Has Venezuela Abandoned Socialism? 8


I interviewed a prominent academic who is a profound critic of the Venezuelan government, and in contrast a strong academic supporter. The conversations were relaxed, open and I believe worthwhile.

There is no serious dispute that the Venezuelan government shifted to some degree towards economic liberalism under President Maduro. The question is to what extent this was an unavoidable response to crippling economic and financial sanctions, and whether there is still a socialist trajectory.

There are several more videos from my time in Venezuela still in production, which embody much of what I learnt, and after publishing them over the next few days I shall publish an article giving my considered reflections on the country.

As ever we need to spread the load and please we are looking primarily to those who have never donated or contributed before. Our Gofundme link for the Venezuelan operation is here:

This is the same crowdfunding account we used for Lebanon so discount the first £35,000 raised as it was spent in Lebanon.

Anybody is welcome to republish and reuse, including in translation.

Because some people wish an alternative to PayPal, I have set up new methods of subscription payment including a Patreon account and a Substack account if you wish to subscribe that way. The content will be the same as you get on this blog. Substack has the advantage of overcoming social media suppression by emailing you direct every time I post. You can if you wish subscribe free to Substack and use the email notifications as a trigger to come for this blog and read the articles for free. I am determined to maintain free access for those who cannot afford a subscription.

Subscriptions to keep this blog going are gratefully received.

Choose subscription amount from dropdown box:

Recurring Donations



PayPal address for one-off donations: [email protected]

Alternatively by bank transfer or standing order:

Account name
MURRAY CJ
Account number 3 2 1 5 0 9 6 2
Sort code 6 0 – 4 0 – 0 5
IBAN GB98NWBK60400532150962
BIC NWBKGB2L
Bank address NatWest, PO Box 414, 38 Strand, London, WC2H 5JB

Bitcoin: bc1q3sdm60rshynxtvfnkhhqjn83vk3e3nyw78cjx9
Ethereum/ERC-20: 0x764a6054783e86C321Cb8208442477d24834861a

Venezuela GoFundMe

 


Allowed HTML - you can use: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

8 thoughts on “Has Venezuela Abandoned Socialism?

  • M.J.

    Great stuff! I’ve shared the link to a few friends.
    Other countries could learn from Venezuela’s example about free education for all up to university being a human right. It reminds me of Cuba’s programme of free medical education to students from Africa. As I recall, the graduates didn’t use their skill to make a killing in the West, but went back to Africa to help their communities.
    Whether Cuba has been to sustain the scheme or indeed its own society generally under the pressure of the American blockade, I don’t know.

  • Siden04

    ‘Maduro recognizes Venezuela is still a capitalist-based economy…’ (Popular Resistance newsletter, 27 May, 2018).

    Thatcher: ‘there is only one economic system in the world, and that is capitalism. The difference lies in whether the capital is in the hands of the state or whether the greater part of it is in the hands of people outside of state control’ (House of Commons speech, 24 November, 1976).

    Capitalist hallmarks, such as class society, commodity production, profit motive, exploitation of wage labour, markets, etc., are found worldwide.

  • Townsman

    What exactly do you mean by “Socialism”?
    If you mean Clement Attlee’s socialism, I can be with you.
    f you mean one-party-state socialism like China or the old USSR, I’m against you because a one-party State always succumbs eventually to corruption. In a genuinely multi-party State there is at least a good chance that the parties not in power will call attention to corruption among those in power. It doesn’t always work, but there’s a chance. In a one-party state, there’s no chance.

    • Stevie Boy

      ‘Chinese socialism’ has been around, in various incarnations, for several thousand years. It is dynamic in that it learns and adapts and is run by highly qualified people. The current push to weed out corruption should be a lesson for the, corrupt, west. No-one is immune or is spared and in many cases corruption leads to prison or death for the offenders. One just has to look at the west to see the glaring differences and rampant corruption that defines western democracy. China may not be perfect but I fail to see anything good in the western democratic systems.
      The west needs a root and branch overhaul, unfortunately the corruption is so deep and wide ranging that I fail to see anything other than revolution as a cure.

      • Townsman

        I’m afraid you’ve missed the point. The key word is “eventually”. Let’s suppose you are right that Xi Jinping is a paragon of clean government who works tirelessly to root out corruption. The point is that he won’t live forever. In a decade or so there’ll be a new generation of leaders, then another, and another. Eventually, but inevitably, there will come to power a corrupt leader.
        As Popper wrote, “The problem of politics is not, ‘Who shall rule?’; it is, ‘How shall we control the rulers?’ “.

  • Pears Morgaine

    Has any country ever achieved true socialism? They either descend into dictatorship or become mixed economies.

    • Bayard

      No, because oligarchies always fight back. Short of a French Revolution style execution of all the oligarchs, there is no way round this. That’s what the Chinese Cultural Revolution was all about: it was the fightback against the oligarchical fightback.

  • M.J.

    This report shows that all is not bliss in Venezuela. The writer (James Luckey) put it nicely when he says that . “I know he’s not in there because of all the wrongs he’s done. He’s in there because bigger bully [Trump] attacked smaller bully [Maduro].”