Well I hope you’ll like the following. It’s from the article
Prince Andrew has nonetheless conducted an interview without knowing the questions where he states that he has no recollection of meeting the girl, which given that he is royal and meets lots of people, seems not unreasonable. He also states that he was at Pizza express at the time of the incident. Indeed what marks out the fact that he is telling the truth is the following
1) It would be reasonable for him to have information about his visits and what he got up to over the course of his lifetime given that as a member of the royal family, he will have people who plan such visits for him and keep records.
2) Phillip Cross someone works on behalf of the deep state of which Simon Shercliff forms a part as the director of national security at the foreign office. Mr Shercliff is responsible for promulgating information (IOPS) on behalf of the state and a member of the DSMA commitee which suppresses information on behalf of the state. Funnily enough Philip Cross deleted referenced to Prince Andrew’s visit to Pizza Express in order to discredit him.
3) The reason why that girl made the allegation that the attack occurred on that particular date is because of the fact that it was known that he had visited Pizza Express. Pizza express was founded by a member of St Catharines college Cambridge, Peter Boizot and as the director of national security, along with the previous director of national security also come from that college, they could no doubt through the old boys network rely upon that restaurant to deny the fact that he had visited.