Fake BBC Video 162

Irrefutable evidence of a stunning bit of fakery by the BBC:

In this version the medic being interviewed says about the 2 minute mark:

“..It’s just absolute chaos and carnage here, erm we’ve had a massive influx of
what looks like serious burns, er seems like it must be some sort of chemical
weapon, I’m not really sure..”

In this version she says – it is at about 2 mins 20 seconds in this edit:

“..It’s just absolute chaos and carnage here, erm we’ve had a massive influx of
what looks like serious burns, er seems like it must be some sort of, I’m not
really sure, maybe napalm, something similar to that..”

The disturbing thing is the footage of the doctor talking is precisely the same each time.  It is edited so as to give the impression the medic is talking in real time in her natural voice – there are none of the accepted devices used to indicate a voiceover translation.  But it must be true that in at least one, and possibly both, the clips she is not talking in real time in her own voice.  It is very hard to judge as her mouth and lips are fully covered throughout.  Perhaps neither of the above is what she actually said.

Terrible things are happening all the time in Syria’s civil war, between Assad’s disparate forces and still more disparate opposition forces, and innocent people are suffering.  There are dreadful crimes against civilians on all sides.  I have no desire at all to downplay or mitigate that.  But once you realise the indisputable fact of the fake interview the BBC has put out, some of the images in this video begin to be less than convincing on close inspection too.



Allowed HTML - you can use: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

162 thoughts on “Fake BBC Video

1 4 5 6
  • Rehmat

    BBC has long been occupied by the Zionist Mafia. It has senior staff who have no moral standards. They distort, lie and fabricate documents to fool the listners.

    For example, in 2011, BBC took five non-believers of 9/11 official story on a 8-day journey across the east coast of United States in search for ‘the truth’ (watch the documentary below). On the way they meet ‘experts’ and victims of the attack. Their guide was no other than Irish comedian with a Jewish surname, Andrew Maxwell. He tried to convince the five non-believers that Osama Bin Laden was indeed behind the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. However, Osama Bin Laden was never wanted for this crime and his name never showed-up on FBI’s wanted poster due to lack of evidence….


  • thinker1958

    this case is equal to the paper talking about Iraq trying to buy yellow cake to make Uranium. The Germans said was an obvious fake document. The US and UK decided to consider it real. Some people from the US and UK should be in trial for hundreds of thousands of dead people (Rumsfeld and friends).

  • Emmpey

    Another ongoing propaganda psy-op is the Malala affair (Malala does this, Malala does that, Malala meets the Queen, Malala opens a school – a constant drip of Malala stories). I would urge people to look at the images that appeared in the media when this story first broke and see how the ‘wound’ wandered around her head, in some her left-eye is bandaged and reports were that she was hit just above the eye, with blackened eye to ‘prove’ it – yet in others her head is bandaged and her eye and forehead appears to be perfectly untouched. In fact I would defy anyone to produce and image that shows the least bit of trauma to her head, not a scratch or a scar to be seen anywhere. And now every time she opens her mouth it is reported at the top of the news and she always says how wonderful the West is and how it protects freedom!!! Honestly, talk about coaching – her narrative is exaclty the same as the chief editor of BBC News.

    There is also a precedent for small girls being used by their fathers to further a geopolitical agenda; when the Kuwaitu ambassador to the US allowed his daughter to go on the international media circus to fake her tears while saying she had witnessed Iraqi troops dragging children from incubators and throwing them out of windows. Lies of Naziesque proportions. Also, why do we never hear from Malala’s father, an outspoken pro-west political activist in his own right? Would it begin to look too obvious where her highly developed views (too highly developed to the point that they deviate from reality and her own personal experience) are coming from?

    I doubt very much that anything we hear reported on the News these days remotely resembles reality. We see a similiar drip of stories about the accused in the Woolwhich attack, e.g. they were attacked in prison (bullshit, as terrorist suspects they will not be allowed any association with other prisoners), they changed their names to Islamic terroist ones (normally you do that when you convert to Islam) etc. etc. Non-stories just to keep the propaganda drumming (excuse the pun) into peoples heads. And today it’s reported that the six arrested ‘in connection’ with the attack are not to be charged wih anything, i.e. there is no connection, so all the talk of further attacks from terror cells at the time was complete hogwash. How many times have we seen mass arrests within hours of dubious operations only to see them all freed without charge? It’s all bullshit I’m afraid.

  • Suhayl Saadi

    Girls in Syria, Iraq and Libya all used to go to school. Those countries had health and edcuation statistics that were on a parallel with, or close to, those of some (Western European) EU countries.

    Following Western (and their lackeys’) ‘intevention’, those three countries no longer have excellent health and education statistics. During the 1990s, due to the criminal sanctions imposed by the UN at the behest of the USA, and enforced by the spies known as ‘weapons inspectors’ (which included, as one of their chiefs in the promulgation of mendacity and mass murder, Dr David Kelly), Iraq went from having health and education statistics equal to those of (pre-financial crash) Greece to having those of Mali.

    So, the ‘West’ doesn’t give a [Fedup, or anyone, please feel free to insert your expletive of choice here] about girls’ education/women’s rights/anyone’s rights in ‘Muslim’/Third World’ countries. ‘Human rights’ is used simply as a tool of propaganda/political expediency.

    So, if Malala was a Syrian/Iraqi/Libyan/Palestinian girl, pleading to be allowed to go to school, etc., or get vaccinated so she didn’t die of preventable disease, etc., she would be ignored by the media and NGO imperialist apparatus.

    Actually, once she ceases to be useful, they will drop Malala and all the other girls of Pakistan like hot potatoes.

    There are bad systemic situations in Pakistan/Afghanistan. The actions of ‘The West’ have never represented solutions to those bad situations; quite the opposite, in fact; the solutions must arise systemically from within those societies. The interests of the ruling classes of ‘the West’ do not coincide with those of the ordinary peoples of those countries. It is at best naive to pretend otherwise. The best ‘The West’ could do would be not to make things worse by constant ‘intervention’ of one sort or another.

    In other words, (since we all are ‘Yankees now), ‘Yankee Go Home!’.

  • Suhayl Saadi

    Malala is just being used as a PR justification for NATO military intervention – and to cover-up probable strategic defeat – in South/Central Asia. That most people here are in solidaity with girls’ (and everyone’s) education in Pakistan is irrelevant. Our ruling classes are busy cooperating with the very same forces that are busy crushing girls’ (and everyone’s) education across a range of other countries in the ‘Greater Middle East’. That’s not even beginning to talk about the economic system. So, in essence, we are providing the guns that the death squads are putting to the heads of thousands of ‘Malalas’ across the region. Then we give one Malala prizes, to make us feel better, to obscure those facts and, as I said, to attempt to justify an ill-conceived, badly-implemented and profoundly failed, military ‘intervention’ that has cost many thousands of lives.

  • Sid

    Jemand said, “The claims of green screen staging and actor-victims are, of course, the usual bullshit from online retards and hoax trolls.”

    If you aren’t a shill and you genuinely believe that at 3mins into the 2nd link, you are witnessing genuine young victims in pain then you may as well give up on life. Does it even have to be pointed out? Is this the friggin twighlight zone ? Appallingly bad acting by a bunch of inexperienced kids who probably don’t know why they have been asked to do what they do in the first place. I particularly like the chap in the white shirt and jeans in the corner who is laid out in pain and just stands up in a flash! Lol!

    I can’t help but wonder if all this Dr Rola edit controversy is just an attempt to somehow legitamise the pathetic footage.

    I half expected to see Chris Morris at the end there.
    “Those are the headlines. God, I wish they weren’t “

  • Jemand

    Hey Sid, who are the actors pretending to be victims? Have any of them told/sold their stories about their acting to the media yet? What stops them from recounting this incident in the future to a very embarrassed BBC? Maybe the BBC will have them and others murdered in order to keep the fake story safe from exposure by uncanny internet detectives like Sid here.

    I’m still undecided whether hoax-trolls are paid shills working to blur the lines that divide truth, lies and propaganda, or whether they are functional retards who have no other hobbies to keep them ‘mentally’ active.

  • Sid

    As I said Jemand, give up on life. Give up on critical thinking. All your questions are completely irrelevant because the footage speaks for itself. Who would have thought kids might be used as a tool of propaganda eh ? Eeek!! You ask who these ‘actors’ are ? And it’s a purposely loaded question, implying I’m suggesting they may be professional ‘crisis actors’ or similar. How about kids of mercenaries? Or tricked into acting out a school play? I doubt they would be settling down to watch Panorama any time soon. Even if these kids understood the real purpose of what they are doing, who in a complicit media would give them a platform ? I bet you were fooled by ‘nurse’ nayirah too ? When did the media give her a platform once the big lie was revealed? Why isn’t the incubator lie taught in our schools? Why don’t we hear about it today?

    Seriously, I would love to know why you find the footage at 3 mins in the 2nd link so real without resorting to Vicky pollard ‘yeah but no but arguments’ ? I would also like to point out Jim Robinson didn’t really die in Neighbours. Well, he sort of died but it wasn’t real. You see Jim was a fictional character played by a fellow called Alan Dale and you’ll be pleased to know, Alan is very much alive. So some good news there.

    Your 2nd paragraph reeks of projection. Don’t embarrass yourself .

    3 mins in, lol, so funny !

  • Jemand

    Who’s Jim Robinson, Sid?

    So I guess you don’t really know that they are actors then. We should just imagine that they are. Who was the director of this fake vid? Or don’t you know that either? Do you have any objective evidence that it’s faked or are we supposed to just imagine that it is? And how does the footage “speak for itself”. Is that legalese for “I don’t know how to explain”?

  • Cerumol

    Some main points about the full Panorama programme from the above post on Media Lens:

    The baby with “severe burns” looks unharmed, and the doctor’s advice is to pick it up. The man identified as the father, who reporter Ian Pannell had said was also burnt, plainly isn’t.

    Dr Rola states “Most of the people have got 70 to 90% burns”. But everyone has kept their eyebrows.

    The same woman arrives twice at the hospital, once with her face covered in white cream, then in the next scene being stretchered in from the back of an ambulance, without cream on her face.

    There is an ITN report of the same incident which includes scenes, not seen in any of the BBC footage, which were “posted on the internet via an account connected to an opposition group”. Why would there be any other camera person at the scene, apart from the BBC’s Darren Conway, who presumably didn’t shoot these scenes and then post them on the internet himself?

1 4 5 6

Comments are closed.