War With Iran 12


For 18 years, the Iranian nuclear programme has been one of the top 10 targeting objectives of the US intelligence services. In 2007 they first conducted a formal inter-agency review. It is done every year. This is not a minor process. A great deal of input is received from dozens of Washington stakeholders, led by the CIA.

The result has been the same every single year. Iran is not currently seeking to produce an Iranian weapon. Many people know that Tulsi Gabbard delivered this assessment in spring this year. Not many people realise that this was in no sense specific to Tulsi Gabbard and she was delivering the same assessment, through the same process, that Directors of National Intelligence under both Republican and Democrat administrations had given.

Nothing changed. The only thing that changed is Netanyahu’s attack on Iran. Trump appears able to get away with simply stating that he does not care what the intelligence agencies say. It is harder for Starmer to do that.

British and American armed forces are already in this war, shooting down Iranian missiles, refuelling Israeli bombers (alongside the Germans) and providing targeting information. Military supplies are shipped to Israel through RAF Akrotiri – which is a British sovereign colony on Cyprus – and Israeli bombers have certainly landed there in the last week; whether starting bombing runs from there, I cannot currently confirm.

There is no public opinion in the UK supporting British participation in an attack on Iran, despite massive and continual propaganda on all state and corporate media. I do not believe anybody informed solely by the mainstream media this last fortnight would have any idea that Israel possesses nuclear weapons, or that there is no evidence Iran was producing them.

The British government has a massive parliamentary majority – gained on just 31% of the vote – and a Conservative “opposition” even more keen to attack Iran than the crazed Zionists Starmer and Lammy. I do not see how they can be prevented from attacking Iran. But they will try hard to fix public opinion. It is therefore essential that MI6’s view, that Iran was not developing a nuclear weapon, is kept quiet.

When Blair produced a dossier of “intelligence” lies to justify the destruction of Iraq, he was fortunate in having Richard Dearlove as Head of MI6, who was not just the most right-wing ideologue ever to hold the position, but one of the most right-wing men anywhere in England. Dearlove believed the moral case for the war was more important than the truth about Iraqi WMD.

Blair also had Sir John Scarlett as Head of the Joint Intelligence Committee and next Head of MI6. Scarlett passionately believed that the case for advancing the career of John Scarlett was more important than the truth about Iraqi WMD.

It is worth noting – and a prime example of how the neoliberal world works – that the next head of MI6, Sir John Sawers, is now an executive of British Petroleum. That company controlled Iran for decades, installed the fake Pahlavi “Shah” in 1921 and engineered and financed the coup that ended democracy in Iran in 1953. The appalling dictatorship of the Shah after that led directly to the theocratic revolution.

BP desperately want Iran’s oil back, so ex MI6 Head Sawers has been all over the airwaves advocating war on Iran. Meanwhile it is not an accident that two days ago, a new Head of MI6 was chosen and installed. Starmer has found his Dearlove.

The appointment was made by David Lammy. Blaise Metreweli was chosen ahead of more obvious candidates, who had served longer in MI6, had more operational experience, and were better analysts or better managers. However Metreweli – who spent much of her career in the Middle East – is a fanatical Zionist. She worked closely with Israel on technologies for surveillance and assassination.

Metreweli developed projects with both Pegasus and Palantir and was intimately connected to Israel’s use of new forms of attack in Lebanon and Iran. She was strongly endorsed to Lammy by Mossad as the next MI6 head. MI6 and the FCDO are inextricably connected. They work literally cheek by jowl in Embassies around the world, and MI6 HQ staff in London have cover jobs in the FCDO.

FCDO officials are extremely unhappy with the UK’s cooperation in Genocide in Gaza, with hundreds of them having been told by Lammy to shut up or resign. There is consternation at Mossad having designated the next Head of MI6. I asked my contact – a senior FCDO figure – whether Metreweli had involvement in the pager attacks in Lebanon. The reply was “Not 100% sure, but probably yes.”

Expect an imminent announcement that MI6 has determined that Iran was indeed about to produce a nuclear bomb.

The government appears to be justifying its current military involvement as the need to defend an “ally”, Israel. Emily Thornberry, a senior government MP and a lawyer, stated last night on BBC Newsnight that the legal right to take military action rested on our “right to defend our friends”. She did not use the word “ally”, and there is no such right as Thornberry posited.

Starmer and Lammy both frequently call Israel an “ally” but there is no public treaty of alliance available. There is a secret UK/Israel Defence Co-Operation Agreement of 2020. It is not known whether this amounts to a treaty of mutual defence.

Such treaties are supposed to be public and registered, not least because part of the alleged purpose is deterrence. You can read all the founding treaties of NATO.

The notion that the UK may go to war on the basis of a Treaty of Alliance that is secret from the British people, is so morally abhorrent it ought not to be able to be mooted, let alone acted upon. But democracy is dead in the UK, to the extent that people have forgotten its meaning.

Much worse, of course, is that this is not a case of mutual defence but of mutual offence. It was Israel that attacked Iran.

In standing alongside Israel, as in standing alongside Ukraine, the UK is condoning terrorist tactics such as the use of car bombs by both Ukrainian and Iranian “allies”. On what moral ground therefore does the UK stand in condemning the use of car bombs on the streets of London, when it supports our “allies” in their use?

You may recall that I recently published two posts focusing on remarkable fake terrorism plot narratives being heavily promoted by the UK security services in the mainstream media. Both revolved around alleged actions against Iran International, an extraordinary Saudi- and CIA-funded fake media organisation that promotes the return of the Pahlavi Shah in alliance with Israel and Iranian Sunnis.

From the Assange campaign, I have contacts on the libertarian side of MAGA that might surprise you, some actually in the Administration. I am told that the endgame being proposed in Washington by Israel and Saudi Arabia is Iranian regime change with the return of the Shah and a Sunni Prime Minister.

Remember there was no war with Iran yet, at the time I wrote those two articles about the remarkable happenings involving the security services and Iran International. This from my first article:

The connections all now click perfectly into place.

The UK has dived deep into the depths of immorality in which Zionism thrives. The consequences will be appalling.

 

———————————

My reporting and advocacy work has no source of finance at all other than your contributions to keep us going. We get nothing from any state nor any billionaire.

Anybody is welcome to republish and reuse, including in translation.

Because some people wish an alternative to PayPal, I have set up new methods of payment including a Patreon account and a Substack account if you wish to subscribe that way. The content will be the same as you get on this blog. Substack has the advantage of overcoming social media suppression by emailing you direct every time I post. You can if you wish subscribe free to Substack and use the email notifications as a trigger to come for this blog and read the articles for free. I am determined to maintain free access for those who cannot afford a subscription.




Click HERE TO DONATE if you do not see the Donate button above

Subscriptions to keep this blog going are gratefully received.

Choose subscription amount from dropdown box:

Recurring Donations



PayPal address for one-off donations: [email protected]

Alternatively by bank transfer or standing order:

Account name
MURRAY CJ
Account number 3 2 1 5 0 9 6 2
Sort code 6 0 – 4 0 – 0 5
IBAN GB98NWBK60400532150962
BIC NWBKGB2L
Bank address NatWest, PO Box 414, 38 Strand, London, WC2H 5JB

Bitcoin: bc1q3sdm60rshynxtvfnkhhqjn83vk3e3nyw78cjx9
Ethereum/ERC-20: 0x764a6054783e86C321Cb8208442477d24834861a


Allowed HTML - you can use: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

12 thoughts on “War With Iran

  • Melrose

    Beware of Freudian slips:
    “the UK is condoning terrorist tactics such as the use of car bombs by both Ukrainian and Iranian “allies””…

    Thanks, Mr. Murray for emphasizing the British involvement in the current Israeli/Iranian conflict.
    This makes it even more puzzling that Iran, probably fully aware of this situation, still accepts to sit in Geneva for negotiations with representatives from the UK amongst others!
    If only the Iranian people could decide for themselves, there could be a major surprise for many commentators…

    • Bayard

      “If only the Iranian people could decide for themselves, there could be a major surprise for many commentators…”

      I don’t know why you would be surprised if the Iranian people decided to raze Israel to the ground. I certainly wouldn’t.

  • Goose

    However Metreweli – who spent much of her career in the Middle East – is a fanatical zionist. She worked closely with Israel on technologies for surveillance and assassination.

    Hence the ‘gadget lady’ moniker. She was ‘Q’ and now she is ‘C’. Reading this, maybe that moniker should be changed to the ‘pager lady’? The Telegraph applauded that indiscriminate pager attack, as a masterfully conducted operation. It took the lives and sight of innocent children, and it didn’t concern itself with whether it caused a vehicle pileup or a plane/helicopter crash. Zionism and the sense of impunity it engenders have made people truly deranged. As you said, were Russia, China and Iran to start employing similar tactics against us, we’d be the first to cry foul. Although, since China manufactures everything these days, they’d probably view it as too vulgar a display of their power.

    • Stevie Boy

      Still many parts of the pager attacks that remain unexplained, like Skripals. ‘We’ know it was Israel, but who else was involved ?
      Maybe this cross eyed bint is an admission of, more, UK complicity !

  • Courtenay Francis Raymond Barnett

    Craig,

    ” Expect an imminent announcement that MI6 has determined that Iran was indeed about to produce a nuclear bomb.”

    As a general rule – is British Intelligence always this unreliable, pliable and complicit when wanting to launch into a full scale expanded war?

    • pasha

      I’m not Craig, but to answer your question: Yes, and most obviously and publicly since Thatcher. Even with a cursory glance at history I can cite the totally unnecessary UK war with Argentina, the destruction of Jugoslavija, the Iraq war, Libya, Syria, Afghanistan, Ukraine, Gaza, Iran . . . our benevolence knows no bounds. British Intelligence, like the US, exists to serve the politics of the day, not to inform or present facts.

  • M.J.

    I think we should persevere with informing our MPs and voting for manifestos closer to our convictions. Also any grassroots activity that draws us e.g denouncing the two-state solution as grand apartheid. Fortunately the Zionists ruling Israel agree – because they want not bantustans but a complete ethnic cleansing of Palestine, making it easier to denounce the two-state solution as dead.

  • Chima from Sharp Focus on Africa

    The problem here is simple. Iran has refused to learn from the North Korean example. The Americans spent the entire 1990s and early 2000s sanctioning North Korea, threatening to overthrow the ruling Kim Dynasty. At one point in the 1990s, President Bill Clinton sent an aircraft carrier as a show of force to threaten the regime of the late Kim Jong-il. All of those threats and sabre-rattling ended the moment his son, Kim Jong-Un, unveiled North Korea’s Nuclear Weapons. If Iran wants to survive as a nation-state, it needs to drop its naivety. Developing nuclear weapons will actually deter both Israel and USA from daring to attack Iran. If the Iranians insist on being free of the nuclear bombs, the US and Israel will frame them as having those bombs and then invade today, tomorrow, next week, next month or next year.

  • James Galt

    What would you say to those who perhaps agree with you concerning the sinister forces that appear to be at work, but who also dislike the Islamic Republic and IRGC and would wish them gone and off the backs of ordinary Iranians?

    • Bayard

      The alternative to the Islamic Republic and the IRGC is a new Shah and a new SAVAK. A democracy with a moderate secular president is not on the cards, 1953 showed that. I somehow don’t think the Iranian people would thank the US or anyone else for making the switch.

  • Goose

    Did anyone catch BBC 2 Newsnight tonight?

    The presenter, giggling and smirking, as he asked the studio guests about the TACO taunts, and whether Trump is ‘chickening out’ of bombing Iran? This is what we’ve become as a country; deadly serious matters, that may result in hundreds of thousands of deaths, discussed by the state broadcaster, as though they’re talking about Trump ‘chickening out’ of a round of golf with Obama. The BBC is appalling, and Newsnight, even before this new threadbare, low cost, couch guests format, has always been a hive of right-wing, neocon mischief and villainy.