Guardian Confirms Mossad Fears 197

 in Uncategorized by

A mainstream media source has finally plucked up the courage to publish the widespread concern among MOD, Cabinet Office and FCO officials and military that the Werritty operation was linked to, and perhaps controlled by, Mossad – something which agitated officials have been desperately signaling for some days.

“Officials expressed concern that Fox and Werritty might even have been in freelance discussions with Israeli intelligence agencies” write Patrick Wintour and Richard Norton-Taylor in the Guardian.

As I have been explaining, the real issue here is a British defence secretary who had a parallel advice structure designed expressly to serve the interests of another state and linked to that state’s security services. That is not just a sacking offence, it is treasonable.

UPDATE

It seems to me the questions now starting to be asked about the connection to Israel and possibly to Mossad might well have had a major effect on Fox’s sudden throwing in of the towel. If he did not believe that resigning would stop some further investigation, he might as well have toughed it out over the weekend; nobody has ever accused Fox of being thin-skinned.

The need for answers to my questions to Matthew Gould is in fact now greater, not less.

Allowed HTML - you can use: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

197 thoughts on “Guardian Confirms Mossad Fears”

1 2 3 4 5 … 7
  • DLJ

    You are a fool to appeal to the Russians, they are both incompetent and capable, have proven more capable, of more bestiality and barbarism than practically any other nation on earth.

    Gadaffi has a good record of shit in this regard too. Don’t forget that. He is the author of his own misfortune.

  • DLJ

    Your (Gordon is a …) report seems to be sourced to this mathaba web site which is undoubtedly a crock of propaganda shit for Gadaffi. I found this lovely quote. You call for the Russians to intervene and cite this bullshit. You immediately discredit yourself and appear as an enemy of our country – “left or right2. (“You may think this is an exaggeration, but it is not: Muammar Gaddafi is not just the leader of Libya. He is a global leader, because his Green Book anticipated, by decades, the Third Universal Theory, otherwise known as The Third Universal Way.”)

  • Komodo

    Just listening to a R4 play on the topic of “Dame” Shirley Porter’s time at Westminster Council. 5p cemeteries, gerrymandering and all. Takes me back to the good old days when an elected official could do what they bloody well liked, pocket the profits, and sod the electorate.

    And then piss off to Israel…

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shirley_Porter

  • mary

    Some snippets from Philip Hammond’s Wikipedia page.
    .
    He joined the medical equipment manufacturers Speywood Laboratories Ltd in 1977, becoming a director of Speywood Medical Limited in 1981. In 1982, an automatic electrocardiograph electrode manufacturing plant figured among his notable achievements. He left in 1983. From 1984, he was a director in Castlemead Ltd, and from 1993–35 he was a partner in CMA Consultants, and from 1994, a director in Castlemead Homes.[5] He has had many business interests including house building and property, manufacturing, healthcare and oil and gas. He has undertaken various consulting assignments in Latin America for the World Bank in Washington, D.C., and was a consultant to the government of Malawi from 1995 until his election to Parliament.
    .
    Hammond’s wealth is estimated at £7.5m – £9m.
    .
    He registers a donation from Michael Hintze too!! and states ‘I am a beneficiary of a trust which owns a controlling interest in Castlemead Ltd, a company engaged in construction, housebuilding and property development.
    .
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_Hammond

  • Hamish

    May I suggest that Mr Fox – when one glances around parliament – is not unique in this respect.

  • mary

    http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm/cmregmem/081022/081022.pdf
    .
    Cameron’s register of interests 2008
    .
    15 March 2008, private plane from Newcastle to Biggin Hill, provided by Michael Hintze on
    behalf of CQS, London. (Registered 20 March 2008)
    6 May 2008, donation from Michael Hintze to the Conservative Party to help sponsor two
    drinks receptions hosted by me for Conservative MPs and their partners. (Registered 20 May
    2008)

    Osborne’s too
    .
    In my capacity as Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer, support for my office is received
    from:
    Mr S Robertson, of London.
    Mr Michael Hintze
    and the same flight as Cameron
    15 March 2008, private plane from Newcastle to Biggin Hill, provided by Michael Hintze on
    behalf of CQS, London. (Registered 1 April 2008
    .
    Arbuthnot and Willetts also declare hospitality and financial donations respectively from Hintze and of course Fox which we know about ad nauseam.

  • Komodo

    Bastards all, it is.

    News at Ten wheeled in Fox’s friend, Daniel Kawczynski, who was remarkably evasive when pressed about Fox’s er, alleged transgressions against the ministerial code. Daniel’s website obligingly supplies details of the MP’s Code of Conduct.

    http://www.daniel4shrewsbury.co.uk/job.php?var=1

    Maybe he should read it.

    Off to discover more about Daniel….

  • John Goss

    DLJ, I sense an anachronistic problem with your statement that the Russians “. . .have proven more capable, of more bestiality and barbarism than practically any other nation on earth.”
    .
    Are we talking today? Or in the past? And are we talking the Russian people? The Russian government? Or Russian oligarchs? The last currently besmirch our green and pleasant land.

  • Komodo

    And what happened to Atlantic Bridge? It’s Transatlantic Bridge now.

    Who’s next? Its other Tory mentors maybe?

    The plot thickens here:

    http://labourlist.org/fox-resignation-leaves-many-questions-unanswered
    .
    “But even with Fox gone, too many questions remain unanswered. Today, Geraldine Peacock, who was chair of the Charity Commission from 2002 to 2006, backed this blogger’s call for the commission to re-open its investigation of the Atlantic Bridge, and more specifically to consider whether misspent charity money should be repaid. Peacock would also like the commission to look at the level of benefit received by Liam Fox, who was a trustee. I would like that investigation to also ask whether others involved in running the charity – including advisory board members George Osborne, William Hague, Michael Gove, Chris Grayling, Eleanor Laing and John Whittingdale – benefited in any way.
    .
    The Atlantic Bridge’s UK charity was required to cease all its activities in July 2010 as none served any charitable purpose. It was given until September 2011 to clean-up its act, but instead opted to wind-up. Its assets were demised to another charity that neither the commission nor the Atlantic Bridge itself will reveal. Last night Newsnight revealed that senior Atlantic Bridge personnel have established a new organisation, Transatlantic Bridge, and have confirmed that the Atlantic Bridge will live on despite the winding up of its UK charity; it has always consisted of multiple legal entities and the US charity continues to trade despite questions from the IRS.

  • Guest

    I wonder if there is something else in play ?, first Murdoch now Fox, a war going on inside the far right, a war for power ?.
    .
    “In politics, nothing happens by accident, if it happens, you can bet it was planned that way”
    .
    Franklin D. Roosevelt (1882-1945)

  • John Goss

    Guest, that’s almost a Marxist statement, the far right vying for power.
    .
    Roosevelt was only part right. Fox’s demise was an accident. It was bad judgment on his part. I doubt Fox was a puppet. There is much more to emerge when all the financial backers of Werritty are brought to light.

    Still, good riddance to Fox, the back benches are far too good for him, but I’m sure he will be able to disgrace them too. It’s time for a full frontal assault on Dominic Grieve, attorney general, who believes himself to be above the law.

  • Komodo

    There’s certainly friction within the Tories. Cameron has promoted a couple of smily-face Osbornites to replace the Thatcherite Fox, so I guess he’s happier now. Not that I can see much difference – the nuances will be apparent to the faithful though. I am rather surprised that both the Times and the Telegraph have gleefully joined in the Foxhunt. Perhaps it was no real surprise to the Osborne faction that Fox had taken enough rope to hang himself?

    But I’ll be interested to see if Hague, Gove and co remain in contact with Transatlantic Bridge…

  • Guest

    John Goss, the far right have a history of fighting amongst themselves, they do it by nefarious means, always have. Given each other their FULL support while inserting the knife between the shoulder blades. Sophisticated deception, it keeps the party together.

  • Ruth

    deepgreenpuddock
    .
    ‘The essence if the affair, however, is wider than just Fox. It is becoming apparent that Fox is part of an unofficial, slightly sub-surface international network of neocon agitators, with financial backers, lobbyists and activists. The objectives of this group are not subject to any kind of democratic process. Fox has adopted a policy position which has circumvented the processes of elected government and exposed our governance to be a charade. Certainly this network is merged with intelligence systems. And now it looks as if Fox has wilfuly merged official British foreign policy with those of an unaccountable and semi-secret quasi-commercial network. Cameron and the rest of the Tories must know this. Fox’s personal position is not a secret, although his promotion of a private position within a cabinet government is either a sacking offence, ( it cannot have any other outcome), or it is a commonly understood subterfuge shared by the cabinet and therefore some kind of conspiracy. Indeed, most of the political system, (like Nulab) must have some awareness of this matter.’
    .
    I think you’re absolutely right. Under the veneer of the government is a shadow or permanent government that makes major decisions and runs the intelligence services, part of whose remit is to raise as much money as possible in any manner. Many of the security companies stuffed full of ex-army/government people are I believe entities owned by the government within the government. You’ll find these companies worm their way round the world to suck in whatever they can. There’s also evidence that the intelligence services are involved in VAT and excise fraud – taxpayers’ money shifted out of the country to fund who knows what.

  • Ruth

    With regard to Chloe Smith I still stand by what I said in 2009,
    .
    ‘I think the the most logical answer as to who Chloe Smith works for is the intelligence services.
    .
    If you take my belief that the political party in power is the executive of the Establishment/permanent unelected government the executive must be compliant. The executive must also have some support of the populace. If people feel they have no say then they may revolt.
    .
    So it’s very important for those in power to maintain the three party system and to control those members of each party. It’s also very important for the incoming party to have a large majority so that it can pass legislation with a big majority. As the economy dips further and people become embittered then some very unpopular measures will have to be taken.
    .
    How better to enhance a party’s image than with pretty young women. This I presume is aimed at bringing young people into political fold; the young are probably going to be the hardest hit in the recession and it’s the young who are more likely to go for violent revolution.
    .
    So are the ‘babes’ the answer? How many of the ‘babes’ will have odd employment histories? Have these ‘babes’ been groomed by MI5 not just to be MPs but to rise as high as possible so that they can carry out the wishes of the Establishment/permanent unelected government all the whist the rest of the country happily believes it’s living in a democracy.’

  • Michael

    According to Stephen Lendman in OpEdNews.com on October 10th 15 TNC fighters were killed outside Bani Walid, all were carrying Israeli ID’S. Late at night, UK SAS Regiment Forces entered Sirte to carry out a special operation. Reportedly 16 were captured and 44 were killed.

  • Rana Mudassar Khan

    Is it something new? After all Blair was surrounded by men with links to Israel and the US is run on similar lines.

    One also wonders whether Oliver Letwin is really that stupid that he dumps state documents in park bins – i presume without ripping them up – who was supposed to be picking them up?

    Did fox go to keep Letwin out of the news?

  • mary

    The Zionist supporters boast here of their number within the mother of Parliaments.
    .
    Israel Lobby in the British Parliament by the ZF and CFI
    February 9, 2010
    250 people and 73 MPs attend pro-Israel lobby at House of Commons to address major issues

    .
    The ZF’s largest pro-Israel lobby of Parliament took place on Wednesday, 20th January 2010, addressed by leading members of all three political parties. The two main themes of the day were: the Law of Universal Jurisdiction and the threat of a nuclear Iran.
    .

    Over 250 people attended the lobby, more than at any preceeding event, with standing room only in the largest committee room in the House of Commons. 73 MPs were seen and showed overwhelming support for the State of Israel and its search for peace, despite evident provocation and terrorist threats.

    /…
    http://www.doingzionism.org/about_us/activity.asp?id=495
    .
    Daniel Kawczynski is amongst them.

  • mary

    Some extracts from the Register of Interests for Daniel Kawczynski. Like Fox, he is partial to globe trotting paid for by others. Who or what is Oliy Majilis of Uzbekistan?

    .
    Name of donor:
    (1)Uzbekistan Airways
    (2)(3)CCC Group of Companies
    Address of donor:
    (1)1 Devonshire Street
    (2)100035, Tashkent, Uzbekistan, 1 Bunyodkor Street
    (3)11A West Halkin Street, London SW1 X8J
    Amount of donation (or estimate of the probable value):
    (1)Upgrade from economy to business class of international flight from London to Tashkent and return; value £1,095
    (2)Accommodation in Tashkent; value £745.20
    (3)£1,488.35 (international flights between London and Tashkent; value £1,268, together with hotel subsistence in Tashkent; value £220.35
    Destination of visit: Tashkent, Uzbekistan
    Date of visit: 21-24 September 2010
    Purpose of visit: to participate in visit of All-Party Parliamentary Group for Central Asia including the signing of a MOU with the Oliy Majilis of Uzbekistan.
    (Registered 21 October 2010)
    .
    15-20 February 2009, to Israel with the Conservative Friends of Israel (CFI), for meetings with politicians and officials and to visit the Golan Heights. Costs of the visit were paid by CFI. (Registered 11 March 2009)
    .
    Name of donor: Government of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
    Amount of donation (or estimate of the probable value): £5000
    (Registered 15 October 2009)
    Amount of donation (or estimate of the probable value): £4000
    (Registered 11 November 2009)
    Amount of donation (or estimate of the probable value): £980
    Purpose of visit: to attend the Royal United Services’ Institute Euro-Mediterranean Security Conference.
    (Registered 12 April 2010)
    .
    29 August-2 September 2005, to India. Hotel accommodation provided by the Government of India. Flights paid for by Dr Liam Fox’s office from a donation by Mr Stanley Fink, a businessman from Middlesex. Upgrade on outward flight from Virgin. (Registered 12 October 2005)
    .
    http://www.theyworkforyou.com/regmem/?p=11817

1 2 3 4 5 … 7

Comments are closed.