David Hare and the Lost Script 5


I have been keeping this confidential, but now it has come out in the Sunday Telegraph’s Mandrake column, apparently sourced to David Hare.

Hare given farcical cut

There has always been a thin line between comedy and tragedy, but, as Sir David Hare knows only too well, it can sometimes become a little too blurred for comfort.

The playwright wrote a screenplay for a film about Craig Murray, the renegade former ambassador to Uzbekistan who was subjected to a Government-inspired campaign of vilification after he spoke out about British foreign policy in the region.

Hare saw it as an essentially tragic tale and wrote a completely serious script, but it swiftly became clear that the film’s director, Michael Winterbottom, did not share his vision. He wanted to turn it into a farce, starring his old chum Steve Coogan.

“Michael was horrified by what I came up with,” the dramatist tells Mandrake. “It was decided that the studio should choose. They chose Michael’s idea and I was sacked. I didn’t lose my respect for Michael, but I did walk away with bitterness. I had wasted six months of my life.”

In the past, Hare’s rocky relationships with collaborators have at least resulted in generous compensation packages. He says that when he complained to Louis Malle about Jeremy Irons’s refusal to stick to his script for Damage, the French director paid him ‘10,000 in compensation.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk:80/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2007/07/08/dp0801.xml

I have never seen the Hare script, which is the property of Paramount. David Hare certainly put a very great deal of work into it, interviewing all the key participants and even travelling out to Uzbekistan, pretending to be a tourist (as did Michael Winterbottom). When Hare finished the script he told me that he was “Thrilled” by it, and felt it was one of the finest things he had ever done.

It does seem astonishing that a major mature work by such a considerable figure as David Hare could be simply abandoned to rot on a Hollywood shelf. I was told that one of the objections to the script was that it was too “stagey” and interior bound. That led me to wonder if it could be produced eventually as a play. But it belongs to Paramount, who whould have to be convinced it was in their interest. David Hare meanwhile is in a pretty bad mood about the entire thing. That is probably an idea to return to in a few years’ time.

Meanwhile, Michael Winterbottom has produced a detailed “Treatment”, which will now form the basis of the film. I am delighted with it. Murder in Samarkand does indeed contain a good deal of quirky humour, and it is important that this vital element is retained. But that does not make it a “farce”. The humour counterpoints the tragedy and the message; which are all still there. The whole point of the book is that it can make you both laugh and cry. Only the key episodes of dialogue are fixed to date, but they are mostly lifted verbatim from the book. I think both Winterbottom and Coogan are well capable of that in the film. Their collaboration on 24 Hour Party People showed something of the potential.

Meanwhile, my next worry is how Paramount will react to the very poor US box office of A Mighty Heart. The reviews have been extremely good, with Angelina Jolie tipped by all major critics as an Oscar contender for her portrayal of Marianne Pearl. But the hard truth is that on a summer’s evening it appears not many people want to go to the cinema and watch a film about a man who dies an appalling, squalid death.

Given that this is exactly the same team as will be making our film, will Paramount’s enthusiasm for the project have waned? I am confident that this project is very commercial, and will produce a very enjoyable as well as thought-provoking film. I do hope they still see it that way.

Michael Winterbottom is very keen on authenticity. Filming is therefore currently scheduled for February to June 2008, to give the full range of extreme continental weather conditions which play a major part in the book.


5 thoughts on “David Hare and the Lost Script

  • johnf

    I must say that I wonder what Paramount executive gave the job to Hare. Hare's films – with perhaps the exception of his first one, produced by David Rose for the BBC, on the British black propaganda radio wars during the last war – have been terrible. He is a stage playwright. He cannot handle a medium as flexible and fast-moving as film. He's only been able to continue to write largely unwatchable films due to his extremely close relationship with various arts funding bodies. They have been unwatchable and swiftly forgotten.

    Thank God he didn't write the script. (As

    you note in the piece, the story seems to have come from Hare so we should beware of some of its accusations). You would have had a wooden, humourless public school Ambassador going through various situations and then giving a priggish and self-righteous speech to Foreign office stuffed shirts who would then recognize the folly of their ways. The thought of a superb comedian like Steve Coogan having to wade through David Hare's turgid dialogue is something which would certainly have got me going to see the film, but for all the wrong reasons.

    The yoking of Hare to Coogan and Winterbottom would have produced a disaster.

  • johnf

    Just to say its not that I don't think the film should have tragedy and terror as well as comedy. But tragedy and terror are more often than not increased and sharpened by the use of comedy. Especially in a world ruled by neo-cons who specialize in farcical cock-ups causing maximum bloodbaths and disasters.

    Hare's priggish self-righteousness is precisely what you don't want in an adult film about the real world today and the terrible course it is taking.

  • Craig

    johnf,

    Yes, there is much in what you say. I think some of Hare's early plays are pretty good, though. But I agree it is going to be a more exciting film now. Not just comedy, but sex and cra chases too!

Comments are closed.