24 Hours To Save The Malyshevs

by craig on October 20, 2011 9:16 am in Uncategorized

Mikel and Nina Malyshev’s family have been told by the UK Border Agency that they have been moved from Yarls Wood to an undisclosed location before deportation to Uzbekistan tomorrow. The UK government continues to refuse to acknowledge the terrible human rights situation in Uzbekistan in general, or the fate that awaits the Malyshevs in particular. No reply has to date been received to a fax to the European Court of Human Rights asking for a suspension.

Please take action – contact your MP, and contact William Hague and Teresa May. The UK government cannot be allowed to continue to pretend that it does not know about the human rights situation in Uzbekistan.

Please repost this and my appeal yesterday on any website on which you can.

UPDATE

Could someone kindly give Amnesty International a call and see if they will urgently contact the British government on this one? They have run cases recently against Uzbeks being deported back from the Ukraine and from Kazakhstan. I have to dash to a meeting on another asylum case.

64 Comments

  1. Baldy Excoriator

    20 Oct, 2011 - 9:59 am

    Craig, do you have any links to further information about this – not that I need any more, but it might make a reposting of info more persuasive if there are multiple sources.

    Thanks

  2. craig

    20 Oct, 2011 - 10:09 am

    Baldy,

    No, nothing I can see online about them.

  3. crab

    20 Oct, 2011 - 10:38 am

    I wrote to my MP yesterday using theyworkforyou.com.

    I remember in 2007, Jahongir Sidiko was almost deported but was saved last minute by internet action started on this blog. I hope we can make a difference again.

  4. HRIMark

    20 Oct, 2011 - 10:58 am

  5. mary

    20 Oct, 2011 - 11:00 am

    Nothing about the couple in this Swansea newspaper but there seem to be quite a number of reports about other deportations.
    http://www.thisissouthwales.co.uk/search/search.html?searchPhrase=deportation&searchType=
    .
    Is the UK Border agency particularly active in the area?

  6. ingo

    20 Oct, 2011 - 11:01 am

    I have written to my MP and it is vital that they get as many representations as possible. I do not question Craigs motives to post this appeal here, but the wooly interpreation of the Governments own policies.
    Who is going to be next? Arsalan? Uzbek in the UK? myself?

    Cameron is planning a three line whip against the Europhobes deciding to vote for a national referendum, advertising the cause and initiating a future vote that would almost definately waste some serious money on a futile set of leading questions to us all.
    Well, not that it will be an issue decided by EU citizens, cause I do not have the vote in a referendum on membership in Europe, the vote will almost certainly be for UK citizens only.

    Experintia docet stultos is my message to Clegg and Hague, you will wake up with those you’d bedded!

  7. lwtc247

    20 Oct, 2011 - 11:03 am

    Done, sent to my local MP.

    Will try William Hague and Teresa May now.

  8. John Goss

    20 Oct, 2011 - 11:09 am

    Craig, Amnesty, who I’ve just phoned, work through asylum seekers’ legal representative because deportation is a legal process. Amnesty just support appeals. I’ve written to Hague, May, and my MP, Steve McCabe and posted your blog link on Facebook. Do they have legal representation? If not how quickly could it be acquired? As you say it is urgent.

  9. anon

    20 Oct, 2011 - 11:14 am

    Had to use a Richmond (Yorks) Postcode: e.g. the one at
    Richmondshire Conservative Club,
    12 Newbiggin
    Richmond
    North Yorkshire
    DL10 4DT
    but explained that it was necessary to do so.

  10. anon

    20 Oct, 2011 - 11:17 am

    & Teresa May can be e-mailed on
    http://www.writetothem.com/write by using the Maidenhead Con Club:
    Maidenhead Conservative Club,
    32 York Rd,
    Maidenhead, SL6 1SF

  11. Baldy Excoriator

    20 Oct, 2011 - 11:28 am

  12. Baldy Excoriator

    20 Oct, 2011 - 11:44 am

    William Hague is even more of a useless tosser than I thought he was. I’ve emailed a number of his predecessors and always had a reply, even if it was so insulting to the intelligence that it made me spit.
    —————–
    The attached message had PERMANENT fatal delivery errors!

    After one or more unsuccessful delivery attempts the attached message has
    been removed from the mail queue on this server. The number and frequency
    of delivery attempts are determined by local configuration parameters.

    YOUR MESSAGE WAS NOT DELIVERED TO ONE OR MORE RECIPIENTS!

    Failed address: fcocorrespondence@fco.gov.uk

    — Session Transcript —
    Thu 2011-10-20 03:32:11: Parsing message
    Thu 2011-10-20 03:32:12: * From: xxx@xxx.com
    Thu 2011-10-20 03:32:12: * To: fcocorrespondence@fco.gov.uk
    Thu 2011-10-20 03:32:12: * Subject: Human rights issues : Mr Xxxxxx Xxxxx
    Thu 2011-10-20 03:32:12: * Message-ID:
    Thu 2011-10-20 03:32:12: Attempting SMTP connection to [fco.gov.uk]
    Thu 2011-10-20 03:32:12: Resolving MX records for [fco.gov.uk] (DNS Server: 10.107.136.6)…
    Thu 2011-10-20 03:32:12: * Name server has no records of the requested type for that domain
    Thu 2011-10-20 03:32:12: Attempting SMTP connection to [fco.gov.uk:25]
    Thu 2011-10-20 03:32:12: Resolving A record for [fco.gov.uk] (DNS Server: 10.107.136.6)…
    Thu 2011-10-20 03:32:12: * Name server has no records of the requested type for that domain
    — End Transcript —

  13. Uzbek in the UK

    20 Oct, 2011 - 11:55 am

    Did email to Hague, May and own MP. It was not possible to have a meeting with him and hopefully that email will work. Although I had no response.
    .
    Unfortunately, I do not believe that any of these will work. These people do not have heart and the only thing that will stop them is to prove that Malyshevs cannot be deported due to risk of facing prosecution.
    .

    Has anyone tried this http://www.asylumaid.org.uk/pages/how_to_get_advice_from_asylum_aid.html
    .

    Might be Malyshevs or their representatives can give them a call urgently?

  14. Uzbek in the UK

    20 Oct, 2011 - 11:58 am

    What about this?
    .
    Advice on detention
    If you need urgent advice on detention, deportation or removal outside office hours you can telephone the IAS on 020 7378 9191 and leave a message on the answer phone. State briefly your problem and provide your name and contact telephone number. Your call should then be returned the next working day.
    .
    Bail for Immigration Detainees

    Bail for Immigration Detainees is an independent charity that exists to challenge immigration detention in the UK. They work with asylum seekers and migrants, in removal centres and prisons, to secure their release from detention. BID assists detained asylum seekers and migrants to make applications for release from Immigration Act detention. BID does not prepare substantive immigration or asylum applications. BID will only help with applications for release from detention where the detainee’s legal representative is unwilling or unable to help, or where the detainee has no

    legal representation.

    e: info@biduk.org

    Main office-London: for all general queries and detainees (except those at Haslar or Campsfield – see below).

    t: 020 7247 3590 (please call between 1.30 p.m. and 4.30 p.m, Monday to Friday).
    f: 020 7247 3550
    Portsmouth office: for detainees at Haslar.

    t: 023 9229 1916.
    f: 023 9229 1913
    Oxford office: for detainees at Campsfield House.

    t: 0845 3304 536 (phones are open on Monday, Wednesday and Friday).
    f: 0845 3304 537

  15. Uzbek in the UK

    20 Oct, 2011 - 12:03 pm

    And this one.
    .
    Refugee and Migrant Justice (RMJ)
    RMJ (formerly the Refugee Legal Centre) has offices across England, and offers free advice and representation for every stage of asylum claims, including to people in detention. There are 12 offices across England. More details, including contact details for local offices, can be found on their website.
    http://www.rmj.org.uk
    Nelson House, 153 – 157 Commercial Road, London E1 2DA
    Tel: 0800 592 398 or 02077 803 333 (detention helpline)
    This telephone advice line is for foreign nationals who are detained in immigration removal centres or in prisons, and it is available on Monday, Wednesday, Friday from 10.30am – 1pm, 2pm – 4pm.
    Tel: 07831 598 057 (emergency out of hours telephone line)
    This line operates between 6pm and 8am (1800 and 0800) on weekdays and all weekend. If you are in an extreme emergency regarding your immigration status, and are threatened with imminent removal from the United Kingdom, you can use this number.

  16. Uzbek in the UK

    20 Oct, 2011 - 12:07 pm

  17. Uzbek in the UK

    20 Oct, 2011 - 12:14 pm

    Does anyone know this chap personally? He is Human Rights Professor and was also a practitioner. He might be able to advise something.
    .
    http://www.conorgearty.co.uk/

  18. John Goss

    20 Oct, 2011 - 12:16 pm

    I’ve phoned Hywel Francis but he was not available, to try and find if the Malyshev’s have legal representation, and who this may be. I’m waiting for him to get back. Surely they cannot be deported without legal representation.

  19. mary

    20 Oct, 2011 - 12:18 pm

    Not being funny Uzbek as I know you are being helpful but perhaps Prof Gearty’s colleague at Matrix Chambers, Mrs Cherie Bliar nee Booth, could help. She is supposed to be good on human rights! Couldn’t resist.

  20. mary

    20 Oct, 2011 - 12:20 pm

    Very much off topic but the BBC are cock-a-hoop at the rumours that Muammar Gaddafi has been captured in Sirte.

  21. Uzbek in the UK

    20 Oct, 2011 - 12:24 pm

    Mary,
    .
    This is not funny really. 1st I did not know that Cherie is in the same Chumber, 2nd does this mean that they all there are so bad. I have heard from some of
    Gearty’s former students that he is a good tutor and is really passionate about Human Right and particularly practical aspect of it.
    .
    I strongly believe that only if we find something in the law that prevents UK authorities to send Malyshevs back to Uzbekistan we will succeed. And knocking all doors is the best practice when you do not really know much about matter.

  22. Uzbek in the UK

    20 Oct, 2011 - 12:34 pm

    John,
    .
    Mr Murray is not providing much of the details but I presume that Malyshevs were smart enough to get some legal advice while putting their asylum case before UKBA. I presume that probably their case was not strong enough e.g. they have not been involved in some activities back in Uzbekistan that Uzbek authorities consider to be illegal but that are legal here (opposition for example or Human Rights Organisation). I presume that their claim was probably more based on them being Russians (ethnic minority) but Uzbek regime is not known for persecution of any particular minority and that on this merits their case have failed but they should have had another attempt (one at least) to appeal.
    .
    The major point onto which they now have to draw attention is that no matter of their past but if they are deported NOW they will be prosecuted just because they have claimed asylum abroad. And this unfortunately is not bogus claim.

  23. John Goss

    20 Oct, 2011 - 12:35 pm

    Uzbek in the UK, Asylum Aid gave me three telephone numbers of solicitors who act in Yarls Wood. I’ve contacted Laura at Wilsons Solicitors who is going to get back to me. Unless we can find out who their legal representative is I doubt anything can be done through Amnesty.

  24. Guest

    20 Oct, 2011 - 12:42 pm

    “Very much off topic but the BBC are cock-a-hoop at the rumours that Muammar Gaddafi has been captured in Sirte.”
    .
    His trial ? will in the most part be…In closed session.
    “He got in an argument with the judge, who closed the trial to the public”
    http://uk.ask.com/wiki/Trial_of_Saddam_Hussein
    .
    IF ? he comes to trial, it will have already been decided that it will be so, Blair can rest easy, as can a few others.

  25. Uzbek in the UK

    20 Oct, 2011 - 12:46 pm

    John,
    .
    You are right more details are needed. Mr Murray needs to urge Malyshevs or their reps to contact Legal Aid. I also heard that RMJ are quite good and they have mobile number advertised.
    .
    Other thing that Malyshevs can add is that their name and case was now made public since Mr Murray revealed their names on his web site and that there is no way their failed asylum case can be kept secret from Uzbek authorities.

  26. John Goss

    20 Oct, 2011 - 1:07 pm

    Uzbek in the UK, Laura got back. The family are not on their books. I presume any legal representation must have come from Swansea.
    .
    Unfortunately I have to go out now. I feel powerless.

  27. mary

    20 Oct, 2011 - 1:09 pm

    If I was a barrister, I would not choose to breathe the same air as Mrs Bliar/Booth and would not admit her to my chambers.
    .
    ….
    Conor is a founder member of Matrix
    ….
    http://www.matrixlaw.co.uk/Members/47/Conor%20Gearty.aspx

  28. angrysoba

    20 Oct, 2011 - 1:23 pm

    This is what I got from Hague:

    Thank you for your email to The Rt Hon William Hague MP.

    Foreign affairs related matters

    If you are writing to Mr Hague in his capacity as Foreign Secretary please go to the Foreign & Commonwealth Office website for contact details

    {http://www.fco.gov.uk/en/contact-us}

    {http://www.fco.gov.uk/en/ministerial-feedback-form}

    Visa matters

    If you are a not a constituent of William Hague and your enquiry or correspondence is related to visa matters, please go to

    {http://www.ukba.homeoffice.gov.uk/contact/}

    I guess the contact details on the fco is worth going for. But probably Theresa May as Home Secretary is the person whose responsibility this is.

  29. Andrew

    20 Oct, 2011 - 1:51 pm

    I sent a message to Yvette Cooper to see if she will help.

  30. glenn

    20 Oct, 2011 - 1:52 pm

    I’ve written to my own MP as a resident of Swansea, so it should concern him directly, because the Malyshevs could also be regarded as his constituents.

  31. mary

    20 Oct, 2011 - 2:33 pm

    Gaddafi has been killed. The blood lust of Hague, Cameron, Fox, Sarkozy, Berlusconi and all the NATO warmongers will be satisfied.

  32. John Goss

    20 Oct, 2011 - 2:51 pm

    Gaddafi’s death hasn’t been confirmed yet but seems likely. I guess Iran has got to start bracing itself.

  33. Uzbek in the UK

    20 Oct, 2011 - 3:03 pm

    Is not Syria suppose to be next? I have no sympathy for Gaddafi but it would have been better if he was tried in court. On the other hand he did not give himself up and has chosen to stand till last. He was ruling Libya for over 30 years. Do not you think that it was enough for both Libyans and himself?

  34. Uzbek in the UK

    20 Oct, 2011 - 3:11 pm

    Any news on Malyshevs? The plane to Tashkent departs at 9.15 pm tomorrow.

  35. Aggravation Cucumber Type

    20 Oct, 2011 - 3:11 pm

    Tried for what? Bombing Libyan cities? Oh no, that was Cameron. Shooting people from helicopters? Oh no, that was Sarkozy. Using Libyan oil money to fund Islamist terrorists? Oh no, that was Obama.

  36. AntiDespot

    20 Oct, 2011 - 3:11 pm

    I guess he will buried in the same “islamic way” as Obama was supposedly buried
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3FbL8WDtrYI

  37. Uzbek in the UK

    20 Oct, 2011 - 3:19 pm

    Tried for being in power for over 30 years. Surely one cannot rule a nation by just being nice and popular supported by everyone and not oppressing anyone.
    .
    In the same way you are trying to justify Gaddafi one could justify any dictator. Dictators usually do not bomb cities on their nation they just kill few hundreds or thousands and plant fear in hearts and minds of millions. That is how they manage to stay in power for a very long time.

  38. Uzbek in the UK

    20 Oct, 2011 - 3:28 pm

    On the other hand life is very interesting and sometimes controversial thing.
    .
    One who is out of desperation steals some food or clothes can be tried and if found guilty face penalties or even imprisonment because laws of the state where one lives are particularly harsh.
    .
    Another one who rules a nation for over 30 years (surely not always supported by popular content), deposits large sums of money in foreign accounts cannot be tried and prosecuted JUST BECAUSE it is against International law to intervene on the matters of sovereign state.

  39. Aggravation Cucumber Type

    20 Oct, 2011 - 3:31 pm

    In the same way you are trying to justify Gaddafi

    huh? If you have to resort to that sort of nonsense, Uzbek, either you don’t believe what you’re saying or your mind is very confused. I didn’t ‘try to justify’ him; I referred to some things which he did not do, but others did, the sort of things he has been accused of by lying propagandists. It may be that he did something he should be tried for, but facts are hard to come by. Do you have any? Killing people – Libya has capital punishment, I believe. Did he order extra-judicial killings? Oh no, that was Obama. Do you think Obama and friends should be tried also?

  40. Aggravation Cucumber Type

    20 Oct, 2011 - 3:33 pm

    Not quite on topic, but closer than Colonel Gadaffi – idiotic British immigration rules.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/20/arts/britains-conflicting-entry-rules-stymie-visiting-artists.html

  41. John Goss

    20 Oct, 2011 - 3:34 pm

    Uzbek, no news on the Malyshevs. It’s disturbing. The waiting is like Troy Davis all over again. I suspect the outcome will be as disappointing.
    .
    As to Gaddafi, yes he was despotic, but what the west has done is just as bad, if not worse. And it’s all for Libyan oil. I can see civil war for the foreseeable future. Our TV reports are replete with victory celebrations but there are others, not so supportive, who are lying low for the moment until their day comes.
    .
    Also there is no clear idea who the UK/US puppet is who will replace Gaddafi. There are a lot of factions in the National Transitional Council and finding a leader to knit together the various strands will not be easy.

  42. Aggravation Cucumber Type

    20 Oct, 2011 - 3:43 pm

    Another one who rules a nation for over 30 years (surely not always supported by popular content),

    Queen Elizabeth I
    Queen Elizabeth II

    But seriously, are you suggesting there should be a cut-off date in international law – right, Mr President, you’ve been in charge for 29 years, 11 months and 29 days. We’ll be round at the crack of dawn. Will you come quietly?

    deposits large sums of money in foreign accounts

    It’s said that Germany has gold on deposit in New York. Do you think Frau Merkel should be prosecuted? Perhaps you think Hugo Chavez can be let off the hook as he has asked for Venezuela’s gold to be returned from London. What about the Chinese holding all that US debt? Perhaps you are too ready to make assumptions – why did Libya have funds on deposit in the USA? Perhaps something to do with their Sovereign Wealth Funds? Hm?

  43. Uzbek in the UK

    20 Oct, 2011 - 3:48 pm

    I did not say that I support killing of Gaddafi but it is true that I have no sympathy for him or any other dictator who either behaves like charismatic leader or keep his profile low but on the same background based on lies, deception and fear of prosecution of anyone who dare to stand against them.
    .
    As I mentioned earlier it is hard to judge whether military operation in Libya is morally right or wrong. International law prescribes all states do not intervene on the matters of each other despite of horrible crimes that are taking places within the border of one particular state. So basically lets say educated and liberal people of the West (like yourself probably) can go to bed at night without any guilt just because Karimov in May 2005 has slaughtered few hundred people including women and children BECAUSE International law prescribes you not to intervene. Is this right? Wrong perhaps? Who knows?
    .
    Today as of yesterday people are dying in another state that is ruled by brutal dictatorship that not only stayed in power for a long time BUT has managed to establish a sort of the dynasty. Yes, mate I am talking about Syria. But you should not feel any guilt for these dying people BECAUSE International law prescribes you that if you decide to intervene you will be WRONG. Will you be wrong? Who knows?

  44. mary

    20 Oct, 2011 - 4:01 pm

    To see film of Gaddafi’s body, with his eyes staring wide open, being dragged through the streets and guns being fired in the air in celebration was terrible. Another extra judicial killing sanctioned by the likes of Clinton and Cameron. We have reached yet another nadir.
    .
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AbtWhXeiK6Q

  45. Uzbek in the UK

    20 Oct, 2011 - 4:07 pm

    In theory it is easier than you think. Democracy should not only be promoted but also defended in International law and by International institutions. Every government of every state in the world should be elected by popular vote WITHOUT any exceptions. Such exceptions like culture, religion, ethnic and territorial differences are all pure and smelly bull shit (pardon my English). Let nations decide who they want to rule them. It is as simple as it sound (but only in theory).
    .
    In practice there are so many states and amongst them there are regional powers, superpowers etc. Each with its own narrow minded interests. Some run by governments elected by popular vote but which are under influence of some (sometimes very nasty) corporations and so called (sometimes also very nasty) interests groups. Others are run by dictatorships where governments do not care of interest of their nations but only of their own (sometimes imaginary) interests.
    .
    So in practise it is very hard to insure that everyONE of us WITHOUT exception of our nationality and luckiness of birth have the same rights and the most importantly FREE from tyranny. That is why I am personally very satisfied when another dictatorship falls although it might be for a short time but when another nation is FREE of tyranny (although I totally understand that my opinion is WRONG according to the current International law).

  46. mary

    20 Oct, 2011 - 4:48 pm

    Add the the creep and US stooge Ban Ki-Moon to my list above.

  47. Abe Rene

    20 Oct, 2011 - 5:28 pm

    Done – I hope, even if my message to my own MP is too late, that the government has more sense than to do this.

    Craig’s role in exposing such things is valuable and needed (a necessary part of the Opposition in the wider sense in a democracy), but the Conservatives look to be in power for a few years. Therefore, apart from working through what influence the Lib Dems have, it seems to me that it will also be necessary to persuade the Tories in terms of enlightened national self-interest, to get real progress on such matters.

  48. lwtc247

    20 Oct, 2011 - 5:41 pm

    Mr Hague replied:

    Hi Louise

    Not constituent, sorry.

    J

  49. Theo

    20 Oct, 2011 - 6:40 pm

    emailed my MP. We’ll see what good it does.

  50. Canny Lass Jim

    21 Oct, 2011 - 7:47 am

    Mary
    Ban Ki-Moon
    The UN needs to avoid appointing not only citizens of the permanent five as Sec Gen, but also citizens of countries under their sway. Perhaps a good way of assessing this is whether they have military bases of P5 members on their territory. Ban is a real shocker, I agree, he’s said things which are completely inappropriate for a UN Sec Gen to say.

  51. John Goss

    21 Oct, 2011 - 9:21 am

    Here is my letter to:

    Dear Theresa May and William Hague,

    It has come to my notice that Mikel and Nina Malyshev have been taken to Yarlswood Detention Centre and will be deported to probable imprisonment and torture in Uzbekistan on Friday 21 October. You could hardly have picked a more despotic country than Karimov’s Uzbekistan. This act wreaks of bargaining human lives for a free passage to Afghanistan as a supply-route for our troops. Of course nobody wants to see our troops without supplies, but I fear this is a big mistake. Please use your powers to prevent this deportation against the wishes of these good law-abiding citizens.

    Kind regards,

    John Goss
    .
    And the reply I just received.
    .
    Dear John Goss,

    Thank you for your letter about the immigration matters of Mikel & Nina Malyshev .

    We appreciate you taking the time to write and would like to assure you that the views you expressed have been noted.

    Yours Sincerely

    Public Correspondence Team

    UKBA
    .
    I meant ‘reeks’ of course, but it’s not the worst mistake I’ve made.

  52. angrysoba

    21 Oct, 2011 - 12:32 pm

    I notice that you also received the same form letter as I did, John.

  53. John Goss

    21 Oct, 2011 - 1:46 pm

    Angrysoba, that doesn’t surprise me. When I wrote about my concerns about the first Gulf war in Iraq I got a large heavy envelope which thudded on the porch like a letter-bomb. It contained a hardly readable (it had been photocopied that many times) copy of Douglas Hurd’s Mansion House Speech, nothing concerned with the specific concerns I raised.

  54. Suhayl Saadi

    21 Oct, 2011 - 2:47 pm

    In other words, John and angrysoba, the bureaucracy is saying to us all: ‘Dear Peasants, Know Thy Place!’

  55. John Goss

    21 Oct, 2011 - 4:34 pm

    Suhayl, if the Malyshev’s are deported, and anything happens to them, the answer from Hague and May’s support team, shows that they are very well aware of the possible fate of the couple, and have proceeded despite that. UKBA stands for UK Border Agency. I wish I could find out who the Malyshev’s legal representative is, or even if they have one.

  56. John Goss

    21 Oct, 2011 - 5:00 pm

    I’ve just done another search regarding the Malyshevs. Quite a few blogs are running the story (all quoting directly from Craig’s blog). Has there been any response from the Court of Human Rights yet? It’s 1700 hours now and the plane is due to go in half an hour.

  57. Uzbek in the UK

    21 Oct, 2011 - 5:20 pm

    ARE THERE any news on Malyshevs? Does anyone know?
    .
    John, if Malyshevs are deported nor Hague or May or Cameron will be able to do anything to secure their well being. Can they claim at least to see Russian Ambassador in the UK. I know that they are not Russian citizens but they are Russian by ethnicity (at least it sound like this) and considering that relations between Putin and Karimov are getting worse there is a chance (although slight chance) that Russia might accept them. I know that it sounds hideous but at least they will be better off in Russia than in Uzbekistan where I feel that after these publications they are awaited by SNB.

  58. Goodjohnease

    23 Oct, 2011 - 12:03 pm

    As Malyshev name can suggest, they are o Russian origin. Under Russian legislation all ethnic Russians and all former Soviet citizen are eligible to Russian citizenship.
    What sense does deporting Russians to Uzbekistan make?
    British authorities are given a hint here.

  59. Gill

    23 Oct, 2011 - 5:16 pm

    Nina & Mikel were deported from the UK on Friday, there was brief contact from Moscow Airport then one phone call from Uzbekistan, no more contact for over 24 hours. Can anyone help making contact?
    They were legally represented, the solicitor said that it shouldn’t have gone this far, they were in the UK for seven years.

  60. gill

    23 Oct, 2011 - 6:26 pm

    swansea ukba refused their appeal also their representitive applied for last minute emergency injunction to a high court judge

    plane was delayed until they had reply but was refused you can follow the story in south wales evening post

    Gill

  61. gill

    24 Oct, 2011 - 10:43 am

    no contact with nina&mickel they were picked up by people unknown PLEASE help trace them AS THE UK said they would be safe

  62. Uzbek in the UK

    24 Oct, 2011 - 12:14 pm

    Whatever UK said is now irrelevant as Malyshevs are now under ‘rightful protection’ of the Uzbek authorities as all other Uzbek citizens who live in Uzbekistan. UK is not going to intervene as by sending them back they (UK authorities) demonstrated that they do not care of Human Rights of this particular couple.

    When have Malyshevs called from Tashkent? Have they managed to pass border control in Tashkent safely or have they called before that? Do they have any family members there in Uzbekistan?

    Have they tried Russian Embassy in London? As being Russian by ethnicity they at least can try to ask Russian Embassy in Tashkent for some assistance. Although not Russian citizens but Russia takes it painfully when Russians of Uzbekistan are being prosecuted and particularly those days when Karimov turning his back to Russia.

  63. Gill

    24 Oct, 2011 - 12:47 pm

    Nina phoned from Tashkent relieved that the British Consulate had met them at the airport & guided them through a side entrance, we haven’t heard from them since. We have checked with British Embassy in Uzbekistan & they told us that they did not meet Nina & Mikel. We have not heard from them since.

  64. Uzbek in the UK

    24 Oct, 2011 - 1:11 pm

    People do disappear in Uzbekistan but this does not seem to me that Malyshevs have been kidnapped. Although, Malyshevs’ case was made public and this I am sure angered Uzbek authorities but kidnapping Malyshevs like this would be an act of extreme stupidity even for such ruthless government like in Uzbekistan. Is there any way to press for British Embassy to find out what happen to Malyshevs? UKBA in collaboration with British Justice system were so sure that sending them back to Uzbekistan will not breach Human Rights so can now British Embassy take their assess from chairs and do something to prove their government right?

Powered By Wordpress | Designed By Ridgey | Produced by Tim Ireland | Hosted by Expathos