The mainstream media for the most part has moved on. But there are a few more gleanings to be had, of perhaps the most interesting comes from the Daily Mirror, which labels al-Hilli an extremist on the grounds that he was against the war in Iraq, disapproved of the behaviour of Israel and had doubts over 9/11 – which makes a great deal of the population “extremist”. But the Mirror has the only mainstream mention I can find of the possibility that Mossad carried out the killings. Given Mr al-Hilli’s profession, the fact he is a Shia, the fact he had visited Iran, and the fact that Israel heas been assassinating scientists connected to Iran’s nuclear programme, this has to be a possibility. There are of course other possibilities, but to ignore that one is ludicrous.
Which leads me to the argument of Daily Mail crime reporter, Stephen Wright, that the French police should concentrate on the idea that this was a killing by a random Alpine madman or racist bigot. Perfectly possible, of course, and the anti-Muslim killings in Marseille might be as much a precedent as Mossad killings of scientists. But why the lone madman idea should be the preferred investigation, Mr Wright does not explain. What I did find interesting from a man who has visited many crime scenes are his repeated insinuations that the French authorities are not really trying very hard to find who the killers were, for example:
the crime scene would have been sealed off for a minimum of seven to ten days, to allow detailed forensic searches for DNA, fibres, tyre marks and shoe prints to take place.
Nearby bushes and vegetation would have been searched for any discarded food and cigarette butts left by the killer, not to mention the murder weapon.
But from what I saw at the end of last week, no such searches had taken place and potentially vital evidence could have been missed. House to house inquiries in the local area had yet to be completed and police had not made specific public appeals for information about the crime. No reward had been put up for information about the shootings.
Behind the scenes, what other short cuts have been taken? Have police seized data identifying all mobile phones being used in the vicinity of the murders that day?
The idea that the French authorities – who are quite as capable as any other of solving cases – are not really trying very hard is an interesting one.
Which leads me to this part of a remarkable article from the Daily Telegraph, which if true points us back towards a hit squad and discounts the ides that there was only one gun:
Claims that only one gun was used to kill everybody is likely to be disproved by full ballistics test results which are out in October.
While the 25 spent bullet cartridges found at the scene are all of the same kind, they could in fact have come from a number of weapons of the same make.
This throws up the possibility of a well-equipped, highly-trained gang circling the car and then opening fire.
Both children were left alive by the killers, who had clinically pumped bullets into everybody else, including five into Mr Mollier.
Zainab was found staggering around outside the car by Brett Martin, a British former RAF serviceman who cycled by moments after the attack, but he saw nobody except the schoolgirl.
Her sister, Zeena, was found unscathed and hiding in the car eight hours later.
Both sisters are now back in Britain, and are believed to have been reunited at a secret location near London.
There are of course a number of hit squad options, both governmental and private, which might well involve iraqi or Iranian interests – on both of which the mainstream media have been very happy to speculate while almost unanimously ignoring Israel.
But what interests me is why the Daily Telegraph choose, in the face of all the evidence, to minimise the horrific nature of the attack by stating that “Both children were left alive by the killers”? Zainab was not left alive by design, she was shot in the chest and her skull was stove in, which presumably was a pretty serious attempt to kill a seven year-old child. The other girl might very well have succeeded in hiding from the killers under her mother’s skirts, as she hid from the first rescuers, and then for eight hours from the police.
The Telegraph article claims to be informed by sources close to the investigation. So they believe it was a group of people, and feel motivated to absolve those people from child-killing. Now what could the Daily Telegraph be thinking?
“Reports received are sourced at the highest levels of the Pentagon and indicate that the administration has been aware of these plans for months.
It is not just the Obama administration. This happened before.
The Air Force moved against the Bush administration in 2007 when it loaded up to nine nuclear weapons on a B 52 aircraft at Minot Air Force Base. We know now that up to three of those nuclear weapons are listed as “missing,” the military expression for this is “Broken Arrow.”
From Veterans Today:
Minot-Barksdale, The forgotten mutiny
In August 2007, at least six nuclear warheads were stolen from Minot Air Force Base in North Dakota. The moment they were loaded, they disappeared from America’s nuclear inventory, “location unknown,” something that is not supposed to happen. There is no possible “misinterpretation” of orders, no mistake, no “wrong label” issue. These weapons were stolen, pure and simple. Discussions of individual commanders having authority to deploy weapons, stories of accidents, confusion or political alignments within the Air Force are “red herrings.” !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
“The “Barksdale Nukes” were believed to be heading to Diego Garcia for use against Iran as part of a false flag war, one started by a naval admiral who was tasked by an extra-governmental agenda to start a war.
This was the Air Force part of a joint operation that is said to have involved 5th Fleet commander, Admiral Cosgriff who as reported to the Secretary of State by Gwyneth Todd, then Chief Political Advisor to the fleet. Todd, who has recently retold her story to the Washington Post and other media outlets, received a death threat this morning after a stalking incident against her by an FBI agent stationed at the US embassy in Canberra, Australia.
Similarly, top defense consultant John Wheeler III, who knew of these issues quite well was mysteriously murdered and his body found in a garbage heap in Delaware in late 2010. No suspects have been arrested; no real investigation has ever been made.
That was then.
Today, key members of the military more loyal to Israel and Wall Street than the United States are said to be planning a mutiny to take place after the presidential election. “
It must be time I retired.
Sorry, Tim V. You cannot retire. There are no retirement benefits from this forum. 🙂
@ bluebird 12 Mar, 2013 – 8:53 am
“NR Your Peacock report is interesting stuff. Once again there is Boeing involved. It is all about money.”
Did we ever consider that the meeting at Martinet was not between SAH and SM, but between SAH and BM?
SAH worked on the AirBus and BM was somehow involved in the 787.
“Brett Martin: Consultant B787 PSIP/SFI Boeing UK Training and Flight Services.” Trading info one direction or the other or both directions.
Might not be big secrets either, just trivial gossip about which company was having problems and delays [the batteries, for example]. Worth a lot to the other side’s sales force. Hundreds of billions if they can persuade their customers that the competition has hidden problems or will be late. There are 850 787s sold thus far at approx. US$250 million each.
BM was also “Training Captain, British Airways [Founder member of Oneworld Management Company].” He means BA was the founder member, not himself. Oneworld was started in Vancouver, Canada, the same place that had the Sabre computer system for airlines, which came up in discussions way back.
NR
Yes, we had discussed that. James made a lot of Boeing references in the early days. We also discussed the al Hilli/Melbourne/Qantas connections and the two Qantas engine failures of their new planes. However, we did nowhere find any reason that would be sufficient for an assassination. Both in business circles (not mafia) as well as in intelligence circles you do not kill in terms of revenge but because you want to avoid something happening in the future. The two main reasons are 1) leaking of classified information and 2) threaten to leak classified information/blackmailing. They kill because of future dangers but not because of past actions. For previous actions you are getting sued.
@ Q 12 Mar, 2013 – 10:18 pm
“Sorry, Tim V. You cannot retire. There are no retirement benefits from this forum.”
I’ve been putting in overtime trying to spike my pension, now you say there’s none? We could form a Craig Murray chapter of a biker gang. They have retirement benefits, disability too. Not extravagant, but enough to get by on.
@ Q Off-topic: In the Montreal courthouse some of the victim’s family are in attendance with their lawyer. Should get interesting. Who will eventually be sued? Not that I’d begrudge them anything they can get out of the fiasco.
Just thinking on this….and
Stedman the accountant has distanced himself from Shtech now.
Did he know the dealings of Shtech ?
He seems confused as to what Al Hilli did.
Was Leonardo declaring an “income” in the UK, to hide the fact that his work wasn’t/hadn’t been in the UK ?
His father didn’t live in the UK. Therefore, given the 183 day rule, he would have been a resident in Spain. Yet the Swiss accounts (we are told) were in the name of Sa’ad.
Clearly HMRC would want a word with him now, if he were here (regardless of where it had been generated).
Follow the money, they always say. But in this case NOT the stolen money, but the “income” money.
Kadhim lived in the UK for a number of years, yet there is no record of him at Co House. so how did he get to Claygate ?
Therefore do we assume he bought the house in Claygate ? This would be post 95…there are no “public” records after that date.
The fortunes of the Al Hilli family certainly changed.
Zaid Al Hilli found a wife, and had a child. But sa’ad didn’t until much later….yet he was a “ladies man” (so Gary Aked said).
A “ladies man” who lived at home (alert, alert, alert ???).
To be honest…he sounds more like a pilot.
Constantly on the move. Well paid. Swiss account. Love of the Middle East. No “home”. A real “Global village” guy.
That’s just one theory.
The money….
Who held the cash. Kadhim ? Or Sa’ad ?
If it was Kadhim, where did he work before. He was no Co Director.
What was he ? A Factory owner…that left Iraq with a bundle of cash…which still remains ???? (Alert, Alert, Alert).
If Sa’ad….his Co Accs (officially) don’t show him as a “high roller”.
PAYE or Co owner, you have to put something down for the Tax Rats.
He did. Was that his income ?
If not, why did SSTL say he worked for them ?
If he did, why did SSTL hire a “low paid contractor” ?
…a low paid contractor, with a three quarters of a million pound house ?
The “house” and Sa’ad don’t fit.
Nor does the house and Kadhim.
So how do they “fit” into that house ?
@NR 10:26 a.m.: This is something to bear in mind. The issue of the Sabre seat reservation system is a whole entity unto itself, spawning theories elsewhere on the web.
As for the other case you mention, what is it with people wanting the public excluded from the administration of justice? I think the idea of needing to see justice being done is what keeps the al-Hilli case going here. So far, not a thing on that front.
Q
First…are you American ?
“I think the idea of needing to see justice being done is what keeps the al-Hilli case going here”
Now that is a debate in itself.
What is “justice being done” ?
Nazi soldiers shooting dead French people fighting for their own houses….?
You see the French would “attack” the occupier of their land.
That’s what happened. That is real. That is history.
Sounds a bit like modern day Iraq !
What makes it “right” that Americans can walk into a land that they have no rights to ????
Ah…. “freedom” ! Or is it “anti terror” !
Thanks to America…the world has never been so unstable.
Is the Al Hilli case more about “America” than “Mossad”.
(Then again, “they” are one and the same).
I doubt if the “gringo” is in the thick of this Al Hilli case….I would be shocked.
They (the Americans) are just “brainwashed” nutters very capable of the deeds done at the Martinet “that day”.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=ieOgAFhSWXk&feature=endscreen
FOX “news” special, by their “reporter” on the ground. Mr Oliver North.
You just can’t make this up !
Its pure Edward Bernays.
The Yanks are crackers…but they number 350 million. And have alot of guns !
The best bit is…when the helo picks up the “small boy hit in a traffic accident”.
THEY FORGET THE NUMEROUS PEOPLE THEY KILLED BY .50 Cal rounds from their “gunships” !
Nothing new: William B Pitzer. http://www.manuscriptservice.com/Pitzer/ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VI07govlUqI
In that clip…stick a black uniform on them…amd a wee small “skull and cross bones” on their hats (Toten Kopf) …and you’re back in 1943 !
Code names: Kennedy assassination – “The Big Event”
Source: E Howard Hunt (of Watergate fame) CIA operative, also engaged in big event (one of the three well dressed “tramps”) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=96FDflK_Iug
Some 42 individuals linked to the Kennedy assassination event (“The Big Event”) died in premature violent incidents. Some of the many with relevant disturbing eye witness evidence of 9/11 who have subsequently “committed suicide” or died in unexplained accidents are listed here. http://dead911whistleblowers.blogspot.co.uk/ and here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjOkczWezBs
We know that all states develop lethal systems to defend themselves. In addition many employ personnel, usually from their armed forces, available to be used for and trained in, the art (?) of assassination. Without exception this activity is denied and shrouded in secrecy presumably because it is regarded as disreputable and illegal. However action against its own citizens is officially regarded as taboo, let alone its own President. All crimes involve cover-up even extending to the ellimination of innocent witnesses and victims. The Kennedy Assassination and 9/11 were huge crimes, the perpetrators of which have so far escaped justice. The organs of the state have been traduced to protect the guilty. Do we have a symptom of the same phenonenum at Chevaline, or will the organs charged with its investigation prove they are worthy of our trust? For trust in Government is what is at stake here. Or are we engaged in the same scurilous activity as those that engineered 9/11? The dead, I believe, cry out for justice from their graves – if they are lucky enough to have them.
Tim v
Excellent video. It shows once more that they assassinate assumed whistleblowers before they can whistle blow but not afterwards. Afterwards they are putting them in jail (see Manning).
I would add Nancy and Adam Lanza to the possible 9/11 whistleblowers. Adam’s famous uncle Robert Lanza, a world famous scientist, was never ever mentioned by media when they were talking about the Lanza’s. I wonder why? Would they never mention Donald Trump when his niece would “kill” 20 people and commit suicide? “Oh, we did not know that she was the niece of Donald Trump although her name was Daisy Trump ….”
Robert Lanza’s wife was one of the “victims” in th 9/11 towers and already in the times of 2001 there were conspiracy reports that were suspicious about her being one of the victims. The media created a lot of tearful stories with Robert Lanza and his son crying for his mum. She became a superstar amongst the 9/11 victims in media coverage.
And then we have the sister of Annette Creegan who died in a tower where she was working for Cantor Fitzgerald.
If we wish to, we could add those names to the list, too.
I do not know whether or not al Hilli fits to 9/11 although his family being a leading part of the so called “London Group” had an imminent and active interest for an Iraq war.
However, whether or not directly related, he was definitely about to whistleblow something he knew or else he had blackmailed somebody being too powerful. That caused the assassination. I am 99.99% sure about that. That confirms all of what we did investigate so far plus this is supported by sane logic.
James
The complete media and movie entertainment setup since 2001 is perfect war propaganda, more racist than the NAZI propaganda ever had been. It is perfect Bernays. Perfectly done and presented.
The picture you get – when you say “Muslim” is the crazy guy with long beard who keeps his four wives fixed in chains and with covered head and body at home for bearing 2 children every 3 years period and who enjoys his time by throwing stones onto the heads of innocent young girls who were accused of showing their faces in public.”
I am sorry to say it that Harsh, but exactly this is the rhetorics of our media. Perfect Bernays. This is much better than Goebbels was ever able to do with the Jews propaganda. Perfect brainwashing and a target in the brains of almost every western individual: The Muslim is responsible for all the evil”, period. Our brain is confirming this while the media are repetitive. Ask John Doe about the typical Muslim and you’re going to get the answer i had cited above.
Yes James. Bernays. And they did it with perfection.
About Annette Creegan
I said this before but I repeat this because of tim’s youtube link:
When my sister died in a huge conspiracy, wouldnt i try to do everything to find the truth?
When i am working with old people all tge time who are people standing close before meeting death, wouldnt i try talking to them and hearing what they are trying to say for final relief of the consciousness? Wouldnt a nurse who accompanies old people into death be something like a trusted priest for them?
Think that Annette had one client who took part in the 9/11 conspiracy. Think that he talked before he died. What are you doing with such information? Whom could you trust? BBC? CNN? How would you publish that hot information? Would you try to contact a journalist? Would you blackmail the government? Would a youtube clib, one more of the millions of conspiracy clips, ever create some sane attention by the general publuc?
You are hard trying to make truth available because of your dead sister. But how could you make it available. Perhaps i would call BBC. A journalist would hear my story. Will the journalist publish such a hot conspiracy story, even though Annette presents evidence?
Of course he wouldnt. He would ask his boss. The answer of his boss could be:
1) wtf! Never! Too hot!
2) well, let me call vauxhall SIS first for an approvement.
Once the call is done and vauxhall reolies with a D notice, Annette is in danger because she knows what she should not know plus she is about to whistleblow her knowledge. A suicide is possible … One of the many. Or else she meets the lone nutter …
Tim v
From
http://letsrollforums.com/there-any-real-victims-t25605.html?s=714ba8f1e7ef76889acbba47951fe8e3&
So I have started with Michele Lanza from Staten Island who is alleged to have perished on 9/11, for the reason that I watched a documentary last year, entitled “Telling Nicholas” where a documentary crew began interviewing the family of Michele Lanza only two days after 9/11. Nicholas, the son of Michele Lanza was told on film ten days after 9/11 by his father, that his mother Michele had died in Tower 2. Apart from the imposition on a grief stricken family so soon after 9/11, the interviews with family members seemed genuine compared to what we have come to expect from the 9/11 actors that have been exposed here on Lets Roll. Maybe some members here have seen the documentary so it would be interesting to get their views on it. Since it is a year or so since I saw the documentary, I will view it again more objectively this time, in light of the exposure here of so many victims as fakes/ sims/actors.However with Michele Lanzia as in the case of so many victims, anomalies begin to show up with just a cursory glance as in the article below from the Staten Island Advance Newspaper with the relevant pieces highlighted in red. By Stephanie SlepianAdvance staff writerTuesday, 10/02/2001 Every morning, Michele B. Lanza called her 7-year-old son from her office on the 97th floor of Tower 2. Sept. 11 was no different. First, Mrs. Lanza spoke to her sister, Cindy Chamberlain-Oricchio. The two discussed Halloween costumes and Christmas shopping. Then Nicholas got on the phone. After telling him to be a good boy, Mrs. Lanza’s last words to her son before he headed off to PS 1 were, “I love you.” The second-grader’s mother is among the missing victims of the terrorist attack. While Mrs. Chamberlain-Oricchio was taking Nicholas and his cousins to school, Mrs. Lanza was desperately trying to escape the chaos. She left a message on her sister’s answering machine after the first plane tore through Tower 1.Mrs. Lanza, 36, an administrative assistant with Fiduciary Trust, explained that she was on the way down the stairs with a group of people. “She said they were going to go ahead and go down the stairs and then she would be home,” Ms. Chamberlain said. “At the end of the call, you could hear the sheer panic in her voice. They knew.” Ms. Chamberlain said her sister was a giving person, always more concerned about everyone else than herself. “She would give you the shirt off her back, even if it was the last one she had,” Ms. Chamberlain said. “To me, she was a wonderful person with a beautiful spirit. She lived for living and she loved being with a crowd of people. Even in her school days, she was always with a group of kids. She never came home by herself. She was very social.” An active woman, Mrs. Lanza enjoyed swimming, softball, sewing and home decorating. She was also a whiz on the computer, producing business cards, invitations, fliers and announcements for friends and family. “I never saw anybody create so many wonderful things out of a computer in my life,” Ms. Chamberlain said. “I wish I had that talent.” But with all her interests, Mrs. Lanza’s main priority and main love in life was her son. Nicholas and his mom spent 10 days in DisneyWorld in July.”It was just the two of them,” Ms. Chamberlain said. “He said he had the best time of his life. It was his special treat and he couldn’t get over that. He never needed or wanted for anything, because Michele was well ahead of him so he would feel no despair. She catered to him more than to herself.” Born Michele B. Chamberlain in West Brighton, she moved to Virginia in 1986 and returned to the Island in July 2000, settling in Tottenville.While in Virginia, she worked for various government contractors in the Virginia and Washington, D.C., area. It was there that she met Robert Lanza. They married in 1990. http://www.silive.com/september11/lr/index.ssf?/september11/lr/lanza.htmlTo summarize: It seems highly unlikely that Michele would have a casual conversation with her sister over Halloween and Christmas shopping as she was about to evacuate the South Tower during the chaos that reigned on September 11th. Why would anyone even have a conversation over Christmas shopping in early September? Her sister’s own words as quoted in the article, refute the notion of the two of them having a casual conversation: “At the end of the call, you could hear the sheer panic in her voice. They knew.” So did she actually speak to her sister or leave a message? “She left a message on her sister’s answering machine after the first plane tore through Tower 1.” And “Sept. 11 was no different. First, Mrs. Lanza spoke to her sister, Cindy Chamberlain-Oricchio. The two discussed Halloween costumes and Christmas shopping. Then Nicholas got on the phone.” The following quote by her sister is a typical example of the standard type of makwish sentiment that appears on all of the memorials: “She would give you the shirt off her back, even if it was the last one she had,” Ms. Chamberlain said. “To me, she was a wonderful person with a beautiful spirit. She lived for living and she loved being with a crowd of people. Even in her school days, she was always with a group of kids. She never came home by herself. She was very social.” Every morning, Michele B. Lanza called her 7-year-old son from her office on the 97th floor of Tower 2. Correct me if I’m wrong but was not the 97th floor, of Tower 2 a floor that has been shown here to be an empty or ‘floorless’ floor? And finally: “While in Virginia, she worked for various government contractors in the Virginia and Washington, D.C., area. It would be instructive to determine which government contractors that Michele Lanza worked for. In conclusion, after a brief look at Michele Lanza it is obviously not possible to determine if she is a real victim without more thorough research, though there are already indications that she may not be.
Here’s one that’s not mentioned in the
http://dead911whistleblowers.blogspot.co.uk/
http://english.pravda.ru/society/stories/11-03-2013/124028-Phillip_Marshall-0/
@ bluebird 14 Mar, 2013 – 9:08 am @ James
The Muslims are being replaced by Chinese or Iranian cyber-warriors for something to fear, and to spend hundreds of billions defending against.
Even if a bad event isn’t a false flag or a genuine cyber-attack, but just an accident, wouldn’t it profit people — the cyber-defender industry on one side or the conspiracists on the other side — to say it was?
An aside: a small newspaper comic strip explained why vampires and zombies are popular dangers in fiction now. It is because you have an enemy that doesn’t involve race, religion or nationality and is acceptable to everybody to hate.
Maybe the most important question to answer is for those who did collect evidence of a huge crime such like e.g. 9/11.
How and where do I tell the truth?
Media?
Police?
Internet Blogs?
Youtube?
How would you proceed best? I wouldnt know an answer:
1.+2. Danger that they blow the whistle to those who would kill you.
3.+4. Just one more amongst the millions of conspiracy websites.
How would one proceed in a world full of fake and scripted information?
I don’t see a way and i would not have a clue if i were in such sitiation.
Perhaps al Hilli, Adam Lanza and Creegan tried exactly to solve that problem, and they all failed. There is no way doing that and on the same time getting theessage out to the general public. No way!
We should consider this. Maybe they were all just naively believing that there are some good people somewhere who will support their issue and that they can whistleblow anonymously …
“The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society.
Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country.
We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of.
This is a logical result of the way in which our democratic society is organized”.
Edward Brenays, “Propoganda” (published 1928).
Edward Bernays, “Propoganda” (published 1928).
Oops. Typo.
Even when “wikileaks” published the attack by American airmen on unarmed people…
…in which the attack was followed with even more heavy fire directed on the on a party trying to perform a rescue of the dying….
….and then the soldiers on the ground refusing to carry the seriously injured and the dying to the nearest equiped medical centre (an American facility)….
…even with all this evidence, the American public are still directed into hating Manning for “stealing” this information and supplying it for publication.
So what would Al Hilli have that would be such a revelation ?
Would he show that the war in Iraq was “illegal” ?
Has that not been proven already with the murder of David Kelly.
Or by the simple fact that there is no UN mandate for the 2003 attack on Iraq and it’s subsequent occupation ?
Al Hilli (or anyone) would have to hold information so damning that it would go directly to the heart of America (if it was America that was responsible for Chevaline). Maybe that would be about Nine Eleven.
…or maybe it was about some future event yet to transpire.
@James: I am referring to the exclusion of the public and media from courtrooms, of course. There are prescribed circumstances when this is allowed and acceptable, and certain in-camera sessions in judge’s chambers, but there seems to be a growing trend toward lawyers wanting to exclude the public from cases which have already blown open in the media around the world. When the cat is already out of the bag, it’s too late, so to speak.
@James: I should add that it is highly unlikely the al-Hilli case will ever be solved, therefore resolving the danger of information being exposed to the prying eyes of the public and media in a courtroom. Problem solved. If it ever did get to court, in 10 years or beyond, whatever information that might have been “dangerous” for public consumption likely wouldn’t be any more. Problem solved. It’s kind of like those Kennedy files that have been sealed for 70 years.
@NR: Faster than you can skin a cat, profiles disappear from LinkedIn. I’m becoming resigned to it.
Q.
What you say is true. This case may never get to court. And therefore there would be nothing presented. No story will be told or known.
Many moons back there were many comments with regard whether or not there was a “D Notice” in place with regard Chevaline.
My view is, things like that are almost redundant. The “media” are so hand in glove with the government that it is not needed. The deal being that the media are “free” to report that “Justin Bieber has lost his left nipple” that “real reports” no longer mean anything.
You don’t believe me ? The days after Princess Diana died in Paris the newspapers and magazines were awash with her story. The very press that we accused of killing her. But it sells papers, goes the line.
Wrong. People buy them.
The culture of “The West” must change. But it won’t.
The long term dumbing down of “the general public” has been going on for years. And the “tools” that are used are exceptional…and proven.
Of course I would be also worried, if I were “in power” and there was a severe breakout of “democracy”. It would directly threaten me. But then again, even Socrates knew democracy didn’t work.
He who shouts the loudest, is the one that’s incontrol. And that’s what they did way back in Greece. And it works. Of course when Socrates started to ask “the people” what they actually thought, they couldn’t answer. Guess that’s why they killed him. Noting changes see !
Which brings me back to Chevaline. And a theory.
If in the real world Israel was (is) dealing directly with Iran, would that shake the tree ? (Remember Allot ?).
But what would Al Hilli have ? How did he get it ?
Well Stedman says he worked on the Airbus (Well, the kitchen !). Are we to assume he was a CAD Engineer ? He also worked at SSTL (so we’re told), but we have no idea what he did….