assange, when she in fact already had. And her testimony changes over time, which makes her doubly-suspect.

    See http://samtycke.nu/eng/2011/07/sex-lies-no-videotape-and-more-lies-false-accusations-in-the-assange-case/ for a great summary of the evidence.

    We also have to wonder why MA2 (Sofia Wilen) provided an unused condom to the police for analysis… the article above states that she was an unwilling complainant and didn’t want to press charges, she just wanted Assange to take an HIV test. This would back this assertion up.

  121. Little does she know that I know that she knows
    that I know she’s cheating on me.

  122. @David Landy MA1 is Sofia Wilén and MA2 is Anna Ardin. I think it has been pointed out already, but it’s not easy to find among all the comments.

    @Rudling When I asked about what time Boström got the phone call from Ardin I was referring to the comment preceding it, about Ardin calling Boström telling him that they had been to the police station. The details of her phone calls during that day could tell quite a lot, I imagine.

    I see no reason to call Craig a “liar”. Nobody knows all the facts and people sketch the events based on what they know. The picture may need som tweaking, but that’s just normal. Trying to piece together the exact details of what happened during that day is a work in progress and will be for some time. It’s more constructive to help with additional sources and pieces of information than to call someone liar when there’s no intent to mislead. Besides, it’s the big picture that matters and I think he got that right.

    I think Ardin made her interview on the 21st, not 22nd as Craig suggests, but that doesn’t matter for his argument, so there’s no point wasting space calling anyone names. Ardin may not have been present during Krans’s interview with Wilén, but Ardin and Wilén had been in touch before they went to the police station so she probably knew the story anyway. In fact her support of Wilén was based on her having experienced something similar (or so she says) so she must have known the general story, at least parts relevant for the rape accusations, whether she was present during that particular interview or not. Even without her presence there are enough strange circumstances, like the date it was registered (26th), that a friend of Ardin conducted it, later additions, that it doesn’t appear to have been signed, and so on.

    In the evening of the 20th Ardin went to a party. I wonder what Wilén did …

  123. The @Rudling part of the previous post was posted here by mistake. It was meant for the Why-I-am-Convinced-that-Anna-Ardin-is-a-Liar page. Sorry for any confusion.

  124. AA was still happy to be photographed smiling with JA, Rick Falkvinge and ? Troberg on the Sunday 2010-08-15 following the above events, according to reports on the following photo which was recently published:

    http://rixstep.com/1/1/20120828,00,01

    Article:
    http://rixstep.com/1/1/20120828,00.shtml

    For date reference (assuming photo not disproved) see:
    Swedish Pirate Party to Host New WikiLeaks Servers (2010-08-15)

    http://rixstep.com/1/20100914,00.shtml
    http://rixstep.com/1/20100817,00.shtml
    http://press.piratpartiet.se/2010/08/17/swedish-pirate-party-to-host-new-wikileaks-servers/

    In the run-up to the 2010 Swedish election, how great were the perceived political ramifications of the Pirate Party aligning itself with the popularity of WikiLeaks?

  125. Also in the following days AA acted as a project leader and media spokesperson to launch a new magazine on 2010-08-18, in
    connection with a different political group.

    This was reported on Swedish Radio (like BBC) and elsewhere; there was a web article and audio clip of an interview with her at: http://sverigesradio.se/sida/artikel.aspx?programid=3993&artikel=3931979

    Article text was:

    2010-08-18 17:13:00
    Ny tidning för muslimer i Sverige
    Tidningen Islam & Politik

    Igår, den 18 augusti, släpptes pilotexemplaret av tidningen Islam & Politik, en tidning om tro och politik som ges ut av nätverket för troende socialdemokrater.

    Anna Ardin från Broderskapsrörelsen har varit projektledare för tidningen, och hon säger att det huvudsakliga syftet är att visa att man kan vara troende och vänster, och att man kan vara progressiv och muslim.
    “Man kan vara progressiv och muslim”

    Det finns ju väldigt mycket fördomar om muslimer, att de tycker det ena eller det andra, eller att de är väldigt konservativa eller fundamentalistiska. Vilket ju inte stämmer, eftersom den absoluta majoriteten av muslimerna i förra valet röstade röd-grönt. Och det förknippar vi ju oftast inte med konservatism, säger Anna Ardin.

    Islam & Politik är en projekttidning som ges ut av Broderskapsrörelsen – en organisation för Sveriges Kristna Socialdemokrater. Det är ett så kallat pilotprojekt, och det är ännu inte klart om det blir en fortsättning eller inte. Men det första numret kommer i alla fall ut i 50 000 exemplar, som i stort sett alla redan är förbeställda, och den kommer distribueras bland annat via Socialdemokraternas valstugor och i en del moskéer och föreningar.

    Tidningen innehåller både debatt-artiklar och mer nyhetsinriktat material. Bland annat en artikel om hur det kan vara svårt för muslimer att köpa bostadsrätt, eftersom räntan vid pengalån av många anses vara haram, det vill säga orent.

    Men varför ger en kristen organisation ut en tidning om Islam?

    Broderskapsrörelsen är en kristen organisation som bildades på 1920-talet, när kristna hade svårt att hitta en plats i Socialdemokraterna, berättar Anna Ardin.

    Då bildades Broderskapsrörelsen för att de skulle kunna hitta en plats att driva sitt politiska engagemang i kombination med sin tro. Och det är just det som har varit drivkraften för många muslimer som har sökt sig till oss. Vi har ju arbetat tillsammans med muslimska organisationer sedan 1994, och sedan 2007 har vi ett formellt nätverk för muslimer.

    Men att koppla ihop politik och religion är inte en självklarhet. Anna Ardin menar att det främst handlar om att man även som troende ska kunna ha en plats i politiken. Men poängterar också att Broderskapsrörelsen tycker att det är viktigt att staten är sekulär och att det råder religionsfrihet i samhället.

    Tro är för många av oss i Broderskapsrörelsen en viktig del i motivationen till att man engagerar sig, och man drivs av en syn på fred och rättvisa som i hög utsträckning är inspirerad av religionen.

    Anna Ardin berättar att tidningen kom till efter att man tillsammans med nätverket för muslimska socialdemokrater diskuterat att det saknas en bra medie-kanal för svenska muslimer. Att jämföra med exempelvis alla tidningar som finns för kristna grupper.

    När projektgruppen sedan diskuterade vad tidningen skulle heta så ratades först förslaget Islam & Politik, för att det skulle låta för extremistiskt. Men efter lite diskussion säger Anna Ardin att de kom fram till att inte acceptera detta, utan istället försöka neutralisera begreppet.

    Varför ska vi egentligen acceptera att Islam & Politik låter extremistiskt, när islam för de allra allra flesta muslimer är en religion som står för fred och rättvisa. Islam och politik är ju egentligen mycket mer neutralt än vad det ofta uppfattas som, säger Anna Ardin, projektledare för tidningen Islam & Politik.

    Reporter Ingrid Forsberg, publicerat 18/8

  126. The Daily Mail article reporting the 2010-08-15 photograph is at:
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2193641/Julian-Assange-rape-claim-Is-photo-clear-him.html

    (Note earlier post’s first link is an image, as is the next:)
    http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/08/25/article-0-14B189E2000005DC-786_634x412.jpg

    Caption:
    “Is this the photo that could clear Assange? Grinning for the camera, WikiLeaks boss and ‘Woman A’ who says he sexually assaulted her 48 hours earlier”

    The article is based on statements by Rick Falkvinge, and alludes to further such social occasions after these events.
    How reputable are The Daily Mail for checking facts, or indeed what AA actually says or claims he did, as opposed to the prosecutor? Was it published also in a paper edition?
    The article is certainly worth reading in addition to the Rixstep one.

  127. Looking a little more widely at her role in the Brotherhood, she appears to be certainly no timid “office girl” writing press releases; rather she was more of a political player (strategist?) used to engaging with mainstream media.

    A few months earlier she was in the media spotlight for the Swedish contingent which took part in the Ship to Gaza protest convoy.
    She was the point contact for all communication with the ship by means of Satellite phone.

    Acting as political secretary for the Christian Social Democrats Brotherhood movement, she spoke to their international secretary Ulf Carmesund who was on the ship with other notable figures including the author Henning Mankell.

    Various articles and interviews appeared, especially on 2010-05-31, as well as some later when they were all deported
    back to Sweden. E.g.:

    http://www.svd.se/nyheter/utrikes/kontakten-med-svenskarna-helt-bruten_4791879.svd

    http://sverigesradio.se/sida/artikel.aspx?programid=95&artikel=3740559

  128. There are further earlier interviews on Swedish Radio with pictures and sound clips of AA dating around 2006-2007, which may relate more to student activism at Uppsala University than the Brotherhood.

    For example this one dated 2006-08-07 concerns her time with a democracy project in Fidel Castro’s Cuba:
    http://sverigesradio.se/sida/artikel.aspx?programid=1291&artikel=911842

    The following one dated 2007-07-10 concerns her starting a disco “Klubb Feber, Visbys first Queerclub” together with Petra Ornstein on the island of Gotland (where she has family – search on the site for Ardin for some mentions).
    http://sverigesradio.se/sida/artikel.aspx?programid=260&artikel=1473279

  129. Her connection to the Social Democrats goes back to at least 2002 according to Swedish Radio.

    Some SR reports from 2002 mention AA as a Social Democrat in Gotland. (- is this regardng cultivating H e m p?)

    2002-03-25: Vill tillåta hampaodling – Gotlandsnytt
    http://sverigesradio.se/sida/artikel.aspx?programid=94&artikel=52814

    2002-04-08: Vill inte ha hampaodling på ön – Gotlandsnytt
    http://sverigesradio.se/sida/artikel.aspx?programid=94&artikel=56246

    Then are some reports at Uppsala University engaged in equality/feminist issues.

    2004-10-30: Betty först bland männen – Upplandsnytt
    http://sverigesradio.se/sida/artikel.aspx?programid=114&artikel=495808

    2007-03-08: Dålig jämställdhet på Universitetet – Upplandsnytt
    http://sverigesradio.se/sida/artikel.aspx?programid=114&artikel=1243413

    By 2007 she has an official position for Gender Equality there.

    At around that time Claes Borgström was making his name as Gender Equality Minister in goverment.
    Does anyone know what direct or indirect party connections they have had?
    Did Claes Borgström ever give a seminar at Uppsala Uni, or at the Brotherhood, which holds an annual convention at Uppsala?

  130. Continuing these biographical explorations, we now turn to press releases made by AA for The Brotherhood in August 2010. They help to confirm details, and give some indications about what AA was working on that took her out of town for 11 – 14 August (see also above for SR item).

    These can be stil found in their archive at:
    http://kristenvanster.wordpress.com/2010/08/

    2010-08-11: Seminar announcement for Wikileaks founder JA, to be held in Stockholm on 14 Aug. 11.00 – 12.30.
    http://kristenvanster.wordpress.com/2010/08/11/krigets-forsta-offer-ar-sanningen-seminarium-med-julian-assange/

    2010-08-13: Seminar with JA booked out (mention of SVT fokus on 27 Aug. – is that TV?).
    http://kristenvanster.wordpress.com/2010/08/13/seminarium-med-julian-assange-sands-pa-natet/

    2010-08-17: Editorial on Wikileaks by Brotherhood’s leader Peter Weiderud.
    http://kristenvanster.wordpress.com/2010/08/17/krigets-forsta-offer-ar-sanningen/

    2010-08-12: New Magazine editor announcement on 13 Aug at 15.15 in P1s Människor & tro.
    This refers to a radio program about religion on SR’s P1 channel.
    http://kristenvanster.wordpress.com/2010/08/12/redaktoren-for-nya-tidningen-islam-politik-i-p1/

    2010-08-16: New Magazine launch party? 18 Aug at 18. (?for ca 2.5 h).
    http://kristenvanster.wordpress.com/2010/08/16/release-iftar-for-islam-politik-pa-onsdag/

    2010-08-18: Changed time for Magazine launch, 18 Aug at 19.00, at Sveavägen 41, ABF-huset i Stockholm.
    http://kristenvanster.wordpress.com/2010/08/18/andrad-tid-for-releasefest-av-islam-politik-imorgon/

  131. Looking more at the Christian Social Democrats Brotherhood movement.

    Some press pages for the Brotherhood on the SD’s web site were edited to remove mention of AA in August 2010 after the story went public. So perhaps these were more prominent and easily found, or perhaps the SD party itself which controlled the site had more interest in protecting her name and their association. See for example:

    http://www.socialdemokraterna.se/Webben-for-alla/Arbetarrorelsen/Sveriges-Kristna-Socialdemokrater—Broderskapsrorelsen/Media/

    Related web sites include:
    http://kristenvanster.wordpress.com
    http://www.broderskap.se
    http://bildbank.broderskap.se
    http://blogg.kristenvanster.se

    The Brotherhood’s leader Peter Weiderud and secretary Lars G Linder may be worth exploring.

    Ulf Carmesund, international secretary of the Christian Social Democrats Brotherhood movement, also is connected to Uppsala University.

    Department of Theology Employees (faculty, staff and other members):
    – Carmesund, Ulf: doctoral student, ulf.carmesund@teol.uu.se
    http://www.teol.uu.se/Kontakt/Personal/

    Publications:
    – Carmesund, Ulf: Refugees or Returnees: European Jews, Palestinian Arabs and the Swedish Theological Institute in Jerusalem around 1948, doctoral thesis, monograph, 2010
    http://www.teol.uu.se/Forskning/Publikationer/
    http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-129819

  132. The Christian Social Democrats Brotherhood were also campaigning for a total ban on all Swedish weapons exports.
    There may well be articles in English, here for instance is one in Swedish that mentions AA:

    2009-08-04 03:08: Broderskapsrörelsen kräver totalstopp för svensk vapenexport.
    http://www.dagen.se/dagen/article.aspx?id=174603

    Totalförbjud svensk vapenexport. Det kravet enades Sveriges kristna Socialdemokrater, Broderskapsrörelsen, kring under helgens kongress i Malmö.

    Enligt fredsforskningsinstitutet Sipri hamnar Sverige på nionde plats på en lista över världens största exportörer av större vapensystem under perioden 2000-2004.

    - Sverige är i särklass det mest vapenexporterande landet per capita. Vi hoppas att folk ska få upp ögonen för att det inte fungerar, vapnen används i krig och de som importerar vapen från Sverige gör det för att använda dem, säger Anna Ardin.

  133. On AA’s activities in Cuba, see for example:

    Professors blogg: CIA connections of Swedish radical feminists in the Assange-plot
    http://ferrada-noli.blogspot.com/2010/12/new-reported-cia-connection-in-sweden.html

    There is one report in Swedish on Swedish Radio.

    2006-08-07 Anna satt i förhör i flera timmar
    http://sverigesradio.se/sida/artikel.aspx?programid=1291&artikel=911842

    There are a few original references on Uppsala Uni sites such as:

    MFS-rapporter
    Minor Field Studies at the Department of Government, Uppsala University

    154. # Anna Ardin, The Cuban multi-party system. Is the democratic alternative really democratic and an alternative after the Castro regime?, 2007.

    http://student.statsvet.uu.se/modules/public/page.aspx?id=64&lvl=2

    Socialist Forum seminar:
    http://home.student.uu.se/p/pany7991/sf/Program.html

    10-12 Kuba efter Castro
    Hur bör vi förhålla oss till Kuba? Anna Ardin och Eva Björklund håller varsin inledning om Kubas situation och möjligher idag, innan vi öppnar för en diskussion.

    16-18 Brian Palmer
    Brian Palmer, antropolog och tidigare utsedd till Harvards bästa lärare, drar paralleller till George Bush när han pratar om den borgerliga regeringen och hur moderaterna fick väljarframgångar i den svenska arbetarklassen.

    http://home.student.uu.se/p/pany7991/sf/Medverkande.html

    Anna Ardin
    Student vid Uppsala Universitet och aktiv i den socialdemokratiska studentföreningen Laboremus.

    Eva Björklund
    Tidigare ordförande för Svensk-Kubanska Föreningen, sitter som ersättare i Vänsterpartiets partistyrelse.

    Brian Palmer
    Tidigare lektor vid Harvard University, numera vid Uppsala Universitet. Har bland annat skrivit boken George W. Reinfeldt, om skapandet av de “Nya Moderaterna”.

    [wikipedia]
    Eva Birgitta Björklund (born November 12, 1942 in Lycksele, Västerbotten County) is a Swedish Left Party politician. She is currently a substitute to the board of the Left Party, and editor of the periodical Kuba (“Cuba”) which is published by the Swedish-Cuban Association. She is a former chairman of the Swedish-Cuban Association. She has also translated many texts by Che Guevara into Swedish.

  134. Title: The Cuban multi-party system. Is the “democratic alternative” really democratic and an alternative after the Castro regime?

    Author: Anna Ardin
    Supervisor: Li Bennich-Björkman

    Uppsala University
    Department of Government
    Masters Thesis
    Spring Semester 2007
    (39 pages)

    annaardin.files.wordpress.com/2007/07/anna-ardin-thesis_final.pdf

    Perhaps this line from the Abstract gives the flavour of it:
    “This study is an actor-centered investigation of the preconditions of a multi-party system in Cuba; if the opposition parties have internal democracy and if their members are tied to each other ideologically.”

    from the Forward:
    “In June 2006 I traveled to Cuba with the intention of staying for at least two months interviewing leaders, members and supporters of various Cuban political parties. ”

    “… two uniformed men in a police Lada came to take me in for interrogation.”

    “It had become too difficult to continue, and I did not want to put my informants at risk, so I decided to leave Cuba. Instead I went to Miami in December 2006 and continued interviewing Cubans there.” (So did she presumably return to Sweden in the intervening months?)

    “Thank you to SIDA and the MFS-committee for giving me this opportunity, thank you Armando and Zaida who opened their home in Miami to me, to Ruben and Marisol who gave me a home in Havana, to Mattias for support and for getting me out of Cuba very fast and to Matthew for proofreading. I would also like to thank my Swedish supervisor Li Bennich-Björkman for all her devoted help. ” (also credits: Photos: Mattias Wiggberg, and others in Cuba).

  135. The term MFS above refers to the Minor Field Studies at Uppsula Uni:

    MFS-rapporter, statsvetenskap
    Anna Ardin, The Cuban multi-party system
    http://www.statsvet.uu.se/Student/MinorFieldStudiesMFS/MFSrapporterstatsvetenska
    p/tabid/5098/language/sv-SE/Default.aspx

    The term SIDA (Sida) refers to “Styrelsen för internationellt utvecklingssamarbet”, which is “Swedish International Development Cooperation” [sic.] It is described as comparable to USAID. http://www.sida.se

    This is part of the Utrikesdepartementet (UD), the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of the Swedish Government. http://www.ud.se They even have a blog:

    On the Julian Assange case | UDbloggen
    18 aug 2012 … To our readers: This blog portal blogg.ud.se is the Ministry for Foreign Affairs blog portal. Most of the content you find here is in Swedish.
    http://blogg.ud.se/blog/2012/08/18/on-the-julian-assange-case/

    One also comes across other development organisations that are connected to the UD or SIDA, such as the Umbrella organisation “Forum Syd”, Diakonia in Asia, Democracy.se and so on.

    http://www.forumsyd.org

    Forum Syd was established in 1995 as a coalition between SVS (Svensk Volontärsamverkan) and. BIFO (Bistånd och Information för Enskilda Organisationer).
    http://www.globalstudies.gu.se/digitalAssets/1339/1339124_perspectives20.pdf

    http://www.diakonia.se

    http://www.democracy.se/general/about

    Evaluation of Forum Syd and Diakonia’s Democracy and Human …
    The Swedish Embassy has been supporting civil society organisatons in Cambodia through two Swedish NGOs; Forum Syd (FS) and Diakonia (DK), focused on …
    http://www.indevelop.se/resultsframework/evaluation-of-forum-syd-and-diakonias-democracy-and-human-rights-prog rammes-in-cambodia/

    One also comes across references to MR which refers to “Mänskliga rättigheter” which is Human Rights http://www.manskligarattigheter.se

  136. correction to above:

    SIDA is actually called in English the “Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency”.

  137. The Brotherhood movement of the Christian Social Democrats decided around 2007 to include other faiths and open its doors to Muslims and others. Among the reported reasons were to help the Social Democrats better influence Swedish society. Hence they are also called the religious Social Democrats of Sweden.

  138. Given that The Brotherhood are an arm of the Social Democrat Party, one wonders what internal conflicts were provoked by the announcement of the support of Wikileaks by the Pirate Party, a new rival of great concern at the time in the context of the September election. Was this a sudden surprise?

    In stark contrast to today, at the time many groups were seeking to associate themselves with Wikileaks to garner popularity.

    See refs given earlier for – Swedish Pirate Party to Host New WikiLeaks Servers (2010-08-15)

  139. Peter Weiderud, the head of The Brotherhood of the religious Social Democrats of Sweden, has held various influential positions depending on the changing political landscape and the progression of his career. As well as various directorships on council of churches bodies, especially concerning international affairs and reducing armed conflicts, there are places on the board of the party, as well as in the government ministry when they were in power.

    One finds sporadic references on the web back to 1997 that give titles such as: “Peter Weiderud (Swedish Ministry for Foreign Affairs)”, or “Peter Weiderud Assistant to Foreign Minister of Sweden”. The best reference is his 2010 Curriculum Vitae, found (in English) at:
    http://parliamentaryforum.org/sites/default/files/weiderud_cv.pdf

    Selected highlights on the more political connections:

    Political Advisor to the Minister, Ministry for Foreign Affairs, Stockholm, Sweden. 1994-99. Speechwriter and advisor with a particular focus on security policy to the Foreign Ministers Lena Hjelm Wallén (four years) and Anna Lindh (one year). …

    Political Advisor to the Minister, Ministry for Foreign Affairs, Stockholm, Sweden. Advisor to the Minister for Development Cooperation and Deputy Minister for Foreign Affairs, Mrs Carin Jämtin, May 2006 – October 2006. Invited by the Minister to contribute to the development on the Swedish Government agenda on development cooperation and foreign affairs. Position ended as result of general election.

    (ongoing) President of the Christian Social Democrats in Sweden, one of four official branches of the Social Democratic Party and member of the International League of Religious Socialist. Elected by the biannual congress in July 2005. In this capacity also member of the Executive Committee and Board of the Social Democratic Party of Sweden.

  140. Peter Weiderud, appears in 2012 as “chair of the religious Social Democrats of Sweden”, commenting on the divisions in the party following the resignation of the leader Håkan Juholt in January.

    2012-01-24: Forces colliding within the Social Democratic party – Radio Sweden
    http://sverigesradio.se/sida/artikel.aspx?programid=2054&artikel=49
    27112

    Weiderud feels that the main division now in the party is not so much between the left and the right strands or even necessarily the urban and the rural strands per se, but between those looking to the past and those looking to the future.

    Weiderud believes the next leader needs to remain true to Social Democratic values and favor change.

  141. Rixstep has commented on the antics of computer companies, US and Swedish politicians since around 2006, which includes the end of the Social Democrats in power under Göran Persson.

    These are to be found under “Red Hat Diaries Archive”:
    http://rixstep.com/2/1/archive.shtml

    One article there sets out the extent of the government and the salaries of all the ministers, staff and advisors and the golden handshake arrangements in September 2006.
    http://rixstep.com/2/1/20060920,00.shtml

    The total numbers of persons are:

    21 Cabinet Ministers
    28 Undersecretaries
    28 Press Secretaries
    119 Political Experts
    11 Planning Managers
    10 Assistants

    ong the multitudes of Political Experts, one finds there the aforementioned Peter Weiderud ranked the third highest in pay with 55.000 SEK pcm, being in the Dept. of Foreign Affairs (UD), topped by two other Political Experts for the Dept. of Finance. Only the Cabinet Ministers and Undersecretaries were paid more.

  142. Anna Ardin spent a third of a year on an internship at the Swedish Embassy in Buenos Aires from 2 May to 16 September 2005. This was organised as pat of the course at the Department of Government, Uppsala University. This Embassy covers Argentina, Bolivia, Paraguay and Uruguay. It seems to have mostly involved writing reports on Human Rights. A 3 page write up (in Swedish) is in the following collected student evaluations:

    http://resources.statsvet.uu.se/repository/1/polmag/PraktikutvVT05_del2.PDF

    ~

  143. 2010 Election candidates:

    2010-09-21

    Arbetarepartiet-Socialdemokraterna

    38. Irmeli Krans, 45, HORNSTULL
    (1 Södermalm-Enskede 0002-02940)

    12. Anna Ardin, 31, SÖDERMALM
    (2 Bromma-Kungsholmen 0002-029410)

    http://www.val.se/val/val2010/valsedlar/K/kommun/01/80/valsedlar.html

  144. CV « ardin.se
    {annaardin.wordpress.com/about/} (from 2010)

    _________________________________________________

    CV

    AKADEMISK UTBILDNING

    Magisterexamen Uppsala universitet vt 2008.

    Statskunskap 120p

    Magisteruppsats 15 p om Kubansk opposition
    Kandidatuppsats 15p om avhopp från kommunala nämnder
    Uppsats 7,5p om politiklöshet som ideologi

    Etnologi 75p

    Uppsats 7,5p om motivation för engagemang och icke-engagemang – en studie av MUF (Högskolan på Gotland.)

    Samhällsvetenskap 30p

    Uppsats 15p om queerfeminism och lesbisk feminism

    Övrigt

    Spanska (30p), franska (30p), praktik (30p, se nedan), Core curriculum (15p), mansforskning (9p), skriftlig framställning (7,5p), språk och kön (7,5p), Sommar med Shakespeare (7,5p)

    Click here to see my credits and grades at Uppsala University

    _________________________________________________

    ÖVRIG UTBILDNING

    UD-Praktik 20 v

    Praktik vid Sveriges Amb. till Argentina Bolivia, Paraguay och Uruguay i Buenos Aires. Tog fram material och skrev grunden till UD:s MR-rapporter om Uruguay och Paraguay. Mediebevakning, jämställdhetsfrågor, turism, brevsvar mm.

    Demokrati och MR-utbildning

    Deltog i Forum Syds organisationsutbyte där 16 personer från Sverige och Zimbabwe tillsammans studerade demokrati & MR, inte minst HBT-rättigheter, i båda länderna under 8 veckor.

    Gymnasium, naturvetenskap

    Utökat program, inriktning språk vid Säveskolan, Visby.

    Utbytesår

    Instituto DAE i San José, Uruguay (biologi & litteratur).

    _________________________________________________

    ARBETSLIVSERFARENHET

    Anställningar

    09 – Politisk sekreterare och pressansvarig, Sveriges Kristna Socialdemokraters förbund – Broderskapsrörelsen.

    07 – 08 Utredare, Sveriges förenade studentkårer, 50 %. Tjänsteman med ansvar för studentinflytande, studenters ekonomi och mångfaldsfrågor.

    07 – 08 Forskningsassistent, Uppsala universitet, 50 %. Arbetar med ett projekt om etniska föreningar och politisk integration i Botkyrka kommun för statsvetenskapliga institutionen och inst. för bostads- och urbanforskning.

    06 – 07 Jämlikhetsansvarig, Uppsala studentkår. Ansvarig för förebyggande och reaktivt arbete mot diskriminering och trakasserier. Ansvarig för egna projekt samt att samordna och underlätta studenters och studentorganisationers arbete inom genus inkl. könsidentitet, funktionshinder, sexuell läggning, etnicitet, religion och social bakgrund.

    2001 Informatör, Operation Dagsverke Honduras. Elevorganisationen i Sverige. Klassrums- och aulapresentationer på skolor samt omfattande pressarbete.

    2000 Pressekreterare (“press and PR manager”). ZERI Foundation på världsutställningen (EXPO2000) Hannover. Presstalesman, arrangör för presskonferenser och PR-arrangemang, uppsökande och reaktivt pressarbete, mediebevakning samt ansvarig för VIP-gästbesök.

    1999 Projektledare (för ZERI Foundation) UNDP, United Nations Development program, Genève, Schweiz. Administrativt ansvarig för huvudkontoret, projektsamordning, informationsarbete, webbredaktör m.m.

    Sommarjobb

    03 – 04 Hamnkapten Visby gästhamn. Receptionist och bryggvakt för inkommande fritidsbåtar, MC- och biluthyrare, ansvar för kassa, öppning, stängning av reception, fortlöpande kontroll av anläggningens faciliteter.

    2001 Kampanjledare för Rättviseakademins (Kooperation utan Gränser) festivalturné. Chaufför, informatör och volontärsamordnare i ett informationstält om rättvis handel vid tre musikfestivaler.

    97 – 02 Flerspråkig guide. Lummelundagrottan. Guidade i turistgrottan och i “äventyrsdelen” på svenska, engelska, tyska och spanska.

    Extrajobb

    08 Projektledare för Doktorand -08, bl.a. en konferens och utbildningsdag om karriärmöjligheter, trakasserier och kön, Doktorandnämnden vid Uppsala studentkår

    07 – 08 Styrelseledamot, Uppsala prod. vård och bildning (budget 5,5 mdr kr)

    01 – 03 Gästskribent/krönikör på ledarsidan Gotlands tidningar.

    00 – 01 Lärarvikare. Gotlands kommun.

    Frilansuppdrag för bl.a. SVT, SR P3 och flera tidningar.

    _________________________________________________

    SPRÅK

    Svenska Modersmål.

    Engelska Flytande i tal och skrift.

    Spanska Flytande i tal och skrift.

    Tyska Goda kunskaper.

    Franska Grundläggande kunskaper.

    _________________________________________________

    IDEELLT ARBETE/FÖRENINGSLIV

    Socialdemokraterna

    02 – Ersättare i riksdagen för Gotland, ledamot i Uppsalas produktionsnämnd för vård och bildning, ordförande för unga kristna Socialdemokrater, förbundsstyrelseledamot Broderskapsrörelsen, styrelseledamot i studentklubben Laboremus mm.

    Uppsala universitet

    03 – 06 Grundutbildningsrepresentant i jämställdhetskommittén och dess beredande utskott, mångfaldskommittén, arbetsgruppen för UU:s mångfaldsplan 07/09, referensgrupp för UU:s likabehandlingsplan 07/09 och akademiska senaten.

    Uppsala studentkår/Sveriges Förenade Studentkårer

    03 – 06 Ordförande för SFS valberedning, ledamot i Uppsala kårfullmäktige samt SFS-fullmäktige, kårstyrelsens sekreterare.

    Uppsala Studentradio

    02 – 04 Styrelseledamot, rekryteringsansvarig, representant i Uppsala. Närradioförenings styrelse, utbildad tekniker och programledare.

    Elevorganisationen

    94 – 99 Distriktsordförande, förbundsstyrelseledamot, Operation Dagsverkesamordnare för Gotland, elevkår- och rådsordförande mm.

    Övrigt

    08 – 09 Ordförande Broderskapsrörelsens ungdomsnätverk

    07 – 08 Förbundsstyrelseledamot Broderskapsrörelsen

    05 – Köksvolontär på Metodistkyrkans Norrlandaläger 1 vecka/år

    05 – 07 Frivillig inom Röda Korsets flyktingverksamhet. Aktiv i svenskträning på träffpunkten i Uppsala, kontaktperson i psykosociala stödgruppen.

    04 – 07 Projektledare och vice projektledare för SIDA-finansierat demokratiprojekt med Kubansk opposition

    04 Klubbmästare Gotlands Nation i Uppsala. Utskänkare och köksansvarig ca 25 timmar i veckan under en termin.

    02 – Aktiv i Amnestys nätbaserade aktivistgrupp för fackliga rättigheter

    01 – 02 Redaktionsmedlem för studenttidningen Hédera hélix.

    00 Volontär på högstadieskola i Thailand, 1 månad.

    97 – Ledare på Metodistkyrkan på Gotlands ungdomsläger en vecka varje sommar.

    _________________________________________________

    Referenser på begäran.

    _________________________________________________

  145. Link in above CV:

    Click here to see my credits and grades at Uppsala University

    http://annaardin.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/record010108.pdf

    Admission Semester H02

    Grades dated 2003-01-17 to 2007-12-28 include Political Science A-D, Spanish, French, Language and Gender in Theory and Practice, Masculinity Studies etc.

  146. Position as research assistant at IBF, 1 Oct 2007 to 31 Dec 2008, “Institutet for bostads- och urbanforskning”, Uppsala Uni.
    {http://www.ibf.uu.se/PERSON/anna/anna.html}
    http://www.ibf.uu.se/ALLMANT/Nybrev3-07/nb3-07.pdf
    http://www.ibf.uu.se/ALLMANT/nybrev1-08/Nr1-08.pdf

    Projects were looking at ethnic organisation and political integration in certain towns in Sweden, and then looking at contol over public space in Stockholm.

    http://www.ibf.uu.se/ALLMANT/nybrev3_08/nybrev3_08.pdf

  147. There is a quite comprehensive biography on Anna Ardin which includes details from some of the above lesser known or since removed references, and others unknown, and goes into some detail of the questionable details of the whole scandal in Sweden with Assange and “die Extrememanze, Anna Ardin”. It is presently updated to mid 2012. It is, however, written in German.

    Anna Ardin

    Svea Anna Karolina Ardin wurde am 19. März 1979 in Visby geboren, wo sie auch aufwuchs. …

    http://www.schwedisch-translator.de/personen/anna-ardin.html

  148. To be, or not to be (continued):
    - that is the question

  149. still on hold …

  150. Postings on various others such as Claes Borgström were to follow …

Powered By Wordpress | Designed By Ridgey | Produced by Tim Ireland | Hosted by Expathos