- This topic is empty.
-
Posts
-
I just did a quick search to see if any of the MSM have covered the letter by the 25 rabbis, and it looks as if most of them have blanked it, but in the process I came across this wikipedia entry entitled ‘Gaza genocide‘, which I’ve not come across before. It’s really long, and very detailed, as such, and I’ve by no means read all of it yet (which would probably take a couple of hours), but I happened to read the following bit (in the section headed ‘Rhetoric from US politicians’):
Republican U.S. Representative Brian Mast compared all Palestinians to Nazis in November on the House floor.[465] On 31 January 2024, he said that Palestinian babies are not innocent civilians but “terrorists” who should be killed, that more infrastructure in Gaza needs to be destroyed, and “It would be better if you kill all the terrorists and kill everyone who are supporters.”[466]
When asked by an activist about the deaths of Palestinian children, Republican Representative Andy Ogles said: “I think we should kill ’em all…Hamas and the Palestinians have been attacking Israel for 20 years. It’s time to pay the piper.”
Last night I came across the following vid by Owen Jones entitled ‘Israeli TV Debates Killing KIDS – And Calling Babies “THE ENEMY”‘, and along with about eight or nine others, saved it to watch later, which I’ve just got round to doing. The clips from the TV debates are hard to stomach, and there is no doubt whatsoever that the proponents are either completely demented nutters and totally psychotic, or paid by the ruling psychopathic elite to go on these programmes to inflame the population:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q3S1pY7JMVY (12mins 40secs)
Also came across this as well:
Kneecap manager’s response on Coachella controversy shows Irish moral clarity | Janta Ka Reporter
CM retweeted someone’s tweet about Michael D Higgins pushing back at smearing anti Gaza war activities as antisemitism at the pope’s funeral. The following link reports what he said.
Higgins slams claims linking Gaza criticism to anti-Semitism as ‘outrageous’
In their introduction to a Haaretz editorial they reposted today, JVL link to a Middle East Eye article posted a week ago. Here’s the headline and sub-headline and some clips from it:
Criticism and celebration in Israel after death of Pope Francis
Many Israelis slammed the pontiff for his vocal support for Palestinians and took to social media to celebrate his death
The Vatican’s announcement of Pope Francis’ death on Monday morning was met with a mix of celebration and criticism in Israel, where politicians, pundits and social media users focused on the pontiff’s condemnation of Israel amid its war on the Gaza Strip.
The pope, aged 88, passed away after denouncing the “deplorable humanitarian situation” caused by Israel’s onslaught on Gaza and expressing his “closeness to the sufferings… of all the Israeli people and the Palestinian people” in his final address on Easter Sunday.
“I appeal to the warring parties: call a ceasefire, release the hostages and come to the aid of a starving people that aspires to a future of peace,” he said….
Zvika Klein, the editor-in-chief of the Jerusalem Post, characterised Pope Francis’ criticism of Israel and support for Palestinians under its assault as “unconditional support for Hamas”….
Commenting under the Channel 14 article, one user called him a “scoundrel” and said “it’s good that he is dead”.
“Thank God the Pope is dead,” another agreed.
On Facebook, social media users categorised him as a “hater of Judaism”.
Under Kan 11’s post about the death of the pope, one user wrote: “I don’t care about this psychotic old man, who hates Israel”.
Under a Ynet report, another wrote: “Pope Francis will be remembered as the one who consistently backed modern antisemitism,” adding that the world is “better off without him”.
Another user said that the pope was “the father of impurity. Another pedophile,” and added: “Thank god we got rid of him.” Another user said: “good news at last.”
On the Walla news account, one user called him “a heretic who supported Nazi Hamas”. And another asked: “Why do you announce on the Jewish media on an Israel-hater who died?”….
https://www.middleeasteye.net/trending/reactions-israel-death-pope-francis
Yep, the zionist hate-mongers were out in force again shortly after it was announced Pope Francis had died.
Another liberal wimp elected in Canada, I say wimp because this person recently chickened out in calling out Israel’s war in Gaza a genocide:
Canadian PM Mark Carney rows back on Gaza ‘genocide’ comments at rally
Video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bb_xIkmtsxw
Note also the booing when the “heckler” bring up the genocide. Liberals are such hypocrites.
There is absolutely no doubt whatsoever that the 15 aid workers were deliberately killed by IDF troops, who lay in wait at the location so as to ambush and murder them when they arrived there. They thought they’d got away with it, but then the video footage emerged exposing their lies, and they’ve been turning somersaults ever since to try and explain the whole episode away. And they’ve been doing their best to make it all more and more convoluted so that people find it hard to follow. And needless to say, it’s all a load of complete and utter lying B/S bollocks.
I’ve just read several articles that came up when I did a search re the IDF report of their (alledged) investigation and, as is so often the case with news coverage, you get different snippets of information in articles that aren’t in other articles. For example, in a CNN article it says that the deputy battalion commander had a ‘poor line of sight to the convoy’, because it was ‘obstructed by a hillside’. Here’s the passage from the article:
Har-Even said the attack on the convoy stemmed from a series of faulty assumptions that soldiers from the elite Golani Reconnaissance Battalion made that day and from the deputy battalion commander’s poor line of sight to the convoy, which he said was obstructed by a hillside.
Ah, well now, that it explains it all, doesn’t it, but then fortunately the hillside doesn’t appear to have obstructed them from firing none-stop at the aid workers for several minutes and, just prior to doing so, identifying first NINE Hamas operatives amongst the aid workers, and then some days later it changed, without explanation, to six. Easily done of course when, for some inexplicable reason, you feel threatened, and in the process mistake three of them for Hamas operatives who weren’t. But being serious for a moment, it’s also the first time I’ve read an article in which it says that the IDF initially said there were NINE Hamas operatives, and prior to now, I’ve only read that ‘it was at least six’. And I can only assume that most of the MSM ommitted to mention the bit about the db commander’s view of the convoy being obstructed by a hillside because it was just too absurd for words, Monty Pythonesque even. But then again, I expect they all have a good laugh contriving and concocting all this stuff. Anyway, here’s a link to the CNN article:
https://edition.cnn.com/2025/04/20/middleeast/israeli-military-professional-failures-gaza-medics-intl/index.html (April 20, 2025)
And here are links to several Sky News articles, and a snippet or two:
Two hours of terror: Sky News investigation reveals how Israel’s deadly attack on aid workers unfolded
New evidence unearthed by Sky News contradicts Israel’s official account of the killing of 15 aid workers.
IDF claim: The vehicles lacked necessary permissions to travel in a combat zone
What we know: The area was not declared a combat zone until four-and-a-half hours after the attack
The IDF has also justified the decision to open fire by saying the vehicles were “uncoordinated” – meaning their movements were not approved in advance by the IDF.
Speaking to Sky News, however, senior officials from the UN, PRCS and Civil Defence say coordination was not required because the area had not been declared a combat zone.
“It was a safe area and does not require coordination,” says Mohammed Abu Mosahba, director of ambulance and emergency services at PRCS.
As Sky News reported on 3 April, an evacuation order for the area was only issued at 8.31am, almost four-and-a-half hours after the first ambulance was attacked.
https://news.sky.com/story/two-hours-of-terror-sky-news-investigation-reveals-how-israels-deadly-attack-on-aid-workers-unfolded-13348776 (April 22, 2025)
Gaza ambulance ‘crushed’ by IDF as aid attacks increase
Sky News analysis shows the deaths of 15 humanitarian workers whose bodies and ambulances were buried in the sand are part of an increasing pattern.
https://news.sky.com/story/gaza-ambulance-crushed-by-idf-as-aid-attacks-increase-13340782 (April 3, 2025)
Israeli troops shot at Gaza aid workers from ‘point-blank range’, leaked documents reportedly show
Documents reviewed by Israeli newspaper Haaretz show that IDF investigators were “not convinced” by a deputy commander’s claim that he misidentified aid vehicles as Hamas.
https://news.sky.com/story/israeli-troops-shot-at-gaza-aid-workers-from-point-blank-range-leaked-documents-reportedly-show-13354441 (April 23, 2025)
IDF report into deadly attack on aid workers is ‘full of lies’, Palestinian Red Crescent Society says
An Israeli military investigation into the deaths of aid workers in Gaza is “full of lies”, the Palestinian Red Crescent Society (PRSC) has claimed.
Following the military probe, a deputy commander will be dismissed for providing an “inaccurate report” and a commanding officer will be reprimanded, the Israel Defence Forces (IDF) said, adding there was “no attempt to conceal the event”….
https://news.sky.com/story/israeli-military-fires-deputy-commander-as-it-releases-findings-of-investigation-into-deadly-attack-on-aid-workers-13352476 (April 21, 2025)
I meant to say in my earlier post in respect of the Sky News investigation determining, in effect, that the IDF were lying about the area being a combat zone or whatever at the time, and also that the paramedics et al neededed clearance from them before entering the area… whether THIS particular falsehood was covered by other MSM organisations – ie did other MSM relate this particular finding of the Sky New investigation. I can only assume that Sky News themselves would probably know of any that did, so I might try contacting them, if it’s possible to do so, which would save me reading through hundreds of articles potentially, trying to determine whether this one did, and that one didn’t. About an hour ago I actually did a search on the Guardian’s website re >15 paramedics killed idf<, and there were around forty articles that came up (which I saved to new tabs), so if that’s anything to go by, it’d take me a month of Sundays to read through all of them. That said, the Times and the Telegraph articles will mostly be behind paywalls.
Anyway, it’s practically impossible for my few remaining brain-cells to hold all the details in respect of this episode in place, and so it occured to me a bit earlier that maybe someone has put an easy-to-follow timeline of events together covering it all, and so I did a search in that respect, but there was nothing. But this wikipedia piece came up, and although it’s not as detailed as I’d hoped, it’s about the nearest thing to a timeline of events that seems to exist at the moment. And it does make some interesting points that I’ve not heard mentioned before (but then wouldn’t expect to in the MSM):
Rafah paramedic massacre
On 23 March 2025, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) attacked several humanitarian vehicles, including five ambulances, a fire truck, and a United Nations vehicle….
The massacre was carried out by soldiers from the Golani Brigade. At the moment of the killings, they were acting under the command of Brig Gen Yehuda Vach, who has a history of establishing “kill zones” in Gaza where civilians are killed and of telling his subordinates that “there are no innocents in Gaza.”[16] Also present at the site were field operatives from Unit 504, a military intelligence unit with a reputation for cruelty and acts of torture….
Following the release of the video recording, Israel changed its account of the incident, admitting that its soldiers have “made mistakes.”[15] Analysts have noted that Israel has a history of giving inaccurate explanations to account for its killings of civilians and of changing its version of events when evidence emerges that refutes its initial explanation.[20] IDF Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir ordered an internal investigation into the incident by the unit responsible for handling suspected war crimes. To date, dozens of incidents have been referred to this unit, but no reprimands or punishments have been issued against IDF soldiers.[21]
According to the Israeli human rights organization Yesh Din, the system established by the IDF’s general staff to investigate potential war crimes is primarily designed to shield the military from accountability while maintaining the appearance of due process. An analysis of Israeli military campaigns over the past decade revealed that at least 664 complaints were submitted for review, yet more than 80% were closed without even launching a criminal investigation. The organization concluded that the military’s law enforcement system seldom pursues charges against low-ranking soldiers and almost entirely avoids investigating senior commanders….
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rafah_paramedic_massacre
This Euronews article also came up in the results, from April 7th, but is fairly limited in what it says, but here’s one passage from it:
5 March: PRCS releases mobile phone footage; IDF acknowledges initial version of events was ‘mistaken’
After the PRCS shared video footage retrieved from the mobile phone of one of the paramedics killed, clearly showing the vehicles with their emergency signals on, the Israeli military acknowledged its initial version of events was “mistaken.”
It also claimed that six of the 15 first responders killed were Hamas operatives, but has not provided any evidence for that claim.
Euronews asked the IDF to elaborate on that allegation, but a spokesperson declined to comment.
And, needless to say, the IDF WON’T be providing any evidence because they don’t have any of course, and will keep on declining to comment if asked to elaborate.
Just came across this very detailed account of the retrieval of the bodies of the 15 paramedics and first responders on Euro-Med Monitor, posted on April 1st. Here’s a part of that particular section of it:
“As soon as the incident occurred, we entered the site west of Rafah with OCHA crews”, Sufyan Ahmed, a member of the Civil Defence team involved in the effort to recover the victims’ bodies, said in a statement to Euro-Med Monitor. “The Israeli army told OCHA that the bodies of the victims were found next to a fire truck and an electrical pole. Using a small bulldozer, we started our excavation at the spot the army had designated. One body was discovered. After examining it, it was determined to be the body of the mission leader, Anwar Abdel Hamid al-Attar.”
He continued: “We used OCHA to get in touch with the army and enquire about the whereabouts of the other bodies. They replied that the bodies were in the same hole from which we had taken al-Attar’s body, next to the electrical pole. We dug deeper into the hole and kept looking, but we could not find anything. We then had to leave the site because the army had given us a limited amount of time.
“We went to the site the following day and waited at a nearby location, awaiting the army’s approval to enter,” he added. “After roughly five hours, we were told that entry was refused, so we departed. The following day, we anticipated being granted access to the site, but were still denied permission. After a few days of waiting, we received approval yesterday, Sunday, and were able to access the site. We were told that the army would stay with us until they told us where the bodies were interred so that we could start the excavation process.”
Explained Ahmed: “When we got to the site, a quadcopter was flying overhead, showing us where the bodies were buried. We received a sign pointing to the graveyard from the drone. We were shocked to learn that the designated site was far from the one where we had previously been informed the bodies were interred. At that moment, we recognised that they had been attempting to delay, procrastinate, and waste our time the first [few days]. We, the Civil Defence staff (two paramedics and two drivers), convened briefly after the new location was determined to devise a strategy for safely retrieving the bodies. We had prior experience on similar missions and had the required equipment.
“We started digging right away, discovered a body, and recovered it. We dug out another body that we found underneath. We then found a third body underneath. We dug further until all of the Red Crescent and Civil Defence personnel’s bodies were found in the same hole. The body of an UNRWA employee was the only one still missing. We asked OCHA about its location, and they told us that it was close to the ‘barracks’ area, west of Rafah.
The bodies had distinct features, but they were in the early stages of decomposition. When they were examined, it was evident that a barrage of bullets had struck them. Based on my observations, the injuries were located in the chest region. A closer look revealed that some of the victims had still been alive despite their injuries—they were apparently buried alive with their feet bound.
“Among the bodies we looked at was Ibrahim al-Maghari’s. His body was covered in severe bruises and showed evidence of torture, and his legs seemed bound. After being shot in the back of the head, his face was completely ripped apart. Regarding Fouad al-Jamal’s body, he was shot in the head from a very close distance, causing his skull to shatter,[giving the appearance of] crushed bones. We discovered that every employee of the Palestinian Red Crescent had been shot in the left and right sides of the head.
After getting permission from the Israeli army, we removed the bodies with immense grief and suffering, moved them to ambulances, and left the site for the hospital.”
Israel’s execution of 15 medical personnel is unprecedented in recent history; crime demands immediate accountability
It is obscene and like most others, such ponerology fill me with revulsion. In a just and fair world, Israel would become the pariah – every country would shun and cease all relations – no trade, no diplomatic exchange, no recognition of sovereignty of the State or its citizens – and a complete ravel ban. Build a fence around Israel and let them fend for themselves until they consume each other.
I always wondered why the Israelites were so persecuted throughout history. I’m beginning to understand why. The Zionist incarnation and the evidence we have all witnessed over the last 18 months should provide urgent momentum for every country to take the above action and more – a clear and unequivocal warning that any use of military force by Israel would lead to its total destruction.
But we can’t do that for two reasons. Firstly, Zionists control the world banking and financial system. The Balfour Agreement was negotiated by Lord Rothschild – that dynasty and others are instrumental and pivotal in the Zionist enterprise and the Greater Israel Project. You don’t bite the hand that feeds you, remains the mantra of pragmatic politicians everywhere. But they are cowards – and complicit in this obscenity.
The other reason is the pernicious influence of Zionist and Israeli agents in politics, media and every aspect of industry – including and especially online. They make life interesting and sometimes not without difficulty. That have form, experience and some ‘success’. 9/11 for example. Salisbury for example. Any atrocity that undermines and divides society.
We need representatives that act without fear or favour. The current PM is a Zionist stooge – too stupid to claim agency – but his conduct on Corbyn as exposed by the Labour Files should leave no one in any doubt where his sympathies lie. It could be an interesting summer.
