Your Man in Saughton Jail Part 1 153


In my second week in Saughton jail, a prisoner pushed open the door of my cell and entered during the half hour period when we were unlocked to shower and use the hall telephone in the morning. I very much disliked the intrusion, and there was something in the attitude of the man which annoyed me – wheedling would perhaps be the best description. He asked if I had a bible I could lend him. Anxious to get him out of my cell, I replied no, I did not. He shuffled off.

I immediately started to feel pangs of guilt. I did in fact have a bible, which the chaplain had given me. It was, I worried, a very bad thing to deny religious solace to a man in prison, and I really had no right to act the way I did, based on an irrational distrust. I went off to take a shower, and on the way back to my cell was again accosted by the man.

“If you don’t have a Bible,” he said, “Do you have any other book with thin pages?”

He wanted the paper either to smoke drugs, or more likely to make tabs from a boiled up solution of a drug.

You cannot separate the catastrophic failure of the Scottish penal system – Scotland has the highest jail population per capita in all of Western Europe – from the catastrophic failure of drugs policy in Scotland. 90% of the scores of prisoners I met and spoke with had serious addiction problems. Every one of those was a repeat offender, back in jail, frequently for the sixth, seventh or eighth time. How addiction had led them to jail varied. They stole, often burgled, to feed their addiction. They dealt drugs in order to pay for their own use. They had been involved in violence – frequently domestic – while under the influence.

I had arrived in Saughton jail on Sunday 1 August. After being “seen off” by a crowd of about 80 supporters outside St Leonards police station, I had handed myself in there at 11am, as ordered by the court. The police were expecting me, and had conducted me to a holding area, where my possessions were searched and I was respectfully patted down. The police were very polite. I had been expecting to spend the night in a cell at St Leonards and to be taken to jail in a prison van on the Monday morning. This is what both my lawyers and a number of policemen had explained would happen.

In fact I was only half an hour in St Leonards before being put in a police car and taken to Saughton. This was pretty well unique – the police do not conduct people to prison in Scotland. At no stage was I manacled or handled and the police officers were very friendly. Reception at Saughton prison – where prisoners are not usually admitted on a Sunday – were also very polite, even courteous. None of this is what happens to an ordinary prisoner, and gives the lie to the Scottish government’s claim that I was treated as one.

I was not fingerprinted either in the police station or the jail, on the grounds I was a civil prisoner with no criminal conviction. At reception my overcoat and my electric toothbrush were taken from me, but my other clothing, notebook and book were left with me.

I was then taken to a side office to see a nurse. She asked me to list my medical conditions, which I did, including pulmonary hypertension, anti-phospholipid syndrome, Barrett’s oesophagus, atrial fibrillation, hiatus hernia, dysarthria and a few more. As she typed them in to her computer, options appeared on a dropdown menu for her to select the right one. It was plain to me she had no knowledge of several of these conditions, and certainly no idea how to spell them

The nurse cut me off very bluntly when I politely asked her a question about the management of my heart and blood conditions while in prison, saying someone would be round to see me in the morning. She then took away from me all the prescription medications I had brought with me, saying new ones would be issued by the prison medical services. She also took my pulse oximeter, saying the prison would not permit it, as it had batteries. I said it had been given to me by my consultant cardiologist, but she insisted it was against prison regulations.

This was the most disconcerting encounter so far. I was then walked by three prison officers along an extraordinarily long corridor – hundreds of yards long – with the odd side turning, which we we ignored. At the end of the corridor we reached Glenesk Block. The journey to my cell involved unlocking eight different doors and gates, including my cell door, every one of which was locked behind me. There was no doubt that this was very high security detention.

Once I reached floor 3 of Glenesk block, which houses the admissions wing, we acquired two further guards from the landing, so five people saw me into my cell. This was twelve feet by eight feet. May I suggest that you measure that out in your room? That was to be my world for the next four months. In fact I was to spend 95% of the next four months confined in that space.

The door was hard against one wall, leaving space within the 12 ft by 8 ft cell for a 4 ft by 4 ft toilet in one corner next the door. This was fully walled in, to the ceiling, and closed properly with an internal door. This little room contained a toilet and sink. The toilet had no seat. This was not an accident – I was not permitted a toilet seat, even if I provided it myself. It was a normal UK style toilet, designed to be used with a seat, with the two holes for the seat fixing, and a narrow porcelain rim.

The toilet was filthy. Below the waterline it was stained deep black with odd lumps and ridges. Above the waterline it was streaked and spotted with excrement, as was the rim. The toilet floor was in a disgusting state. The cell itself was dirty with, everywhere a wall or bolted down furniture met the floor, a ridge built up of hardened black dirt.

A female guard looked around the cell, then came back to give me rubber gloves, a surface cleaner spray and some cloths. So I spent my first few hours in my cell on my knees, scrubbing away furiously with these inadequate materials.

The female guard had advised me that even after cleaning the cell I should always keep shoes on, because of the mice. I heard them most nights in my cell, but never saw one. The prisoners universally claim them to be rats, but not having seen one I cannot say.

A guard later explained to me that prisoners are responsible for cleaning their own cells, but as nobody generally stayed in a new admissions cell for more than two or three nights, nobody bothered. Cells for new arrivals will be cleaned out by a prisoner work detail, but as I had arrived on a Sunday, that had not happened.

So about 3pm I was locked in the cell. At 5.20pm the door opened for two seconds to check I was still there, but that was it for the day. There I was confused, disoriented and struggling to take in that all this was really happening. I should describe the rest of the cell.

A narrow bed ran down one wall. I came to realise that prison in Scotland still includes an element of corporal punishment, in that the prisoner is very deliberately made physically uncomfortable. Not having a toilet seat is part of this, and so is the bed. It consists of an iron frame bolted to the floor and holding up a flat steel plate, completely unsprung. On this unyielding steel surface there is a mattress consisting simply of two inches of low grade foam – think cheap bath sponge – encased in a shiny red plastic cover, slashed or burnt through in several places and with the colour worn off down the centre.

The mattress was stamped with the date 2013 and had lost its structural resistance, to the extent that if I pinched it between my finger and thumb, I could compress it down to a millimetre. On the steel plate, this mattress had almost no effect and I woke up after a sleepless first night with acute pain throughout my muscles and difficulty walking. To repeat, this is deliberate corporal punishment – a massively superior mattress could be provided for about £30 more per prisoner, while in no way being luxurious. The beds and mattresses can only be designed to inflict both pain and, perhaps more important, humiliation. It is plainly quite deliberate policy.

It is emblematic of the extraordinary lack of intellectual consistency in the Scottish prisons system that cells are equipped with these Victorian punishment beds but also with TV sets showing 23 channels including two Sky subscription channels (of which I shall write more in another instalment). The bed is fixed along one long wall, while a twelve inch plywood shelf runs the length of the other and can serve as a desk. At one end, up against the wall of the toilet, this desk meets a built-in plywood shelving unit fixed into the floor, on top of which are sat the television and kettle next to two power points. At the other end of the desk, a further set of shelves are attached to the wall above. There is a plastic stackable chair of the cheapest kind – the sort you see stacked outside poundshops as garden furniture.

On the outside wall there is a small double glazed window with heavy, square iron bars two inches thick running both horizontally and vertically, like a noughts and crosses grid. The window does not open, but had metal ventilation strips down each side, which were stuck firmly closed with black grime. At the other end of the cell, next to the toilet, the heavy steel door is hinged so as to have a distinct gap all round between the door and the steel frame, like a toilet cubicle door.

Above the desk shelf is fixed a noticeboard, which is the only place prisoners are allowed to put up posters or photos. However as prisoners are not permitted drawing pins, staples, sellotape or blu tak, this was not possible. I asked advice from the guards who suggested I try toothpaste. I did – it didn’t work.

There is a single neon light tube.

The admissions unit has single-occupancy cells, of which there are very few in the rest of the jail. All the prison’s cells were designed for single occupancy, but massive overcrowding means that they are mostly in practice identical to this description, but with a bunk bed rather than a single bed.

The prison is divided into a number of blocks. Glenesk block had three floors, each containing 44 of these cells. Each floor is entered by a central staircase and has a centrally located desk where the guards are stationed. Either side of the desk are two heavy metal grills stretching right across the floor and dividing it into two wings. Within the central area is the kitchen where meals are collected (though not prepared), then eaten back locked in the cell.

The corridor between the cells either side of each wing is about 30 feet wide. It contains a pool table and fixed chairs and tables, and is conceived as a recreational area. There are two telephones at the end of each wing from which prisoners may call (at 10p a minute) numbers from a list they have pre-registered for approval.

The various cell blocks are located off that central spine corridor whose length astonished me at first admission. I did not realise then that this is a discreet building in itself rather than a corridor inside a building – it is like a long concrete overground tunnel.

I should describe my typical day the first ten weeks. At 7.30am the cell door springs open without warning as guards do a head count. The door is immediately locked again. At 8am cereals, milk and morning rolls are handed in, and the door is immediately locked again. At 10am I was released into the corridor for 30 minutes to shower and use the telephone. The showers are in an open room but with individual cubicles, contrary to prison movie cliche. At 10.30am I was locked in again.

At 11am I was released for one hour and escorted under supervision to plod around an enclosed, tarmac exercise yard about 40 paces by 20 paces. This yard is filthy and contains prison bins. One wing of Glenesk block forms one side, and the central spine corridor forms another; the wall of a branch corridor leading to another cell block forms a third and a fence dividing off that block a fourth. The walls are about 10 feet high and the fence about 16 feet high.

In the non-admissions, larger area of Glenesk block the cells had windows with opening narrow side panels. It is the culture of the prison that rather than keep rubbish in their cells and empty it out at shower time, the prisoners throw all rubbish out of their cell windows into the exercise yard. This includes food waste and plates, newspapers, used tissues and worse. At meal times, sundry items (bread, margarine etc) are available on a table outside the kitchen and some prisoners scoop up quantities simply to throw them out of the window into the yard.

I believe the origin of this is that this enclosed yard is used by protected prisoners, many of whom are sexual offenders. Glenesk house has a protected prisoner area on its second floor. “Mainstream” prisoners from Glenesk exercise on the astroturf five-a-side football pitch the other side of the spine corridor. (For four months that pitch was the view from my window and I never saw a game of football played. After three months the goals were removed.) New admissions exercise in the protected yard because they have not been sorted yet – that sorting is the purpose of the new admissions wing. New prisoners therefore have to plough through the filth prepared for protected prisoners.

At times large parts of this already small exercise yard were ankle deep in dross – it was cleaned out intermittently, probably on average every three weeks. Only on a couple of occasions was it so bad I decided against exercise. After exercise getting the sludge off my shoes as we went straight back to my cell was a concern. I now understood how the cell had got so dirty.

After exercise, at noon I collected my lunch and was locked back in the cell. Apart from 2 minutes to collect my tea, I would be locked in from noon until 10am the following morning, for 22 hours solid, every single day. In total I was locked in for 22 and a half hours a day for the first ten weeks. After that I was locked in my cell for 23 hours and 15 minutes a day due to a covid outbreak.

At 5pm the door would open for a final headcount, and then we would be on lockdown for the night, though in truth we had been locked down all day. Lockdown here meant the guards were going home.

Now I want you again to just mark out twelve feet by eight feet on your floor and put yourself inside it. Then imagine being confined inside that space a minimum of 22 and a half hours a day. For four months. These conditions were not peculiar to me – it is how all prisoners were living and are still living today. The library, gym and all educational activities had been closed “because of covid”. The resulting conditions are inhumane – few people would keep a dog like that.

It is also worth noting that Covid is an excuse. In September 2017 an official inspection report already noted that significant numbers of prisoners in Saughton were confined to cells for 22 hours a day. The root problem is massive overcrowding, and I shall write further on the causes of that in a future instalment.

The long concrete and steel corridors of the prison echo horribly, and after lockdown for the first time I felt rather scared. All round me prisoners were shouting out at the top of their voices. That first evening two were yelling death threats at another prisoner, with extreme expressions of hate and retribution. Inter-prisoner communication is by yelling out the window. This went on all night into the early hours of the morning. Prisoners were banging continually on the steel doors, sometimes for hours, calling out for guards who were not there. Somebody was crying out as though being attacked and in pain. There were sounds of plywood splintering as people smashed up their rooms.

It was unnerving because it seemed to me I was living amongst severely violent and out of control berserkers.

Part of the explanation of this is that for most prisoners the new admissions wing on first night is where they go through withdrawal symptoms. Many prisoners come in still drugged up. They are going through their private hell and desperate to get medication. I can understand (though not condone) why the prison medical staff are so remarkably bad and unhelpful. Their job and circumstances are very difficult.

On that first evening I was concerned that I did not have my daily medicines, and by the next morning my heart was getting distinctly out of synch. I was therefore relieved to receive the promised medical visit.

My cell door was opened and a nurse, flanked by two guards, addressed me from outside my cell. She asked if I had any addictions. I replied in the negative. I asked when I might receive my medicines. She said it was in process. I asked if I might get my pulse oximeter. She said the prison did not allow devices with batteries. I asked if my bed could somehow be propped or sloped because of my hiatus hernia (leading to gastric reflux) and Barrett’s oesophagus. She said she didn’t think that the prison could do that. I asked about management of my blood condition (APS), saying I was supposed to exercise regularly and not sit for long periods. She replied by asking if I would like to see the psychiatric team. I replied no. She left.

I was taken out to exercise alone, with four guards watching me. I felt like Rudolf Hess. In the lunch queue I met my first prisoners, who were respectful and polite. The day passed much as the first, and I still did not get my medicines on the Monday. They arrived on the Tuesday morning, as did the prison governor.

I was told the governor had come to see me, and I met him in the (closed) Glenesk library. David Abernethy is a taciturn man who looks like a rugby prop and has a reputation among prisoners as a disciplinarian, compared to other prison regimes in Scotland. He was accompanied by John Morrison, Glenesk block manager, a friendly Ulsterman, who did most of the talking.

I was an anomaly in that Saughton did not normally hold civil prisoners. The Governor told me he believed I was their first civil prisoner in four years, and before that in ten. Civil prisoners should be held separately from criminal prisoners, but Saughton had no provision for that. The available alternatives were these: I could move into general prisoner population, which would probably involve sharing a cell; I could join the protected prisoners; or I could stay where I was on admissions.

On the grounds that nothing too terrible had happened to me yet, I decided to stay where I was and serve my sentence on admissions.

They wished to make plain to me that it was their job to hold me and it was not for them to make any comment on the circumstances that brought me to jail. I told them I held no grudge against them and had no reason to complain of any of the prison officers who had (truthfully) so far all been very polite and friendly to me. I asked whether I could have books I was using for research brought to me from my library at home; I understood this was not normally allowed. I was also likely to receive many books sent by well-wishers. The governor said he would consider this. They also instructed, at my request, extra pillows to be brought to prop up the head of my bed due to my hiatus hernia.

That afternoon a guard came along (I am not going to give the names except for senior management, as the guards might not wish it) with the pillows, and said he had been instructed I was a VIP prisoner and should be looked after. I replied I was not a VIP, but was a civil prisoner, and therefore had different rights to other prisoners.

He said that the landing guards suggested that I should take my exercise and shower/phone time at the same time as other mainstream new admission prisoners (sexual offender and otherwise protected new admission prisoners had separate times). I had so far been kept entirely apart, but perhaps I would prefer to meet people? I said I would prefer that.

So the next day I took my exercise in that filthy yard in the company of four other prisoners, all new arrivals the night before. I thus observed for the first time something which astonished me. Once in the yard, the new prisoners (who on this occasion arrived individually, not all part of the same case), immediately started to call out to the windows of Glenesk block, shouting out for friends.

“Hey, Jimmy! Jimmy! It’s me Joe! I am back. Is Paul still in? What’s that? Gone tae Dumfries? Donnie’s come in? That’s brilliant.”

The realisation dropped, to be reinforced every day, that Saughton jail is a community, a community where the large majority of the prisoners all know each other. That does not mean they all like each other – there are rival gangs, and enmities. But prison is a routine event in not just their lives, but the lives of their wider communities. Those communities are the areas of deprivation of Edinburgh.

Edinburgh is a city of astonishing social inequality. It contains many of the areas in the bottom 10% of multiple social deprivation in Scotland (dark red on the map below). These are often a very short walk from areas of great affluence in the top 10% (dark blue on the map). Of course, few people make that walk. But I recommend a spell in Saughton jail to any other middle class person who, like myself, was foolish enough to believe that Scotland is a socially progressive country.

The vast majority of prisoners I met came from the red areas on these maps. The same places came up again and again – including Granton, Pllton, Oxgangs, Muirhouse, Lochend, and from West Lothian, Livingston and Craigshill. Saughton jail is simply where Edinburgh locks away 900 of its poorest people, who were born into extreme poverty and often born into addiction. Many had parents and grandparents also in Saughton jail.

A large number of prisoners have known institutionalisation throughout their lives; council care and foster homes leading to young offenders’ institutions and then prison. A surprising number have very poor reading and writing skills. The overcrowding of our prisons is a symptom not just of failed justice and penal policy, but of fundamentally flawed economic, social and educational systems.

Of which I shall also write more later. Here, on this first day with a group in the exercise yard, I was mystified as the prisoners started going up to the ground floor windows and the guards started shouting “keep away from the windows! Stand back from the windows” in a very agitated fashion, but to no effect. Eventually they removed one man and sent him back to his cell, though he seemed no more guilty than the others.

By the next week I had learnt what was happening. At exercise the new admissions prisoners get drugs passed to them through the window by their friends who have been in the prison longer and had time to get their supply established. These drugs are passed as paper tabs, as pills or in vape tubes. There appears no practical difficulty at all in prisoners getting supplied with plentiful drugs in Saughton. Every single day I was to witness new admissions prisoners getting their drugs at the window from friends, and every single day I witnessed this curious charade of guards shouting and pretending to try and stop them.

My first few days in Saughton had introduced me to an unknown, and sometimes frightening, world, of which I shall be telling you more.

———————————————

 
 
Forgive me for pointing out that my ability to provide this coverage is entirely dependent on your kind voluntary subscriptions which keep this blog going. This post is free for anybody to reproduce or republish, including in translation. You are still very welcome to read without subscribing.

Unlike our adversaries including the Integrity Initiative, the 77th Brigade, Bellingcat, the Atlantic Council and hundreds of other warmongering propaganda operations, this blog has no source of state, corporate or institutional finance whatsoever. It runs entirely on voluntary subscriptions from its readers – many of whom do not necessarily agree with the every article, but welcome the alternative voice, insider information and debate.

Subscriptions to keep this blog going are gratefully received.

Choose subscription amount from dropdown box:

Recurring Donations



 

Paypal address for one-off donations: [email protected]

Alternatively by bank transfer or standing order:

Account name
MURRAY CJ
Account number 3 2 1 5 0 9 6 2
Sort code 6 0 – 4 0 – 0 5
IBAN GB98NWBK60400532150962
BIC NWBKGB2L
Bank address Natwest, PO Box 414, 38 Strand, London, WC2H 5JB

Bitcoin: bc1q3sdm60rshynxtvfnkhhqjn83vk3e3nyw78cjx9
Ethereum/ERC-20: 0x764a6054783e86C321Cb8208442477d24834861a

Subscriptions are still preferred to donations as I can’t run the blog without some certainty of future income, but I understand why some people prefer not to commit to that.


Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comments will be closed on January 28, 2022.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

153 thoughts on “Your Man in Saughton Jail Part 1

1 2 3
  • Disinterested Bystander

    I look forward to Paul Hutcheon’s next article in the Daily Record castigating you for your jigsaw identification of our brave prison officers. He’ll probably mention something about you owning a house with more than one bedroom as well.

  • Ebeneezer Scroggie

    I couldn’t help noticing the symbolism of that revolving door behind Craig Murray when he made his speech upon being released from Saughton.

    The appallingly high rate of recidivism and the overcrowding and rotten conditions in Scottish prisons are definitely linked.

    Let’s face it: life in Scotland under the SNP is a bit shit. Education standards are going down down down in both primary and secondary schools. Life expectancy has stopped going up, for the first time in hundreds of years. We have an appallingly high suicide rate and a dreadful rate of drug addiction. We have a horribly high rate of imprisonment per capita, the worst in Europe. These things are all linked, y’know. There’s nothing random about it. It is all a cause/consequence sequence.

    If you wanted to set about setting up a system which self-perpetuates imprisonment and drug abuse, you would end up with exactly what Craig Murray has described.

    The separatists often fantasise that a Scotland amputated from the UK would become like Norway in some way. Utter bullshit of course, but it is believed by many.

    Do a YouTube search for:

    Norwegian Prison – Michael Moore

    Then, to satisfy yourself that it’s not just Michael Moore’s perspective, do a more general search for Norway Prison. There are several videos which go into much more detail about how the Norwegian prison system works.

    In Norway they discovered, almost by accident, that a prison system which concentrates on rehabilitating people into polite society actually costs less when you count into the equation the wider costs of crime, than the Scottish or American style of prison which brutalises the victims.

    Prison, like so many other aspects of life in Scotland, has been a devolved matter for 22 years now. Plenty of time to imitate Norway. Scotland will never become Norway. A cold water version of Cuba perhaps, but never Norway. Compare and contrast the Norwegian government’s approach to prison to that of the SNP government’s approach. Then consider that the vile conditions described in Craig Murray’s article above were inflicted on a model prisoner who was not convicted of a crime of violence. Not convicted of a crime at all, actually. Certainly a victimless ‘offence’.

    It’s not about money either. It costs more to keep those poor sods in Saughton and Barlinnie et al than it costs to send a kid to Eton, Harrow, Oxford or Cambridge. The societal costs of recidivism are even higher.

    We have a deeply stupid and incompetent and malicious government in Scotland. It needs to be changed – or abolished. Change would be better, I think.

    • Alf Baird

      It is not an independent Scotland justice system Craig is describing, it is a colonial justice system where social institutions continue to protect the interests and cultural hegemony of the oppressor, not the downtrodden native. Let’s remember that “colonialism is always a co-operative venture” in which native elites play a part (Fanon).

      • Ebeneezer Scroggie

        It is a myth that England invaded and colonised Scotland. It’s ‘Braveheart’ crap.

        The Union was instigated in two stages. In the first it was a Scottish king who rode South at the head of two armies. Not an English king invading Scotland. One was a small military army. Very puny as the country was at peace, so little more than a large bodyguard really. The other was an army of clerks, administrators and lawyers. They set up shop immediately behind Whitehall in a large area which became known as Scotland Yard. From there, literally at the back doors of Whitehall, they monitored and controlled Whitehall.

        The second stage was also instigated by Scots, not English. The independent parliament dissolved itself at their own request as a result of having made a complete arse of a speculative money-making scheme. The “Estates of Scotland”, so called because the independent parliament was stuffed full of Scottish land owners, went begging for money from England because they’d made such an arse of things and had practically bankrupted Scotland through greed and stupidity. An entire new bank was set up to disburse £400,000 of free money among the feckless and the reckless who had pissed away their family fortunes on the idiotic Darien scheme. That bank went bust in 2008 as a result of greed and fecklessness and was bailed out by a Scottish Chancellor and a Scottish Prime Minister. At its own request it has changed its name from Royal Bank of Scotland to National Westminster. Irony?

        It tends to be Scots in the vanguard of colonisation and empire building. India and Hong Kong are just two examples where Scots showed their prowess over the English in building the British Empire. Enslaving subjugated populations is something of a Scottish art. In almost every street of the first and second phases of Edinburgh’s New Town you can see traces of that, if you know how to look. The enormous wealth that it took to build the New Town didn’t come from Scottish industry. It didn’t come from the innards within the old Flodden Wall or from Holyrood either. It almost entirely came from Scots colonising other people’s land and property and by monetising poor people.

        The Scots legal system is home grown and thoroughly corrupted politically, as has been shown in both the Salmond and Murray cases. The chief prosecutor is a political appointee. A member of the Scots, not the English or British, cabinet. The Lady judge in both cases is a politically ambitious individual who is gunning for a top job which is in the personal gift of the Scottish First Minister. The system stinks, as do some of the results such as the malicious prosecution and perverse verdict in the case of those two Libyan guys. It’s only when a jury gets involved that there is any justice. Hence that Lady judge wants to abolish jury trials in cases such as the attempted stitchup of Wee Eck. Hence they did not dare risk prosecuting Craig Murray under criminal law because they knew what the outcome of a jury trial would have been.

        The Scottish Prison Service has been a devolved Scottish entity for 22 years. It’s independence from the UK has resulted in the system which Craig Murray so eloquently describes above. It’s a Scottish problem, not the fault of the English or the UK. The nonsense of blaming the English or colonialism for the shambles that Scotland has become in the past dark 14 to 22 years is getting a bit stale.

        If the Pygmy Parliament and its Executive were going to attempt to become Norway they’d have made a start by now. The SPS prison estate would have been a really good place to start.

        • Alf Baird

          As I said, you need to remember that “colonialism is always a co-operative venture” in which native elites who mimic the colonizer’s culture and language and take on their ‘values’ always play a decisive role (Fanon).

          So yes of course the Scots native elites/bourgeoisie play their part in selling out their own people because that is a fundamental part of colonialism; but colonialism still requires its colonizer and the “positive values, good climate, harmonious landscape, social discipline and exquisite liberty, beauty, morality and logic” of the mother country (Memmi).

          • Ebeneezer Scroggie

            If there was any colonising going on, it was the Scots colonising the English (plus a wee bit of NorthEastern Ireland, but that’s another story).

            If you want to subjugate and dominate a people, the most effective way is get them indebted to you on a huge scale. The Septics knew that and Britain has been Uncle Sam’s poodle ever since 1945. William Paterson knew that too. He was the Scots banker who invented the concept of a National Debt. He sold the idea to the Scots king who loved it. Until Paterson’s invention, it was the king who racked up huge debts, usually to fund wars, not the nation itself. He created a bank for the special purpose of getting the United Kingdom into debt. He called it The Bank of England. He became immensely rich as a shareholder, as did the king who was the largest shareholder. Debt is how money is made, quite literally.

            He was a con artist, as so many banksters are, but his bank still exists and still trades under its original name.

            He went on to bankrupt Scotland by selling shares in a dud company called The Company of Scotland Trading to Africa and the Indies. Scotland’s wealthy people and many not so wealthy, invested every bawbee they had and borrowed to the hilt to buy more and more shares as the share price ballooned. Four ships set off from Leith and Newhaven to what we now call the Panama Ithsmus to set up an entrepot and build a road across the ithsmus and make Scotland filthy rich by taking hefty dues from shippers who wanted avoid the risk and expensive shiptime of sailing around the savagely dangerous Cape Horn.

            The ships were heavily laden with goods such as woolly bunnets and tweeds which they hoped to trade with the local ‘Indians’. They hadn’t got a clue about the environment and climate of tropical rainforest and so they died like flies. They also fought amongst themselves, being Scots. Most of their efforts were expended on building forts to fight eachother and the Spanish and, hopefully, the fekkin English. Very few survived. Unsurprisingly, the Scots banker himself was one of the few survivors.

            The colony failed. It failed for obvious reasons, but mostly because there was naeb’dy to colonise. It’s why the Saltyre will never dangle on the moon.

            Scots colonisation of the English has been much more successful. Fantabbydosie, as Wee Nippysweetie might say. That £100 investment in the UK National Debt has grown to £2.6Trillion. We peeled £10Billion off the munificent English providers just last year. Last week Wee Jimmy Krankie handed out millions upon millions upon millions to Scottish hairdressers and nailpainters, almost all at the expense of the subjugated English taxpayers and the ballooning national debt of the UK.

        • John Monro

          I like your style, Ebenezer. Useful riposte to excessive and often undeserved Anglophobia. Useful reminder of a not so glorious UK history in which all willing partook of.

  • Stuart Littlewood

    Scary report from Craig. Huge respect to him for putting it together. So who inspects these awful places that cost the taxpayer a fortune?

    This from the HM Inspectorate of Prisons for Scotland (HMIPS) website….

    Standards of Inspection and Monitoring
    These are our Standards for Inspecting and Monitoring Prisons in Scotland.
    The regular monitoring and inspecting of prisons and other places of detention provides an important safeguard and a reassurance to the public. Such scrutiny needs to be conducted effectively, identifying both areas of good practice and where improvements should be made. The requirement to report these findings publicly contributes to public confidence in the criminal justice system.
    These published standards are referenced against relevant law, international and professional guidance, policy and research findings. The standards articulate what is expected of a well-run prison and contain very clear statements identifying what is important and what will be monitored and inspected. They are designed to assist those who are running prisons and to encourage openness and transparency in the scrutiny of places of detention.

    Purpose
    Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Prisons for Scotland is required to inspect the 15 prisons across Scotland in order to establish the treatment of, and the conditions for prisoners and to report publicly on the findings. The Public Services Reform (Inspection and Monitoring of Prisons) (Scotland) Order 2015 came into force on 31 August 2015 and from this date HM Chief Inspector of Prisons for Scotland assumed overall responsibility for the monitoring of prisons, which is carried out on a day to day basis by independent prison monitors.

    The United Kingdom is a signatory of the United Nations Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture and other Cruel, Inhumane and Degrading Treatement or Punishment (OPCAT). HMIPS is one of 21 bodies that comprise the UKs National Preventative Mechanism (NPM), which has a duty to regularly monitor the treatment of detainees and the conditions in which they are held.

    The Chief Inspector also has responsibility for:
    # the inspection of the treatment of and conditions for prisoners under escort
    # produce and publish an Annual Report which is presented to the Scottish Ministers and laid before Parliament

    Inspection
    Standards for Inspecting and Monitoring Prisons in Scotland:
    Our programme of regular inspections is informed by an assessment of risk and requirement. We continue to conduct inspections of prisons and court custody units and undertake return visits where necessary.
    We will also conduct unannounced inspections as required.
    Our prison inspection teams comprise HMIPS staff, and subject experts from other organisations including inspectors from the Care Inspectorate, Education Scotland, Healthcare Improvement Scotland as well as staff from the Scottish Human Rights Commission, the Scottish Prison Service and the Children and Young People’s Commissioner Scotland.

    Independent Prison Monitoring Advisory Group – Mark Hamid is IPM at HMP Edinburgh. Mark is a Governance Advisor at a university in the Lothians and brings a wealth of experience working in the courts and wider public sector.

    So, given what Craig says, is someone having a laugh?

    Assuming HMP Edinburgh = Saughton, there was an Inspecting & Monitoring report 4 months ago:

    Regime
    Prisoners reported mixed views on the return to the pre-COVID regime towards the end of the quarter – some saying it is better, and others preferring the earlier lock up in the evenings. Overall the recent changes to the regime appear to be positive.
    Staff prisoner relationships
    The majority of prisoners continued to report positive relationships with staff, with most saying that staff on the halls generally tried to help solve problems. The atmosphere on the halls was generally good. However, concerns were raised in some halls that staff tended to congregate behind the desks. The practice of shouting for prisoners from the desk area is not appropriate.
    Decency
    There were no complaints raised to IPMs about the vermin problems over the last couple of months – IPMs are aware that this issue can be ongoing. During some visits the litter outside the halls was excessive. Some newly inducted prisoners have raised concerns about understanding some basic aspects of prison life – for example how to get clothes laundered and access to cleaning materials.
    Food Concerns
    were raised by individual prisoners about special diets. The prison previously committed to ensuring that colour coded menus are on display on all halls – this happened for a while, but many have been removed. This was raised with the new catering manager who informed IPMs that colour coded menus are not considered good practice, and she is considering better ways of sharing nutritional information with prisoners.
    Purposeful activity
    Workshops and education appeared to be getting back to pre-pandemic levels.
    Progression
    Concerns remain nationally about the ability of prisoners to progress through their sentences. The HMIPS review into progression is underway, with inspectors having spent two weeks in HMP Edinburgh. They spoke to around 100 staff and prisoners. The team will be visiting all Scottish prisons over the next few months before writing up their report.
    Medication
    IPMs were concerned about the amount of time spent issuing medication each day, and the impact this had on the regime.

    Report on a follow-up Liaison Visit to HMP Edinburgh on 8 July 2021. “These liaison visit reports provide assurance to Ministers and the wider public that scrutiny of the treatment and conditions in which prisoners are held has been continued during the pandemic,” says the Introduction.

    There’s a complaints process: “Our complaints handling procedure reflects HMIPS commitment to valuing complaints. It seeks to resolve customer dissatisfaction…. Complaints give us valuable information we can use to improve customer satisfaction.”
    But do prisoners (“customers”?) know how to use it?

  • Fwl

    Thanks Craig Murray for this posting about your early days in prison. If we come to life to learn then you have certainly had some diverse educational experiences. Keep at it.

  • Ste fella

    “Every single day I was to witness new admissions prisoners getting their drugs at the window from friends, and every single day I witnessed this curious charade of guards shouting and pretending to try and stop them.”

    Do leading members of new SNP hone their independence negotiation skills with a stint as a Saughton prison guard?

  • durak

    We have much in common.
    Saughton for civil offence (English unpaid Poll Tax, 3 days, 1993) and they did drive me there in a police car as well.
    Lived on the same road as your grandfather (West Pilton Gardens, as a student, Edinburgh 1992-1995)
    Worked Uzbekistan 2002-2006 (visited the embassy a few times, with that solitary guard).
    Ragu, the bar downstairs, Dublin and many other clubs off Broadway, the infamous Juliano’s (alas closed a long time ago).
    Every time I read this blog a new coincidence comes up!

  • SA

    Let us get this straight: you arrived to the Jail on Sunday 1st and handed all your medicines in and you then did not receive of your medication until Tuesday. You have atrial fibrillation and other conditions. You are presumably on medicines to thin the blood. It is negligent of the authorities to deny you medication which could prevent complications and interfere with your right to live as this act of omission has endangered your life.
    Secondly: you have hiatus hernia and Barrett’s esophagitis. If not propped up at night you may suffer from regurgitation and consequent inhalation pneumonia. Your life was also put in danger.

    Do the authorities wish to play god with the lives of people just because they are convicted of a vague offence of Jig Saw identification?

    Was the judge biased in the belief that you have added to the possibility of identifying anybody just because she knew who is who in this case?

    Gross injustices have been committed here. I hope that you appeal not only against your conviction but against the way your life was endangered. All of this is uncalled for and smacks not of justice but of exemplary punishment and revenge. I hope you appeal.

    • Peter Mo

      Right On.
      Sending someone to jail say over 60 totally different ballgame to someone in their twenties. As you infer can be a death sentence. That could equate also to lets say 5% of remaining life where as for someone in their twenties its 1%. Medication also relevant to age when taking it away for a couple days. Conclusion….. Dorrian has attempted to murder Craig, albeit in a gutless indirect way.

      • Peter Mo

        I would like to expand the concept of judicial murder. Using a hypothetical case of someone not accused of any crime against fellow citizens, aged over eighty, requiring constant medical attention, never had a record of violence of any kind yet is denied bail, placed in the harshest prison and isolated. All against medical advice. Dies soon after in prison.
        Can the judge be arrested by the police for murder?
        Juggling a few facts around not hard to come up with the Julian Assange predicament.

    • Shitegeist

      Has to be asked though, do they do that to everyone? I imagine that they do, and Craig wasn’t given “special treatment” in this regard, much though authorities might have liked him to be.

      As is currently being demonstrated with Assange, this is what happens when you make serious emnity with the ruling class of a state which holds (or can gain) power over you: you are going to be used as a cautionary example, in any way that they can think of, and notions like “human rights” have no relevance whatsoever unless they can somehow be enforced. It’s win-win for the ruling class here, because if Craig didn’t oblige them by dropping dead from medical neglect, then he was going to wind up documenting for all to read the conditions that he was subjected to – thus delivering to everybody else the warning about what happens when you cross the rulers.

      • SA

        There is a difference between the state depriving you of personal freedom, legally or illegally, from depriving you from the basic human right of the right to life. Given the lack of gravity of the crime in that at worse it did not endanger anyone’s life whether the conviction was legal or not, then the punishment and any consequences or potential consequences is degrading and out of proportion and is against basic human rights. This is the point I am making.

        The above incidentally also applies to Assange, even more so given that he has not been charged with breaking any laws in this country and his incarceration is unending. Despite this being highlighted by the UN rapporteur of human rights. The UK is no longer a country that upholds basic human rights and this is what is so worrying. Another case is that of the disappearance of the Skripals.

  • Nu

    @Craig – I’m surprised nobody told you how to stick papers up on your cell’s noticeboard. The screws were having a laugh when they suggested toothpaste. The substance that’s in general usage in men’s prisons for this purpose is semen.

  • Shitegeist

    AFAIK, the “intellectual disconnect” that you speak of – between the bed and the TV – isn’t one. The TV is simply there to make the prisoners easier to manage. The same mentality that installed the beds would also remove the TV, if they felt that they could get away with it. Like allowing the drugs exchanges, it’s a necessary concession in order for the staff to have peaceful lives (and the prison to remain staffed).

1 2 3