“And that’s all this is; a belief.”
And that’s your belief.
“Eh? What makes that so implausible? I can get around it just by …”
… then you describe an implausible scenario. You prove my point again.
“That’s a remarkably narrow interpretation of the “official narrative”. It basically reduces the official narrative to “WTCs 1 and 2 weren’t pre-rigged with explosives”. But that does seem to be what most Truthers mean by “the official narrative”.”
Er, yes, that is a pretty fair summary of the official narrative. I just don’t understand what you’re getting at half the time.