Which part isn’t true?
“The photo looks like someone rather being rather naive about the ways people attempt to exploit people like him. What made him vulnerable was the fact that he had a need for money as a result of Princess Ferguson and Epstein took advantage of that fact. It was not sex and she is apparently the only “victim”.
Had he been “up to something” or intending be “up to something”, he would not have posed with the victim and provided evidence.”
The idiot who wrote that disinformation doesn’t understand that Andrew Windsor was one of Epstein and Maxwell’s targets. They were extremely manipulative and ruthless predators. Of course Andrew Windsor is not the brightest spark. He was a very easy target. Just look at Ghislaine grinning in the background. She set the photo up. According to Virginia Roberts it’s not all she set up.
But this is not he point.
Why is MI6 apparently confirming that videos of Andrew with Virginia Roberts (at least) presumably exist?
What is their game? Are they setting things up so that they can avoid blame if videos and photos become public? Will it be “the Russians are trying to bring down the Queen”?
And please don’t claim some drunk MI6 officer blabbed his mouth off in a pub. This information was given to the Times deliberately.