Reply To: Vaccine contaminants and safety


Home Forums Discussion Forum Vaccine contaminants and safety Reply To: Vaccine contaminants and safety

#55506
SA

Nice one

“Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors have been involved in vaccine/biologic litigation. The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.”

But also when you look at this ‘smoking gun’ you find that they quote 16 studies. None of those studies have any statistical power to answer the question asked. The highest study examined 47 cases with 25 controls. Not only not sufficiently powered but also skewed. Of the sixteen studies 13 have 20 or less subjects, and only two have 47 subjects. Two studies are only observational. I wonder how this paper got accepted.

Then let us look at this

“RETRACTED ARTICLE: Systematic Assessment of Research on Autism Spectrum Disorder and Mercury Reveals Conflicts of Interest and the Need for Transparency in Autism Research “ with these authors:

Janet K Kern 1 , David A Geier 2 , Richard C Deth 3 , Lisa K Sykes 4 , Brian S Hooker 5 , James M Love 4 , Geir Bjørklund 6 , Carmen G Chaigneau 4 , Boyd E Haley 7 , Mark R Geier 2

The reason for the retraction is probably because of conflict of interest!
And finally, the grand titled “Institute of Chronic Illnesses, Inc.”
This institute has three employees and Mark Geier is the director and a budget of about $9000 dollars.

  • This reply was modified 5 months ago by modbot.
  • This reply was modified 5 months ago by modbot.
  • This reply was modified 5 months ago by modbot.
  • This reply was modified 5 months ago by modbot.