Maybe Node is referring to this, which is indeed linked to in Iain Davis’s piece in OffGuardian.
https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4347/rr-4
Had you wished to counter his argument you could perhaps have presented an alternative perspective, as put forward by another bmj contributor here:
https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4347/rr-8
But I realise that ‘Quack, quack quack, “I am so great, you are so dumb”; the great conspiracy theorist puts the stupid sheeple in his rightful place!’ is probably more in keeping with the ‘fruitful scientific discussion’ engaged in on this thread.