“With due respect node, This is a complete red herring. Clark never said that hacks are included in this trust, he was talking about scientists. I am sure Clark can answer for himself but I have noticed this tendency to divert pretending to answer one question with another. “
Sigh… I made a reasonable point (which Clark would agree with) that “a sly few” will take advantage of the situation I described, and Clark changed it to “Node tells us that all engineers, virologists, epidemiologists, statisticians and climate scientists know what to say to advance their careers” (which is intended to make me sound unreasonable).
SA, honestly, which of us is guilty of diversion?