- This topic is empty.
-
Posts
-
Okay, Epstein and the royal family.
Look what just happened. Genocide Starmer “calls for” ex-Prince Andrew to testify in the USA. Some more photos and emails come out from the occupied territory known as Washington DC. More info is suddenly in the public domain about both ex-PA and Peter Mandelson. Mandelson falls. Starmer’s premiership is widely viewed as in danger, perhaps imminent danger. Starmer suddenly doesn’t say anything about ex-PA any more.
A bit later, there’s talk of airports. Specifically there’s talk of Epstein using a British military airport – RAF Marham near Sandringham in Norfolk – followed by stories about Stansted and Luton and “you don’t need a visa if you transfer from one private jet to another at a private facility”. (Remind me of the definition of “human trafficking” again.)
Bear in mind that ex-PA is a f*cking idiot. See his famous interview for proof of this. This suggests there is no way he can be allowed by the British elite to testify publicly anywhere.
Also bear in mind that Princess Diana was murdered, and then, as fast as you know it, her ex-husband was in Paris grabbing her body. (Readers with ex-wives might like to consider how tricky this might be if you wanted to do the same for some reason.)
Epstein too was murdered. This is about as obvious as anything can be.
The “king” is starting to be heckled about Epstein. “How much did you know?” etc.
Funnily enough, his bf Michael Fawcett has done stalwart work as a “party organiser”.
Media circles are beginning to smell the air and they know the “king” and the mediaeval monarchist arrangement in Britain is in trouble. Never mind that in recent years shitclown terms such as “the UK government” have become widespread. That’s a symptom of decay and precarity. When the monarchy falls, there will be a few drips and then BANG, things will start happening quickly.
Watch for the following.
1) Articles about “William, Prince of Wales”, i.e. the crown prince. Because if the elite have to sacrifice his father, it’s him they will put up as a “consensus” replacement, isn’t he good, he’s so ready, what a kind man who cares about the proles and the sick so much, etc.
2) Articles preparing for the “suiciding” of ex-Prince Andrew. Because as I said, they’re not going to allow him to testify.
And…guess what…look what the machine is putting out right now…
The crown prince has been talking about “male suicide” and giving everyone tips about their “emotions”>
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cm21d4j26pdo
This was him dressing up as a “chav” with his army officer pals:
https://revoltingsubject.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/f_200604_april11ed__202427a.jpg
This is him joking about the spread of Covid-19:
https://edition.cnn.com/2020/03/04/uk/prince-william-coronavirus-joke-intl-scli-gbr
The guy’s a f*cking moron just like his father, grandfather, and uncle, and he has no basis on which to give anyone advice about their emotions or about anything else.
But I suspect he’s going to be talked about a lot as a man who’s so good at taking responsibility and rising to the occasion on behalf of us all.
Another piece on “Prince” William’s sage thoughts about suicide:
“Suicide rates for UK men are a ‘national catastrophe’, says Prince William
William tells radio panel that talking about emotions and mental health should become ‘second nature to us all’”
His speech for after his uncle gets suicided and his father gets exposed is probably already being drafted. Sob, sob, sometimes it’s so hard to be a man… He crossed the line but he was my uncle … And the pressure was too much even for Daddy … ” And no film of him losing his temper because he hasn’t got the right pen to sign some document or other … What a guy, stepping up, just like George VI, etc……..
Wait, then there’s the other alternative. Leaving the Middle Ages behind. What do we reckon?
Suicide, right. And as far as I know he hasn’t even claimed to have known anyone who committed suicide. So why’s he being given this topic to spout about?
Daily Mail reports Prince Andrew arrested!
Correction: should be “former prince”
Remarkable timing by Brian Red.
Clearly BR has sources at the highest level in the English Establishment. 😎😇
It would appear he is being detained by the ordinary Plod. It is unclear who will want to question him about what. It should be totally UK jurisdiction by officers with British only passports and 3 generations prior, born and living on UK soil. Who wants him and why are the most important questions.
It’s his birthday today, bless him, still the Queen’s son, still a prince, even if the porky earl of Caernarfon may have been more than a friend and shoulder to cry on for the Queen. The rumours were rife at the time of his birth, and the official photo following his birth looks less than joyous.
Maybe Epstein did really die and the bearded dishevelled man being escorted by IDF officers off a plane in Israel wasn’t him. Maybe the word that his bank account is still in use is just made up rumour. Maybe the prison officer’s statement that a switch took place during the missing 3 minutes on CCTV at the prison is another fiction. Maybe all the files being deleted even though they were noted previously are being accessed by someone else.
Today planes are taking off from USAF Mildenhall, flying en masse towards Iran, where the Strat of Hormuz is closed for Iran to conduct exercises. Two large aircraft carriers await them.
Andrew is a liability, a useful idiot as Epstein described him, but the UK security services need to know what he knows, need to know about who gets through UK airports bypassing national security. This is not currently about the trafficking of young women and children, but about foreign influences bypassing national security at many points across the UK.
I hope he will put up with the inconvenience. I hope they keep him on British soil. I hope they can treat him as a British asset, more than an Israeli asset, though it is clear Epstein delivered the goods for many who paid his and Ghislaine’s asking price.
This is the monarchy in jeopardy, the government’s perfidy needs to be exposed. Blair thought he was playing with the big boys on a level playing field. The eggs in the basket that is Andrew must be kept safe. He is the most high status link we have to the network of global power broking. The risk he faces is the threat from Trump and from Israel.
Things are happening. Keep this in-house. Ghislaine’s pardon depends on it.
More evidence is coming to light that Epstein is alive. Reuters reports that he purchased a palace in Morocco a few days before his arrest, and that he transferred $600 million into a trust 2 days before his suicide. The allegations that the Maxwell interview was of somebody else are also widely believed, and both Epstein and Maxwell are understood to be in Israel at this point.
They are too valuable to lose for the entire web of influence that is routed through them
Mandelson arrested, same offence as AMW!
(temporarily resurfaces)
As the monarchist buffoon David Dimbleby – a man with so much judgement and love for his fellow human being that he joined the Bullingdon Club at Oxford – sagely opines that the monarchy may emerge stronger from the disgrace and arrest of the “king’s” brother, Andrew Lownie manages to say what some of us have been saying for 30 years…
namely, that the respect that’s given to the royal family and the monarchy in Britain has long been a huge national security hole.
Unfortunately Lownie says, “That’s what the Chinese and Russian secret services realised – that the easiest vulnerability of the British establishment is the royal family”.
But it wasn’t China or Russia that the ex-prince was passing government secrets to, was it? It was the Occupation regime in Palestine.
Did I just say government secrets? Okay, so what’s all this stuff about possible “misconduct in public office” charges? What about the Official Secrets Act? What about espionage?
Maybe the tune will change once the police have called off the search of the ex-prince’s residence for anything that might possibly incriminate the “king”, eh?
I think it’s total bullsh*t that the “king” wasn’t informed about the arrest and searches. IMO he was the guy who instructed them in the first place.
Also, just to tie a few things together here… David Dimbleby held the pen for the d*ckhead in the fancy hat whose face is on the coinage when the said d*ckhead was the crown prince, ghosting his autobiography for him.
In that tome, it’s mentioned how when Thatcher was PM the crown prince pushed for setting up a kind of second Foreign Office to handle relations with the despotisms of the Gulf. Fast forward a few decades, and curiously it was a figure from precisely one such despotism – the Qatari one to be precise – that the crown prince, who is now the “king”, was exposed as accepting millions of euros from, in suitcases full of cash. Oh wait, it was for “charity”.
Lownie says “it was priced in that Ferguson’s charity dabbling might not be entirely altruistic”. Such litotes is very poor writing, but let’s leave that aside. “Royal charities” – ah yes. Is that family one of givers or takers? Don’t we all know the answer? This is unless you’re the kind of person who won’t wash your hand for a week after you’ve shaken hands with one of the wretches.
What should happen now is that those who want to move forward a bit, after the long backward step since the year 1660, should focus on points that include the following.
1. What have the ramifications been of allowing this family of filthy arrogant “entitled” f*ckers to operate at high levels in the state without ever undergoing proper vetting, but instead benefiting from an entire swathe of fawning sycophants? Look at SIS, MI5, the arts – including things like the British Museum – the universities, anything to do with land law, the judiciary, the Church of England, the media. (On that last point, why has almost everything to do with issues of media freedom as against privacy rights in this country always involved considerations of the royal family first and foremost?)
2. Those who own felt tip pens and can get hold of spray paint might like to remember that monarchist symbols are everywhere. They are probably even more prevalent than representations of Lenin were in the USSR.
3. It’s time to start ridiculing those who have accepted monarchist awards and honours. Tracy Emin, f*ck you! Dawn French, Benjamin Zephaniah, etc. – these are the people who deserve respect for turning such “honours” down.
4. How does wanting a gong, and the gong system generally, affect corruption and the keeping shut of mouths? Bit of a no-brainer, that one – even before we realise the role of Lords Lieutenant in the tax system, which may surprise some.
5. Time to ridicule the idiots who refer to Britain as the “UK” too. Surely Scottish separatists can agree with leftwing internationalists (Scottish or otherwise) on this one? No-one makes anyone say “UK”, okay? It’s totally up to you what you say. Call it “Britain”. Consider it a dare. You’ll feel much better if you do. This country doesn’t have to have a monarchist regime, okay. “Don’t let daylight in upon magic”? “Chesterton’s Fence”? “The Tragedy of the Commons”? These are just totally bullsh*t lines that right wing conservatives come out with, to attempt to “justify” what, deep down, they know cannot be justified.
“Look at SIS, MI5, the arts – including things like the British Museum – the universities, anything to do with land law, the judiciary, the Church of England, the media”
And of course the armed forces too – not just the army, but also the other services which are still called the “royal” navy, royal air force, and within the army the “king’s” this, that, and the other. There’s a reason for that.
Spread the word… “Rumpelstiltskin”!
No more “King Street”, “Queen’s Road”, “sovereign” coins, and “Royal” Theatre. They managed to dump this crap in most of Ireland. How about Britain catches up?
And of course there’s the trio of far-right political parties with “UK” in their name: Reform UK, Advance UK, and Restore UK. Yes this is the 2020s, but why don’t they dress up like Henry VIII for full effect?
The statement allegedly made by the police that they had received information from the “lord speaker”, i.e. Michael Forsyth, that Mandelson was about to flee the country, may actually be true. (Mandelson has done this before at least once when he was in trouble.) Forsyth seems to be denying only that he had info about Mandelson’s “movements”, not what he is actually said to have had information about, which is Mandelson’s intentions. Forsyth in this scenario could have been acting as conduit for the “king”. Which is not to say the BVI would be the most likely destination for Mandelson. The “king” and his advised lackeys probably think they’re playing a clever game. He ain’t half going to come a cropper.
“They managed to dump this crap in most of Ireland.”
In an article today from the Irish Times archived link https://archive.is/dm0aH.
“Ireland to allow French and British vessels to patrol Irish-controlled waters”
The Royal Navy and the Marine Nationale will be helping us out 😀 “specifically focused on addressing the threat from the Russia shadow fleet, a group of hundreds of vessels used by Moscow to transport sanctioned oil.
Shadow fleet vessels often enter Irish economic waters where they occasionally loiter over subsea cables. They are also considered an environmental risk due to their poor condition.”There have been multiple articles from the same paper over the last 12-18 months sounding alarm bells over a Russian navy vessel or ship in “Irish controlled waters.” They refer to the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) as Irish controlled waters neglecting to point out that they are international waters and any ship can be there if they want to be. However in this article the refer to the EEZ as “Irish economic waters.”
Good to know the Royal Navy has our backs.
The British elite seem to be jamming themselves up You-Know-What creek, as the conveyer to the police of the story about Mandelson’s intended flight to the British Virgin Islands switches from the “lord speaker” (Michael Forsyth) to the Commons Speaker (Lindsay Hoyle). Oopsadaisy!
But find me a news site that mentions that Forsyth was once deputy chairman of J P Morgan UK. J P Morgan is a “financial” company with global reach. And guess what – both Mandelson and Epstein were involved with it.
The MSM is rushing to report that somebody got a bit confused and mixed up the speaker of one House with the speaker of the other. Like f*ck they did!
Hoyle could be being introduced into the narrative because even long after the days of the crook Michael Martin and the paedophile George Thomas, the Commons Speaker is still a role that is held in awed respect, rather as the royal family and the Archbishop of Canterbury used to be, back in the day.
So watch this space. I’m reminded of the way the Belgian royal family were once called in to bolster respect in the Belgian arrangement after many politicians had been implicated in a paedophile murder scandal in which the best-known figure was Marc Dutroux. Perhaps Hoyle will soon solemnly address the nation? Will the Speaker’s chair in the Commons take over from the throne in Westminster Abbey and the lectern in Downing Street for a day or two? It could do.
The nature of the “reporting” also comes across in the fact that the “news” that Mandelson has had to surrender his British passport (goodness knows how many others he holds) isn’t being put in the context of the fact that a British citizen flying to the British Virgin Islands (which are a British colony) isn’t required to bring his passport.
Of course a commercial carrier might ask to see one, but hey, this is Peter Mandelson we’re talking about and there are such things as private jets as well as lowly commercial ones and “royal” airforce ones.
Then again, Hoyle may well be more than simply a usefully “respected” puppet figure in this. What in the blazes was actually doing in the tax haven called the British Virgin Islands when he supposedly heard the “rumour” about Mandelson’s impending flight there? Apparently he was marking 75 years since the restoration of the territory’s legislature. He gets about, doesn’t he?
Interesting word, “restoration”. The Restoration in 1660 is part of the problem here.
Gordon Brown is also being used as a respected figure, given the way he was marketed for 13 years as a very serious and spendthrift guy who “knew his economics” rather than as the part of the Blair-Brown crimes against humanity duo that he actually was.
Some may feel I am being unfair and mention that Brown has criticised Goldman Sachs. But he is no Jimmy Carter. First, Brown was once honorary patron of the Jewish National Fund:
https://www.scottishpsc.org.uk/gordon-brown-mp-a-case-to-answer/
Second, and more recently he could hardly open his mouth about Gaza without going “hostages, hostages, hostages”, and he wasn’t talking about the Palestinians held by the Zionists. What a berk. How much was he paid?
And don’t forget that Brown may himself may have been a lover of Peter Mandelson. The story is that they had a super-bitchy breakup and then they made it up, at least through gritted teeth. Perhaps now he’s got his claws out for Mandelson again.
Morning all. History has been made in the Brummi by election, a first time win by a Green candidate trouncing Reform and Labour into 2nd./3rd. place.
Many muslim voters showed to accept a woman working class plumber as MP, lead by an openly gay Zionist who wants to legalise and regulate currently illegal drugs.
The message is clear to see for all, muslims do accept diversity, even if it does not fit with their personal views, which can’t be said from the sour grapes merchants ripping into them with their bile and excuses of daring to print their leaflets in Urdu, family voting, jawn, that age old hangover which lets partys cheat at elections. CHANGE IT THEN, MAKE THE VOTING SYSTEM PROPORTIONAL AND REGULATED!
Have a great day.The Green Party won that by-election simply because they weren’t Labour or Reform.
“The Green Party won that by-election simply because they weren’t Labour or Reform.”
Is that not the very essence of a political shift? People didn’t vote for what was on offer from Labour, Reform, the conservatives and the Lib Dems and instead voted for what the Green party and its candidate had to offer. The conservatives and Lib Dems even lost their deposits failing to get 5% of the vote.
Unusual for turnout to be higher in a by-election than in the preceding general election in the same constituency.
Starmer talked up both Reform and the Greens, contrary to the notion that Labour ignored the Greens. They all work for the same masters.
Those two things suggest this by-election was the opposite of purely local. But in these febrile times, that may not be a surprise.
The overlap of Muslims with stupid idiots was a factor in the implementation of the desired result. Anyone who is a Muslim and who votes Green needs to grow some brain cells fast. One doesn’t even have to mention Zack Polanski to make this point, although mentioning him does amplify it. Don’t do what community leaders tell you, even if they mention Gaza.
George Galloway was a disgrace. He is an intelligent man and quite capable of understanding what Green politics is about.
The overlap of white people with stupid idiots as the main factor in the growth of support for Reform, Restore, and Advance has long been clear.
People talk about opinion polls and how sometimes they get things wrong. But there are those who have extremely good information about what’s going to happen in an election. Y’know, surveillance and computers and behavioural science and smartphones and stuff. Television watchers may get a surprise on the night. That doesn’t mean Elon Musk does.
Anyway we have August 2029 as the date when it will be sensible to have left Britain by. This won’t be pushed back, because even if the election is cancelled or the rules are changed, that won’t create a later date for the clampdown. But the date may well be brought forward.
Correction: turnout wasn’t higher, but it was only very slightly lower. It fell from 48.0% to 47.6%.
@Pears – “The Green Party won that by-election simply because they weren’t Labour or Reform.”
@ET – “Is that not the very essence of a political shift?”
It could well be, yes. I’m not sure what the word “simply” is doing in Pears’s observation.
But I agree that most who voted Green didn’t vote for what the Greens have to offer (e.g. if you want to drive a car that won’t turn into a useless metal box a short way into a power cut, you’re antisocial). There is a lot of awareness in the population about greenwash. Most people know it’s codswallop. The problem is that (as with many other things) this awareness doesn’t connect with articulation or with action, so it doesn’t lead anywhere. Most people know schools are rubbish, too – as well as the medical system.
Two notes on Green party politics as it is presented:
* NATO membership – they’re not really against it. There’s no way they’ll go into the next general election saying they are.
* animal rights – I support a ban on all blood sports, an end to badger culling, an end to factory farming, and a complete ban on close confinement in cages – all of which are promised in the Green manifesto. But the notion of “the creation of a new Commission on Animal Protection” shows that the backtracking (“kicking it into the long grass”) has already been worked out. Why not ban vivisection and other harmful animal experimentation on Day One? An immediate ban is what those of us who seriously support these things have long wanted.
Perhaps the two main political parties in the House of Commons after the next election will both be British versions of the National Rally in France, formerly known as the National Front. They both may become seriously “rainbow” in the sense of gathering support (or fake opposition) from other political parties and from circles which haven’t so far been very “political” in flavour at all. As one RN guy said in France, “we are neither left wing, nor right wing – we are the bird”.
I’m not sure whether the point has been made yet that those who want a Reform government will be very pleased with the rise of the Greens.
The Telegraph (should we call it the Reformgraph?) cites some kinda Baxtering or similar voodoo with predicted Commons seat totals of Reform 254, Green 249, Labour 33, Tories 10 (and it seems with SNP winning more “Westminster” seats than Labour, although I couldn’t find the exact predicted numbers):
The said newspaper doesn’t ask what would actually happen after such an election outcome. It’s a shame they don’t quote figures for SNP and LibDems because then nerds could have a whale of a time wondering about the chances of a Green-SNP-Labour-LibDem coalition under Green leadership or “confidence and supply” support for minority Green government. The clichéd phrase “house of cards” comes to mind.
The Greens had a superbly well chosen candidate in that by-election. “I’m just an ordinary lass”, etc. (Never mind that most plumbers I’ve met, with very few exceptions, have been barefaced scammers and not at all trustworthy characters.)
Green and Reform are two heads of the same populist beast.
“I wasn’t much interested in politics, but then I realised an ordinary person like me, born and bred here, had to do something,” etc.
There’ll be more.
Just don’t mention elephants in dining rooms.
Brian, ‘most plumbers I met’ my friend is a plumber who does not rip people off, he does work for people that are in dire need, many old,its that some people have an attitude problem with plumbers.don’t know what is; nvolved to work to regulations, be it gas oil or electric heat pumps.
He has done his trade from the age of 14 working all hours in London, sleeping in a plastic bathtub in an container to save money, learning on the job, passing his qualifications.
He has a massive positive reputation for not letting people down in need.
I have met about six other plumbers he knows and your description does not fit, some are owned hundreds/ thousands even because people need help but cant afford to pay.
Maybe you prefer some of the regular establishment place persons os your representative, I for one prefer a plumber before a career lawyer, solicitor plus a smattering of ex forces, the plethora of service providers prefered than popular change.Dearest Shabana Mahmood: rescind your crimminality creation scheme and ambitions to become PM, drop the appeal against peaceful direct action activists of PA, now, before it will hurt your party any more.
The Green Party wanted to withdraw from NATO but changed their mind after Putin’s invasion of Ukraine. Likewise they were all for leaving the EU but since Brexit want back in.
@nevermind – Agreed that some plumbers are okay. They are a bit like dentists, medics, etc. – if you can find one who’s good, hang on to him. This said, some are exceptionally nice on the first job only. I’m very surprised that you know so many who are good and trustworthy. For the record, I belong to a minority ethnic group where I live and there is often an element of my being seen as fair game. There are also some who like nothing better than ripping off elderly people.
