@ET
“A consent form doesn’t indemnify anyone Dave nor waive anyone’s rights. In fact, the vaccination consent form is so bad I suspect any decent lawyer would tear it to shreds in a court in 30 seconds”.
Very interesting point, please elaborate. I understand informed consent is required and there is a difference between theory and practice, I mean if its so bad, shouldn’t it have already been challenged? So is the consent form, a deception to appear to meet a legal standard, giving the vaccinators immunity, but in practice fails the test making the entire vaccination experience illegal, but requiring someone to take up the case, in fear of being called an anti-vaxxer?