Fighting Back Against Zionist Control of the UK 136


I today met our legal team and instructed them to submit an application for interim relief in the Scottish judicial review of the proscription of Palestine Action. If successful this will immediately lift the proscription in Scotland, pending the review.

Scores of people in Scotland face imminent conviction for terrorist offences simply for exercising free speech and expressing their opposition to the proscription. Most of these are summary cases with no jury, but up to six months imprisonment. Others face up to 14 years in jail for speeches supporting Palestine Action.

A terrorism conviction is life-changing even without a prison sentence. It routinely leads to loss of employment and inability to get another job, to debanking, and to severe international travel restrictions.

Most of those facing these massively disproportionate effects are entirely respectable citizens who merely wish to oppose the facilitation of genocide.

My calculation is that submitting the application for interim relief is likely in itself to lead the Crown to drop the prosecutions for speeches, placards and T shirts. The UK government is desperate to avoid the situation of Palestine Action being legal in Scotland and not in England, with all the constitutional questions that arise.

Dropping the prosecutions would remove our main argument for interim relief (and probably make that avenue impractical for us). But this would be a huge win, removing the threat of a terrorism conviction from large numbers of peaceful campaigners in Scotland.

If the Crown does not drop the prosecutions, I am very confident our interim relief application in Scotland will succeed. In England, the High Court refused interim relief and then refused to lift the proscription pending appeal, even after it had ruled the proscription unlawful.

This nonsensical position is explained by the fact that in the English case, Judge Chamberlain was replaced at the last moment by three hand-picked very right-wing judges with a long history of finding for the government in “security”-related cases. In Scotland we are not on that kind of rigged pitch.

On the original timetable the judicial review was due to start this coming Monday. It has however been postponed at least until June because the UK government is introducing “secret” evidence from intelligence that we will never be allowed to see or reply to. The veneer of democracy and human rights in the UK has worn extremely thin.

The extent of Zionist domination of the UK government was shown in the astonishing decision to ban the annual al-Quds march for Palestine, which has been taking place for 47 years without incident.

The Minister of State at the Department of Justice, Sarah Sackman, called for the demonstration to be banned.

The Israeli and USA attack on Iran is, beyond argument, illegal in international law. Iran is not a proscribed organisation. It is not illegal to express support for Iran. Whether it is “anti-British” is a matter of opinion, not of law. Personally I think supporting the genocidal apartheid state of Israel is “anti-British”. But expressing an opinion is a specific legal right.

Sackman worked as a clerk in the Supreme Court of Israel. She is a fanatical Zionist with a long-term financing record from the Zionist lobby. As “Courts minister” she has been the leading advocate for the government’s proposed abolition of many jury trials. She is behind the plans for five-at-a-time, two-and-a-half-hour trials in England for 2,700 Palestine Action activists.

The positioning and empowerment of this Zionist monstrosity is yet more evidence of how deep Israel’s tentacles run in the UK Establishment, and in Starmer’s Labour Party in particular.

Interviewed on Sky News yesterday, Sackman condemned “Iranian attacks on civilians” but refused to condemn the US bombing of the girls’ school in Minab, describing this as “the realities of war”.

We are fighting against a deeply entrenched evil. The legal campaign against the proscription of Palestine Action is a small corner of this fight, but it is essential as an assertion of our freedom to carry the fight at all.

I am afraid the full Scottish judicial review is going to be very expensive. The latest estimate we have from the legal team is a final cost of £263,000 – without going to the Supreme Court. Of the £263,000 we have to date through all donation avenues raised a total of £189,000. We are therefore currently an estimated £74,000 short.

We need everyone who can contribute to contribute, even if it is only a pound, dollar or euro. And we need everyone who already contributed to think of another person who they can ask to contribute. All of us have to look towards people we know of good heart with means.

If we succeed, we will save many scores of people from the life-changing consequences of a terrorism sentence and from possible jail. But PLEASE do not contribute if you really cannot afford it – we are trying to make people’s lives better, not worse.

https://www.crowdjustice.com/case/scottish-challenge-to-proscription/

I know these are the most difficult of times. But that is why we have to keep fighting. The sums needed to mount a successful legal challenge to the power of the state can be eye-watering. But we are the many. Every penny helps, but please do not cause yourself hardship. You can contribute via the crowdfunder above or via these methods:

Alternatively by bank transfer:

Account name: MURRAY CJ
Account number: 32150962
Sort code: 60–40–05
IBAN: GB98NWBK60400532150962
BIC: NWBKGB2L
Bank address: NatWest, PO Box 414, 38 Strand, London, WC2H 5JB

Or crypto:

Bitcoin: bc1q3sdm60rshynxtvfnkhhqjn83vk3e3nyw78cjx9
Ethereum/ERC-20: 0x764a6054783e86C321Cb8208442477d24834861a

Because some people wish an alternative to PayPal, I have set up new methods of subscription payment including a Patreon account and a Substack account if you wish to subscribe that way. The content will be the same as you get on this blog. Substack has the advantage of overcoming social media suppression by emailing you direct every time I post. You can if you wish subscribe free to Substack and use the email notifications as a trigger to come for this blog and read the articles for free. I am determined to maintain free access for those who cannot afford a subscription.

Subscriptions to keep this blog going are gratefully received.

Choose subscription amount from dropdown box:

Recurring Donations



PayPal address for one-off donations: [email protected]

 


Allowed HTML - you can use: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

136 thoughts on “Fighting Back Against Zionist Control of the UK

1 2
  • zoot

    ‘Interviewed on Sky News yesterday, Sackman condemned “Iranian attacks on civilians” but refused to condemn the US bombing of the girls’ school in Minab, describing this as “the realities of war”.’

    Absolutely encapsulates the values of this Labour ZOG. These are the values that they and the media are steadily trying to enforce on the rest of the population, by demonizing, criminalizing and prosecuting anti-war, anti-genocide sentiment. All while pretending to be anti-genocide, anti-Trump’s war themselves and being represented as such by an unscrupulous commentariat. Fighting back against these amoral, murderous zionist-owned ghouls is imperative. What sort of country will it be if they fully succeed?

  • Cynicus

    “Sackman worked as a clerk in the Supreme Court of Israel. She is a fanatical zionist with a long term financing record from the zionist lobby.”
    ========

    That background should immediately rule her out of the decision making process with anything to do with pro-Palestine activity.

    “Ant-British” eh?

    What is this woman’s first loyalty? Is it to Israel or to Britain?

  • Jack

    As many already pointed out, what an absurdity at the UNSC, the one and only organ that is supposed to stop unprovoked, naked aggression, instead 8 of 10 their members voted for the – arab initiated – resolution condemning the victim of the obvious assault!?

    If anything those nasty arab regimes are the ones that should be condemned for enabling the assault on Iran (on Gaza, on Lebanon, on Yemen etc). They could have proclaimed, before the war started, that they will not allow the US/israel to use their airspace/soil. Now they cry when Iran target these hostile sectors.

    Norman Finkelstein put it, perhaps a bit blunt, but there is obviously a whole lof of truth to his statement about this horrid clientele:
    Video: Norman Finkelstein: The emirates are brain dead, retarded: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DUuJBJ3gElQ/

  • Squeeth

    Sackmann is the perfect appointment, she will do what the British state wants, she carries the taint of antisemitism because of her support for the zionist occupation of Palestine, thus many people who detest her conduct in the British executive will keep quiet, to avoid promiscuous false allegations of antisemitism and the British executive can wallow in false martyrdom for employing a “Jewish woman” when she is anything but. Trebles all round!

    • Brian Red

      @Squeeth – Huh? She is Jewish and I’m struggling to understand what you mean when you say she will do what the British state wants. She is about as clear an example of ZOG as you can get – a monster who can’t call the mass murder of children wrong when it’s done by those who work for the same ethnic supremacist entity that she does. Time to reconsider the notion that the USA controls the Occupation?

  • Stevie Boy

    Sarah Sackman born in 1984. Her father, Simon Sackman, is of Eastern European Jewish descent, his wife, Donna Seruya-Sackman The eldest daughter of the Hon. Solomon Seruya, former Minister for Economic Development of Gibraltar, her mother’s Sephardic Jewish family had moved from Tarragona in Spain via Italy and Morocco to Gibraltar. She is a member of New North London Synagogue. [Wiki]
    Say no more !

    • Tom Welsh

      The UK’s central and local government seems to be the prize in an ongoing battle between Jews and Muslims. The Muslims seem to be more visible, but one suspects the Jews wield far more power than meets the eye.

      Those British people who still occupy positions of power or influence are mostly useless nonentities.

      • Nota Tory Fanboy

        Wow you racists are brain dead. You can be both Jewish and British. You can be both Muslim and British. You can be both Christian and British. You can be both Sikh and British. You can be both Buddhist and British. You can be both Hindu and British. You can be both Druid and British. You can be both atheist and British.

        • Stevie Boy

          The point is that Jewish zionists are Israeli firsters, ie. fifth columnists, the enemy within. The likes of Adelson and Chinn have no allegiance to the countries they live in. Nothing to do with racism other than Jewish zionists consider themselves superior to everyone else. FACT.

          • Nota Tory Fanboy

            Stevie Boy, no.
            Tom Welsh specifically set up three groups of people as mutually exclusive in their comment:
            Muslim people,
            Jewish people
            and British people
            with the overt implication that neither Muslim nor Jewish people in the UK were British.

  • glenn_nl

    On a related note, regarding a fight-back against Zionist control of our state broadcaster, Owen Jones won his case today – defending himself against the BBC’s zionist Raffi Burg and his demented support for Israeli genocide:
    ____
    I am delighted that the High Court has ruled in my favour on the key issues in the libel case brought by Raffi Berg.

    The court rejected the claimant’s interpretation of the article and ruled that it expressed an opinion based on stated material.
    ____

    The case:
    https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/kb/2026/564

      • zoot

        I see they’ve also moved Clive Myrie from his rooftop in Tel Aviv so he doesn’t have to report on what’s being done to the Genocide/ rapist capital.

    • M.J.

      Excellent! There is a good summary of the judgment in Middle East Eye.
      The actual judgment seems to hinge on whether an statement made by Jones about Berg being a rogue journalist was a statement of fact (as Berg claimed) or of opinion (as Jones did), the basis for which Jones had indicated. The court found for Jones.

    • Scott

      Thanks for sharing Glenn. I read that (or at least the highlights). While the win is positive, there doesn’t seem to be anything for others to hang their hats on for future cases. Looks like while Owen won the battle, Lawfare will continue to win the war.

  • John peck

    Don’t engage in this scam. First of all with AI it’s easy to prepare legal documents and arguments for free. Secondly it should not cost more than 5 grand even if you instruct a solicitor do argue them on your behalf. Craig has stupid ideas and then asks his audience to pay for them while the lawyers laugh to the bank lol

    • Brian Red

      @John – I do not agree with you, but it would be nice to think at least some lawyers in Scotland would be willing to put in some work pro bono.

      • Nota Tory Fanboy

        Indeed. A regime (and its allies) that deploys AI models to target civilians. Several cases have been thrown out after defendants attempted to use ChatGPT as their attorney only for the other parties to find that it simply hallucinated case law. AI is not your friend.

    • M.J.

      What you have posted contains a number of mistakes. Leaving aside minor editorial mistakes:
      1. ‘stupid’ should be ‘brilliant’. Do not forget that you are talking about an exceptionally gifted person. His professional attainment (Ambassador) is objective evidence of this.
      2. This is not a scam but a commendable human rights venture.
      3. Last but not least, your attempt to put people off making contributions has been in vain, because I have just put a small coin in the tin, and wish Craig luck.

    • Scott

      Your fantasy and lack of knowledge is amusing John (I do hope it is genuine ignorance and not paid for ignorance), but for now human lawyers are more reliable, and AIs (LLM) are still prone to hallucinations. I don’t imagine Craig wants to leave this to chance.

      There is a company called Legora for example, which recently raised $550M and is rapidly gaining law-firm customers. But this is still early days (it can do document review, contract analysis, legal research… but still needs a human in the loop).

      As a cautionary tale, check out this case going through the US courts currently for what happens when you trust the AI.

      https://nypost.com/2026/03/06/us-news/blowhard-chatgpt-bot-posed-as-lawyer-convinced-woman-to-fire-her-real-attorney-while-citing-phony-case-law-suit/

      • Bayard

        “AIs (LLM) are still prone to hallucinations.”

        The problem is that they have no world view. Try asking any one of them this question, “The car wash is only a hundred yards from my house. Should I walk there or take the car?” and see what answers you get. The last person who tried was almost universally recommended to walk there.

      • M.J.

        @Scott: I remember my shock when I first discovered that, not only was ChatGPT not infallible, but that it was capable of BS – making up plausible but demonstrably wrong answers.
        Anyone who trusts AI more than experienced real human experts or other reputable reference material does so at their own risk, even though AI can be an impressive reference tool.

  • Brian Red

    The Financial Times is leading on “Oil windfall gives Russia $150mn a day”.

    This will hardly come as a surprise to most of their readers, who will realise that being a big seller of something when there’s a shortage because several of your leading competitors have been hit with supply problems is lucrative. (They love their economics, those types.)

    Gotta wonder whether someone might be asking who will rid them of the turbulent failed casino owner from New York.

    Meanwhile Trump is heading Bokassa-wards and is influencing members of his administration to wear the brand of shoes that he likes:

    https://www.esquire.com/style/mens-fashion/a70714040/trump-florsheim-shoes/

    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/mar/10/trump-florsheim-shoes

    • Stevie Boy

      I don’t understand why we need all this oil, after all we have windmills and sun mirrors, surely some mistake 🙂

    • Jack

      Russia falling in line with Trump’s interests, would it not be better, from Russia’s standpoint, to stand by now and simply profit from the soaring prices than supporting Trump’s move by flooding the market with more oil = decreasing the price on oil

    • Jack

      It should be a new legal case opened at the ICC and ICJ regarding the latest aggression on Iran too but also regarding the destruction of Lebanon. It is absurd that the PM of Lebanon – Nawaf Salam – was the former head of the ICJ, still Salam have not urged, raised, called on the ICJ to investigate the attacks on Lebanon! This passivity (or is it corruption?) just embolden israel and the US to commit more war crimes.
      What is really the point of arab nations if they are just to let israel and the US do what they want anyway without any pushback whatsoever, decade after decade? Why not give away your nation right away if you are so submissive to begin with? Sigh.

      Iran’s Red Cross organisation today report massive destruction of civilian sites:
      “Iran’s IRNA is reporting, citing the head of Iran’s Red Crescent Society, that “24,531 civilian units have been damaged in various sectors of which 19,775 units are residential”.
      @aljazeera

      Also this article below from december 2025 is interesting:
      Exclusive: US threatens new ICC sanctions unless court pledges not to prosecute Trump
      https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-threatens-new-icc-sanctions-unless-court-pledges-not-prosecute-trump-2025-12-10/

      Why would an alleged “peace-maker” like Donald Trump that promised not to start any wars fear a possible indictment at a war tribunal/ICC unless he indeed planned to wage illegal wars?

      • Bayard

        “Why not give away your nation right away if you are so submissive to begin with? Sigh.”

        Probably because there’s both money and power to be had with the latter, whist the former only gains him money.

        “Why would an alleged “peace-maker” like Donald Trump that promised not to start any wars fear a possible indictment at a war tribunal/ICC unless he indeed planned to wage illegal wars?”

        Anyone who thinks that graphene is the thinnest substance in the world has obviously not thought of Donald Trump’s skin.

      • AG

        re: since you mention Nawaf Salam

        From the comments section of nakedcapitalism.com, blogger AURELIEN:

        “(…)
        On Lebanon, Beeley has the wrong end of the stick. Again. There is no split in the government or between the government and the military. The re-establishment of the monopoly of legitimate force for the government was one of President Aoun’s signature policies from the beginning. This involves getting rid of Hezbollah’s military capability (and that of other militias), but Aoun, as former Army commander, and Haykal, whom he personally appointed, are clear that Hezbollah cannot be closed down forcibly and that it would be suicidal to attempt to do so. As far as I can tell this is the view not only of the government and the Army but of the entire Lebanese political class. Before the latest round of violence, the Army was in fact making some progress disarming Hezbollah in the South.

        What this is actually about is a badly-timed intervention by the Prime Minister Nawaf Salam. He’s a Sunni (and the Sunnis harbour a particular grudge against Hezbollah for the murder of Rafik Hariri in 2005) and he’s a technocrat, not a politician, with a generally poor sense of political judgement. When Hezbollah carried out a token bombardment of Israel a week or so ago, he went off the deep end and without consulting anyone, made an announcement after a Cabinet meeting demanding the dissolution of Hezbollah. (The Lebanese political class as a whole is angry with Hezbollah for getting the country involved in another pointless war, but Salam seems to have blurted out what a lot of his colleagues were thinking. Aoun’s comments were much more measured.)

        There is, and remains, no appetite in any part of the Lebanese political system for trying to dismantle Hezbollah forcibly, US fantasies of doing so notwithstanding.
        (…)”

        + this link from comments there, piece by Alastaire Crooke/Conflicts Forum:

        “The Lebanon Front — Hezbollah Returns to the Battlefield; “Northern Israel paralysed under Hezbollah’s infernal fire – A compilation tracking consequential & strategic observations — Analysis & reports from the Arabic press and leading regional commentators (12 March 2026)”

        Mar 12, 2026
        https://conflictsforum.substack.com/p/the-lebanon-front-hezbollah-returns

        • craig Post author

          Over half of the actual troops of the Lebanese Army are Shia, as are about a third of the officers. So the idea of the Lebanese Army forcefully disarming Hezbollah is utter nonsense.

          • AG

            I believe Aurelie Daher from Sciences Po would agree with you.
            As I assume would Aurelien (not related) considering the final quote “There is, and remains, no appetite in any part of the Lebanese political system for trying to dismantle Hezbollah forcibly”.

            What I cannot wrap my had around is Aurelien´s criticism of Vanessa Beeley and her assessment of Syria, ISIS etc. On the other hand I have zero expertise of my own and am constantly learning. Eventually in troubled waters when people who I regard as informed disagree on important issues.

            Considering that Lebanon used to be an important hub re: publishing as was acknowledged in the FRG in the 1970s, it is a catastrophe.

    • Republicofscotland

      Brian.

      Lets not forget Iran is a UN founding member – one wonders what UNESCO would say – if say Iran bombed the Eiffel Tower, or the Statue of Liberty or the Coliseum in Rome, or London’s Tower Bridge, would UNESCO be silent then, I very much doubt it.

      “UNESCO seemingly has nothing to say while US-Israeli forces bomb UNESCO World Heritage sites across Iran”

  • Harry Law

    It must be remembered the US/Israel started this war, and in the midst of negotiations in an perfidious attack on Iran’s leader and his whole family and other political leaders. Iran had the right to defend itself and take reprisals….
    Iran has [correctly] taken the position of an eye for an eye, in response to the bombing of Iranian oil depots the Iranians bombed Haifa oil refinery and so on.
    Iran does have the right to use Belligerent reprisal against Israel who target as a matter of policy innocent civilians [see Dahiya doctrine], it is also simply a matter of common sense, as an example, suppose two boxers agree to the marquess of Queensbury rules, and one kicks the other in the groin and stands on his opponents neck, the other is allowed to strike out with his foot in order not to be killed, although kicking is not allowed.
    State practice establishes this rule as a norm of customary international law applicable in international armed conflicts. A belligerent reprisal consists of an action that would otherwise be unlawful but that in exceptional cases is considered lawful under international law when used as an enforcement measure in reaction to unlawful acts of an adversary.
    Purpose of reprisals. Reprisals may only be taken in reaction to a prior serious violation of international humanitarian law, and only for the purpose of inducing the adversary to comply with the law.
    (ii) Measure of last resort. Reprisals may only be carried out as a measure of last resort, when no other lawful measures are available to induce the adversary to respect the law.
    (iii) Proportionality. Reprisal action must be proportionate to the violation it aims to stop.
    (iv) Decision at the highest level of government. The decision to resort to reprisals must be taken at the highest level of government.
    (v) Termination. Reprisal action must cease as soon as the adversary complies with the law.
    https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/customary-ihl/eng/docs/v1_rul_rule145

    • Brian Red

      The Occupation and the USA have unlawfully attacked Iran militarily. It is lawful for Iran to whack Occupation and USA military installations in the region and anywhere in the world.

    • Nota Tory Fanboy

      Locrian Law results in everyone being blind. If we can criticise Israel and the UK for their respective Samson Options then we can criticise Iran for its own (even though it was demonstrably provoked, illegally by the US and Israel – pretty sure Starmer was quoted on day one or day two as saying the UK had support aircraft in the air too?)

      • Nota Tory Fanboy

        An abridged quote from Starmer’s statement: “The United Kingdom played no role in these strikes…Our Forces are active and British planes are in the air” (no doubt doing the same sorts of Gaza-like things he told RAF service members on Cyprus they couldn’t tell the World about)

          • Nota Tory Fanboy

            or to have read the internationally – and domestically ratified – agreed definitions of genocidal acts and what their obligations are to prevent and/or punish them.
            But of course, it only “seems” that way to a newly arrived extra terrestrial. He wouldn’t be squirming and trying to avoid admitting this as much as he is if he was ignorant of it. Through his career, he has “special knowledge” (in a legal sense) and thus no defence whatsoever in law. He will burn for eternity in the Hell of the god in which he supposedly believes. He will forever be damned by history books. Every schoolchild will look upon New Labour and the Conservatives as the Uniparty of Criminals Against Humanity.

    • Republicofscotland

      Harry Law.

      The sly old fox Indian leader Modi who hailed Israel, and now the penny has dropped – that there might not be a regime change in Iran, he’s hoping his country’s ships will be allowed to traverse the traits of Hormuz – after a phone call with Iran’s leaders.

      Modi’s actions.

      “He visited Israel just hours before the attack on Iran.

      He betrayed India’s long-standing non alignment foreign policy.

      He said that India stands with Israel with full conviction.

      Israel might have assured him that there would be a regime change in Iran.

      He came back to India, and the US- Israel attacked Iran and killed their Supreme Leader.

      He did not condemn the targeted killing of their Supreme Leader.

      He did not condemn the violation of Iran’s sovereignty and international law.

      Instead, he strongly condemned Iran’s counterattack on US military bases in other Gulf states.

      He did not condemn the killing of 87 sailors in a US attack on an Iranian ship returning from India in the Indian Ocean.

      He waited for days for a regime change in Iran.

      Iran closed the Strait of Hormuz but opened it only for China and Bangladesh.”

  • Harry Law

    What has Trump [lately sounding like Baghdad Bob] achieved, No regime change, Strait of Hormuz closed. Haven’t recovered any nuclear material. No uprising on the streets [quite the opposite] No capitulation. Iran destroying all US bases and pummeling Israel. Iran on the way to driving the US out of the Middle East and at the same time destroying the petrodollar and driving the rest of the world to economic ruin and starvation, on the other hand they did manage to kill an 86 year old man with his grand daughter. They also killed 170 little girls and set the whole of the Muslim world [billions] against the US/Israel. Hell of a job Caligula you will certainly be remembered in the history books.

    • Nota Tory Fanboy

      People who think there isn’t a plan here haven’t been paying attention; first America commits piracy on the high seas with Venezuela’s oil, then shuts down 20% of international oil trade (the majority of which was apparently bought by Asia). So America’s secured resources for itself and said “now half the World’s population can go f*ck themselves”…

      • Stevie Boy

        Do you honestly think the USA will not be affected by the oil blockade ? Remember, America has outsourced its manufacturing, pharmaceuticals and technology which means the impacts on the outsourced nations will rebound on America. If there was a plan it was developed by a retarded chimpanzee, give ’em a banana.

  • azymax

    Excellent initiative to apply for interim relief – the potential impact on individuals’ lives is vastly out of all proportion to any conceivable damage attributable to the dissent invoked. The Govt knows it has already lost the cause of proscription for Palestine Action and I’m still not understanding a priori how it has got away with delaying proceedings.

    It’s clear from POAC’s 2007 judgment in PMOI v Secretary of State that the only relevant facts and assessments are those evaluated and obtaining at the precise time of the Secretary of State’s decision-making (there a deproscription appeal, but for the curious: especially paras.¶¶129-133). The Govt here had already presented on several occasions thru’ 2025 such of those it considered evidential to the courts in the Strand (in both OPEN and CLOSED). Following grant of permission for judicial review in Scotland end-January, there would have been plenty of time to change the horses at Whitby and get the rolls up to Edinburgh well in advance for next Monday.

    That tactic comprises a manipulation of process to impose a result unachievable in justice, namely the maintenance in effect of criminal pursuits until fresh measures (cf Walney’s bill-in-prospect) can be etched into statute that will outlaw direct action against purveyors of genocide.

  • Harry Law

    Paradoxically the US/Israel war on Iran and the murder of the ayatollah could have the opposite effect on Iran’s nuclear ambitions, the late ayatollah forbid nuclear weapons, in his opinion they were Haram [forbidden] in Islamic teaching. It is thought his Son may have a different opinion.
    Iran has enough highly enriched uranium [HEU] to make 10 nuclear weapons, this HEU can be enriched to 90% weapons grade in a few days, each weapon is likely to have an explosive power of 15 kilotons i.e. 15,000 tons of TNT equivalent.
    The design for simple fusion weapons is well known and they do not require testing to prove they will work. Iran has the technical skill to make nuclear weapons and mount them on their unstoppable hypersonic missiles.
    It has been suggested that a device could be stored on any cargo vessel and sailed into any US port. Before the Iraq war Condi Rice falsely claimed she did not want to see a mushroom cloud over New York City, this could be a real prospect if this war continues.
    This scenario could happen even after nuclear weapons had been used on Iran, since these facilities are so far underground or under a mountain range they would be impervious to destruction.
    This is the problem of having a game show host [Trump] advised by his Son in law Jared Kushner and his real estate friend Steve Witkoff both of whom are Zionist fanatics, as is Trump.

  • Brian Red

    USA regime thugs are boasting about their Zionist masters having “disfigured” Mojtaba Khamenei. The Zionists have already murdered Khamenei’s wife and other members of his family.

    They really don’t like “Amalek” – a symbol for anyone who tries to stop them from thieving, invading, and murdering. In recent years, they have used this term “Amalek” about both the Palestinians in Gaza and now Iran. It’s a symbol for “Kill, kill, kill”.

    • Republicofscotland

      Scott Bessent – the US Treasury Secretary gave an interview, in which half way through it, a suited person interrupted the interview, to tell him the president needed to see him immediately, on return Bessent looked visibly shaken, and stumbled through the rest of the interview.

      anyway its not just Netanyahu that’s not been seen in public since the strike, Ben Gvir has also disappeared from the public gaze.

    • Republicofscotland

      There’s lots of speculation online – that Netanyahu has been killed in an Iranian strike on his office -he (Netanyahu) hasn’t been seen in public since the strike.

          • Republicofscotland

            Iranian drones and missiles to be fired across the Black sea.

            ” Ebrahim Azizi, head of the Iranian Parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Committee:

            “By providing drone support to Israel, Ukraine has effectively become involved in the war and, under Article 51 of the UN Charter, has turned its entire territory into a legitimate target for Iran”.”

        • Nota Tory Fanboy

          Republicofscotland what does that say about Iran providing drone support to Russia against Ukraine before Israel and America’s illegal war against Iran? Why would it therefore be unacceptable for Ukraine to declare that Iran is Russia’s co-belligerent?

  • Republicofscotland

    These bases that English forces co-use – were both struck by Iran on Wednesday night.

    “Brigadier Guy Foden, assistant chief of staff for operations at Permanent Joint Headquarters (PJHQ), said: “Erbil and Baghdad were both struck a number of times last night with increasing coordination.”

  • zoot

    Matt Kennard speculates whether the mushroom-cloud explosions seen over Tehran are the fruits of one of the heavy bombers departing RAF Fairford in Gloucestershire.

    He notes that RAF Fairford is the US Air Force’s only bomber Forward Operating Location (FOL) in Europe.

    https://x.com/kennardmatt/status/2031838157516177618

    No such speculation in respectable media, where Sir Keir continues to be hailed today for his triumphant, high-principled ‘opposition’ to Trump’s illegal assault on Iran:

    “‘Could be the making of him’: Starmer’s allies praise stance on Trump and Iran
    Refusal to kowtow to US president has won public backing”

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2026/mar/14/starmer-trump-iran-middle-east-us-israel-conflict-britain

    • zoot

      Likewise, still no report in the Guardian of its own journalist’s legal victory over BBC Middle East editor and Israel propagandist Raffi Berg.

  • Brian Red

    On-topic for Zionist control of Britain: Starmer may fall over Epstein.

    ““I refute the suggestion of a cover-up,” said Starmer’s spokesperson.”

    As well as conveying a cringe-making ignorance of the meaning of the word “refute”, this suggests that Starmer is on his way out of the door.

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2026/mar/12/starmer-may-face-more-resignations-after-release-of-mandelson-whatsapp-messages-say-sources

    Westminster is trying to ringfence the Epstein matter to Mandelson, to some extent relieving the pressure on ex-Prince Andrew, definitely keeping it away from the “king” (and avoiding any suggestions about the “king’s” special friend, “party organiser” Michael Fawcett), keeping it away from elite circles in general (they’ll have learnt from the Mark Dutroux and Michel Nihoul affair in Belgium – see reference to “torture video” in Epstein papers), and also avoiding the issue of which foreign power members of the government and royal elites were passing state secrets to.

    It is unlikely that any of the political parties – any of them, from the extreme left to the extreme right – will make this point. They are bright enough to know not to saw through the branch they’re sitting on.

    • Bayard

      “““I refute the suggestion of a cover-up,” said Starmer’s spokesperson.”

      Nothing is confirmed until it has been officially denied.

    • Alyson

      Just bear in mind that Epstein and Ghislaine and Trump’s proclivities were not known outside of their circle. The cache of documents which have been uncovered are revealing monsters who passed as highly respected role models. Where are all the children? Is it true Epstein purchased large quantities of sulphuric acid, kept pigs, and had dungeons with passages that opened over the sea?

      A former bodyguard of Prince Andrew’s commented that he was always courteous and respectful, and questioned the purpose of the narratives that paint him in such a bad light. He was undoubtedly a useful fool who felt entitled to belong in the circles of the ultra wealthy, who had obtained their wealth in ways that were not transparent or understood. And he paid off Virginia as if she was an ex wife, and not an attractive masseuse who was younger than he should have associated with, though still above the UK age of consent, and within employment legislation. Ghislaine would bring Virginia to London with her to make up a dinner date and nightclub outing, and to dance with Prince Andrew. Anyway he isn’t a bad person. Epstein and Ghislaine clearly are very bad people, and their proximity to former leaders of Israel puts their usefulness at a very high level.

      Mandelson was a different class of fool, who considered he was privy to information that might serve the UK, as well as pampering his ego, or whatever, and thus delivered information to Epstein that had the potential opposite outcome. Epstein used everyone and was useful to the most powerful and corrupt. As a distraction the denouement unfolding, of Iran doing what no other nation would have the leverage to advance on so many fronts, is an awakening that sees charlatans and pragmatists rushing to realign their interests with the changes occurring daily. Different awfulnesses are being committed by the same circle of abusers acting in defiance of law, on micro and macro unimaginable scales. Such awful inhumanity. Keeping our own sanity in this media disinformation blackout means never losing sight of the humanity of others.

  • Tom74

    The Americans are desperate to depose Starmer so they can install a right-wing hawk to share the blame for their Middle East genocide. So the CIA instructs their client journalists and politicians in the UK to peddle a trumped-up scandal to damage Starmer and use faked polls to pretend its democracy. Very little to do with Zionism as such except that Israel is (also?) a puppet regime that the US are hiding behind, as well as their historic reason for being.

    • zoot

      Sir Keir fell over himself to allow heavy US bombers to set forth for Iran from British airbases in Cyprus, the Chagos Islands and Gloucestershire, knowing full well they were targeting primary schools. (What stalled British participation for a few hours was the opposition in cabinet of Ed Miliband).

      I strongly doubt Sir Keir’s participation in the Gaza Genocide is news to any reader of Craig Murray’s articles in the past two and a half years. Nevertheless, here’s what your guy will be remembered for:
      https://jacobin.com/2026/02/uk-israel-gaza-genocide-media

      • Peter Mo

        As soon as the bombing of the girls school became news Starmer should have halted all cooperation with Trump & Rubio. It is inexcusable that he has not. This is a point that should be hammered by all anti-genocide/war activists.

        • zoot

          Indeed. There has been no mention at all in respectable media of Starmer’s disregard for the school bombing. That is to be expected. But it has not been highlighted either by anti-war voices in Britain. One of the most despicable war crimes even by 2020s standards.

    • Brian Red

      The US government is becoming desperate. Today Trump says he wants China, Japan, France, and South Korea to change his nappy for him send service personnel to risk their lives helping him out against Iran in the Gulf. Gotta wonder whether this embarrassing message has been delivered through official diplomatic channels.

      The US has lost this war. Still, expect surprises from the country’s owners by the time of Passover.

  • Republicofscotland

    Already four countries are boycotting the World Cup in the USA, Scotland must boycott the World Cup in America.

  • Republicofscotland

    The Orange One is really scraping the bottom of the barrel here as he asks China to send warships to the Straits of Hormuz, he’s also asked a couple of his minion allies such as England, France, and Japan to do the same.

    Does anyone recall, when I think it was Trump, but it could’ve been Biden – pleaded with China to help them to defeat Russia, when Russia proved too overwhelming for Ukraine to handle, along with its Nato allies.

    Of course China a staunch ally of Russia’s, politely told Nato’s head the USA where to go.

    Source.

    Donald Trump urges UK, France and China to send warships to keep Strait of Hormuz open after Iran attacks | The Independent

    • zoot

      Very good. In the 5 days since he issued that video the British media has become even more deceitful. Especially in regard to Britain’s role.

      Startling juxtaposition at 16:40 mark of the Clive Myrie/ BBC framing of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine with their framing of Trump’s attack on Iran. Bold and completely without shame.

  • Brian Red

    London police have threatened to arrest anyone at the Al Quds day protest who expresses support for Palestine Action (sic) or for intifada.

    One understands that celebrating the killing of all the Egyptian firstborn remains lawful in Britain.

    • Stevie Boy

      The establishment term for the Al Quds march is ‘Hate Rally’.
      I assume that refers to people who hate genocide and hate illegal invasions …

  • Peter Mo

    It’s time to get onto the offensive with Government ministers. If outside Parliament they are advocating for proscribing various entities as terrorist then in fact that encourages the real terrorist (Netanyahu) to commit violence even genocide against those in anyway linked to the proscribed organization. It’s a criminal act under the Crimes act to encourage overseas violence particularly against innocent civilians.
    So c’mon lawyers get your act together and “Fight back.against the Zionists”.

  • Jack

    Apparently Trump bomb Iran not because they are a threat, but because it is “fun”, still the stupid media/politicians keep framing that the war was somehow a last resort because Iran was somehow this threat!?
    https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/3/15/trump-says-us-may-hit-irans-kharg-island-again-just-for-fun
    Trump is clearly a psychopath that is being lead by the more slick sociopathic Netanyahu.

    Another good article I want to share is this, about the fanatical nutcases in the iranian diaspora, they will have a rude awakening sooner or later when they realize that israel and the US could not care less about iranians as such:
    In Pursuit of Whiteness: Why Iranian Monarchists Cheer Israel’s Genocide
    https://web.archive.org/web/20260217122429/https://www.jadaliyya.com/Details/46906

    • zoot

      Thanks Jack, good article that. They are extreme right-wing racists who in another life would have been the subject of critical investigation by the Guardian, BBC, Channel 4 News etc. Instead, zionist-imperialist liberal media represents them as noble, high-principled freedom fighters.

      The gusano ‘Iran expert’ being given the most airtime in Britain is a comedian who has never set foot in the country, Omid Djalili. He is still being given the stage despite insisting the Iranian government blew up the girls’ school in Minab.

      Mr Djalili says the IRGC kept the girls’ bodies ‘on ice’ from the January riots to use as propaganda against Trump and Israel! Despite that, he was still granted a long interview about Iran by Channel 4 News on Friday night.

      This is where the British media is at.

      • Jack

        zoot

        Yes these deluded expats gets prime coverage – in reality these people have of course minuscule support inside of Iran.
        This is like if the same western media would give credence to ukrainan expats, urging Russia to bomb Ukraine. Unfathomable!

  • Republicofscotland

    The (IOF) has begun a a ground invasion of Lebanon, not content will stealing the Palestinians lands they now want Lebanese lands as well, Greater Israel here we come.

    • Alyson

      The US is keeping Iran busy so that 450,000 reservists can go into Lebanon, now that they have expelled 700,000 people from the southern half of Lebanon. Seems that this is what it is all about. This is why there is no exit strategy from the invasion of Iran. The goal is the entire Greater Israel project, with the Gulf States predicted to turn against Iran when their US bases get hit, or intercepted missiles and drones unfortunately land on civilians.

      • Republicofscotland

        And I bet the US puppet leader of Lebanon Joe Aoun, instructs his forces not to fire a single shot at the IOF, but to concentrate their fire on Hezbollah.

    • Jack

      And the lousy lebanese government have the gall to engage with something akin to normalization talks with israel behind the scenes while lebanese lives are taken minute by minute. Pure treachery, it is insane why the arab population do not overturn these fifth-column regimes that let israel go bezerk all over their region.

      That israel manage to engage in so many wars at the same time also crush the absurd prevalent narrative that “little” israel is so “threatened” by so many “neighbours”. The reality is of course the other way around: Israel is the rogue military powerhouse that threat the defenseless region decade after decade.

  • zoot

    Renewed celebration of Sir Keir in the British media today as the great man restates his resolve to stay out of ‘Trump’s War’ on Iran.

    Said as the majority of Trump’s bombers continue to operate out of British bases, in the most intense bombing campaign from British soil since the carpet bombing of Germany in WW2.

    No challenge to the gaslighting from any quarter of the media or the political class other than the Usual Suspects (Polanski, Corbyn, Sultana) and the National newspaper in Scotland.

1 2