UK Moves to Block US Senate Report to Protect Blair, Straw and Dearlove

by craig on April 14, 2014 12:04 pm in Uncategorized

From a British diplomatic source I learn that Britain has lobbied the United States against the publication of the Senate Intelligence Committee report on torture and extraordinary rendition.  The lobbying has been carried out “at all levels” – White House, State Department and CIA.  The British have argued that at the very least the report must be emasculated before publication.

The British argument is that in a number of court cases including the Belhadj case, the British government has successfully blocked legal action by victims on the grounds that this would weaken the US/UK intelligence relationship and thus vitally damage national security, by revealing facts the American intelligence service wish hidden.  [We will leave aside for the moment the utter shame of our servile groveling judges accepting such an argument].  The British Government are now pointing out to the Americans that this argument could be fatally weakened if major detail of the full horror and scope of torture and extraordinary rendition is revealed by the Senate Intelligence Committee.  The argument runs that this could in turn lead to further revelations in the courts and block the major defence against prosecutions of Blair, Straw and Dearlove, among others, potentially unleashing a transatlantic wave of judicial activism.

The unabashed collusion of two torturing security states in concealing the truth of their despicable acts – including complicity in the torture of women and minors – and blocking criminal prosecution of the guilty is a sign of how low public ethics have sunk.  Fortunately there are still a few people in the British Foreign Office disgusted enough to leak it.

 

Tweet this post

461 Comments

  1. BrianFujisan

    16 Apr, 2014 - 4:17 am

    Tony M…. Well said

    And a great post from Craig… as Macky say’s Doing what he dose best ..Indeed.

    WRG Michael Ruppert… a heart felt tribute from Abby M

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nWXbKOAHANQ

  2. Yes Brian. RIP Mike Ruppert. He obviously found that living in this world with its injustices and evils was no longer possible for him. In the link that AlcAnon sent, he said his head woke up before he did and that it was terrified.

    I thought of this poem by Louis MacNeice

    ‘Prayer Before Birth

    I am not yet born; O hear me.
    Let not the bloodsucking bat or the rat or the stoat or the
    club-footed ghoul come near me.

    I am not yet born, console me.
    I fear that the human race may with tall walls wall me,
    with strong drugs dope me, with wise lies lure me,
    on black racks rack me, in blood-baths roll me.

    [..]

    I am not yet born; O fill me
    With strength against those who would freeze my
    humanity, would dragoon me into a lethal automaton,
    would make me a cog in a machine, a thing with
    one face, a thing, and against all those
    who would dissipate my entirety, would
    blow me like thistledown hither and
    thither or hither and thither
    like water held in the
    hands would spill me.

    Let them not make me a stone and let them not spill me.
    Otherwise kill me.’

    http://www.poemhunter.com/poem/prayer-before-birth/

    One of his friends speaking on the link is involved in monitoring the radiation being brought to the American Pacific shores from Fukushima. She was saying that the irony is that she has to pay $600 for the tests.

  3. The Tories are killing our NHS

    Wednesday 16th April 2014

    Now’s the time to pile on the pressure for Labour to go big on the health service, says JOHN LISTER

    Join the dots, you can see the emerging picture – the NHS is being suffocated through prolonged and deliberate cash starvation.

    What began under the banner of the Con-Dem coalition trying to address the deficits created by the banking crash has now emerged as a thought-out, long-term Tory plan to scale down public spending and permanently reduce the size of the state.

    [..]

    Since then we have seen things get even worse – more billions of “unspent” NHS money have been clawed back by the Treasury, and £1.5bn of the frozen, allegedly “ringfenced,” NHS budget has been forcibly handed over to councils this year to prop up the even more parlous finances of social care, with even bigger sums to be deducted next year.

    There’s also a huge question mark over the future of NHS spending after the 2015 election – a year in which a further round of major cuts in public spending has been set in motion by Osborne, and many expect that as soon as the general election votes are counted the “ringfence” protecting the NHS against outright cuts would be scrapped if the Tories get back in.

    But even in the best-case scenario Osborne’s plans would see a 10-year freeze in health spending while costs and pressures increase each year.

    /..
    http://www.morningstaronline.co.uk/a-9fe3-The-Tories-are-killing-our-NHS

  4. Here is Mike Ruppert in 1996. A courageous man.

    Former LA Police Officer Mike Ruppert Confronts CIA Director John Deutch on Drug Trafficking
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UT5MY3C86bk

    How about the stooges including the House Representatives Juanita and Julian?

  5. A rather scary image of the newly promoted General Yousef Bin Ali Al-Idrisi.

    http://www.saudigazette.com.sa/index.cfm?method=home.regcon&contentid=20140416202122

    They all seem to have ‘bin’ there and done that. :}

  6. Mary,
    Evil will always be in the singular.
    “injustices and evils was”

    A contrast to goodness.

    The millitary machine is the foundation of our system. I suppose it is natures way of an sustainable civilised society?

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=dLM4uB6_d-E

  7. Ba'al Zevul (Close Brackets)

    16 Apr, 2014 - 9:22 am

    The Slog – Good to see you here. Quality blogging.
    Rose – We try to please, and when we succeed we are astonished. “Oleaginous” doesn’t quite convey Mandelson’s exudative propensity, does it? Glad you agree.

  8. Keith Crosby

    16 Apr, 2014 - 9:29 am

    Thanks for that Craig, I’ve copied it onto Media Lens.

  9. Ba'al Zevul (Close Brackets)

    16 Apr, 2014 - 9:39 am

    Good site, linked on The Slog. Sample page – tax-dodging fatcats leeching off taxpayer department:

    http://www.exaronews.com/articles/5236/nhs-2400-senior-officials-off-payroll-buried-review-revealed

    Good addition to the CM Blogroll, Craig?

  10. Excellent post,Craig, but it was to be expected that Jack and Tone both of the same hue, chosen for their ‘guile and cunning’ (barbara Castle)would act to ensure thier retirement is a fluffed pillow, not a cell at the ICC.

    Its refreshing to see new posters here, thanks for your contributions and wit, the more the merrier.

    leaves to say, time to exchange scoundrels is only a year away and should any of you want someone Independent to vote for, now is the time to put yourselfs about and start campaigning, time for it was never better. Norfolk has lost 40% of its Conservative membership and party politics is at its lowest ever….. good luck

  11. Mr Schultz of Starbucks wants our custom back. Revenues have fallen since the tax evasion was revealed and he is relocating the EU HQ to the UK, and the MENA offices too.

    http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/local-national/uk/starbucks-to-move-europe-hq-to-uk-30191348.html

    I will never be a customer of his due to his support for Zionist Israel.

    ‘In 1998, Schultz was awarded the “Israel 50th Anniversary Tribute Award” from the Jerusalem Fund of Aish Ha-Torah for “playing a key role in promoting a close alliance between the United States and Israel”.’
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Howard_Schultz

  12. Neil Clark is, quite understandably, confused;

    http://rt.com/op-edge/west-leaders-ukraine-democracy-600/

  13. I have been looking around The Slog. Good stuff.

    ‘Hunt Balls’ caught my eye. Nothing to do with foxes but with a weasel called Jeremy.

    http://hat4uk.wordpress.com/hunt-balls/

  14. Ba'al Zevul (Close Brackets)

    16 Apr, 2014 - 11:46 am

    Very interesting piece, Macky. Not so much for the obvious questions he is asking, but for a lead on what it is Russia is actually trying to do, and even on how it intends to do it. Which appears to be to define spheres-of-influence wrt Europe and the US a little more rigorously than the US, particularly, would like. I’m inclined to believe that an actual takeover, or even division, of Ukraine are not the current objectives, but that destabilisation and demographics will force the election of a Russia – leaning government; the presence of Russophobes in the west of the country would provide a channel for trade with Europe – as long as Ukrainian identity is maintained, there would be no conflict of interest between Ukrainian and Russian-speakers, and Russia itself would have a buffer state between it and an apparently expansionist EU/NATO area.

    Latvia (half of whose population (28% of Latvians are Russian – speakers ) have no vote in Latvia (14%) and Estonia (similar demographic and citizenship constraints) are perhaps less likely to retain semi-autonomy in the event of Russian expansion. Worth noting, perhaps, that

    “in accordance with Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention, the settlement of Russians in the Baltic States during the period (1945 onwards, under Stalin – BZ) was illegal under international law” (“The Occupying Power shall not deport or transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies”).[6][7][8] The convention was adopted in 1949, including by the Soviet Union. However, as the Soviet Union maintained the Baltic States joined the USSR voluntarily, it did not consider the convention applicable to the Baltic states.” [Wikipedia: Russians In The Baltic States]
    (There were at the time only 7-8% Russians in Latvia, but ‘voluntary’, slightly earlier, meant ‘us or the Germans’ – BZ)

    – and that if Stalin considered the Balts worth mopping up in the interest of coherent borders, Putin may well have a similar notion.

  15. Ba'al Zevul (Close Brackets)

    16 Apr, 2014 - 12:06 pm

    Ok. I can see a slug in the hostas. Old piece – what was Lord Mandelson of Mucilage doing in Ukraine in 2011?

    http://www.whatson-kiev.com/index.php?go=News&in=view&id=10894

    Akhmetov, eh?

    https://www.kyivpost.com/content/ukraine-abroad/financial-times-ukraines-oligarchs-accused-of-double-dealing-over-separatism-343694.html
    (links to FT piece – paywall, sorry, but you get the idea)

    Looks like Akhmetov’s running with the hare and hunting with the hounds.

    Private Eye’s current issue has a connection:

    Re:…the long-planned South Stream pipeline to bring Russian gas to southern European countries via a new route which bypasses Ukraine…construction contracts awarded to oligarchs close to…Putin….At the British Chambers of Commerce conference this month Peter Mandelson (who has many contacts among the ranks of the oligarchs) helpfully opined that all our gas bills could be lower if only the EU could negotiate a single gas purchase contract with Gazprom. [snip]

    …the undisclosed commissions paid on various big contracts between Gazprom and certain European national gas companies are legendary in the industry. Whom, one wonders, might Mandelson have in mind to negotiate the deal he is advocating?
    Private Eye 1364, print edition, p 8.

  16. Ba'al Zevul (Close Brackets)

    16 Apr, 2014 - 12:21 pm

    Damn. Totally meaningless statement here:

    “Latvia (half of whose population (28% of Latvians are Russian – speakers ) have no vote in Latvia (14%)”

    To clarify: 28% of Latvians have Russian origins, either Imperial or Soviet. Half of these don’t have Latvian citizenship, probably mainly because as long as they don’t, they can cross the Russian border without visas. That’s 14% of the total.

  17. Ba’al Zevul; “I’m inclined to believe that an actual takeover, or even division, of Ukraine are not the current objectives, but that destabilisation and demographics will force the election of a Russia – leaning government”

    Most rational commentators agree with you on that score; talking of which, and as a complimentary return for your h/t iro the interesting Slog blog, check out this site;

    http://vineyardsaker.blogspot.fr/

  18. Ba'al Zevul (Close Brackets)

    16 Apr, 2014 - 12:51 pm

    Thanks, Macky. Though it has to be said that both Ukraine and Russia are countries in which playing chess in the street is the norm, while I am crap at chess – so rationality may not be enough. The Saker site…may or may not be righteous but it’s very supportive of the Russian Authorised Version, and I have to treat it much as I would anything echoing William Hague, anywhere, on any subject whatever – with caution.

  19. “Ok. I can see a slug in the hostas. Old piece – what was Lord Mandelson of Mucilage doing in Ukraine in 2011?”

    More to the point what are armoured vehicles bearing the Russian flag doing in Eastern Ukraine doing today! Hardly the local militia that the Putinistas deceitfully claim.

  20. Ba'al Zevul (Close Brackets)

    16 Apr, 2014 - 1:26 pm

    Haven’t a clue, old chap. Why not tell us? With sources, of course.

    Blair levered half a million out of his very good friend Pinchuk for his Cash Faith Foundation last year. Pinchuk has made quite a lot out of EuroUkraine, and supports the current unelected government (for now):

    http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/apr/03/victor-pinchuk-interpipe-debt-downgraded-junk

    Whose oligarchs do you want to win, ESLO?

  21. @Mary

    and Michelle is busy lighting the candles.

    https://twitter.com/BarackObama/status/455872355311419392/photo/1

    Same old, same old – what are you trying to say, somehow I doubt it is Happy Passover.

  22. “More to the point what are armoured vehicles bearing the Russian flag doing in Eastern Ukraine doing today! Hardly the local militia that the Putinistas deceitfully claim.”

    Did you just make this up, ESLO, or do you have a source?

    Sounds like total bollocks, but amusing that you don’t even seem to understand that.

  23. Ba'al Zevul (Close Brackets)

    16 Apr, 2014 - 1:36 pm

    I’ll save him the trouble, Herbie.

    A soldier guarding one of six troop carriers now under the control of the rebels told Reuters he was a member of Ukraine’s 25th paratrooper division from Dnipropetrovsk.

    “All the soldiers and the officers are here. We are all boys who won’t shoot our own people,” he said, adding that his men had had no food for four days until local residents fed them.

    A spokesman for the separatists and a witness in Kramatorsk said the Ukrainian troops had given up their vehicles to the rebels after talks.

    http://uk.reuters.com/article/2014/04/16/uk-ukraine-crisis-idUKBREA3D0C420140416

  24. Whose oligarchs do you want to win, ESLO?

    Neither – but you forget where the Ukrainian oligarchs originally got their ideas from and how they benefit from Putin wishing to have a similar type of system to that which he imposes on Russia.

  25. Herbie

    Try the 5th photo from Reuters here – also reported on Sky TV

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-27045534

  26. YouKnowMyName

    16 Apr, 2014 - 1:45 pm

    Some Latvian’s are Russian origin – some are North American origin

    Latvia’s President Vaira Vīķe-Freiberga (1999 – 2007) who grew up in Canada, not USA, was alleged to have been successively KGB then later CIA agent…

    Lithuania also had a former U.S. Citizen as President (1998 – 2009), Valdas Adamkus , who was NCO in the US Army Intelligence (Lithuania coincidentally had a black-torture-prison about this time)

    Estonian president Toomas Hendrik Ilves (2006 – present) was educated in the USA before performing journalism/intelligence at RFE/RL [wikipedia]

    not that we’re exempt from ‘meddling’ in the UK – with Kennedy Memorial Trust/Laurence Stern Fellowships/British American Project alumni everywhere in British Meeja & Poli-ticks

  27. So it’s not exactly the Russian invasion ESLO tried to pretend.

    It’s the Ukrainian army surrendering to local civilians.

    Dear, oh dear.

    There’s no way in a million years Putin would send forces across the border, without first openly stating his pretext.

  28. “but it’s very supportive of the Russian Authorised Version”;

    The Saker is not only an ex-military analyst, but Russian as well, that his opinions may coincide with the Russian, is open for rigorous testing by his commentators, in one of the least moderated blogs I have encountered yet;

    “First, this blog deals primarily with two regions: the Middle-East and Russia. The reason for that is because these are the regions where, in my opinion, most of the important “action” is happening. Recently this blog has been “wall to wall Ukrainian”, but that is only because something really important is happening there. Before, for *years* I did not post a single thing about the Ukraine. In the past, I posted mostly about the Middle-East and, especially, Iran and Hezbollah. I did that because I considered that they played a crucial role. Eventually, when I realized that Syria had become the front line, I did a huge amount of coverage of the civil war in Syria. If tomorrow something massive happens in Australia or Iceland or Tahiti, I will try to cover that too. But the fact is that for the foreseeable future the Middle-East and Russia are the two spots on the planet where the most important things are happening”

    http://vineyardsaker.blogspot.fr/2014/04/personal-announcement-appeal-to-my-non.html

  29. Ba'al Zevul (Close Brackets)

    16 Apr, 2014 - 1:49 pm

    I forget very little, Eslo. You forget that the Maidan protests were originally against oligarchy in general, and that they utterly failed to improve the situation. And have now been hijacked by oligarchs.

    Viz:

    https://www.kyivpost.com/content/business/oligarchs-step-in-to-save-ukraines-sovereignty-338116.html

    It’s basically one bunch of oligarchs against the other at the end of the day. Each citing the ‘threat’ posed by the other, and somone still waiting to see how it pans out before taking another slice of Ukraine’s GDP (1/3 of Poland’s, per capita, btw)

    Where did they get the idea? Milton Friedman, probably. Or maybe Fukuyama. Greedy bastards are transnational.

  30. Ba'al Zevul (Close Brackets)

    16 Apr, 2014 - 1:51 pm

    Fair enough, Macky. Just registering my caution. I wouldn’t want to be like ESLO, uncritically swallowing soundbites from the people I liked.

  31. ESLO

    “Neither – but you forget where the Ukrainian oligarchs originally got their ideas from and how they benefit from Putin wishing to have a similar type of system to that which he imposes on Russia.”

    What are you on about. In Ukraine as in the West, Oligarchs have directly controlled the state.

    They don’t in Russia, since Putin took over.

    He doesn’t allow them to directly involve themselves in politics. He manages them by playing one off against the other, often invoking the national interest in oppossition to their business interests.

    If only we could have something like that in the West, we’d all be much better off.

  32. Another Russian who understands what is going on

    http://www.themoscowtimes.com/opinion/article/the-true-role-of-the-fsb-in-the-ukrainian-crisis/498072.html

    @Herbie

    “They don’t in Russia, since Putin took over.”

    Comedy gold – please read something about Russia other than Putin’s propaganda – the whole State is being run for the benefit of Putin and those oligarchs in his circle. You really have no clue whatsoever.

  33. Herbie

    Ask yourself why the Sochi games were so expensive.

  34. Herbie

    Ask yourself why the Putin’s Party is usually called the “Party of Crooks and Thieves” in common Russian parlance.

  35. “He doesn’t allow them to directly involve themselves in politics.”

    So why did he appoint Roman Abramovich as governor of Chuchotka for 8 years – during which time his company was able to take advantage of some local tax concessions in order to reduce the tax on his companies which were located there?

  36. ESLO

    Spouting propaganda seems to be all you have. Amusingly that propganda would be far better directed at the West than at Russia under Putin.

    The simple fact is that Putin has relegated the oligarchs to interests competing with other interests, the most important of which is for Putin, the Russian state itself.

    He’s sharing the wealth amongst the people, increasing salaries and pensions and so on.

    We know what the West wants of Russia, that it be as it was under Yeltsin, him drunk as a skunk, whilst people starved and died as the resources of the country were stripped.

    You see, he changed all that. That’s the point. It’s also why the West don’t like him.

    Western oligarchs continue to plunder their peoples, and it will only get worse.

    Putin put it all back the way it should be with competing interests evaluated according to the priorities of the country as a whole.

    He’s what used to be called a one nation Tory.

  37. ESLO

    Abramovich was in politics at the beginning of Putin’s term, but he’s no longer involved in politics.

    That’s the transition.

    But even in Putin’s early days it’s clear the direction he wanted things to take.

    It looks as though Putin got him to put something back in the meantime, before he resigned from politics:

    “”There are probably strings tied to his governship of Chukotka, such as having to spend quite a lot of extra money there alleviating poverty,” says Ms Ter-Sakarian.

    However, Mr Abramovich is estimated to have already spent $1.3bn of his own money on good causes in the state.”

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/4293684.stm

  38. ESLO

    “Another Russian who understands what is going on”

    That would be Andrei Soldatov …

    who works for Foreign Policy and Foreign Affairs, the Neocon house magazines.

    Dear, oh dearie me.

    The Moscow Times takes a Western line on matters Russian.

  39. Sofia Kibo Noh

    16 Apr, 2014 - 2:55 pm

    Ba’al. 1:36 pm

    Is that how people who play chess in the street arrange the delivery of APCs?

    “All the soldiers and the officers are here. We are all boys who won’t shoot our own people,” he said, adding that his men had had no food for four days until local residents fed them.

    http://uk.reuters.com/article/2014/04/16/uk-ukraine-crisis-idUKBREA3D0C420140416

    Maybe the citizens of Donetsk should just organise a big street party with lots of FOOD!

  40. RT asks

    How will the standoff between Russia and the West over Ukraine play out?

    28% – The heightening of tensions will spark a new Cold War
    9% – Western sanctions will force Russia to come to the bargaining table
    46% – The West will accept Crimean integration with Russia for economic reasons
    17% – Crimea will remain a simmering issue for decades

    http://rt.com/news/

  41. Ba'al Zevul (Close Brackets)

    16 Apr, 2014 - 3:11 pm

    Sofia – Is that how people who play chess in the street arrange the delivery of APCs?
    It’s how I’d arrange it if the Russian Army were just a hop and skip over the border waiting for a civil war to happen. But I’m crap at chess, as I said. And I agree re. food. Maybe they should roast an oligarch or two, and I am really neutral as to which ones.

    ESLO – So why did he appoint Roman Abramovich as governor of Chuchotka for 8 years – during which time his company was able to take advantage of some local tax concessions in order to reduce the tax on his companies which were located there?

    I’m sure you know really. Try to think of it as the Russian equivalent to Osborne’s appointment of Angela Leadsom as City Minister (what that? New Libor ministry?), also giving her the brief for the “help-to-buy” scheme. An ex – Barclay’s investment banker, as is her husband, and deeply into buy-to-let, she’s not short of a bob or two… but hey, why not buy Private Eye this week and see for yourself?

    Take-home message : the impression is that “…despite his protestations of clamping down on Britain’s many financial excesses, Osborne has given the Treasury’s City brief to a wealthy ex-banker who uses trusts to reduce her tax bill and offshore accounts to exploit a booming property market”

    Both Russia and the US do it bigger, but we do it too.

  42. The fog of war = the fogh of Rasmussen

    NATO ups military presence amid Russian threat
    April 16, 2014

    BRUSSELS (AP) — NATO is strengthening its military footprint along its eastern border immediately in response to Russia’s aggression in Ukraine, the alliance’s chief said Wednesday.

    Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said NATO’s air policing aircraft will fly more sorties over the Baltic region and allied warships will deploy to the Baltic Sea, the eastern Mediterranean and elsewhere if needed.

    “We will have more planes in the air, more ships on the water and more readiness on the land,” Fogh Rasmussen told reporters in Brussels, declining to give exact troop figures.

    /..

    http://www.chron.com/news/world/article/NATO-ups-military-presence-amid-Russian-threat-5406300.php

  43. Ba'al Zevul (Close Brackets)

    16 Apr, 2014 - 3:19 pm

  44. David Swanson who co-founded After Downing Street.org, another American to whom we owe our gratitude, writes –

    Torture is Mainstream Now
    by David Swanson / April 15th, 2014

    As Rebecca Gordon notes in her new book, Mainstreaming Torture: Ethical Approaches in the Post-9/11 United States, polls find greater support in the United States for torture now than when Bush was president. And it’s not hard to see why that would be the case.

    Fifteen years ago, it was possible to pretend the U.S. government opposed torture. Then it became widely known that the government tortured. And it was believed (with whatever accuracy) that officials had tried to keep the torturing secret. Next it became clear that nobody would be punished, that, in fact, top officials responsible for torture would be permitted to openly defend what they had done as good and noble.

    The idea was spread around that the torture was stopping, but the cynical could imagine it must be continuing in secret, the partisan could suppose the halt was only temporary, the trusting could assume torture would be brought back as needed, and the attentive could be and have been aware that the government has gone right on torturing to this day with no end in sight.

    /..
    http://dissidentvoice.org/2014/04/torture-is-mainstream-now/

    DAVID SWANSON is the author of “War Is A Lie” and “Daybreak: Undoing the Imperial Presidency and Forming a More Perfect Union.” He blogs at http://davidswanson.org and http://warisacrime.org

    Swanson holds a master’s degree in philosophy from the University of Virginia. He has worked as a newspaper reporter and as a communications director, with jobs including press secretary for Dennis Kucinich’s 2004 presidential campaign, media coordinator for the International Labor Communications Association, and three years as communications coordinator for ACORN, the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now.

    Swanson is Co-Founder of AfterDowningStreet.org, creator of ConvictBushCheney.org and Washington Director of Democrats.com, a board member of Progressive Democrats of America, the Backbone Campaign, and Voters for Peace, a convenor of the legislative working group of United for Peace and Justice, chair of the UFPJ working group on Accountability and Prosecution, and a member of the Robert Jackson Steering Committee.

  45. Ba'al Zevul (Close Brackets)

    16 Apr, 2014 - 3:42 pm

    Mandelson and the Oligarchs (cont’d) – Evtushenkov, Deripaska:

    http://alexanderboot.com/content/mandelson-won%E2%80%99t-be-short-rouble-or-two

    A cutting wit at work here.

  46. Ba’al Zevul

    Reported tax breaks of $482 million for one company.

    But he spent $1.5 billion of his own money.

    Not quite the kind of deal you’ve described above.

  47. Ba'al Zevul (Close Brackets)

    16 Apr, 2014 - 3:51 pm

    Macky – Not saying I agree with everything this man says, but just to give the other side of Church – State relations in Russia, apropos the (Russian Ortho) Saker blog:

    http://alexanderboot.com/content/letter-friend

  48. Ba'al Zevul (Close Brackets)

    16 Apr, 2014 - 4:00 pm

    Herbie – Just to complicate the picture further, Abramovich (philanthropic as he certainly was to Chukotka – $179M annually since 1999, estimated) resigned the chairmanship of the legislature last year. In response to bad mans Putin’s decree:

    A United Russia source said that Abramovich’s decision to leave Chukotka was motivated by Putin’s decree that elected officials must get rid of their foreign property if they wish to hold office in Russia. Faced with the choice between wealth overseas or political power at home, many officials have already departed, though not always willingly. Nine members of the Federation Council (five of whom are on the Forbes list of richest Russians) have left since Putin first floated the ban last December. Federation Council member Valentina Matviyenko said she expected two more wealthy council members to quit in the autumn. By contrast, Mikhail Rostovskiy writes that Abramovich was relieved when Putin announced the policy, since he was tired of playing “papa” to the distant Chukotka okrug

    http://imrussia.org/politics/515-the-end-of-the-affair-abramovich-leaves-chukotka

    IOW he left Russian politics in order to Follow The Money.

  49. Ba'al Zevul (Close Brackets)

    16 Apr, 2014 - 4:01 pm

    Like Blair.

  50. WHO CONTROLS BRITAIN?

    Barack Obama far from dismantling George W Bush’s secret state has diligently reconstructed and extended it, consolidating British expertise and resources in intelligence gathering to boot. Part of that deal was a promise not to rake up the past, except to rewrite history, which meant no naming or shaming the agencies torturers and their top level planners.

    The other part of course, according to a number of analysts including investigative journalist Jason Lewis, revealed it was the CIA that helped draw up the dodgy Iraq Dossier which John Scarlett produced as chairman of the UK governments Joint Intelligence Committee.

    http://not4attribution.blogspot.co.uk/2012/02/rendition-did-uk-play-secret-role-new.html

    I strongly believe this secret entanglement between Britain and America needs urgent investigation and inquiry.

    Clearly the CIA were involved in the Lockerbie bombing.

    http://www.scotsman.com/news/scotland/top-stories/but-if-he-didn-t-do-it-who-did-the-other-theories-1-906931

    Within an hour of Flight 103 crashing American personnel were on the scene and took over to the annoyance of the local SOC police.

    We can ask, does America control the British Establishment? – Certainly Blair, Milliband and Balls furthered their education in America. UKIP was formed by American influence; EDL is suspected of being CIA sponsored, while other British political advisers are members of the elite British American Project, another CIA sponsored organisation.

    It seems our own ‘secret courts’ best answers this question – To be sure we are being screwed by the people we pay – WE PAY – to preserve our hard won freedoms now seriously undermined and eroded.

  51. Ba’al

    It’s fine that Putin would require such a commitment. Wouldn’t it be great if our own leaders were to do that.

    Point is that Putin changed the way these oligarchs operate, which is what I’ve been arguing.

    Only a fool would suggest that Putin hasn’t rescued the country from the Yeltsin days.

    And remember that Yeltsin’s way is the way the West wanted it run.

    ===================================================

    This article from Alexander Boot indicates he’s a bit of a looper too. Seems he was involved in the McWhirters’ very right wing so called Freedom Association

    http://alexanderboot.com/content/let%E2%80%99s-boycott-john-kerry-not-israel

    Perhaps he’s posting here.

  52. Ba'al Zevul (Close Brackets)

    16 Apr, 2014 - 4:26 pm

    It’s fine that Putin would require such a commitment. Wouldn’t it be great if our own leaders were to do that.

    Wouldn’t it just. But that doesn’t make me a blind supporter of Putin. I think it can be taken that the oligarchs, though not permitted to rule directly, still rule, and with Putin’s consent. It’s not even certain that he could withdraw his consent – this is how Russia is traditionally governed. Or so this piece would suggest;

    ” Unfortunately, our understanding of Mr. Putin’s regime and its most important players remains heavily distorted by our disappointment that Russia has failed to develop along Western lines. By fixating on Mr. Putin’s authoritarian streak, hostility to outside influences and resistance to Western-style reforms, we generally overlook that his value to the system, like that of the czars who preceded him, is based on maintaining the balance among competing vested interests. Just as it was five centuries ago, the main battles inside the Kremlin among these groups are about power, money and access to special privileges, not ideology.

    Eventually, the day will come when Mr. Putin is no longer in power. Yet it seems highly unlikely that his informal style of rule will be replaced by a rule of law system based on strong institutions and checks and balances. Rather, the West must brace itself for the possibility that the oligarchic system itself, with its deep roots in Russian political culture, will outlive its current master. ”

    Unfortunately, our understanding of Mr. Putin’s regime and its most important players remains heavily distorted by our disappointment that Russia has failed to develop along Western lines. By fixating on Mr. Putin’s authoritarian streak, hostility to outside influences and resistance to Western-style reforms, we generally overlook that his value to the system, like that of the czars who preceded him, is based on maintaining the balance among competing vested interests. Just as it was five centuries ago, the main battles inside the Kremlin among these groups are about power, money and access to special privileges, not ideology.

    Eventually, the day will come when Mr. Putin is no longer in power. Yet it seems highly unlikely that his informal style of rule will be replaced by a rule of law system based on strong institutions and checks and balances. Rather, the West must brace itself for the possibility that the oligarchic system itself, with its deep roots in Russian political culture, will outlive its current master.”

  53. Ba'al Zevul (Close Brackets)

    16 Apr, 2014 - 4:29 pm

    Sorry – link here, rather than two copies of text:
    http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/31/opinion/russias-oligarchy-alive-and-well.html?_r=0

    Agree re. Boot, but the Mandelson piece was a laugh, you have to admit.

  54. “IOW he left Russian politics in order to Follow The Money.

    Like Blair.”

    Don’t think so. Blair made his money after politics. Were Putin to do that it could be like Blair, but ultimately there was no future for Abramovich in Russian politics. Chukotka is a god-forsaken place about as far as it’s possible to get from Moscow without bumping into Sarah Palin.

    It’s not politics as an oligarch might wish it. These guys wanted to run the country for themselves, and themselves alone, before Putin got established.

    Bit like the way the Anglo/Saxon world runs these days.

  55. Richard Branson has fallen for a Ukrainian’s message.

    Richard Branson ‏@richardbranson · Apr 15
    Like Yulia, we should all stand firm alongside Ukraine & stand up for true democracy http://virg.in/yul

    Richard Branson ‏@richardbranson · Apr 15
    Honoured to receive a hand-painted orange protester helmet from Yulia from ‘I Am A Ukrainian’ http://virg.in/yul pic.twitter.com/OIc6LnQhT9
    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BlRDSqFCcAAXnuF.jpg

    Like more than eight million people around the world who have watched the video I Am a Ukrainian, I was deeply moved by the message of Yulia Marushevska from Kiev earlier this year.
    15 April 2014
    http://www.virgin.com/richard-branson/yulia-and-ukraine

    Now who has brought him into the arena.

  56. Ben-Smoker, joker, red-eyed toker

    16 Apr, 2014 - 4:38 pm

    Mark; The dots need connecting. Is there some relevance to Ukraine, Boston and Awlaki?

    Comments are interesting, as well.

    http://whowhatwhy.com/2014/04/14/uss-boston-bombing-report-hints-even-darker-reality/

  57. ESLO

    16 Apr, 2014 – 1:30 pm
    @Mary
    and Michelle is busy lighting the candles.
    https://twitter.com/BarackObama/status/455872355311419392/photo/1
    Same old, same old – what are you trying to say, somehow I doubt it is Happy Passover.

    Yes Happy Passover. Perhaps you were as surprised as my Jewish friend in the West Country, who sent me the link, to find that the Obamas are Jewish too. Or perhaps they just celebrate Jewish holidays. That must go down well with the people in the AIPAC lobby group.

  58. “I think it can be taken that the oligarchs, though not permitted to rule directly, still rule, and with Putin’s consent. It’s not even certain that he could withdraw his consent – this is how Russia is traditionally governed.”

    Yeah but, he takes the decisions. He’s running it like a council of interests, and if the voters don’t like what he does they can get rid of him.

    It’s hard to get rid of oligarchs.

    He really does play one off against the other and when he wants to emphasise a state interest, he then says that his old muckers are insisting. Much better than the greasy pole bureaucrats we’ve got.

    It’s traditional leadership.

    I hear the argument that when he goes you may not get another leader with his skillset, and the oligarchs will just take over again, but I’m sure he’s thought of that.

    He’ll have to set up systems which ensure that doesn’t happen, and encourage ordinary people to take an interest in their democracy.

    Despite its long history, Russia is at an early stage of development in economic terms and new systems and the embeddedness of them takes time.

    All I ask of him is that he halt the onward march of Western hegemony.

    Whilst Putin is trying to bring in the rule of law, our gangsters are completely out of control, and it’s my belief that they need to be stopped before they do any more damage.

    I had my complaints in the past, but I wouldn’t have said that before the late 80s.

  59. “They don’t in Russia, since Putin took over.”

    Putin is now the world’s richest head of state, worth between $40 and $70 billion.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/11/29/richest-world-leaders_n_4178514.html

  60. “Yes Happy Passover. Perhaps you were as surprised as my Jewish friend in the West Country, who sent me the link, to find that the Obamas are Jewish too. Or perhaps they just celebrate Jewish holidays”

    There is nothing unusual in any democratically elected leader showing respect for religions and interest groups in a company other than his/her own – that is what seeking to govern by consent entails.

    “That must go down well with the people in the AIPAC lobby group.”

    It may well do – but isn’t it a form of reverse Zionism, or worse, to try and make links between the support of a respected religion and that of Israel? Aren’t you just the reverse side of the coin to those who say that those who oppose Israel are anti-Semitic (or prejudiced against the Jewish religion as the pedants here would prefer).

  61. Abramovich (philanthropic as he certainly was to Chukotka – $179M annually since 1999, estimated)

    Small price to pay for the amount of tax he avoided on his company’s profits I assure you.

  62. Eslo I have heard it all how. ‘Reverse Zionism’. That’s a new one.

  63. Try some ‘Zionism’ in forward gear, full speed ahead.

    Remote-control machine gun installed on top of wall near Bethlehem — Ma’an
    http://mondoweiss.net/2014/04/machine-installed-bethlehem.html

    Imagine living with that pointing down at you.

    Or put yourself in the place of Mariam Barghouti, one of Obama’s citizens, languishing in an Israeli jail.

    American citizen, translator and student—Mariam Barghouti arrested and detained in West Bank
    http://mondoweiss.net/2014/04/american-translator-barghouti.html

    Anyway a joyous Passover – Chag Pesach Sameach!

  64. Mary, Macky

    The Slog is f***ing funny. A libertarian Alf Garnet providing refuge for disenfranchised DM readers on acid. It gets more mental than here!

    The insane Nazism of extreme feminism
    pc feminism reducing efficiency of fire service.
    https://hat4uk.wordpress.com/tag/feminism-islam/
    Don’t build more houses stop immigration

  65. Habbabkuk (La vita è bella) !

    16 Apr, 2014 - 9:02 pm

    Just to pick out a couple of gems from Hurby’s post at 16h53, singing the praises of new world hope President Putin:

    “..and if the voters don’t like what he does they can get rid of him.”

    I assume that was written tongue in cheek?
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~

    “I hear the argument that when he goes you may not get another leader with his skillset, and the oligarchs will just take over again, but I’m sure he’s thought of that.

    He’ll have to set up systems which ensure that doesn’t happen, and encourage ordinary people to take an interest in their democracy.”

    I’m sure he has thought of that – probably with the help of a few well-endowed foreign bank accounts.
    And I’m also sure that encouraging “ordinary people to take an interest in their democracy” is something he spends most of his waking hours thinking about.

    And what you say there is in contrtadiction with what you said just vefore, which was :

    “He really does play one off against the other and when he wants to emphasise a state interest, he then says that his old muckers are insisting. Much better than the greasy pole bureaucrats we’ve got.

    It’s traditional leadership.”. VERY traditional!
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    “Whilst Putin is trying to bring in the rule of law,…”

    More tongue in cheek, I suppose?
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    “All I ask of him is that he halt the onward march of Western hegemony.”

    The best of the lot, Hurby. Leaving aside the presumptiousness of the “All I ask of him” (I’m sure he’s listening hard, Hurby), I wonder if you could explain exactly why that would be a such good thing? I think you’re exhibiting what Orwell called “transferred nationalism”.

    ===================

    Taken together, your post is the most foolish post I’ve read for a very, very long time.

  66. Habbabkuk (La vita è bella) !

    16 Apr, 2014 - 10:22 pm

    Hurby

    “There’s no way in a million years Putin would send forces across the border, without first openly stating his pretext.”
    ___________________

    Are we to infer from this that Hurby would be happy for Russian forces to enter Ukraine provided that rasPutin provides a pretext?

  67. Habbabkuk (La vita è bella) !

    16 Apr, 2014 - 10:35 pm

    Hurby

    ““More to the point what are armoured vehicles bearing the Russian flag doing in Eastern Ukraine doing today! Hardly the local militia that the Putinistas deceitfully claim.”

    Did you just make this up, ESLO, or do you have a source?

    Sounds like total bollocks, but amusing that you don’t even seem to understand that.”
    _____________________

    “Total bollocks” – I do think that you have cracked the mystery, Hurby.

    As any fule – and any Eminence – no, these are not Russian troops at all. They are agents provocateurs impersonating Russian soldiers. They are, in fact, troops dressed up in stolen Russian-type garb sent by the illegitimate,fascist hyena govt in Kiev, liberally supplemented by cunningly disguised US Navy Seals, Walruses and Porpoises, all in the pay of Ronald Reagan, Boris Yeltsin and Amschel Rothschild (all deceased).

    Thanks for that insightful insight, Hurby.

    *****************

    Russian Oligarch Flagday – please give generously!

  68. Habbabkuk (La vita è bella) !

    16 Apr, 2014 - 10:43 pm

    Hurby (yes, It’s That Man Again!)

    “He’s sharing the wealth amongst the people, increasing salaries and pensions and so on.”
    ___________________

    I take it that the “he” refers to President Putin.

    You seem to possess considerable expertise in socio-economic developments in today’s Russia. Would you consider sharing with us the information you have regarding wealth sharing, salaries and pensions. I’m particularly interested in the figure for the minimum state pension in Russia – now and before the “increase”. Any oindication as to wealth distribution in Russia would also be welcome.

    Thanks in advance.

  69. That offering from Herbie truly was the very worst post ever written on the Craig Murray blog. I’m not sure whether to laugh or cry. :-(

  70. Habbabkuk (La vita è bella) !

    16 Apr, 2014 - 11:22 pm

    You are right, Anon. D’you know, I sometimes wonder whether Hurbee and posters like him aren’t really people in the employ of those who wish Craig’s blog and Craig himself ill. After all, with enough guff like the above from Irby, people in time will start thinking “well, if that’s the kind of nutter Craig’s blog attracts…..”

    Or are they just fruits and nutcases, full stop?

  71. Ultimately it boils down to the difference between Yeltsin and Putin.

    Most of the West’s puppets are Yeltsins, allowing the rape and plunder of their country.

    Putin has stopped that and is using the wealth generated by their resources to build up internal infrastructure, economic. social and so on. You can’t do that if you submit to the Western bully. That’s not what they want.

    That’s the whole history of Africa of South America and so on. They just weren’t allowed independent development. Until recently.

    Putin is in the mould of DeGaulle or Nasser etc, standing up for a multipolar world against the West’s desire to finally impose a unipolar one.

    That’s the choice.

    Place your bets.

  72. Habbabkuk (La vita è bella) !

    17 Apr, 2014 - 12:24 am

    “Putin is in the mould of DeGaulle or Nasser etc,…”
    ________________

    Not very encouraging models, I’d say, given the short-livedness of their “achievements” and the mess their countries are in.

  73. Habbabkuk (La vita è bella) !

    17 Apr, 2014 - 12:26 am

    BTW, Herbie, how about some concrete figures and data, as requested, re pensions “and so so” in Russia?

  74. Habbabkuk (La vita è bella) !

    17 Apr, 2014 - 12:27 am

    “[You do your job; I’ll do mine, thanks.]”
    _______________

    Fine by me, boss :)

  75. fred 16 Apr, 2014 – 6:27 pm

    “Putin is now the world’s richest head of state, worth between $40 and $70 billion.
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/11/29/richest-world-leaders_n_4178514.html

    I’m hoping you’re just being mischievous with this comment, Fred. Your Huffington Post link presents no more ‘evidence’ than:

    “Putin is believed to be worth between $40 and $70 billion, Bloomberg notes.”

    When we check what Bloomberg actually said, their writer Leonid Bershidsky completely demolishes the idea. He says:

    “The media reports, which often cite one another, ultimately tend to rely on one primary source: a November 2007 interview given by a prominent member of Moscow’s chattering classes, Stanislav Belkovsky, to the German daily Die Welt. In the interview, he claimed that Putin “controlled” 37 percent of the oil company Surgutneftegaz and 4.5 percent of natural gas monopoly Gazprom. The $40 billion estimate of Putin’s fortune was simply the 2007 market price of these stakes.”

    ….then ….

    “There has never been the slightest bit of evidence that Putin actually owns stakes in Surgutneftegaz or Gazprom.”

    …. and even more damningly ….

    “The late tycoon Boris Berezovsky once admitted to hiring Belkovsky, who is Jewish, to muster Russian nationalist forces against Putin.”

    So to summarise, Fred, your claim about Putin’s wealth stems from an unsubstantiated allegation made by someone who was once paid to cause Putin trouble. When Putin was asked about journalists repeating the allegations, he said:

    “It’s just chitchat, nonsense, nothing to discuss. They picked it out of their noses and smeared it on their pieces of paper.” Then he continued, “I am the wealthiest man not just in Europe but in the whole world. I collect emotions, I am wealthy in that the people of Russia have twice entrusted me with the leadership of a great nation such as Russia — I believe that is my greatest wealth.”

    http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2013-09-17/vladimir-putin-the-richest-man-on-earth

  76. Habby says of my claim that “Putin is in the mould of DeGaulle or Nasser etc,…” in advocating a multipolar world rather than a unipolar one:

    “Not very encouraging models, I’d say, given the short-livedness of their “achievements” and the mess their countries are in.”

    They were early adopters. The later models are much more refined, reflective.

    And then there’s timeliness.

    You do understand that “the mess their countries are in.” is a direct result of their desire for independent development having been stymied by the West.

  77. The Next 911 : Either you are with us or you are with the terrorists.

    Have the British Trident coordinates been programmed into the Trident II D-5 onboard arming computers? Yes I believe they have. Possibly 80 Russian sites have been targeted with 150KTon thermonuclear bombs.

    We rad today Rasmussen said that NATO air policing aircraft will fly more sorties over the Baltic region and NATO ships would be deployed in the Baltic Sea and the Eastern Mediterranean.

    http://rt.com/news/nato-ukraine-response-rasmussen-872/

    The British Navy and the RAF will be involved in these various NATO ‘exercises’ to slowly ramp up the pressure on President Putin; a strategic part of the Ukraine putsch.

    Why do this when a ‘mistake’ or a tragedy or an’act of god’ might cause Russia and Putin to retaliate, strike back, turn the tables or even the score?

    I do not have to answer that question except to say that to our American neocons, Putin has forsaken world order. He has exposed, laid bare the Western alliance insidious, fraudulent, devious rendition program, it’s proxy wars and ‘red line’ activated chemical WMD covert operations; EVEN exposed the American ‘pearl harbor’ attack in 2001 when NORAD was confused by ‘drills’ and steel buildings fell like castles of sand hit by the oncoming tide.

    Putin like Saddam, like Moammar Gadhafi is a traitor to the ‘system’ -to Plutus and Mammon. He must fall on his sword,

    China the deponent will have to sit on her hands, impotent from the threat of nuclear annihilation by US nuclear war-heads totally around one thousand operational Megaton and 500 tactical 150Kton.

    I hope I am wrong albeit the double-encrypted plan must reside in Eastbury Park’s COMNAVNORTH bunker…

  78. Oh gosh look!

    Surely it’s not the Habbabkuk,ESLO,Anon night shift multi-post gang up on someone schtick?

    How quaint,really.

    Kerchingggg!!….now don’t forget to fill in the overtime chits chaps and bwing the bossy wossy a wittle apple for the morning eh?

    You know i’m right chaps innit like,yeah,what eh?

    Fanjitas yoll.

  79. BrianFujisan

    17 Apr, 2014 - 3:30 am

    It is not without good reason that Brennan is known unofficially as Obama’s “assassination and torture tsar”. The 58-year-old spymaster is the embodiment of how Washington has itself become a secret, unaccountable government that has set itself above the law in the running of torture and assassination programs by presidential command. Brennan is the “éminence grise” of the White House’s covert world of state terrorism.
    Following disclosure of Brennan’s weekend visit to the Ukrainian capital, the White House was evidently caught on the back foot. The Oval Office made the somewhat unconvincing attempt to portray it as a perfunctory meeting between security officials. Well, if it was merely a routine itinerary then why was the fact of the meeting such a closely guarded secret – up until the matter was leaked by parliamentary sources in Kiev?
    The timing of Brennan’s sojourn in Kiev comes at a crucial juncture. The unelected Western-backed junta in Kiev is threatening a violent crackdown on pro-Russian protesters in the east and south of the country.
    So far, the protesters have taken over government and police buildings in the major cities of Donetz, Karkhov, Lugansk, Slavyansk and Horlivka. The takeovers have been carried out with notably little violence – in contrast to the Western-backed street violence that occurred in Kiev from the end of November. The eastern Ukraine protests have met minimal resistance from local police and other security forces, and indeed the latter seem to have willingly joined in the defense of the demonstrations.
    The leaders of the self-appointed regime in Kiev are struggling to contain the protesters in the east and south of Ukraine. The chaotic situation is a pointed reminder that the fascists and neo-Nazis who seized power in Kiev at the end of February – after nearly three months of Western-backed street subversion – do not have a democratic mandate to rule over the whole country. The protesters in the eastern cities view the Kiev junta as having come to power illegally. As one woman told media: “They are just a gang of criminals”.
    That view would seem to be substantiated by the tacit revolt among police and security forces in the east of Ukraine against the orders for a crackdown given from Kiev. Such clear lack of command over a basic institution of the state indicates that the Kiev cabal has lost control, or more accurately, never had control in the first place – apart from precipitating the illegal coup in Kiev against the incumbent President Viktor Yanukovych.
    The vacuum of central authority in Ukraine is evident from the ineffective deadlines issued by the office occupiers in Kiev. Ironically, this supports Moscow’s position that any political solution will have to be based on a federal settlement among the regions of Ukraine. American, European and Russian officials are to meet in Geneva this week, but there is little sign that the Western parties can admit to the reckless folly of their efforts at forcing regime change across Ukraine on the back of the Kiev cabal.
    Kiev’s first ultimatum for the protesters in the eastern cities to relinquish their occupation of public buildings expired last Friday. Kiev had given demonstrators 48 hours last week to disperse otherwise it was sending in “anti-terror” military forces to do so. That deadline was defiantly ignored by armed protesters behind their barricades. So too was a second deadline, which expired on Monday morning.
    This is the context for the secret visit by CIA chief John Brennan to Kiev at the weekend. The Washington-backed regime is floundering to cope with the nationwide crisis it has helped to provoke, and it needs a steadying hand from Uncle Sam.
    The CIA’s covert involvement in destabilizing Ukraine goes all the way back to the end of the Cold War, when the country was targeted for regime change from the early 1990s as a calculated pressure point to exert on Russia. The admission at the end of last year by US state department official Victoria Nuland that the US had funneled some $5 billion into Ukraine for subversive activities under the guise of myriad CIA front organizations, such as the National Endowment for Democracy and the Heritage Foundation, is testimony to this strategic gambit.
    The question might be asked: why did Brennan have to visit Kiev in person? Surely, a lesser dignitary bearing a sealed letter would have sufficed? The fact that Brennan was obliged to press the flesh with leaders of the Kiev junta suggests two things. Firstly, the junta is way out of its depth in maintaining a façade of “governance” over a population of 45 million, many of which are armed and implacably opposed to its Western-infiltrated rule. Given Brennan’s top ranking as Washington’s éminence grise, his meeting in Kiev was probably designed at shoring up the shaky US-backed regime in the face of growing dissent.
    Secondly, and more sinisterly, Brennan was letting his hosts in Kiev know – in the most authoritative unspoken way – that they could rely on the full panoply of Washington’s state terrorist expertise.
    The CIA director is a holdover from the Bush administration in which he was a formative figure in drawing up the torture and extraordinary rendition practices during the 2000s. Brennan’s rise through the ranks of the American national security apparatus is in tandem with the rise of American government lawlessness around the world.
    In 2008, he had to withdraw his nomination for the top CIA post under public pressure then from his known involvement in and support for torture. The Obama administration circumvented that glitch by appointing Brennan as the president’s “chief counterterrorism advisor” – a career appointment that did not require Congressional oversight.

    http://dandelionsalad.wordpress.com/2014/04/15/cia-terror-chief-pulls-rank-in-kiev-by-finian-cunningham/

  80. “The argument runs that this could in turn lead to further revelations in the courts and block the major defence against prosecutions of Blair, Straw and Dearlove, among others, potentially unleashing a transatlantic wave of judicial activism.”

    It would bring me great joy to see Blair in the dock. I’m not quite sure what he should be charged with, war-crimes, treason, or corruption in office. I don’t think he can realisticaly be charged with all of them, though of course he is quite obviously guilty of all of them. I’d go with Treason, personally. The war-crimes is never going to stick, and the corruption in office is too boring. But Treason is a good one. It brings added shame, and I wonder if we could still theoretically take him to the tower and chop of his head?

    Apparently, though, Blairy is fearful of assassination, quite genuinely. In case the spooks are reading, I personally would never go above shouting a bit of abuse, and maybe chucking a shoe in his general vicinity – but I’m quite sure some of Bliary’s new pals would go much further. I suspect this is the reason he pops up every so often, repeating his little mantra about whatever it is he talks about, so as to show he is still ‘safe’. I think there is much more chance of Bliar having a little accident, than there is of him going to court.

    Godwin alert. There is that little book called ‘Political Ponerology’, which I’m sure many have read on these boards. In this book, the writer bemoans, quite genuinely, the death of the leading Nazi’s at Nuremberg, because humanity lost the chance to see how evil works, to study the psychopathology of these deviant minds. They may have deserved their fate, no doubt, but their death gained us nothing other than revenge. The writer goes on to suggest that this was never entirely an accident, as too many people simply didn’t want us to know how evil works, and the legal establishment played along. I mention this, because I’m quite sure Blair will never face a court, in case we see a little too much about how powerful men operate, and about the inter-connectedness of it all. So I imagine the senate report will be bland, and full of those funny black redaction marks, and Obama – another curious case – will wibble something about healing, and moving forward, and much will remain a mystery, as ever.

    Also, lots of dead bankers these days. Very curious that. I didn’t know so many were that unhappy. One of them, apparently, shot himself with a nail-gun I believe 9 times, poor guy. Suicide, obviously.

  81. Jives Perhaps it is a surfeit of C2H5OH that produces the late night mass t—-l postings!

    ~~~

    Meanwhile the Heir to Blair does God again in an attempt to recover his diminishing electorate.

    David Cameron puts God back into politics
    British Christians should be unashamedly ‘evangelical’, says David Cameron, as he speaks of the ‘healing power’ of faith in his own life http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/10771339/David-Cameron-puts-God-back-into-politics.html

    ‘His comments amount to an olive branch to the churches in the wake of rows over issues such as welfare cuts and gay marriage. His Government has also been accused of failing to stand up for Christians.’

  82. Ba’al; “Macky – Not saying I agree with everything this man says, but just to give the other side of Church – State relations in Russia, apropos the (Russian Ortho) Saker blog”

    Well my impression on reading his stuff, is much like yours & A Node’s, ie, he is as nutty as a fruitcake; I thought it would be rather fitting to see what Saker himself would have to say about his fellow Russian’s writing , so I asked him, and here’s the reply;

    “LOL! Whoever wrote that knows less about Russia than Bart Simpson or, alternatively, is a crazed russophobe with not an ounce of honesty left in him. You can safely disregard anything this character has to say about Russia. Besides, if the guy knew anything at all he would not have to pepper an article about Putin with Tsars, Rasputin, Holy Russia or this pearl “old imperial chauvinism underpinned by the Third Rome effluvia”.

    I just took a quick look at his site and there is no way he is just an ignorant Bart Simpson, which leaves option 2: he is the kind of folks who emigrated from the USSR in the 1970 and who made their entire career of the russophobia. It’s the kind of people I try to stay away from and I mean that, I always try to flush my mental toilet afterwards.

    How is this title (of one of his articles): “Putin: KGB Gang$ta for Life”? Putin was in the foreign intelligence service, just like Papa Bush, but I doubt that folks like this Boot (probably a made-ip name), would write that about him,

    Forget this steaming pile of shit is my best advice!”

    A clarifying correction to my “one of the least moderated blogs I have encountered yet” iro the Vineyardsaker blog, because in fact pre-moderation is in effect ! What I really meant is that I’ve seen strong challenging views to his opinion pieces, and that I have never seen anybody moaning about any other person being banned.

    Also I came across this, which adds interesting bio bits about Saker himself;

    http://turcopolier.typepad.com/sic_semper_tyrannis/2014/04/who-is-saker.html

  83. @A Node

    Only you could take an article that puts Putin at the top of a list of world leaders by wealth and decide it says he isn’t.

  84. Sofia Kibo Noh

    17 Apr, 2014 - 8:41 am

    RD / ELSO.

    I doubted your assertion that the Russian army had taken over Eastern Ukraine.

    Then I found this.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=NJ4ffOWmZpM#t=0

    (Not for the squeamish.)

  85. Norfolk county council is featured in this weeks Private Eye under rotten boroughs, please find it yourselfs, at least that would resemble some activity.

    I hade enough of rattling vages and reactionary sodding talk, disseminating information so that some f…wit can take the piss out of you for it here, a person who ius essentially leaderless, always on the lookout for new leaders they can latch on to, providing they fit the perfect ideals demanded.

    As usual I will try and help to get some Independent candidate, this time of my own choice, to get elected, because I want change. UKIP’s support shows that many traditional party addicts are now fed up with party politics, but there is nothing there for them but an apathetic public screaming for change, no takers, tacklers or new ideas.

    Shall leave you to the daily argy bargeying, blogging I believe its called.
    @Brian Fujisan
    Shall see you this year, not sure when shall let you know here or on Squonk.
    take care all, I’m just too busy for……..

  86. Habbabkuk (La vita è bella) !

    17 Apr, 2014 - 9:18 am

    Herbie

    “Habby says of my claim that “Putin is in the mould of DeGaulle or Nasser etc,…” in advocating a multipolar world rather than a unipolar one:

    “Not very encouraging models, I’d say, given the short-livedness of their “achievements” and the mess their countries are in.”

    They were early adopters. The later models are much more refined, reflective.”
    _________________

    Examples, please.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~=

    “You do understand that “the mess their countries are in.” is a direct result of their desire for independent development having been stymied by the West.”

    ________________

    Facile. Herbie vaunts Nasser and De Gaulle, and then when I point to their singular lack of success, does a reverse ferret and says ““the mess their countries are in.” is a direct result of their desire for independent development having been stymied by the West.”. Nit very convincing as an argument. For Herbie, always on the look out for new heroes, paradise always seems to be just around the corner.

  87. Coming to this a bit late, but to respond to Craig’s original post:

    The shocking bit is that it’s Obama defending actions taken by Bush’s administration and Cameron defending stuff done under Blair. What is the point of having an opposition and different parties of government if they are all on the same side? And it’s certainly not our side or they’d fess up and explain why whatever was done was so obviously in everybody’s best interests and deserves such cross-party support.

  88. @DavidH

    The point is that to do otherwise would be seen by many as unpatriotic and lose a lot of votes.

    Most people will defend their country on international matters whether it is right or wrong.

  89. The tragic loss of life on the now sunken S Korean ship Sewolss has happened close to its intended destination of the island of Jeju, a world heritage site.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-27056653

    That fact has not prevented the US from destroying some of its beauty for a naval base with the cooperation of a servile S Korean government.

    http://truth-out.org/opinion/item/19518-jeju-island-tragic-destruction-of-pristine-marine-area-for-another-naval-base-for-the-us-missile-defense-system

    Note that some of the original protesters have been imprisoned.

  90. s/be Sewol Owned by Chonghaejin Marine Co Ltd since October 2012

    http://www.krs.co.kr/eng/custom/search/c_search_infoship_view.aspx?ClassNo=8955299

  91. YouKnowMyName

    17 Apr, 2014 - 11:19 am

    Quote “assertion that the Russian army had taken over Eastern Ukraine” :-)

    now mainstream media are reporting the recent secret CIA ‘inspiration’ in Kiev

    http://www.msnbc.com/all/why-was-cia-chief-kiev

    was he there to take-over western Ukraine or was he there to establish a new torture base?

    whilst we’re checking out the MSM – there’s a socio-scientific analysis of an Oligarch driven country – reported here in the Torygraph

    Personally I wouldn’t have guessed that – this country where positions of powerful interest groups are “not substantially correlated with the preferences of average citizens”, does seem to have some issues with its worldwide policies not being substantially correlated with the preferences of worldwide citizens? At least we’re only talking about a “Civil Oligarchy”[Winters]

    I have no opinions on this developing situation – I am reading widely – whilst it is still possible

  92. fred 16 Apr, 2014 – 6:27 pm
    “Putin is now the world’s richest head of state, worth between $40 and $70 billion.”

    A Node 17 Apr, 2014 – 12:56 am
    “I’m hoping you’re just being mischievous with this comment, Fred.”
    fred 17 Apr, 2014 – 8:35 am
    “Only you could take an article that puts Putin at the top of a list of world leaders by wealth and decide it says he isn’t.”

    A Node now
    I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt and presume that you’ve realised you were being a gullible fool by believing the Huffington Post article, but rather than take the graceful way out that I offered you, you’ve decided to bluster.
    I’m quite willing to discuss this. Perhaps we could start by you addressing the points I made instead of being insulting.

  93. @A Node

    I aint in any doubts at all shit for brains, you are one of them dumb retards that will just believe whatever suits you regardless.

    So go fuck yourself.

  94. Fred; “Most people will defend their country on international matters whether it is right or wrong.”

    If turning a blind eye to illegal wars, mass murder, inhuman crimes, as well as financial & human right crimes at the expenses of the ordinary citizen, can be classed as “defending their country”, then you may have a point, but the real answer is that it is a logical fallacy to have expected either Obama or Cameron to prosecute their predecessors, as they would never have got elected if they had even hinted at such a thing, as that is not how our respective “democracies” work ! I remember the Bush regime making very sure that Obama was very clear on this, long before he actually become President.

  95. fred 17 Apr, 2014 – 11:37 am

    “@A Node

    I aint in any doubts at all shit for brains, you are one of them dumb retards that will just believe whatever suits you regardless.

    So go fuck yourself.”

    …. counts to ten …. sighs …. moves on.

  96. Habbabkuk (La vita è bella) !

    17 Apr, 2014 - 12:00 pm

    Macky

    “I remember the Bush regime making very sure that Obama was very clear on this, long before he actually become President.”
    __________________

    Do you have any links/sources to confirm your memory? Thanks.

  97. @Macky

    It’s just the way people’s minds work. If somebody gets’ caught with a kilo of cocaine in Manchester then they are evil dope fiends and the government should lock them up and throw away the key. If they get caught with a kilo of cocaine in South America then they are victims and the government should be getting them out of there.

    For most people their country is like family, nobody wants to accept that their son is the kind of kid they don’t let him play out with. Cognitive dissonance kicks in.

  98. @A Node

    Look I don’t have any sort of an agenda here. I had recently read the Huffington Post article because it was linked to from the Tom Watson twitter feed, it seemed relevant to the discussion so I posted it.

    If you don’t want to believe it don’t but don’t go calling me names to try and discredit it.

  99. I understand what you are saying, Fred, and of course people will protect members of their family for minor misdemeanours. This is a natural and reasonable tradition.

    However, if that family member commits a heinous crime, such as “murder most foul”, there are few families who wouldn’t turn them in as a matter of decency, unless they were in fear of their own neck. Indeed, the law of the land would expect them to. I’d have thought that in a “mature democracy” there would be procedures that could be invoked, if the betrayal of expected values at a national level goes off the scale.

    It can’t be a proper democracy unless that is the case.

  100. Prince Bandar led the Saudi financial support for the miltary coup against Muhammad Mursi. That would be the equivalent of Cameron locking up Blair. Are there occasions when principles come before politics in Islam, while outside Islam politics always come before principles. The principle in question being the use of US supplied spying technology to allow the Mursi government to make problems for ideological opponents rather than security threats.

Powered By Wordpress | Designed By Ridgey | Produced by Tim Ireland | Hosted In The Cloud