Reply To: Tone and subtext of SARSCov2 propaganda in Britain


Home Forums Discussion Forum Tone and subtext of SARSCov2 propaganda in Britain Reply To: Tone and subtext of SARSCov2 propaganda in Britain

#69950
Clark

‘which […] exactly mirrored what was about to happen in just three months time’

Well it wasn’t exact. The 201 scenario had several times infection fatality rate, for instance, and it assumed no vaccines would be available for the 18 months the exercise considered.

‘In particular, the simulation posited that a “secretive elite cult” has deliberately released a weaponised Corona virus to cause “significant reduction in the global population.”’

Eh? No it didn’t; not at all. It posited that the outbreak arose in pigs in South America and passed to humans. I was looking at Event 201 just a few days ago in response to a comment by josh r; the latter part of this comment and the page and a half that follows.

J, Paul Schreyer’s claims appear to be false; why did you repeat them without checking?