Blears Lies Exposed: Ikram Yakubov Feature on Newsnight 16


For those who missed it,the featue on Ikram is here, though I suspect only for today.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/newsnight

It is worth watching, particularly for confirmation that the Tashkent “bombs” were false flag incidents – which was a major point in my time in Tashkent. My investigation which established this is covered at length in Murder in Samarkand. Nonetheless both the British and US have continued to use these fake al-Qaida linked bombings to justify our sypport for Karimov.

This is important, as they were knowingly lying, the Joint Terrorism Assessment Centre (JTAC) having officially accepted my analysis of events, and informed me so by diplomatic telegram to Tashkent. Hazel Blears (unsurprisingly) was liar in chief:

http://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2005/10/hazel_blears_ma.html


16 thoughts on “Blears Lies Exposed: Ikram Yakubov Feature on Newsnight

  • JimmyGiro

    The truth will out!?

    I wonder if half the conspiracy theories that circle the web are themselves ‘false-flag’ operations, which cause people to become cloy, and fail to scrutinize their masters.

    If lies become so common place will we ever bother to challenge them. Just like Hilary Clinton’s ‘miss speaking’, the truth has been displaced by the bad money of lies. In our Oprah and Jeremy Kyle culture, it’s who screams wins, let the devil sort out the reason.

  • mary

    Craig got Blears’ number way before she was busted on her three-second-homes-in-one-year fraud. She said and did so much to demonize the Muslim population in the UK.

    I was actually quite pleased to see her sitting in the back of her vandalized car the other day. Like her erstwhile leader Bliar she should be standing in a dock. She is a wicked little person and I always thought there was something unpleasant about her with that phoney fixed smile.

    http://www.daylife.com/photo/02ZBbpl5mUdC9

    What has she got lined up after she loses at the next election?

  • Abe Rene

    I’m surprised that the BBC broadcast such a report, even including the interview with Craig. Possibly because of Obama’s election, the broadcast was not seen as being so much against American interests, and so not censored. Also the likely slaughter that Labour face next year may mean that the BBC feels a little better to flex its muscles of what independence it has got.

  • ingo

    My understanding would be that the BBC is already reaching out to the next power source, the Conservatives, their dependency is showing through and they did leave out the most damning piece about Mr. Conroys death and the circumstances, would be surprising if they’d ever challenge hazel Blears on the circumstances surrounding her false reporting to the House, which has to be seen in a new light.

    Also, from now on, one should be exposing some more of the underlying stories, point to the minutes in existence and hold the MI’s to account for taking the mickey out of the Human rights act, subverting the life of a senior diplomat, helping to oust defectors, and much more.

    How dare they make this man homeless, once on the streets of London he will be open to attack by anyone, homeless people are attacked every day of the week and I would not put it past someone using this fact, he is now an even greater target thanks to the UK Government, bastards like Alisher must already have be alerted, I fear for this man, he needs help and support now that he has spoken out.

    A circuit of safe houses, for him and other like him could provide relief and rest for these tortured souls.

    My family was part of such a circle during the second world war in Hamburg, they gave shelter to Jews and other ‘undesirables’ in those days, helping them to be safe on their journey to the west, it was highly dangerous, it jeopardiesd your and your families lifes, those who got caught did not see a judge or jury, they were executed there and then.

    But it worked well and the same principle can work today.

  • tony_opmoc

    If you are in the UK, you can view the entire programme for up to 7 days on BBC iPlayer. According to the BBC website it should work on Windows, Macs, Linux, Nintendo Wii and iPhones.

    Tony

  • anon

    What has Hazel Blears got lined up after she loses at the next general election?

    Norwich North demonstrated that bye-elections like canal boats have only two gears, forward and reverse. The good people of Norwich clunked the machine into reverse, and voted Tory.

    Blears has returned to her constituency to purchase/ bribe/ forge her successful re-election. By Allah, this country vowed never to return to tory government for fifty years minimum and preferably for a good many years more than that. The crisis from banking which was created by Mrs Thatcher and not prevented by Gordon Brown has only confirmed that position.

    If Brown had gone to the polls immediately on coming into office, before the banking crisis, he would have lost power. But now we are stuck with them. If the tories came to power, they would in effect reverse the entire welfare state.

    Sometimes, as a taxpayer, that seems not a bad idea. But the cost to the taxpayer of the zionist criminal bankers plus the government’s vastly overpaid privately and publicly employed managerial class, far exceeds the cost of the welfare state. Looking at a pop-eyed Adam Smith on my £20 note makes me angry. It’s his idea that you throw lots of dosh at society and collect it back in taxes.

    The trouble is that less and less money is thrown at the actual working class that a Labour party of any sort is supposed to represent. Hazel Blears , if not elected, will just be re-cycled like public money, like Tony Blair when he becomes president of the EU. Plus sha change, plus sh’est la jolly meme chose, mon vieux.

  • Strategist

    Actually I think Blears will get back in, relatively comfortably.

    Just another twist in the plot of Coronation Street…

  • shafiur

    Dear Craig, the mobile is no longer accepting messages or taking calls. Please would you kindly contact me re the interview. Thanks.

  • George Laird

    Dear Craig

    I wonder if the slashing of Hazel Blears tyres was Act of God or Karma?

    What goes around comes around.

    I hope the public in Salford vote her right out the door.

    Yours sincerely

    George Laird

    The Campaign for Human Rights at Glasgow University

  • mary

    Letter to the US Attorney General on Dissident Voice

    http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/08/call-to-appoint-independent-special-prosecutor-to-investigate-torture/

    Call to Appoint Independent Special Prosecutor to Investigate Torture

    Holder Warned that Limited Investigation and Selective Prosecution Would Violate the Law and Further Undermine Credibility of DOJ

    by Kevin Zeese / August 12th, 2009

    Attorney General Eric Holder

    U.S. Department of Justice

    950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

    Washington, DC 20530-0001

    Re: The Convention Against Torture Requires the Investigation and Prosecution of Torture by an Independent Prosecutor Mandated to Investigate the Facts and Apply the Law. Selective Prosecution of Some Instances of Torture, or Limiting Prosecution to Low Level Officials, Will Not Satisfy the Requirements of the Convention Against Torture or Other Laws Proscribing Torture.

    continues/….

    ______________________________

    The CIA activities in Ukbekistan should be included in any investigation.

  • Roderick Russell

    Craig, I just have to comment on your article “Blears Lies Exposed” since it was lies from the very same Hazel Blears that caused me so many problems back in 2005. I was then living in Manchester, UK. A Member of Parliament had approached the government asking for an honest investigation into my complaints of torture. Though you are probably sick of hearing about it, it is all outlined on the wiki whose URL is:

    http://zerzetzen.wikispaces.com

    Blears role in the government cover-up conspiracy was pivotal. At the time she was Minister responsible for Special Branch and MI5. If you look on the WIKI at “Ch. 4 ?” Government Cover-up Conspiracy”, her role in the cover-up is explained. Some of her letters are also included so that anybody interested can see for themselves.

    Basically, the MP’s request for an honest investigation met with the following written responses (some of the letters are on the Wiki for anyone to view) all of which were designed by Ms. Blears to ensure no investigation ever took place. Firstly, the Home Office said they were investigating which turned out to be a lie because Ms. Blears then wrote that they wouldn’t investigate because she said I had never reported the matter to the police in the first place. An MP then proved to Blears and Blair (who was now also involved) that I had reported the matter to the police. So now the lie changed: according to Ms. Blears I had reported it and the police had investigated which was also untrue since they had never investigated. Her excuses are mutually exclusive. If one were true, the others must be lies. In fact, they are all lies. Meanwhile I was getting threatened just for pushing the matter with Ms. Blears. Finally, she said that my complaint was a civil matter anyway. Yet Ms. Blears was replying to accusations of death threats, vehicles smashed into property, etc. Ms. Blears is a lawyer. Surely lawyers know the difference between civil and criminal law.

    Incidentally, if anybody wants to know why my complaints are a human rights abuse and not just crimes, it is because the State is provably involved in some of the zerzetsen torture and in the cover-up conspiracy.

    Blears’s lies back in 2005 ensured that my complaints of zerzetsen torture would never be honestly investigated and that the cover-up conspiracy would continue to this day. The result: 4 more years of threats against my wife and children as well as myself. If you read the Wiki you will see “more of Blears lies exposed”. This woman seems to have a history of covering up human rights abuses.

    Incidentally I can be difficult to contact because my email, post and even telephone are sometimes effectively controlled by MI5/6 and CSIS and I have definative proof of this.

    Roderick Russell – #207, 1733 – 27 Ave. SW, Calgary AB T2T 1G9 Canada – (403) 229. 0864

  • Roderick Russell

    Craig, I just have to comment on your article “Blears Lies Exposed” since it was lies from the very same Hazel Blears that caused me so many problems back in 2005. I was then living in Manchester, UK. A Member of Parliament had approached the government asking for an honest investigation into my complaints of torture. Though you are probably sick of hearing about it, it is all outlined on the wiki whose URL is:

    http://zerzetzen.wikispaces.com

    Blears role in the government cover-up conspiracy was pivotal. At the time she was Minister responsible for Special Branch and MI5. If you look on the WIKI at “Ch. 4 ?” Government Cover-up Conspiracy”, her role in the cover-up is explained. Some of her letters are also included so that anybody interested can see for themselves.

    Basically, the MP’s request for an honest investigation met with the following written responses (some of the letters are on the Wiki for anyone to view) all of which were designed by Ms. Blears to ensure no investigation ever took place. Firstly, the Home Office said they were investigating which turned out to be a lie because Ms. Blears then wrote that they wouldn’t investigate because she said I had never reported the matter to the police in the first place. An MP then proved to Blears and Blair (who was now also involved) that I had reported the matter to the police. So now the lie changed: according to Ms. Blears I had reported it and the police had investigated which was also untrue since they had never investigated. Her excuses are mutually exclusive. If one were true, the others must be lies. In fact, they are all lies. Meanwhile I was getting threatened just for pushing the matter with Ms. Blears. Finally, she said that my complaint was a civil matter anyway. Yet Ms. Blears was replying to accusations of death threats, vehicles smashed into property, etc. Ms. Blears is a lawyer. Surely lawyers know the difference between civil and criminal law.

    Incidentally, if anybody wants to know why my complaints are a human rights abuse and not just crimes, it is because the State is provably involved in some of the zerzetsen torture and in the cover-up conspiracy.

    Blears’s lies back in 2005 ensured that my complaints of zerzetsen torture would never be honestly investigated and that the cover-up conspiracy would continue to this day. The result: 4 more years of threats against my wife and children as well as myself. If you read the Wiki you will see “more of Blears lies exposed”. This woman seems to have a history of covering up human rights abuses.

    Incidentally I can be difficult to contact because my email, post and even telephone are sometimes controlled by MI5/6 and CSIS and I have definitive proof of this.

    Roderick Russell – #207, 1733 – 27 Ave. SW, Calgary AB T2T 1G9 Canada – (403) 229. 0864

  • Dima

    Please! Can anyone help me to watch this video? I am from Uzbekistan. And all this kind of materials are constantly blocking by all ISPs.

Comments are closed.