Evil Russian Propaganda from the Evil Russian Invaders 236


If you would like to listen to some evil Russian propaganda, here is my new interview on Sputnik News.

The BBC World Service was founded by the Foreign and Commonwealth Office and funded by them directly for six decades, until a cosmetic change last year. Its specific purpose is to spread British values and the British view of the world abroad. It specifically, on its dozens of different national services, gives an opportunity to dissident voices who cannot get on their mainstream media. The Americans spend hundreds of millions annually on outfits like RFE/RL to do the same. Yet when the Russians do precisely the same thing on a much smaller scale, for example by enabling you to listen to me, this is portrayed as evil propaganda.

Fortunately we have the Henry Jackson Society to defend you from it. The Henry Jackson Society, supported by Liam Fox, Jim Murphy and pretty well every other right wing enthusiast you can name, is of course a great believer in free markets. And its sense of the market has detected that its old product of a constant stream of Islamophobia is becoming dated, and currently buyers want Russophobia. Whatever your phobia, the Henry Jackson Society will have some to sell you, so here we have their new Manual of Russophobia.

Written by Dr Andrew Foxall, Director of the Henry Jackson Society’s so-called Centre for Russian Studies, has by brilliant research exposed the fact that Jeremy Corbyn, Seumas Milne, Tommy Sheridan and Colin Fox have all appeared on Russia Today television. And that a tiny group of left wingers I have never heard of once met in a pub with some Russian nationalists from the Ukraine. Funniest of all is the contention that CND is funded by the Russians.

Given that the Henry Jackson Society is, and always has been, financed by CIA money laundered through American New World Order supporting private foundations, this is rather amusing. This pathetically thin hate manual is now on the desk of every Conservative and New Labour Progress Group MP.

It is of course no coincidence that the overt security service operations operate in close co-ordination with the supposedly covert ones. The same day that the Henry Jackson Society paper was released, the head of MI5 gave an interview to the Guardian about the Russian threat. The Russians are not just coming, they are here! You can’t see them because they are inside your laptop, where the Russian government apparently want to steal all your secrets. Our security services don’t like the competition. That is their job.

Apparently the Russians are out to steal Britain’s industrial secrets, like how the Nissan Qasghqai is built or how the Chinese and French build Hinkley Point. I hope they don’t get the blueprints of the new Dyson. Andrew Parker has of course to work hard as MI5 to find a new enemy. While he has yet again repeated the ludicrous claim that there are 3,000 Islamic terrorists in the UK, he must realise people will query the low productivity of these terrorists when it comes to killing anybody.

Russophobia has of course peaked in the US with Clinton’s claims that it is Russia which is revealing her gross corruption and all her opponents are servants of Russia. She wants to face down Russia in Syria, in order to give it to the Islamic terrorists of whom Andrew Parker worries we have 3,000 in the UK. Clinton’s claims of Russian involvement in hacking her entourage are totally unfounded, hence the lack of evidence. I am however surprised there have been no serious attempts to fabricate some.

Who benefits from this ratcheting up of anti-Russian rhetoric to hotter than cold war levels? Why the armaments and security industries, of course. Expect more donations to politicians and their foundations, and more pesky corruption investigations to be dropped by prosecuting authorities.

The truth is that Russia is not our enemy. There is no chance that Russia will attack the UK or US. It has never happened and it never will. Nor is it remotely likely that Russia will attack any EU member state. The only thing that can make such a contingency even a 0.1% possibility, is the continuing gross anti-Russian rhetoric and propaganda and continued forward stationing of NATO assets. History from WWI to the Gulf shows that military build-up can in itself cause conflict.

The danger to the world is us.

New Book: Sikunder Burnes: Master of the Great Game – by Craig Murray

Liked this article? Please share using the links below. Then View Latest Posts


236 thoughts on “Evil Russian Propaganda from the Evil Russian Invaders

1 2 3
    • michael norton

      I am not shocked that The Donald will not be allowed to win, that’s as expected but that The Clintons & ISIS funded by the same people, surely that blows killary out of the water?

      • kief

        ‘I am shocked that there is gambling going on here’

        Heh. Don’t fret. It won’t be your first foray into error.

        I’m certain you weren’t hoodwinked into the ‘rouge prince’ deflection, were you?

        That error would make you equal to Hillary.

  • michael norton

    The politician and barrister is the second Conservative MP to stand down in as many weeks – Zac Goldsmith last week forced a by-election over his opposition to expanding Heathrow airport.

    Sources say Mr Phillips informed party whips earlier this week that he would resign as an MP as he felt his values were not the values of the government.

    He has been critical of the government’s approach to Brexit since June’s Leave vote, accusing Theresa May of trying to “ignore the views” of Parliament and avoiding scrutiny of the government’s negotiating position.

    I suggest Frau Theresa May call a general election,
    saying she will issue in HARD BREXIT MEANS HARD BREXIT

    we cannot go on with the judiciary despoiling the peoples BREXIT and the E.U. commissariat pissing themselves laughing at us.

    • Dave Lawton

      Churchill`s adviser.This is what the elite thought of the British people in the 1930`s.

      Nothing has changed.”During a 1930s lecture, Lindemann argued that surgery, mind control, and drug and hormone manipulations would one day allow humans to be fine-tuned for specific tasks. At the lower end of the race and class spectrum, he suggested, one could remove the ability to suffer or to feel ambition. This subclass would do all the unpleasant work and not once think of revolution or of voting rights. To perpetuate empires, he theorized, one need only remove the ability of slaves to see themselves as slaves.”

      And this what the arrogant City of London fund managers and Hedge funders still think.A history lesson will put you in the picture.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FN_pBKhftkg

      • Kempe

        Eugenics were quite popular in the 1930s and whilst Lindemann did some important work he got a lot of other things wrong. He held back the development of RADAR and tried to convince Churchill that the V2 didn’t exist.

        Only a minority of the revolting peasants were serfs, most were what today you might call middle class, people with some land and property. The sword (not dagger) on the City of London’s coat of arms represents the sword of St Paul and was known to have been in use before the revolt. I didn’t bother going any further. Williams is always high on histrionics, low on facts.

      • lysias

        Was Lindemann’s lecture before or after the publication of Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World?

    • kief

      What’s the problem? All these window coverings are pap for the population. Why don’t you take your own advice and damn the torpedoes. We get Trump. You just LEAVE the EU. Simple even for Simon.

      EZEE PZEE

1 2 3

Comments are closed.