The mainstream media for the most part has moved on. But there are a few more gleanings to be had, of perhaps the most interesting comes from the Daily Mirror, which labels al-Hilli an extremist on the grounds that he was against the war in Iraq, disapproved of the behaviour of Israel and had doubts over 9/11 – which makes a great deal of the population “extremist”. But the Mirror has the only mainstream mention I can find of the possibility that Mossad carried out the killings. Given Mr al-Hilli’s profession, the fact he is a Shia, the fact he had visited Iran, and the fact that Israel heas been assassinating scientists connected to Iran’s nuclear programme, this has to be a possibility. There are of course other possibilities, but to ignore that one is ludicrous.
Which leads me to the argument of Daily Mail crime reporter, Stephen Wright, that the French police should concentrate on the idea that this was a killing by a random Alpine madman or racist bigot. Perfectly possible, of course, and the anti-Muslim killings in Marseille might be as much a precedent as Mossad killings of scientists. But why the lone madman idea should be the preferred investigation, Mr Wright does not explain. What I did find interesting from a man who has visited many crime scenes are his repeated insinuations that the French authorities are not really trying very hard to find who the killers were, for example:
the crime scene would have been sealed off for a minimum of seven to ten days, to allow detailed forensic searches for DNA, fibres, tyre marks and shoe prints to take place.
Nearby bushes and vegetation would have been searched for any discarded food and cigarette butts left by the killer, not to mention the murder weapon.
But from what I saw at the end of last week, no such searches had taken place and potentially vital evidence could have been missed. House to house inquiries in the local area had yet to be completed and police had not made specific public appeals for information about the crime. No reward had been put up for information about the shootings.
Behind the scenes, what other short cuts have been taken? Have police seized data identifying all mobile phones being used in the vicinity of the murders that day?
The idea that the French authorities – who are quite as capable as any other of solving cases – are not really trying very hard is an interesting one.
Which leads me to this part of a remarkable article from the Daily Telegraph, which if true points us back towards a hit squad and discounts the ides that there was only one gun:
Claims that only one gun was used to kill everybody is likely to be disproved by full ballistics test results which are out in October.
While the 25 spent bullet cartridges found at the scene are all of the same kind, they could in fact have come from a number of weapons of the same make.
This throws up the possibility of a well-equipped, highly-trained gang circling the car and then opening fire.
Both children were left alive by the killers, who had clinically pumped bullets into everybody else, including five into Mr Mollier.
Zainab was found staggering around outside the car by Brett Martin, a British former RAF serviceman who cycled by moments after the attack, but he saw nobody except the schoolgirl.
Her sister, Zeena, was found unscathed and hiding in the car eight hours later.
Both sisters are now back in Britain, and are believed to have been reunited at a secret location near London.
There are of course a number of hit squad options, both governmental and private, which might well involve iraqi or Iranian interests – on both of which the mainstream media have been very happy to speculate while almost unanimously ignoring Israel.
But what interests me is why the Daily Telegraph choose, in the face of all the evidence, to minimise the horrific nature of the attack by stating that “Both children were left alive by the killers”? Zainab was not left alive by design, she was shot in the chest and her skull was stove in, which presumably was a pretty serious attempt to kill a seven year-old child. The other girl might very well have succeeded in hiding from the killers under her mother’s skirts, as she hid from the first rescuers, and then for eight hours from the police.
The Telegraph article claims to be informed by sources close to the investigation. So they believe it was a group of people, and feel motivated to absolve those people from child-killing. Now what could the Daily Telegraph be thinking?
Correction to last link: Coherent background on bros Boston life:
http://sports.yahoo.com/news/hierarchy-brothers-marathon-bombing-234204305–spt.html
@ Bluebird: As I was the one who inadvertently flipped the page here’s a summary of what you posted:
Credit Bluebird:
Alleged Boston Bombers’ Uncle Ruslan Tsarni [Tsarnaev] was married with Samantha Ankara Fuller, daughter of this guy listed below. He served 20 years as an operations officer in the CIA. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graham_Fuller
In 1995, Tsarnaev incorporated the Congress of Chechen International Organizations in Maryland, using as the address listed on incorporation documents. 11114 Whisperwood Ln, in Rockville Maryland, the home address of his then-father-in-law Graham Fuller. “Congress of Chechen International” c/o Graham Fuller.
Political literature list of CIA Graham Fuller:
http://m.foreignaffairs.com/author/graham-e-fuller
Very interesting Graham Fuller (CIA) book: (father in law of Ruslan Tsarni)
http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2007/12/13/a_world_without_islam
http://www.companydirectorcheck.com/samantha-ankara-fuller
Marriage and divorce confirmed by ancestry.com
http://search.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/sse.dll?gl=allgs&rank=1&new=1&MSAV=0&msT=1&gss=angs-c&gsln=Tsarnaev&uidh=bhv&ti=0
“I believe that this is a breakthrough for the “jason bourne” patsy identity of those two poor boys and it explains why Tamerlan was phoning his uncle Ruslan while the police was hunting them with guns and that he said ” uncle please excuse what my (mothers) family (suleimanov) has done, please help us. WE are innocent!”. Tamerlan had not contacted his CIA uncle for years before this sudden phone call. This is getting better than a movie script!”
I believe that i found a link between al Saffar and CIA Graham Fuller.
We had never heard of Shia Sheikh al Saffar of Saudi arabia, have we?
http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/2/5/1/5/7/pages251574/p251574-14.php
The clergy have played an important role in the Shias’ struggle for rights. Despite the radicalism of the Shia position with regards to the Saudi state following the Iranian revolution, by the late 1980s and the beginning of the 1990s, the situation changed. The leading Shia clerical figure within the Kingdom, Sheykh Hassan al-Saffar, notwithstanding his radical views in his early years, gradually moved toward a more moderate stance vis-à-vis the Saudi state. According to Fuller and Francke, “al-Saffar’s liberal vision reflects the only workable long-term political strategy for the Saudi Shias, who can never aspire to the establishment of a Shia Islamic state, and who must therefore come to terms with the state in which they live—even while preserving their community’s minoritarian culture
http://www.examiner.com/article/is-the-west-ready-for-graham-e-fuller-s-forthcoming-book-a-world-without-islam
http://articles.latimes.com/2000/oct/23/local/me-40606
Two interesting articles of Graham Fuller regarding Islam and Hezbollah.
It does not seem that he supports zionism and he writes positively about Hezbolah and Shia.
Israel must hate him.
He definitely represents the other CIA but not the zionist CIA group.
He must have been a part of former CIA team “al Hilli”.
@ Bluebird : Story on Ruslan now mainstream. Also, “FBI agents today said they had tracked down Misha and believed he had no link to the terror attacks.”
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2315929/Boston-terror-suspects-uncle-married-CIA-officers-daughter-shared-home-agent.html
“It is unclear as to whether this [his Miranda Rights] will matter in court as the FBI says Tsarnaev has already confessed to a witness.” [Lucky he did that. Is there no physical evidence?]
“A spokeswoman for U.S. Attorney Carmen Ortiz said: ‘Before being advised of his rights, the 19-year-old suspect told authorities that his older brother, Tamerlan Tsarnaev, 26, only recently had recruited him to be part of the attack’.”
“Police had previously said Dzhokhar exchanged gunfire with them for more than an hour last Friday before they captured him inside a boat in a suburban Boston neighborhood.”
[He was later said to be gunless. Gunfire all one way for an hour? The media was nearby so the timeframe must be correct. What were the police doing, firing a burst and waiting for word from the thermal imaging cam that suspect stopped moving. The must have seen from those images he wasn’t returning fire, so they wanted him very dead.]
“Investigators have found pieces of remote-control equipment among the debris and are analyzing them, officials said. One official described the detonator as ‘close-controlled,’ meaning it had to be triggered within several blocks of the bombs.”
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2316019/Dzokhar-Tsarnaev-locked-small-video-recorded-cell-40-miles-outside-Boston-TV.html
It wasn’t cell phones then. Do toy-car remotes work over “several blocks” meaning at least two?
@ Tim V @ James
Piece said to have rope around it, lowered down?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2315518/Plane-fragment-9-11-wedged-Manhattan-buildings.html
Wait a sec, I shoulda been a lawyer. “FBI says Tsarnaev has already confessed to a witness. [Lucky he did that. Is there no physical evidence?]”
It wasn’t Dzokhar that confessed to Danny, it was Tamerlan, when he first carjacked. Dzokhar wasn’t aboard yet, but following in another car. So he hasn’t confessed to anything. His presence with bro might be evidence of Accessory After the Fact. I know my TV law.
“After the Cambridge shooting, the suspects carjacked a Mercedes 350 SUV at gunpoint, according to a federal affidavit. Both suspects rode in the SUV to Watertown, the affidavit says.”
“However, photographs obtained by NBC News and eyewitness accounts given to NBC News producers indicate that both a green Honda and black Mercedes SUV were parked at the scene of the Watertown shooting. Several people who were near the scene that night said the Honda was positioned behind the Mercedes.”
“Key to that reenactment was a green Honda that appears to be the same car that was parked on Laurel Street, in Watertown, during the 200-round shootout there.”
http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/04/27/17944133-police-eye-second-car-in-watertown-shootout-after-boston-bombing?lite
They’re sticking with the “200-round shootout” extending for an hour, with a now acknowledged unarmed suspect. Not a bit of curiosity how this could be.
The misnamed journalists were partying with their masters, the DC elites, last night and for all we know the after-party is still in progress.
@NR: Any minute now the Merc will morph into a dark Pajero, and the other vehicle, whatever it was, will morph into a white Peugeot 206. I can hardly wait! As for the mechanic who claimed the younger Tsarnaev picked up the Merc from his garage, where it was being repaired, whatever has become of him?
@ BB: Yes, it is interesting about the Graham Fuller articles. He seems more of a pragmatist than a ideologist. Here’s one:
http://calhoun.nps.edu/public/bitstream/handle/10945/11175/fullerFeb06.pdf?sequence=1
Predictable:
http://intellihub.com/2013/04/26/boston-terror-attack-invokes-drones-to-surveil-next-years-marathon/
I wonder if they’ll be powered by Tenergy batteries.
Some helpful advice for the pros on drone batteries (including Tenergy), and what can go wrong when things are not done right:
http://www.ardrone-flyers.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1474
Particular caution should be paid to Lithium polymer batteries, which can explode.
BTW, were any batteries being charged in the vicinity of the finish line, for the race cameras, etc.? Did anyone spot drones in the area?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2264437/Pictured-The-lithium-battery-grounded-Boeings-hi-tech-Dreamliner-jets-world.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2279175/Airbus-drops-lithium-batteries-new-A350-airliner-Boeings-Dreamliner-plagued-battery-problems.html
http://www.nashuatelegraph.com/news/1001019-469/nashua-hobby-show-owner-admits-he-may.html
A faulty battery in an airliner can send stock prices plummeting. Do competitors benefit from this; do they benefit only if the technology they are using has a better track record?
Are the lithium batteries for emergency lighting systems located in or near the galley in these planes?
One more link to the dangers of lithium ion batteries, Airbus and fire suppression:
http://www.shawconnect.ca/NewsArticle/Money/6442531511_182/Airbus_warned_of_lithium_battery_risks_a_year_ago_presentation/story.aspx
Carlos Arredondo [cowboy hatted man pushing horrifically injured Jeff Bauman] said Boston police had already stopped by Tuesday and asked for some personal belongings on behalf of the FBI, which is running the investigation. He gave them the shoes, pants and T-shirt he wore at the race, as well as four photographs he took immediately after the attack.
He wasn’t specific about what investigators hoped to discover from his clothing, saying only that they took some items ‘‘they need to evaluate.’’
http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/2013/04/17/marathon-rescuer-gets-attention-from-press-and-fbi/YO30koYmEjpyh4vzxO49iL/story.html
From how many other rescuers did the FBI take forensic samples?
Many conspiracy sites are all over these two, plus the assisting woman, as being “crisis actors” [doubtful], but the authorities must have sensed something hinky.
Carlos and Jeff are fully certified all-American heros by all media. CNN promotes a quickie, private “fundme” donation site for Jeff.
Carlos is alleged [don’t know if true] to be an illegal/undocumented immigrant/alien [pick-ur-word] intergral to the new US immigration law being debated. He’ll be presented to Congress, as were Sandy Hook victims in gun law debate. Congress needs it’s own permanent symphony orchestra to provide tear-jerking/patriotic sound-track as required. John Williams as the nation’s composer laureate.
“Bauman… was the subject of a photo that’s come to symbolize the April 15 carnage as he was rushed away in a wheelchair with his legs shredded. Yet even in an ambulance that day, he was “adamant” as he described a man with whom he’d made eye contact depositing a bag on the sidewalk just before the blasts…”
“We were watching the runners and everyone was having a great time, and just that one guy, you know, he didn’t look like he was having a good time,” Bauman said of Tamerlan Tsarnaev, one of two suspects in the attacks. “He was right next to me at that point, and he had a bag and he had his glasses and he had kind of a leather sweatshirt type of deal and you know, it’s warm out. He was just an odd guy. He just struck me odd.”
“I just looked at him and thought, what’s this guy’s problem?” Bauman said. “He was there and then he was gone. And then: boom.”
“Bauman found himself in a hospital room full of FBI investigators to whom he relayed his recollections. Two days later, he’d do the same for a sketch artist whose drawing ended up looking “just like” Tamerlan, he said.”
Bauman… described a man in a hooded sweatshirt under a black jacket, wearing a cap and sunglasses.”
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-04-22/boston-hero-looked-guy-in-the-eyes-before-telling-fbi.html
(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE) VOICE OF JEFF BAUMAN, LOST BOTH LEGS IN BOSTON BOMBINGS: Everyone was having a great time. And just that one guy, you know, he didn’t look like he was having a good time. So, he was right next to me, you know, at that point, and he had a bag and he had his glasses. He had like a kind of like a leather like sweatshirt type of deal and, you know, it’s warm out. This is an odd guy. It just struck me odd. And, that’s what I remember of him. And then, the next thing you know, fireworks and I’m on the ground.
[No mention of bag on ground.]
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: So you actually looked this person in the eyes. I mean, you [he?] have sunglasses on but you made eye contact with this gus?
BAUMAN: Yes.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: And immediately you knew there was something wrong.
BAUMAN: Yes. Yes. Exactly. Like he just didn’t seem right, you know? So, you know, like you size somebody up and I just looked at him and I was like what’s this guy’s problem, you know?
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Yes. And how long before the explosion was that, Jeff?
BAUMAN: You know, it could have been five minutes. it could have been two minutes.
BAUMAN: It was quick, you know?
BAUMAN: He was there and then he was gone and then boom.
BAUMAN: Yes. Well, I was still conscious. I was being transported from the blast site to the hospital. And the whole time I — when I was in the hospital, I was given descriptions of the guy, [mis-spoken/mis-transcribed?] the first guy, the guy with the hat and the glasses, the aviators and the five o’clock shadow.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Tamerlan. Suspect number one. Right.
BAUMAN: Yes. Suspect umber one. I was just real out of it —
(CROSSTALK)
BAUMAN: — coming out of the first operation, I guess. Yes. The FBI was all around my room. They were there from the moment I was talking right when I got to the hospital.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: And was it — was the sketch artist ever brought in so they actually drew a picture or they just took your description, the words of your description?
BAUMAN: Yes. They — well, for the first suspect, I think they just took the description, but then, there was — then I think they saw the second suspect and on like Wednesday, they had a sketch artist in.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: And so, he drew a picture. And did it look like the guy that we now know is suspect number one?
BAUMAN: Yes. It looked just like him.
(END VIDEOTAPE)
BLITZER: Amazing young man. If you’d like to help Jeff Bauman with his recovery and I hope you do, you can go to GoFundMe.com/BucksforBauman. Good idea.
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1304/26/sitroom.01.html
Another interview: (BEGIN VIDEOTAPE) JEFF BAUMAN, BOSTON VICTIM (via telephone): Everyone was having a great time. And just that one guy, you know, he didn’t look like he was having a good time. So he was right next to me, you know, at that point, and he had a bag and he had his glasses.
[No mention of placing bag on ground.]
He had, like, kind of like a leather-like sweatshirt type of deal and it is warm out. He’s just an odd guy, just struck me odd. And that’s what I remember of him. And then next thing you know, I hear fireworks and I’m on the ground, you know?
(END VIDEOTAPE)
TAPPER: Jeff Bauman is now facing a pile of medical bills, so his friends have set up this web site to help out. If you want to donate, go to gofundme.combucksforbauman, Bucks for Bauman
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1304/26/cnr.11.html
NR
28 Apr, 2013 – 10:36 am a couple of observations come to mind. I am sure others have made the same.
First if there is rope around the landing gear – if is entwined – this virtually rules out the possibility that it came from the impact – the only realistic way it could have got from impact to that crevasse. Any rope would have been consumed in the resulting in the inferno. At the very least it would be scorched. This leaving aside the unlikely scenario of the landing gear somehow getting entangled in rope either before or after impact.
So if that part is not there as a result of the impact, different explanations must be imagined. How could landing gear of an aircraft find its way to that location some time after the event?
The more recently it has been placed there, the greater the likelihood although this does not rule out a long time frame. (Up to 12 years unless incredibly there prior to 2001) Put another way, the longer there, the greater the chance of it being discovered.
Basically I see two hypothetical explanations, though others might think of more: the landing gear is genuinely a part of of one of the two planes (in which case experts will be able to identify the type and probably the specific aircraft) or it is the landing gear of an aircraft that did not crash into the Twin Towers.
In the case of the former the part would have had to have been discovered after the event and retained, then subsequently conveyed to the scene and presumably lowered to where it was found using the rope.
Who would do this? Well it would have to be someone who knew where it was stored, could get access to it, and then able to convey it to where it was found. Only someone who wanted to shed light on the actual aircraft would do this. Could it be someone who wanted the truth to be known?
The second situation could only be explained in terms of counterfeit – i.e. someone setting out to identify an aircraft, though not the actual impacting aircraft. This might conceivably be a ruse to support the official story and refute claims that it was not the civilian aircraft as stated by the Government.
So now we must await the results of the investigation – as long as it is not hi-jacked and corrupted by national agencies – to better understand what happened.
@ Q 28 Apr, 2013 – 4:50 pm
“@NR: Any minute now the Merc will morph into a dark Pajero, and the other vehicle, whatever it was, will morph into a white Peugeot 206. I can hardly wait! As for the mechanic who claimed the younger Tsarnaev picked up the Merc from his garage, where it was being repaired, whatever has become of him?”
If green Honda moved with hijacked Benz to Watertown that means another “lone wolf” drove it. That’s 3 lone wolves, almost a wolf-pack. Or AQ on-line training has simple instructions on converting Hondas to self-driving Google cars.
The mysterious “Misha”
When finding him I found a lot of interesting blogs. The below one was posted in 2006 by a blog poster from Surrey:
http://zzzptm.com/wordpress/?p=167
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2006 2:29 pm Post subject: Hamza: Patsy For The Clash Of Civilisations Gang.
In an effort to scare the pants off the misinformed and a largely dim-witted television-gazing public, the prosecution in the trial in Britain of Abu Hamza al-Masri (formerly Mustafa Kamel Mustafa) told the court the Egyptian cleric at the Finsbury Park mosque “had a 10-volume terrorism manual at his home which was dedicated to Osama bin Laden and featured a list of targets including Big Ben, skyscrapers, airports and football stadiums,” even “large congregations at Christmas” would not be spared, according to the UK Telegraph. Prosecutor David Perry and the British government told the court Hamza’s home contained a veritable treasure trove of stereotypical Muslim hate materials, including “more than 2,700 audio tapes and 570 video tapes, some of them labelled ‘Jihad’… [and] boxes piled with blank tapes and others labelled ‘master’, suggesting they were being prepared for distribution.” It would appear Hamza was attempting to out-do the phantom al-Zarqawi in straight up psychopathic viciousness. In order to understand how far the Brits will go to portray radical Islam as a religion of serial murder and wanton butchery, it is best to quote the UK Telegraph article at length: Britain and Western nations were “100 per cent anti-Islam”, [Hamza] said in another tape, calling on his followers to spread Islam “by the sword” and adding: “European leaders only respect those that are strong.” He said: “Killing the kafir for any reason is OK, killing the kafir for no reason is OK,” and he specifically singled out those that granted licences for “wine shops”. Hamza added: “We like blood and are addicted to it. When they say they love Allah they must ask themselves how much fafir blood they have spilt for Allah.” Describing non-believers as “germs and viruses” in another tape he added: “There is no drop of liquid loved by Allah more than blood of Serbs, Jews or any other enemy of Allah.” In a speech about a terrorist attack in Egypt, which killed 58 people in November 1997, Hamza told his audience the tourist industry should be Islamised and added: “While children should not be killed directly, their killing is permissible if they are in the target area.” Asked if suicide bombing was permissible he said: “People call it suicide to put people off. It is not called suicide, it is called martyrdom.” The court heard Hamza was calling for a worldwide “caliphate” of Muslim Shariah law and for a Muslim ruler in the White House. Hamza claimed Jews were “blasphemous, traitors and dirty” and added that “Hitler was sent to torture and humiliate Jews”, the court was told. In short, Hamza was portrayed as the Charlie Manson of Islam. However, it should be remembered that MI6 and the CIA spent a lot of time and billions of dollars a few short years ago looking under rocks high and low for Charlie Manson-like Muslim nut jobs such as Abu Hamza for operations in Afghanistan and later in Kosovo and elsewhere. Hamza was associated with al-Muhajiroun, an offshoot of Hizb ut-Tahrir, a militant Islamic organization that draws its “middle leaders and lieutenants are from the old Muslim Brotherhood,” according to Misha Pozhininsky of Sobaka. It is well known that the Muslim Brotherhood was penetrated and co-opted by the CIA in the 1950s and 1960s (John Loftus, a former Justice Department prosecutor, believes British intelligence sponsored the Brotherhood even earlier, at the close of the Second World War and relocated many of its members from Egypt to Saudi Arabia in the 1950s). According to the Washington Post, “State Department and CIA officials have met with Brotherhood activists in Egypt, Kuwait, Jordan, the Palestinian territories and elsewhere to track currents within Islamic politics.” Moreover, according to Loftus, “back in the late 1990s, the leaders [of al-Muhajiroun] all worked for British intelligence in Kosovo. Believe it or not, British intelligence actually hired some Al-Qaeda guys to help defend the Muslim rights in Albania and in Kosovo. That’s when Al-Muhajiroun got started.” One of Hamza’s associates, Haroon Rashid Aswat, pegged as the July 7 London bombing “mastermind,” was a British intelligence asset. Of course, considering British intelligence hired out (for the tidy sum of £100,000) an “al-Qaeda” cell in a botched effort to kill Libya’s Qaddafi, this sort of revelation should come as no surprise (the allegation was made by former MI-5 officer David Shayler and corroborated by French intelligence). One look at Aswat and it is obvious he is little more than a mastermind at tying his shoes in the morning. It stands to reason the CIA and MI6 would naturally recruit the most vicious and demented of patsy terrorists for the long-term plan to discredit and slander Islam, as well as attempt to take out enemies such as Qaddafi and Slobodan Milosevic (and, as well, stir up trouble in Russia’s troubled Muslim republics, a scheme dreamed up by Zbigniew Brzezinski), thus the accusations against the misanthropic hatemonger Abu Hamza al-Masri are no surprise. No doubt MI6 went out of their way to find a dim bulb such as Hamza, one who could be easily and credibly associated with rooms full of hate material (obviously, a person residing in England or America with even the slightest lick of intelligence would not be associated with such material in the wake of nine eleven). As a set-up patsy, Hamza will now take a long and hard fall, providing the British government, the American Straussian neocons, and the Zionist master planners in Israel with even more grist for their total war mill. In the interim, we will be subjected to even more lurid details about Hamza and his confederates, details that fulfill the most rabid and hateful fantasies of the Muslim hating neocons, a small group of depraved sociopaths determined to spread chaos, suffering, and murder in the Middle East.
http://ww.propagandamatrix.com/articles/february2006/070206victory.htm
http://www.thefreelibrary.com/CIA+leaves+U.S.+soldiers+blind+against+terrorists.-a0140524702
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chechnya-sl/message/26805
The mysterious “Misha”.
The mysterious Misha is obviously Russion Truther and ex-Afghanistan fighter Red Army Ltd. MISHA POSHININSKY.
Searching for him there are a lot of Blogs regarding Chechnia and Afghanistan.
N THE AGE OF UNIVERSAL DECEIT,TELLING THE TRUTH IS A REVOLUTIONARY ACT”
(Misha Pozhininsky)
Misha Pozhininsky Born and educated in Kaliningrad, Misha Pozhininsky joined the Red Army’s elite Airborne corps and served two tours of duty in Afghanistan. After being cast out in Gorbachev’s “reforms,” he tried to make a shift to civilian life – a process which has been hard and never-ending. After working for a machinist for a few years and as a bodyguard in Tajikistan and Moscow, he emigrated to America, where he drove a taxi and, in his words, “thought daily about killing myself.” Unlike most, he managed to make a triumphant return, combining a steely composure and his suicidal tendencies into a successful career as a photojournalist.
Interesting article by Misha regarding Russian tactics in Afghanistan including the poisoning of all enemy leaders in a conference.
http://www.network54.com/Forum/155335/thread/1081645158/1081645158/A+Good+War+Kabul+1979
NR
The “Nine One One” New York part found in the breeze alley.
Doubtful it’s landing gear. The “parts number” puts it as a clamp. Probably flap actuator installation.
Could it have got there ?
Maybe. And impacts do send things fly (or rather “not flying”) everywhere.
What of the rope/cable ?
Could be from the build. Could be from when someone previously tried and failed to get it (from scap value, for “ebay” sale, during the clear up…and it was too hard to get). Who knows.
One thing is sure, if it did indeed come from one of those aircrafts that entered those buildings, the reinforced concrete and steel posts did their job ! That’s kind of missed in all this.
My point has always been about “9/11”, who was flying the planes ?
Not the pilots. Not the hijackers.
By that I mean….we saw planes hit the build.
We saw impacts.
We saw devastion.
We saw the building “fall”. (well, that applies to 2 buildings !)
And that’s the point.
You had to have “something” hit the buildings to make the “fall” look at least possible. An airliner is the only thing that could look the part.
And look at it anothr way.
When those two aircrafts hit, they were spaced really well apart.
Not together….or way, way out. Yet when they took off, they were under a variety of delays. If they all took off at the time they should have done, then the points of “takeover” would need to have been different.
So who turned those planes when they did ? The hijackers ? But they didnt have comms with each other. So you would need to have an a “overview” of the situation !
Its not “what happened” on that day.
It’s what “should have happened, but didnt” that shows you it’s “dodgy”. And that provides you also with a possible answer as to “why WT7 fell down”.
Three aircraft were probably “due in” that day.
One to WTC7. Then WTC2 and WTC1.
But what the hell. They got what they wanted, so the job worked out.
Just my thoughts.
@ James @ Tim V
Thanks for opinions on landing gear or whatever it was. Wait n see now.
@ Bluebird
One report says Misha is “Mikhail Allakhverdov, and he now lives in a “modest, tidy apartment with his elderly parents” in Rhode Island.”
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/04/28/we-love-this-country-mysterious-misha-friend-of-boston-bombing-suspects-reportedly-speaks/
Either he’s the real Misha or your Misha is real. Note their Misha lives in Rhode Island now. Not next door to the Russells, I hope. The gov could trot out a Misha actor.
You asked a while back if the oil companies are tied in with the intelligence agencies. Yes they are. One for the obvious reasons that oil refineries, pipelines, etc. are part of critical wartime infrastructure. In the old days a nation’s SISs would protect their industries and spy on potential enemies. With multinationalism, who knows what basket of spies and vipers is involved with oil and resource industries.
The second reason, at least until recently, was exploration data was incredibly valuable. Not only petroleum, but those companies, from their research, knew where mineral ore deposits lay. Info for investors and for states regarding who might be worth invading. Now, with satellites, don’t know how much of this data one side could have that the other didn’t.
If interested in the Carlos & Jeff show, a good account here, including comments:
http://memoryholeblog.com/2013/04/26/the-unlikely-antics-of-bostons-cowboy-hero/comment-page-3/#comment-9647
Contains this, I’d never seen before: “The main detail that’s been troubling however is this bit of evidence concerning the murder of the MIT campus police officer Sean Collier. Collier was shot execution style for no discernible reason whilst seated in his car on Thursday, 18, April. The reported shooter in that case was a white male, 5′ 5″ tall with dark complexion wearing a cowboy hat. Also, at 12:07 AM on the 18th, Cambridge Massachusetts police reported the active shooter on the MIT campus, who fired at least six shots as being a Hispanic male in a cowboy hat. Suspect is alleged to have the blood of Officer Collier on his person.”
That would explain why the FBI wanted clothing/shoes. Also shades of Lee Harvey. Cop killer = summary execution. Why change a script; just do a remake.
Also: “Or was this perhaps a contrived scene where Arredondo fulfilled a particular predetermined role? Was the apparently maimed man who would later play a key role in identifying the Tsarnaev brothers as the alleged evil culprits deliberately left unattended for a photo shoot? Why otherwise would Bauman be ignored by everyone including his valiant rescuer for so long? … I think you can see Jeff was being kept back for the major photo-op. it’s as if people have been told to leave him alone until Cowboy Carlos is ready to do the Rescue Dash.”
““What happened next, he later recounted to a reporter: He found a young man, a spectator, whose shirt was on fire. He beat out the flames with his hands. The young man, who turned out to be Jeff Bauman, had lost the lower portion of both legs….” [Totally false by vid evidence.]
Not that it matters. Carlos had another stamp of Certified Hero added when the Boston Celtics presented him at a game. No undoing that.
It’s full-on war-time propaganda now. Hollywood live-action is on board since assassination of Osama. Why not the toons with SpongeBobSquarePants playing the WWII Donald Duck role?
On-Topic: The al Hillis are not forgotten. User Alexander Cartier 4-28-2013 at 19:53:02 over at MZT posted a link to video he made of a journey he took up to Martinet. Haven’t looked yet, but others say it’s revealing as to what a strange place it is for anyone to go for any reason.
http://www.marilynztomlins.com/articles/chevaline-shootings-saad-al-hilli-sylvain-mollier-brett-martin-philippe-d-xavier-baligant-2/
“CONFIRMED: Katherine Russell (alleged bomber’s wife) is granddaughter of Richard Warren Russell, Skull and Bones member and entrepreneur in the energy industry.
“Russell’s obituary lists Warren King Russell II as son – and that’s Katherine’s emergency room doctor father.
“That means wife had family spook connections as well as husband Tamerlan (Uncle Ruslan).
NR
29 Apr, 2013 – 9:46 am
“That would explain why the FBI wanted clothing/shoes. Also shades of Lee Harvey. Cop killer = summary execution. Why change a script; just do a remake.”
My thought entirely – a point I made earlier. The cop killing has not been explained in any way. I think it has been attributed to the brothers, which if carried out by someone else, is sure sign of a set-up – a criminal conspiracy. As always if it is the law enforcement agencies are doing it, what hope is there of proving it has happened?
Here we go again . Twelve years on and still the same rationale. “Boston bombs will IMPROVE US/Israeli relations.
http://www.boomantribune.com/comments/2013/4/22/15951/4304/7#7
I tried to check out that video journey NR
29 Apr, 2013 – 10:02 am
but trouble is you have to wade through all the comments as it doesn’t seem to have pages. I don’t suppose you could give a clue where abouts it is on the scroll? Or alternatively a specific web page? Cheers.
oh sorry NR i now see u have included a date and time. will take another look later.