I Need A Craig Murray 185

URGENT: The access code to listen live to this morning’s hearing is now published on the court website. https://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/coming-to-court/public-access-to-a-virtual-hearing Last night my lawyers told me that the hearing had been moved forward to 09.45 from 10.00, but that is not reflected on the court website at the minute.

I tried to do a public service in making available to everybody key facts from the Julian Assange extradition hearing and the Alex Salmond trial, which revealed a picture very different from that portrayed in the mainstream media. I find myself wishing now I had somebody to perform the same service for me.

I am particularly constrained about what I can say in my own case. The last week has been incredibly hectic, with our reply to the Crown’s submissions (written arguments) due in last Thursday, and our responses to the Crown’s amendments in view of our responses, due in today. I previously published the indictment, called the “petition”; the written arguments are called the “submissions”. I cannot publish these at present but I think I can publish this brief extract from the Crown’s submissions, paras 48 to 50. They are slightly edited, on legal advice, to remove even the remotest possibility that the Crown might claim that in some esoteric way they could lead to the identification of witnesses [you should see the rest of the rubbish in the Crown’s submissions!], and I publish with little comment but they are followed by some not irrelevant images of publications that are not being prosecuted for potentially influencing the jury. I can think of no reason you cannot comment, but please say nothing that might in any way reference specifically anybody with a protected identity.

Extract from the Submission of the Crown:

48. … The characters talk about how they can fabricate allegations of sexual offending against a previous minister, including attempted rape, in order to destroy his reputation. The script suggests that there was never any such offending and despite a large team of police working on the investigation for months, they did not find any evidence of serious offending. The characters suggest that more women from their organisation should be found to fabricate allegations against the former minister and that the criminal investigation has been orchestrated by the minister and his or her colleagues.

49. It is respectfully submitted that there are undeniable and crucial similarities with the prosecution of Alex Salmond and his readers note this in the attached comments section (production 2). The Respondent has not explicitly named Alexander Salmond … but the Website hosts comments attached to the article which do name him in connection with the content. The tenor of the article is that Alex Salmond has been the victim of a false campaign, motivated by political gain and that all of the criminal allegations against him have been concocted by members of government in order to damage his reputation.

50. It is respectfully submitted that such commentary from the Respondent … meet the test set out in the 1981 act. These articles carry a severely prejudicial risk to the course of justice. Should any potential jurors have read these articles, there is the clear implication that the witnesses are lying and the criminal investigation is at best, flawed or at worst, corrupt. Any potential jurors exposed to such material carry the risk of being prejudiced against the witnesses prior to hearing their evidence.

My personal blog. Influenced the jury. I am facing jail for that.

Tomorrow’s (Tuesday 7 July) hearing is at 10am. It will again be a procedural one dealing with management of the case, but again I should be very grateful indeed if any of you are able to listen in and follow the process, as matters vital to the course of the case are often determined in these procedural hearings.

You will be able to access the case via the link given at the bottom of this page. https://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/coming-to-court/public-access-to-a-virtual-hearing
The password for the case should be posted on that page on Tuesday morning.

Finally, again I do apologise that I am finding it very difficult to keep up regular blog posts on other subjects while this case against me is in train.


Unlike our adversaries including the Integrity Initiative, the 77th Brigade, Bellingcat, the Atlantic Council and hundreds of other warmongering propaganda operations, this blog has no source of state, corporate or institutional finance whatsoever. It runs entirely on voluntary subscriptions from its readers – many of whom do not necessarily agree with the every article, but welcome the alternative voice, insider information and debate.

Subscriptions to keep this blog going are gratefully received.

Choose subscription amount from dropdown box:

Recurring Donations


Paypal address for one-off donations: [email protected]

Alternatively by bank transfer or standing order:

Account name
Account number 3 2 1 5 0 9 6 2
Sort code 6 0 – 4 0 – 0 5
IBAN GB98NWBK60400532150962
Bank address Natwest, PO Box 414, 38 Strand, London, WC2H 5JB

Subscriptions are still preferred to donations as I can’t run the blog without some certainty of future income, but I understand why some people prefer not to commit to that.

Allowed HTML - you can use: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

185 thoughts on “I Need A Craig Murray

1 2 3 4
  • U Watt

    How about Alex Salmond returning the favour to you? You are only in this spot because you tried to help him. It would surely help if he drew wider attention to the clear double standard the Crown is applying to your blog post and the mass media’s reports of his trial.

  • L. Campbell

    Can’t quite believe this is going all the way. It really is ludicrous whatever your take is on the Salmond trial. Some people in the know and moving in those circles might have worked out who the witnesses were, but most of the hoi polloi wouldn’t have had a scoobie, but, in any case, all the lurid headlines would have alerted anyone, let alone jurors, to extraneous information on the case. To pick out one person – you – to carry the can is beyond ridiculous, particularly when you stated that you had no intention to out their identities. Mens rea – intention – is an integral and fundamental necessary element of guilt, unless behaviour is so derelict/dangerous as to be reckless to the point of fulfilling the necessary mens rea. Your pieces did not do that, in my opinion, which probably isn’t worth much, but there you are. I diverge somewhat from the accepted position, but I do not believe that any of the media reporters actually outed the women intentionally. It is exceedingly difficult to report in depth, with all the facts, without giving something away that might alert someone somewhere to a person’s identity.

  • Border Bus

    Concerns raised as Defendant presents witnesses at Trial in Scottish Court!!!
    Why was this “trial” allowed to start let alone continue?
    Utter Disgrace.

      • James

        Border Bus – will Nicola Sturgeon try to introduce trial-without-a-hearing? Just to make sure that innocent people such as Craig Murray don’t get accidentally acquitted ……

        • Border Bus

          James – If the “special advisers” put it in her script, yes and then, at their discretion, trial without Jury

  • Republicofscotland

    So Lady Dorian is surprised by the length of your witness list, the relevancy is clear, you’re fighting for your freedom and all avenues must be available to achieve this.

  • Twostime

    Best wishes Craig, sincerely hope justice is done. Seems so clear to me.

    • Border Bus

      Strategically placed tabloids in supermarkets and petrol stations – making it virtually impossible for anybody to avoid the tabloid headlines

1 2 3 4

Comments are closed.