Nick Cohen Has Gone Mad 2


Nick Cohen’s latest rant is a defence of La Palin, under the guise of advice to liberals on how to attack her more wisely. He gives the game away with the following defence of Blair:

If they had confined themselves to charging Tony Blair with failing to find the weapons of mass destruction he promised were in Iraq, and sending British troops into a quagmire, they might have forced him out. They were so consumed by loathing, however, they insisted that he had lied, which he clearly had not.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/sep/07/uselections2008.republicans2008

Which planet is Cohen on? On 24 September 2002 Blair told the UK parliament this:

The dossier we publish gives the answer. The reason is because his chemical, biological and nuclear weapons programme is not an historic leftover from 1998. The inspectors aren’t needed to clean up the old remains. His WMD programme is active, detailed and growing. The policy of containment is not working. The WMD programme is not shut down. It is up and running…

Iraq has chemical and biological weapons, that Saddam has continued to produce them, that he has existing and active military plans for the use of chemical and biological weapons, which could be activated within 45 minutes, including against his own Shia population; and that he is actively trying to acquire nuclear weapons capability.

http://www.biogs.com/blair/blair14.html

Which is beyond doubt the most infamous lie, or series of lies, in all political history. It fulfils all the criteria of a lie by being demonstrably untrue, and by the fact that Blair knew it to be untrue. Unlike Nick Cohen, who was in a pub somewhere, I was a senior British diplomat at the time the dossier was produced and a former head of the FCO section monitoring Iraqi sanctions enforcement. I know, and have counted as a friend, John Williams, the Head of FCO News Department who did the first draft and is now a man wracked with conscience. I was told at the time that our claims were “Bollocks” by Bill Patey, then head of the FCO department covering the Middle East and now our Ambassador in Saudi Arabia, I heard first hand and before the war started witness of the pressure and career threats that reduced members of the FCO Research Analysts to tears.

It is interesting that Cohen tries the same rhetorical trick with Blair that he does with Palin. He starts off by trying to sound sympathetic to liberals, that there is validity to “charging Tony Blair with failing to find the weapons of mass destruction he promised were in Iraq, and sending British troops into a quagmire.”

But in fact we know these are not Cohen’s views at all and he remains a major cheerleader for the Iraq war. He has written an entire book about how misguided the “Left” are for not understanding Iraq and the noble neo-con desire to export “democracy” by force. So if Cohen disguises his defence of Blair with a false cloak of sympathy for the arguments against him, how much notice should we take of his feeble anti-Palin points before he defends her? Is it not more probable that the laughable old dipsomaniac is simply lost in admiration of another fellow neo-con?


2 thoughts on “Nick Cohen Has Gone Mad

  • writeon

    Craig,

    Excellent point, as per usual. It's nice to have someone with inside knowledge and a line to how history will probably be written decades from now. Right now, however, the acceptance of such an analysis is incredibly controversial and dangerous.

    Palin is actually both a religious and political extremist. She's also seems to embody symbolic archetypes that have a long, long, history in Western culture. She's a 'goddess' and a 'huntress'. She has a 'maverick' 'feral' quality about her, and she has a proven record of fecundity.

    I think she could prove to be the difference between the two candidates and who wins the presidency. Underestimating her symbolic appeal is folly. In the post-political world, the emotional response of voters to carefully presented and crafted symbols is of greater significance than the rational presentation of a political programme or 'ideology'. I think we are moving into a new era, and away from the ideals of the enlightenment, where the real world is increasingly being replaced by another, alternative, non-real world, of 'spirits' and 'God'.

  • ruth

    The same sort of manipulation was used by the government when trying to close down hospitals. Ministers and New Labour MPs would join the demonstrators in their constituencies.

Comments are closed.