The War for Greater Israel 441


There has scarcely been an attempt to pretend any justification in international law for the attack on Iran and murder of its leader. The response of the UK government, focusing almost entirely on condemning Iran for exercising its legitimate right of self-defence, takes the Starmer dishonesty meter further off the scale.

The RAF has been actively involved in genocide in Gaza for two years with its surveillance and logistic support for the IDF. It is now fighting for Israel again; intercepting Iranian missiles is not defensive; it is joining in the attack on an already vastly overmatched opponent.

I am afraid that the truth is the Iranian attempt to defend itself militarily will be less impactful than many anti-imperialists hope. The astonishing amounts of money spent by the US government on military and surveillance technology simply do have real-world effect.

Here in Venezuela, having seen the major sites struck by the US on 3 January, I have concluded that no act of betrayal was needed. Just overwhelming force and precision technology applied against a technologically unequal opponent whose key capabilities were all on open hilltops or in unhardened barracks.

Iran is much more militarily sophisticated, but facing exponentially more force. Khamenei was killed in his own home, not hiding away. He is going to prove a lot more powerful as a martyr than as a ruler with his internal critics.

We are facing not only a period of unapologetic imperialism to which virtually all Western countries are prepared to defer, but a return of medievalism, both in the sheer barbarity and scale of physical abuse, as witnessed in Gaza and in general Israeli brutality, and in use of kidnap and murder as methods of high policy. Legitimising the killing and kidnap of leaders of opposing states is of course a double-edged sword.

Having sanctioned genocide, mass killings and deliberate destruction of medical facilities and staff, the mass murder of children, as well as the kidnapping and murder of Heads of State, it is hard now to imagine almost any atrocity which the Western powers are in any moral position to condemn.

While Iran’s military ability to strike back is limited, the ramifications of this attack will not be. The rulers of Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states have reverted to the norm of being not only reliable US and Israeli satraps, but promoters of atavistic hatred of Shia Muslims.

The West is deliberately exploiting the Shia/Sunni divide, as it has for centuries; but this will now destabilise the region for decades. Iraq in particular is going to be convulsed, and so will Pakistan. In Bahrain, the Shia population has been held in check by its Sunni rulers using systematic Western-sponsored murder and torture. Using it as a base to murder the Ayatollah is going to blow back.

It would appear that we are going to witness an aerial campaign to destroy Iran’s civilian infrastructure, as in Iraq where 65% of clean drinking water, 50% of hospitals and clinics and 80% of electrical generation was destroyed by “liberation” by the NATO powers. The object is the destruction of Iran as a viable state.

It is worth recalling that Iran used to be a Western-style state with a reasonable democracy. It was the election of the Socialist Mosaddegh in 1951, and his nationalisation of British Petroleum, which was met by the MI6- and CIA- sponsored coup of 1953. The vicious and vainglorious rule of their puppet Shah was the cause of the theocratic revolution.

Escalating Western sanctions were imposed by the US or EU on Iran in 1979, 1984, 1995, 1996, 2010, 2012, 2015, 2018, 2019 and 2025. There were UN-approved sanctions imposed from 2006 to 2010. These very substantially hampered Iran’s economic development.

The curious thing is that the founding myth of the Western powers is that economic development leads to an expanding, educated middle class which promotes both economic and social liberalism and produces the conditions for democracy. By this reading, if you wished to cement in power an authoritarian government, then limiting economic development is the way to do it. There is something in this reading; I do not doubt that the West’s relentless efforts to strangle Iran – which have had some real success – have hampered its political development.

That is not to accept all the Western myths about Iran. Female education is very strong, and there is extensive female participation throughout economic and governmental institutions. Iran has an extremely good record of tolerating and even supporting minority religious communities, including the Jewish community. There are plenty of women in Tehran without head coverings – Iran is far more tolerant in this regard than Saudi Arabia. While it retains a retrograde intolerance of gay people, it acknowledges gender dysphoria and assists trans people.

I am not prepared to give a moment of countenance to arguments that bombing Iran back to the nineteenth century is going in any way to improve the lives of its people. It did not do so in Iraq, Afghanistan or Libya. It was a disaster which unleashed waves of refugees upon Europe, leading directly to the rise of the far right.

I think it is unlikely to change the form of government in Iran in any significant way. Regime change by bombing is a highly problematic concept.

What it has done is to remove Ayatollah Khamenei, whose fatwa on the creation of a nuclear weapon was the only reason Iran does not have one. It is delusional to believe that Iran, with its excellent scientific base, could not have developed nuclear bombs in secret away from those monitored enrichment programmes, had it chosen to do so. What is likely to result in the medium term from this conflict, if it long continues, is a more primitive, more atavistic and nuclear-armed Iran.

The Iran nuclear deal torpedoed by Trump in 2018 had provided a rare moment of hope. With sanctions easing, there were chances of both smoother economic development and reform in Iran. That is why Israel wanted the agreement scuppered.

The attempted obliteration of Iran is part of a systematic attempt to eliminate by physical force all pockets of resistance to American hegemony. We have seen Rubio’s astonishing assertion of Imperialism as a positive force. Matthew Lynn in the Washington Post exemplified the new Western doctrine. He mocked China for its pacific policy. He argued that for China to build infrastructure for the Global South was futile because the United States might simply seize, blockade or destroy any infrastructure by military force. This he viewed as not shameful, but a great triumph.

What long-term lessons China, Russia and the Global South are learning from the abandonment by the entire West of the principles of international law, we shall see in the decades to come. None of this is going to be good for anyone. It is not just a Trump phenomenon. Biden fully supported the Gaza genocide. Almost all major political parties throughout the West are under firm Zionist control, as is all of the significant major media and the ownership of every significant alternative media platform.

Iran has provided, directly and through proxies, the only military opposition to the creation of Greater Israel. This war is for Greater Israel. But it is also a wider effort to re-establish the failing economic dominance of the United States by military control of key resources. There is no part of the world which will be safe from the fallout.

 

———————————

My reporting and advocacy work has no source of finance at all other than your contributions to keep us going. We get nothing from any state nor any billionaire.

Anybody is welcome to republish and reuse, including in translation.

Because some people wish an alternative to PayPal, I have set up new methods of payment including a Patreon account and a Substack account if you wish to subscribe that way. The content will be the same as you get on this blog. Substack has the advantage of overcoming social media suppression by emailing you direct every time I post. You can if you wish subscribe free to Substack and use the email notifications as a trigger to come for this blog and read the articles for free. I am determined to maintain free access for those who cannot afford a subscription.




Click HERE TO DONATE if you do not see the Donate button above

Subscriptions to keep this blog going are gratefully received.

Choose subscription amount from dropdown box:

Recurring Donations



PayPal address for one-off donations: [email protected]

Alternatively by bank transfer or standing order:

Account name
MURRAY CJ
Account number 3 2 1 5 0 9 6 2
Sort code 6 0 – 4 0 – 0 5
IBAN GB98NWBK60400532150962
BIC NWBKGB2L
Bank address NatWest, PO Box 414, 38 Strand, London, WC2H 5JB

Bitcoin: bc1q3sdm60rshynxtvfnkhhqjn83vk3e3nyw78cjx9
Ethereum/ERC-20: 0x764a6054783e86C321Cb8208442477d24834861a


Allowed HTML - you can use: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

441 thoughts on “The War for Greater Israel

1 2 3 4
  • Republicofscotland

    It sounds like Trump thinks he’s won already.

    “US President Trump: “I don’t object to the presence of a religious leader in Iran, but they should treat the US and Israel well.

    My choice of the next leader of Iran will be made easily, just like I did in Venezuela””

    • Jack

      Sounds obviously desperate in my book, demanding capitulation = Trump want to end this war asap.
      He thought the war would be a quick war and that Iran would cry uncle just like that. While US/Israel have the upper (military) hand, iranians are a proud nation that will fight until the very end.

      It was the same fallacy (“this would be a quick war”) that caused US to become stuck in Iraq, for some 20 years!
      Video of comparsion between Bush admin vs Trump admin rhetoric: https://x.com/OfTheBraveUSA/status/2028495775525740760?s=20

    • MARK M CUTTS

      Republicofscotland.

      It looks like that lonely electron has been spinning around in Trump’s head again
      looking for a synapitic connection.

      He calls them ‘ideas ‘

  • Adrian Cheale

    I’m not so sure that Iran’s ability to respond will be as limited as you suggest. Most “analysts” online suggest that Iran is wearing down the USraeli weaponry by firing lowtech and cheap drones etc the cost of which to destroy is in the billions of dollars and the US has only a limited supply of weaponry to destroy these cheap drones. Apparently. After the USraeli regimes are weaponless, then the Iranians will launch their major weaponry. But the people of Iran will have to pay the price for now. Iran has been gearing up for this attack for deacdes and considers this attack to be existential. All or nothing.

  • Republicofscotland

    “The US is pressuring Sri Lanka not to send back survivors from the targeted Iranian warship — Reuters”

    On the above apparently the warship was on some sort of drill with India, off the coast of India, lightly armed and not involved in the fray, I’ve also read that the US sub buggered-off and left the Iranian sailors (ones that survived) floating in the sea – luckily Sri Lankan rescue boats – picked up the survivors.

    • Jack

      Note that the alleged surveillance by the police had been going on for months, but of course the arrest come now, with the intent to condition the population with anti-iranian messages/sentiment > justify israel’s war on Iran.

      Note also the deceptive language of alleged “jewish” targets as to paint iranians as some antisemitic terrorists, why would Iran target “jewish” targets outside of Iran, when jews (live in peace), inside Iran, in the thousands!? If Iran would like to hurt jews they could easily do it inside Iran, without getting caught. If anything there could sure be iranian agents that scout targets now but they are targeting israeli targets, not jewish ones

      • nevermind

        One wonders, in all this bombing and assured destruction by the superior lawbreakers , how many Iranian jews, living in Iran with proper constitutional rights, have been killed by America and the occupying Zionazis.
        How many?

      • Bayard

        From the Grauniad article: “Police said: “The investigation relates to suspected surveillance of locations and individuals linked to the Jewish community in the London area.”

        That’s pretty thin, even for British government propaganda, they were only “suspected” of “surveillance” of locations and individuals “linked to the Jewish community in the London area.” So they weren’t caught in the act of looking at something they shouldn’t have and the locations and individuals they weren’t caught looking at weren’t Jewish. Given that most areas in London have a Tube station, that means every other area can be truthfully described as linked to them. As for the “individuals”, they could have been the dustmen who cleared the rubbish from the streets on bin day.

    • Brian Red

      At least the three who are British-Iranian will be allowed to return to Iran à la Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe. Right?

  • Nick

    Hi Sir,

    I recently watched Marwan Bishara on AL Jazeera when asked by the News Anchor if he felt there was a genuine possibility the current conflict could culminate in Israel launching a nuclear strike on iIran, confidently state he didn’t believe there was a serious risk things could come to that.

    However I do believe if you polled the Israeli population about the use of a nuclear attack on Iran the reults of that poll would be quite terrifying, particularly if Iranian missiles continue to inflict damage on Israel. I think we are some time away from it happening, but I think the Israeli state is predicated upon being able to militarily dominate the people on the territory it occupies and all those that surround it. Should a time ever come where it is failing to do that, I believe Israel would use it’s nuclear weapons. (particularly if the country in question was both near and far enough away from it’s own territory: Iran fits the bill perfectly).

    To me one very obvious demand Iran is entitled to make in any ceasefire negotiations, (amongst many others demands that would also be reasonable-too many to list here) is that Israel give up it’s nuclear weapons arsenel and becomes subject in future to the same level of inspections as Iran has in the past agreed to be subject to regards storage and future production of nuclear material. Except honestly it really shouldn’t be up to Iran to make this demand. We, the rest of the whole world should be demanding it. Probably starting with the rest of the Arab world, all Israels neighbouring countries. (realistically if there were any chance of such a demand to materialise, that would be the place). Frankly recognition of Israels right to exist should long ago have been predicated, as a minimum, on it’s giving up all nuclear weapons and allowing itself to be subject to the most stringent of inspections. (Along with a million other conditions being placed upon it which have not).

    I actually believe that there is one day a very good chance this will happen, unfortunately I’m almost certain it will come AFTER Israel has dropped a nuclear bomb somewhere.

    I’m a cheery sod eh? I don’t work for Al Jazeera so so I can probably get away with saying what I really think.

1 2 3 4