MI5 Take Us For Fools 6


Imagine my hilarity when the front page headline new “Iranian plot”, trailed by MI5 as involving weapons stores, attacks on the Israeli Embassy and on Whitehall, turned out to be yet another faked “surveillance operation” against Iran International, the “media company” that is dodgier than Al Capone’s accountant.

The BBC still made it the second item on Saturday’s main news, as “Iranian Terror Plot discovered”. Three men have been charged and remanded on bail before a hearing at the Old Bailey on 6 June.

This is another exercise of the UK’s draconian new legislation, the openly fascist National Security Act 2023, where it is an offence to gather information, whether classified or not, as “Engaging in conduct likely to assist a foreign intelligence service”.

This is an incredibly low bar – prosecutors don’t have to prove there is any actual contact with a hostile power. So if you take a photo of Downing Street, as many tourists do, that can be an offence as it could be “useful” to non-existent “Iranian terrorists” or others. We already have one person in jail for taking photos of Iran International despite absolutely zero evidence that he had ever had any kind of contact with Iran.

One man – Mostafa Sepahvand – is also charged with “open source research” with a view to committing violence. Again the bar is incredibly low: no evidence of actual plans to commit violence are requiured.
Personally, I have difficulty with imprisoning people before they commit a crime on the basis that they might be going to. This kind of prevention certainly works, in a sense. If you locked up the entire population, for example, there would undoubtedly be no crime committed, except for crimes committed in prison. But I find charges of thinking about a terrorist attack, without any evidence of ever having communicated such a thought to anybody, a large number of steps too far.
Please read my last article which went into MI5’s Iran International scam in depth. An “Iranian terrorism in the UK” narrative is being created to justify UK involvement in a US/Israeli attack on Iran. I did not expect MI5 immediately to pull the same scam again.
On the theme of articles immediately being vindicated, a number of people doubted my story from a Foreign Office source a month ago that al Jolani would recognise Israel next year in return for the lifting of sanctions. Three weeks later Trump announced the lifting of sanctions and met with al-Jolani. I believe this blog still has a truly useful role to play in explaining what is happening behind the scenes – what the mainstream media does not tell you.
 

———————————

My reporting and advocacy work has no source of finance at all other than your contributions to keep us going. We get nothing from any state nor any billionaire.

Anybody is welcome to republish and reuse, including in translation.

Because some people wish an alternative to PayPal, I have set up new methods of payment including a Patreon account and a Substack account if you wish to subscribe that way. The content will be the same as you get on this blog. Substack has the advantage of overcoming social media suppression by emailing you direct every time I post. You can if you wish subscribe free to Substack and use the email notifications as a trigger to come for this blog and read the articles for free. I am determined to maintain free access for those who cannot afford a subscription.




Click HERE TO DONATE if you do not see the Donate button above

Subscriptions to keep this blog going are gratefully received.

Choose subscription amount from dropdown box:

Recurring Donations



PayPal address for one-off donations: [email protected]

Alternatively by bank transfer or standing order:

Account name
MURRAY CJ
Account number 3 2 1 5 0 9 6 2
Sort code 6 0 – 4 0 – 0 5
IBAN GB98NWBK60400532150962
BIC NWBKGB2L
Bank address NatWest, PO Box 414, 38 Strand, London, WC2H 5JB

Bitcoin: bc1q3sdm60rshynxtvfnkhhqjn83vk3e3nyw78cjx9
Ethereum/ERC-20: 0x764a6054783e86C321Cb8208442477d24834861a

 


Allowed HTML - you can use: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

6 thoughts on “MI5 Take Us For Fools

  • Cynicus

    “ I believe this blog still has a truly useful role to play in explaining what is happening behind the scenes, what the mainstream media does not tell you.”
    ======
    You are being too modest.

    It does more: it contradicts active support by the MSM for various disingenuous government agendas.

  • Brian Sides

    I am reminded of the 2000 terrorism act clause 58
    1)A person commits an offence if—
    (a)he collects or makes a record of information of a kind likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism, F1…
    (b)he possesses a document or record containing information of that kind [F2, or
    (c)the person views, or otherwise accesses, by means of the internet a document or record containing information of that kind.]
    https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2000/11/contents

    A number of people were given very long prison sentences for being in possession of information that they not only had no intention of acting on but had not read and sometimes did not even now they were in possession of the information.

    The fact that they have to make up these pretend terrorist just demonstrates how few if any real terrorist that have not been sponsored by the security services there are. Considering the death and destruction the west has caused in so many countries for such a long time it is rather amazing that there are not lots of terrorists seeking revenge . If terrorists wanted to blow up trains on the London underground they could do so every day of the week and twice on Sunday.
    The Inquest into the 7/7 attack confirmed that there were multiple holes in the floor of each of the trains but did not try to explain how this fitted the given narrative of a single bomb per train.

  • Courtenay Francis Raymond Barnett

    Craig,

    When you write:-

    ““Engaging in conduct likely to assist a foreign intelligence service”.

    It is not just what you write – it is the writings of the vast majority of all the co-conspirators bloggers who follow you.

    Sorry – must inform MI 5.

  • M.J.

    “it is an offence to gather information, whether classified or not, as “Engaging in conduct likely to assist a foreign intelligence service”.
    The government’s explanatory website (https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/complying-with-the-national-security-act-2023-security-professionals/a-guide-to-the-national-security-act-2023-for-security-professionals-accessible) makes it clear that the activities (including information gathering) have to be against the UK. So people who are not acting against British interests shouldn’t have to worry. The website gives a helpful Appendix with examples.
    BTW HMG did not, repeat not, pay me to write this. I’ll prove it to you. HMG are skinflints. I rest my case. 🙂

    • S

      Will be interesting to see how the Iran International trial pans out, then. If it is as Craig says it is, then it doesn’t fall into the examples in the appendix there.

  • pete

    Thank you Craig for the timely reminder that we could all be locked up for reading your blog, I suppose I will just be making matters worse for myself if I were to tell everyone about a hack on the Signal application that resulted in 410 gigabytes of information falling into the hackers hands, see: https://ddosecrets.com/article/telemessage. Please use this information wisely and, no it is not available for anyone to download. Just jouralists.