Your Party (Working Title) 100


If I were living in England, I would join Corbyn’s new party, and I urge people in England to do so. In Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland there are other factors, which I shall come on to.

I also say this with great respect for my friend George Galloway, whose Workers Party kindly hosted my candidacy for Blackburn in the General Election. I think Jeremy has been wrong in pointedly excluding George from the consultation meetings on setting up the new party.

But the truth is this. At nearly 700,000 signups, “Your Party” has already three times as many putative members as the Workers Party got voters at the General Election. Jeremy has the ability to create a juggernaut which the media and Establishment simply cannot ignore the way they shun George.

My advice to Workers Party members is to join Jeremy’s new party. There are many smaller left-wing parties which appear to be signing up en masse to the new venture – like the CPGB and the SWP – while having no intention of dissolving their own membership and structures.

It is very possible that the rules of Your Party will permit such dual membership.

I am thrilled by the potentially transformative effect of the public actually getting to hear left-wing arguments. This is how Corbyn, even handicapped by the conservative baggage of the Labour Party establishment, managed to get a far higher vote in two general elections than Keir Starmer achieved in his.

The Scottish Independence referendum showed the same effect. Despite massive media bias, the public did actually still get a chance to hear the arguments for Independence that had been kept from them. The result was a step change in support for Independence of 15% or more, which has never been lost since.

Your Party could shift the Overton window, permanently. For the first time in 40 years the public might get some exposure to the arguments of the Left.

We know that renationalisation of utilities, better public services and taxation of the wealthy are popular. When Corbyn led Labour, there was a brief opportunity to vote for those policies with a realistic chance of success, and millions of people took it.

Your Party will not be saddled with the need to compromise with the Blairites, and thus will be able to develop policy platforms of much greater internal coherence.

I think it is safe to assume it will be anti-NATO and favour a pacific foreign policy based on respect for international law. I think it is safe to assume that its policies will not only favour redistribution of wealth, but will challenge fundamental capitalist tenets of the ownership of the means of production.

I have no doubt it will be firmly anti-Genocide and will back BDS measures against Israel including arms sales.

I very much hope it will support a single state of Palestine. It is plain there is no viable two state solution. Palestine has been dismembered, chopped up, separated. The idea that a viable, non-contiguous state can be assembled from the ruins of Gaza, with the West Bank (or parts of it) and East Jerusalem is plainly nonsensical.

It is a Bantustan solution designed to provide cheap labour to service Israel daily. The fact that all the Western government proponents of a two state solution speak of a demilitarised Palestinian state, permanently at the mercy of the genocidal Israeli state, shows how dishonest the plan is.

It has been suggested to me that Your Party will adopt the policy that the Palestinians should decide. I agree with that, but with one caveat. That cannot mean the hated Mahmoud Abbas should decide, and the Palestinians cannot decide with a literal gun to their head.

Let Palestine be free from the river to the sea. Then let the Palestinians decide whether they want to agree to the creation of a separate Jewish state.

The membership must decide the policy. I am reasonably confident of the result.

What cannot happen is an abuse of the central mechanisms of the party to demonise and/or expel people for false anti-semitism accusations, as the Labour Party did under Jeremy’s leadership.

It goes without saying that the ludicrous IHRA definition – equating anti-semitism with criticism of a state that is committing Genocide – must be rejected.

If it is really to be a different, bottom-up type of party, then the party leader ought not to have that type of power. The key salaried positions should also be subject to election rather than just appointed at discretion. Decentralisation must be very real and effective every day.

Which leads me to the nations of the UK.

The Left in Scotland is overwhelmingly pro-Independence. Unionism is very heavily a right-wing thing. There is a rump of left-wing thinkers who oppose Scottish Independence on internationalist grounds with a vision of working class solidarity. But that is a dwindling and far from vigorous strain of thought.


Neither Jeremy Corbyn nor Zarah Sultana has, so far as I can see, said a word about Scotland in talking about the new party. Their vision appears very Anglocentric. I hope that this silence is an acknowledgement that the position of the party in Scotland is, as English people, not their concern.

The existence of the SNP and of Plaid Cymru means that Your Party is entering a significantly more crowded market in Scotland and Wales, where not only is nationalism an extra factor, but the nationalist parties already sit well to the left of Keir Starmer (admittedly not a difficult ask).

In Scotland, I think mistakenly, there seems a widespread presumption that the Corbyn project will fall flat. But disillusionment with Labour in Scotland is enormous, both nationally and locally. As is disillusionment with the SNP.

Those connected to the Corbyn project in Scotland at the moment appear largely to come from the Old Labour establishment, many of whom have been vehemently anti-Independence.

But I doubt the party will reflect that.

Young people in Scotland are overwhelmingly pro-Independence. Another factor which receives insufficient attention is that opinion polls regularly show between 30 and 40% of Labour voters in Scotland are pro-Independence. Those are important recruiting demographics for Your Party.

I have not seen any figures for signups in Scotland. Pro rata with the UK there would be 70,000, which would make Your Party immediately the biggest party in Scotland. I think it is fair to assume there are at least 30,000. Nobody can know where they stand on Independence.

If Your Party is to be a genuinely decentralised organisation, then its Scottish and Welsh parties should be separate legal entities. They alone should decide their policy on Independence.

I suspect that a fudge will be attempted, whereby Your Party supports “the right of the Scottish people to decide”. That is frankly no use to anyone, and proceeds from an assumption that permission has to be granted.

The right of the Scottish nation to self-determination is established in international law. It is not a policy just to state it.

The support for Genocide in Palestine is not a bug, it is a feature of the rogue British state. That imperialist entity needs to be broken up.

So, where do I stand personally on the new Corbyn party?

I have signed up for information. I will make honest and well-motivated efforts to shape it and influence its members, and I encourage other people to join at this stage. I shall work for it to be decentralised in its structures, anti-Zionist and anti-NATO in its views, and for Scottish and Welsh Independence.

Depending on results, I shall decide whether to stick with it. I do hope it will be a broad church and that people will not split over small matters; but on large matters I cannot myself be part of a Zionist or Unionist party.

 

———————————

My reporting and advocacy work has no source of finance at all other than your contributions to keep us going. We get nothing from any state nor any billionaire.

Anybody is welcome to republish and reuse, including in translation.

Because some people wish an alternative to PayPal, I have set up new methods of payment including a Patreon account and a Substack account if you wish to subscribe that way. The content will be the same as you get on this blog. Substack has the advantage of overcoming social media suppression by emailing you direct every time I post. You can if you wish subscribe free to Substack and use the email notifications as a trigger to come for this blog and read the articles for free. I am determined to maintain free access for those who cannot afford a subscription.




Click HERE TO DONATE if you do not see the Donate button above

Subscriptions to keep this blog going are gratefully received.

Choose subscription amount from dropdown box:

Recurring Donations



PayPal address for one-off donations: [email protected]

Alternatively by bank transfer or standing order:

Account name
MURRAY CJ
Account number 3 2 1 5 0 9 6 2
Sort code 6 0 – 4 0 – 0 5
IBAN GB98NWBK60400532150962
BIC NWBKGB2L
Bank address NatWest, PO Box 414, 38 Strand, London, WC2H 5JB

Bitcoin: bc1q3sdm60rshynxtvfnkhhqjn83vk3e3nyw78cjx9
Ethereum/ERC-20: 0x764a6054783e86C321Cb8208442477d24834861a


Allowed HTML - you can use: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

100 thoughts on “Your Party (Working Title)

1 2
  • James Chater

    Hello. I too have signed up. I agree with its priorities of redistriburing wealth, but have some reservations about its foreign policies. I hope that media reports that corbyn is moving towards a policy of re entering the EU are true. However, I don’t want his new party to be anti NATO. Especially not with Russia the way it is at the moment. There was a reason the Soviet Empire disintegrated. The Soviet satellite states as well as the Soviet republics, once given the chance to break free, seized the opportunity with both hands. Once putin revealed his true colours by attacking Chechnya in the 2nd chèchnyan war, this gave rise to a desire among many states to join nato. Nato didn’t just “expand”. The East European countries came knocking on nato’s door because it was their only hope. Western politicians should respect that. Don’t get me wrong, if an opportunity came along for bilateral arms reductions, we should jump on it. But with putin and his merry men bombing raping looting and stealing children in Ukraine, now is definitely not the time. Compassion at home and firmness abroad, this is the way to go.

    • Alyson

      Chechnya’s terrorists were not just politically orientated. They were very scary and anti west as well, as I heard first hand from a charity worker who was held at gunpoint. Most of the former Soviet satellite countries came to independence within an eastern bloc alliance, and have respect for Putin’s achievements in raising standards of living for Russian people.

      Russia has oil and gas and is not amenable to dollar hegemony and this is why Zelensky was chosen to act the part on behalf of Israel and US hedge funds. Regime change didn’t happen and so we will pretend that extreme measures must be taken to distract our attention from the terrible suffering of the people of Gaza,

      They went as far as they could within media disinformation and outright threats to Corbyn when he would otherwise have led a decent Labour Party into government. But Greater Israel was planned decades ago and no democratic peace is going to change that, Dollar hegemony will win if it has to sacrifice every last one of us. The gas under Gaza is sufficient to power Europe and east for decades to come, but they still want to erase the competition, which is Russia, and Black Rock has financial control of much of Ukraine’s infrastructure and trade, in exchange for weapons.

      The immorality of greed is the problem, not nations or religious affiliations. Most people are people who love their families, their friends, and want to contribute to their communities. We have to be cajoled into seeing each other as less than our nearest and dearest.

      Madmen are at the helm. Heaven help us all.

      • Pears Morgaine

        On the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 the Chechen Republic declared independence; however this was not reocognised by President Yeltsin on the grounds that unlike the former Soviet satellite states Chechnya had never been a sovereign entity, it had always been a part of Russia. The country was also an important hub for the export of Russian oil and gas. Russian troops were sent in and despite overwhelming numerical superiority were soundly defeated after which Yeltsin agreed a treaty recognising Chechen independence. In 1999 Putin chose to rip up that treaty, invaded, and replaced the legitimate government with his own puppet hard man. Naturally other former Soviet states took note of this and saw joining NATO as the best insurance policy they could have against a repetition. The Ukraine war seems to have borne that out. Without doubt the actions of Chechen terrorists have been unconscionable but Kadyrov’s brutal regime is as bad if not worse.
        https://www.hrw.org/tag/chechnya

        Gaza’s share of the East Mediterranean gas fields, Gaza Marine 1 & 2, holds proven reserves of 31 BCM (Billion Cubic Metres). The EU’s annual consumption is about 300 BCM. Whilst the Gaza find is not vast, it is large enough to provide some measure of prosperity for the inhabitants.

        • Bayard

          “In 1999 Putin chose to rip up that treaty, invaded, and replaced the legitimate government with his own puppet hard man. ”

          You’ve skipped the bit where the Chechens, stirred up, no doubt ,by the usual suspects, tried to overthrow the “legitimate government” using terror. So unlike in Ukraine, the RF got their hard man in rather than the one the West wanted, but, of course that’s the wrong outcome: “until someone we like can get elected”. See also Moldova, Romania etc.

          • Mart

            “…the RF got their hard man in rather than the one the West wanted”

            At the time Putin was the one the West wanted. Have you forgotten Tony Blair’s visit to Moscow to help his election campaign and the subsequent state visit with jolly rides around London with the now deceased Betty Windsor? His brutality towards Chechens was ignored, of course – they are Muslims so no problem there.

            What a rotter he turned out to be after all the West did for him, eh?

    • Tom T

      The EU is becoming increasingly authoritarian and currently supports the genocide in Gaza. Von der Leyen is currently talking about raiding citizens’ private savings to fund war with Russia. Is that really an entity you’d like to rejoin?

  • Barry Milligan

    I do believe that ‘Your Party’ has said that they will be announcing something to do with Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales in the near future 😀

  • Tom74

    Jeremy Corbyn is literally a great person, and the only politician in modern politics I truly admire. But the upshot of Your Party doing well at the next general election will be what, except help Farage and the Right generally? It is the perennial tactic of the powerful in this country, and their allies beyond, to manipulate almost every election by funding or hyping up a third or fourth party – the SDP in the 1980s, the Liberal Democrats in 2010, UKIP in 2015, the Ulster Unionists in 2017, the Brexit Party in 2019 and Reform in 2024. I hope I am wrong but I feared Jeremy is in danger of being used to help the Right.

  • Pears Morgaine

    So close to a million people have signed up to a new political party with no stated polices, not even an official name, because of the personality cult surrounding its leader. Good luck with that.

    In the past Corbyn has blown hot and cold over Indyref2 and support for Scottish Independence generally. I think kicking the can down the road is the expression.
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-50397033

    I’m sure his approach to NATO and defence matters overall will make him a proud successor to George Lansbury.

1 2